User talk:Saga City

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Saga City!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Category:Women_named_Barbara[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Women_named_Barbara has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token c92e83641923470000bcbad69b22e07e[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Categories like "Railway bridges in the Outer Hebrides"[edit]

Hi! If you find any more empty and unneeded categories like this you can add a {{Speedy|Reason}} - it is probably easer than starting a category for discussion. I created thousand of categories with my bot when we prepared an upload of about one million files. A few of those categories are useless but it was much easier to create all the categories and just delete the empty ones after the upload. --MGA73 (talk) 00:22, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. I'd worked out the reason but wasn't sure of the etiquette involved in deleting them. S a g a C i t y (talk) 09:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Lavender fields[edit]

… many thanks for further sorting! --:bdk: 17:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

London categories?[edit]

Hi, have you found any advice on what should be included in London / Greater London categories? I see you have moved File:Roman Catholic Church of St. James the Great, Petts Wood, Kent - geograph.org.uk - 137223.jpg from Category:Roman Catholic churches in London to Category:Roman Catholic churches in Greater London. I believe in most cases, the former category has been used for Greater London rather than London or City of London. This may be ambiguous, but is supported by the entry in the Counties of England template {{Counties of England|prefix=:Category:Roman Catholic churches in|suffix=}} being London rather than Greater London. Just thought I'd better warn you that if you are creating or populating Greater London categories then they won't appear in the general "Counties of England" navbox unless you ask for a change to it and that most established English ceremonial county groupings use London instead of Greater London, so they would all need changing or diffusion as well. Scillystuff (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Pictures and images[edit]

Hi, I see you've added some images to this previously-deleted category, and I can't think of a good reason for recreating such a broad category. It would seem that if these should be anywhere, Category:Views would be the obvious candidate; however, I suspect that there are more specific categories for them. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

It's the default category for Cat-a-lot; so a few have got in there by mistake. I then move them out again to their correct destination. S a g a C i t y (talk) 18:31, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:21, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Recent Edit[edit]

Not sure if this edit is strictly correct... Navigable (to me) suggests that a boat could use it - well maybe in the fullness of time, but since it's an empty trough over the M6toll with no connections - not as this time! I'm not fussed either way, I just did not know if you knew about the oddness of it - it's one of those odd things where the motorway got put in only if the builder made an aqueduct when the canal crossed the path. It went up in 2003, I guess another 10 years will go before it see any water... :-(  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

I have found that canal aqueducts are spread, chaotically, between Aqueducts, Canal Aqueducts and Navigable Aqueducts. As this stage I am trying to get the all in once place. Navigable Aqueduct seeming the most popular so I moving everything to there and this is one you noticed. As to the final naming my preference is 'Aqueducts built for canal traffic' as this will include those in and out of use - they will be contrasted against 'Aqueducts built to carry water'. Best Wishes S a g a C i t y (talk) 20:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Shipley Bridge[edit]

Hi, Shipley Bridge is a bridge, not a hamlet - so the majority of images placed in Category:Shipley Bridge do not belong there, and the cat should have the normal bridge categories (eg its listed status).--Nilfanion (talk) 13:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Category talk:Falkirk[edit]

Hi, I've made a propsal here if you are interested in commenting. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:33, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Saga City,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:St_Michael_and_All_Saints,_Rearsby[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:St_Michael_and_All_Saints,_Rearsby has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Motacilla (talk) 07:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

RfC on the scope of file renaming criterion 2[edit]

Pursuant to the closing of the RFC "Proposed overhaul of the "Which files should be renamed?" section", a second RfC has been opened at Commons:Requests for comment/File renaming criterion 2 specifically to address the scope of criterion 2, which currently reads "To change from a completely meaningless name to a name that describes what the image displays." Since you participated in the initial discussion, I am notifying you of the follow-up RfC.

Please note that I fully anticipate that the first few days will see a number of additional options proposed, so it may be a good idea to check back periodically on the RfC.

Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:43, 25 July 2014 (UTC)