User talk:Sam916

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

designing[edit]

hi , I hought I will design ur userpage as it is fucking boring. u happy ? I wil design more if u want. I got ur permisiion --Mazfired (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


Image deletion warning The image Image:Circus circus Reno.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion.

Thuresson 15:51, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

vernacular names[edit]

In the future, please don't edit out the vernacular names in galleries such as Leucophyllum laevigatum. They are there as a memory aid for when the systematic name is unfamiliar, and as a double-check on interwikis. Stan Shebs 20:09, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Also, the systematic name should always be in italics, which is why I add them and expect them to be retained. Stan Shebs 20:20, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Mimas tiliae[edit]

Hi Sam916, please don't worry about my reverts. The taxobox is not used in commons because this is the central image database and its not necessary to deal with it here. The taxobox is normallly used in articles which describe the species and thats the place for a taxobox! If you want you can write an article about Mimas tiliae in a language of your choice and fill it with a taxobox! :-) BTW: Help sorting and identifying lepidoptera images is always welcome! Many Greetings and a Happy New Year, --Olei 00:05, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Machine translation into Czech[edit]

Hi!

Your attempt to "translate" (I guess by using some machine translation tool) the image description for the POTD into Czech ("San Františkán Internacionál Letecký přístav v noci.") has really been unsuccessful. Machine translation from English to Czech is unusable in most cases, don't do that, please.

--Mormegil 13:54, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

RetouchedPicture Template[edit]

Hey Sam916, I noticed you tagged two pictures with {{RetouchedPictures}}. The template is quite new and it is good to see it catching on. The current criteria for enlistment are discussed on Template_talk:RetouchedPicture. However leaning, perspective correction are not considered a reason to tag. Please feel free to contribute your thoughts on the template talk page. Cheers --Dschwen 16:30, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Korean as well?[edit]

Looking at your edit on PoTD, you speak Korean as well? -- WB 08:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

welcome[edit]

hi Sam,

Welcome to the Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life project!

TeunSpaans 19:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

Angry[edit]

BTW, I'm extremely angry that you emptied out the Category:Agave and Category:Yucca that I was filling up. Didn't it occur that maybe you ought to ask before trashing somebody else's project? How would you like it if I followed you around and undid all your edits? Stan Shebs 00:13, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

What the heck was your project anyways? I was merely following what we had discussed on the WikiProject Tree of Life Talk Page. The Category:Agave and Category:Yucca didn't have enough species to have it's own genus category. -- Sam916 00:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
There are 150 species of agave and 40+ yuccas, perfectly fine category sizes. I don't see that anybody agreed with your proposal to not have genus categories, and if you had taken the trouble to look at the page histories, you would have seen that I had been moving each into a subcategory, one by one. Would it have been so difficult to put a note on the category page or on my page asking why I was doing that? Stan Shebs 04:56, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Image deletion warning Image:SFO at night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.
Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jkelly 22:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)


ToL Newsletter issue 1[edit]

The inaugural newsletter of the Tree of Life project has been published. You are welcome to read the newsletter, comment on its contents, frequency and form, or unsubscribe by putting your name on my talk page.

Teun Spaans 21:45, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Heliconius erato 2.JPG[edit]

You can delete this version now. I've uploaded a higher resolution image under a different file name and switched all the English Wikipedia links accordingly. Thanks for the assist, though. Rklawton 02:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

Category:Airport_map[edit]

Hi, just a quick note to let you know I've moved an image you put in Category:Airport_map to the correct category Category:Airport_maps :-) --Tony Wills 23:34, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Image deletion notification[edit]

Image deletion warning A file you contributed has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-- Duesentrieb 12:59, 14 September 2007 (UTC)


Image:SFO_at_night.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:SFO_at_night.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Davepape 21:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Ignore that - I discovered the previous deletion request. Apparently the flickr user has changed the license yet again. In any event, I've removed the request, based on Siebrand's assertion that it was okay at one point. --Davepape 21:33, 20 September 2007 (UTC)


Image:Pringles machine.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Pringles machine.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-guerreritoboy (talk) 19:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Request for comment[edit]

Discussion regarding the Categories "Fossil xxx" is occurring on Wp:ToL (here). As a member of the project you input is requested in to gain a larger view of the communities opinion on how to handle the points raised. Thanks --Kevmin (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)


File:Ministère des finances de Bercy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ministère des finances de Bercy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--WhisperToMe (talk) 09:38, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

File:US-FishAndWildlifeService-Logo.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:US-FishAndWildlifeService-Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

71.48.183.124 21:26, 20 March 2012 (UTC)


File tagging File:Kansai International Airport Terminal Interior.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kansai International Airport Terminal Interior.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kansai International Airport Terminal Interior.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

MilborneOne (talk) 19:52, 17 May 2012 (UTC)