User talk:Salamander724

Salamander724님, 위키미디어 공용에 오신 것을 환영합니다!

초보자 길라잡이 초보자 길라잡이와 FAQ는 여러분이 사용자 등록 후 필요한 많은 것들을 도와드릴 것입니다. 이 문서들은 환경 설정을 하는 방법 (언어 설정)과 파일을 올리는 방법, 기본적인 라이선스 정책을 설명하고 있습니다. 위키미디어 공용에 기여하는 데에는 전문적인 기술이 필요하지 않습니다. 과감하게 기여해주시고, 다른 사용자의 기여도 좋은 뜻으로 봐주세요. 여기는 정말 쉬운 위키입니다. 도움이 필요하다면 더욱 자세한 정보는 사용자 모임에서 얻을 수 있습니다. 안내소나 사랑방 또는 IRC 채널 #wikimedia-commons (바로 접속)에서 질문을 할 수도 있습니다. 관리자들의 사용자 토론 문서를 통해 연락을 취할 수도 있습니다. 저작권과 관련한 문의는 Commons talk:라이선스에서 해결할 수 있습니다.		유쾌한 팁과 트릭 바벨 상자를 사용자 문서에 넣어 여러분이 할 수 있는 언어가 무엇인지 알릴 수 있으며, 그래픽 능력도 표시할 수 있습니다. 여러분이 올린 파일은 자동으로 개인 화랑에 저장됩니다. 토론 문서에 의견을 적은 후에는 ~~~~를 입력하여 서명을 남겨주세요. 커먼센스 도구로 올린 파일에 알맞는 분류를 찾을 수 있습니다. 다른 사용자도 파일을 쉽게 찾겠지요! 그림을 표시하지 않고 해당 그림 문서로 연결하려면, File:Foo.jpg처럼 입력하세요. 그러면 File:Foo.jpg와 같이 표시됩니다. 다른 프로젝트에서 파일을 복사해오는 것이라면, 꼭 커먼스헬퍼를 사용해 보세요. 실수를 했나요? 파일의 이름을 바꾸거나 파일을 옮기고 싶나요? 파일을 새롭게 다시 올리고, 이전에 올린 파일에는 {{rename|바꾼 이름|numeric rationale|Additional reason}}과 같이 입력하세요. 더욱 자세한 정보는 삭제 지침에서 얻을 수 있습니다.
(P.S. 이 메시지의 피드백을 남겨주실 수 있나요?)

Image Tagging Image:Mydog2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mydog2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 13:03, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

User:Shizhao/test

User:Shizhao/test has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Sz-iwbot (talk) 15:26, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Your image at FP

Hello Salamander03. You've put your image under the delisting candidates. So I'll put it on the right place for voting for it to be featured. Cheers. --Lošmi (talk) 13:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Oh, thank you very much! ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 03:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Salamander724!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Dead katydid.jpg was uncategorized on 5 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:54, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Nasa-korea full.jpg was uncategorized on 4 December 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Linoleum Knife.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Grasshopper_climbing_2.jpg

File:Grasshopper_climbing_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taxocat (talk) 14:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Portrait of a Doomed Asteroid.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:The Bluest.jpg

File:The Bluest.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— Huntster (t @ c) 19:30, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Daedongyeojido-full.jpg

Please use baseline for this image. --McZusatz (talk) 21:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Problem solved. ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 01:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Daedongyeojido-full.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Impressive.--Selbymay 20:45, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old map of Korea.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : I know it's the most accurate map of Korea in old era. And all criteria met in my opinion. --Naturehead (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

 Oppose I think this scope is so broad that it is impossible to choose one "best". cmadler (talk) 01:54, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Daedongyeojido is not just old map, but it has sufficient historical importance. And this file is the highest resolution in category:Old maps of Korea. ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 05:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Put aside it's historical importances and the technical things such as the resolution it has, many other maps in this scope are of Asia, not only of Korea. If you search for maps of Korean Peninsular in 19th century, and in particular made in Korea(Chosun era), you can confirm the most detailed and accurate is this one. --Naturehead (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Scope schould be in singular (unlike category). --Ikar.us (talk) 15:58, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Per Naturehead. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 13:24, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Penyulap ☏ 17:09, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. --Jebulon (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Planck Maps the Microwave Background.jpg

File:Planck Maps the Microwave Background.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Peel (talk) 13:14, 5 April 2013 (UTC)