User talk:Schängel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Discobrand[edit]

(Benutzer Was soll's ist jetzt Metternijer wegen dem Lokalkolorit)

Ich werde mich bemühen, die Bildbeschreibungen etwas zu ergänzen, sobald ich Zeit habe - kein Problem

Metternijer (talk) 06:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Prima vielen Dank. Sonst kann damit niemand etwas anfangen. Auch bei anderen Bilder immer drauf achten, dass die Beschreibung eindeutig ist und das Datum im Format „2010-07-14“ eingefügt wird. Gruß --Schängel (talk) 11:40, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol[edit]

Habe dich mal zum "Autopatroller" gemacht, d.h. alle dein Edits sind automatisch gesichtet und keiner muss da mehr hinterher schauen. Hoffe, dass ist ok für dich. Viele Grüße --Matt314 (talk) 17:45, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Klar vielen Dank für das Vertrauen :-) --Schängel (talk) 18:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Es ist mir schon klar, daß Du gerne andere Leute die Arbeit machen läßt und dich dann zum großen Zampano der Kategorie Koblenz aufspielst in dem nur Du und nur Du die Regeln bestimmst. Deswegen kannst Du mich mal - am Abend besuchen Kowelenzer (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

LOL da spricht wieder das Kind :-) Kann sich an keine Regeln halten und ist dann beleidigt ... das erinnert mich irgendwie an die Pubertät :-) --Schängel (talk) 17:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Revert[edit]

Hallo!

Wie ich sehe, hast du im August 2010 dieses Bild auf eine geringere Auflösung zurückgesetzt. Dir muss Bewusst sein, dass auf Commons der Grundsatz vorherrscht: je größer die Auflösung, desto besser. Ich habe deine "Bearbeitung" zurückgesetzt und hoffe, dass du derartige Dinge kein zweites mal durchgeführt hast. Ansonsten musst du diese "Bearbeitungen" ebenfalls zurücksetzen. --High Contrast (talk) 16:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

Das weiß ich sehr wohl. Das hatte damals aber einen Grund. Das Bild wurde nicht angezeigt, stattdessen kam eine Fehlermeldung. Ich bin davon ausgegangen, dass beim Hochladen in höherer Auflösung ein Fehler geschehen ist und hab es deswegen zurückgesetzt. Jetzt scheint es aber wieder zu funktionieren. --Schängel (talk) 20:45, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
Dann ist ja alles in bester Ordnung. Obschon eine entsprechende Begründung wünschenswert gewesen wäre. --High Contrast (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Buga_2011_Koblenz_-_Infobande_Festungsplateau_2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Buga_2011_Koblenz_-_Infobande_Festungsplateau_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.102.254 20:20, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Koblenz im Buga-Jahr 2011 - Blumenhof am Deutschen Eck 03.jpg[edit]

Ich nehme an du bist über die Nutzung im “Mainzer” informiert worden; falls nein jetzt hier.--Symposiarch (talk) 08:04, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Nein wie auch? Ich nehme an, dass es sich beim Mainzer um eine Tageszeitung handelt. Wurde wenigstens die Lizenz eingehalten? Danke und Gruß --Schängel (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Rheinanlagen.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Rheinanlagen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Rheinanlagen.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ALE! ¿…? 09:33, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Moselanlagen.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Moselanlagen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Moselanlagen.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ALE! ¿…? 09:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Festungsplateau.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Festungsplateau.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Festungsplateau.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ALE! ¿…? 09:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Schloss.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Schloss.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Buga 2011 Koblenz - Plan Schloss.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

ALE! ¿…? 09:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Gedenkplatte_Mitterrand-Kohl_Douaumont.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gedenkplatte_Mitterrand-Kohl_Douaumont.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 23:45, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Koblenz im Buga-Jahr 2011 - Deutschordenskommende 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koblenz im Buga-Jahr 2011 - Deutschordenskommende 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


File:Koblenz im Buga-Jahr 2011 - Blumenhof am Deutschen Eck 13.jpg[edit]

Hallo Schängel, ist das nicht eine Skulptur von Bernar Venet? Siehe Category:Sculptures by Bernar Venet. Hast Du vielleicht noch mehr Bilder davon und kannst den Namen dieser Skulptur herausfinden? Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 05:53, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Hallo ja in der Tat, dies ist eine Skulptur von Bernar Venet. Ich habe die Kategorie gesetzt. Weitere bider findest du in der Bundesgartenschau-Kategorie. Der Name der Skulptur findest du hier (Punkt 13). Gruß --Schängel (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Koblenz_im_Buga-Jahr_2011_-_Panoramablick_auf_Koblenz.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Koblenz_im_Buga-Jahr_2011_-_Panoramablick_auf_Koblenz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

90.186.51.8 18:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

File:BUGA 2011 064.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:57, 28 February 2012 (UTC)


File:St Peter und Paul 06 Koblenz 2012.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


File:St Peter und Paul 05 Koblenz 2012.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


File:St Peter und Paul 04 Koblenz 2012.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


File:St Peter und Paul 03 Koblenz 2012.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:41, 16 March 2012 (UTC)


File:St Peter und Paul 02 Koblenz 2012.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Brauchst Du...[edit]

vielleicht die emailadresse von jergen? Oder kann ich Dir sonnst jemand empfehlen, den Du hinter meinem Rücken gegen mich aufhetzen kannst? Oder versuchst Du es diesmal alleine? hmpf......... L' empereur Charles (talk) 09:09, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Städtische Festhalle Koblenz 1905.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Städtische Festhalle Koblenz 1905.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

L' empereur Charles (talk) 16:42, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Casinogebäude Koblenz 1908.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Casinogebäude Koblenz 1908.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

L' empereur Charles (talk) 16:43, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Barbara-Denkmal Koblenz 1907.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Barbara-Denkmal Koblenz 1907.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

L' empereur Charles (talk) 07:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Barbara-Denkmal Koblenz 1908.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Barbara-Denkmal Koblenz 1908.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

L' empereur Charles (talk) 07:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Friedrich-Mohr-Denkmal Koblenz 1914.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Friedrich-Mohr-Denkmal Koblenz 1914.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

L' empereur Charles (talk) 07:58, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Städtische Festhalle Koblenz 1903.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Städtische Festhalle Koblenz 1903.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

L' empereur Charles (talk) 08:05, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Pass lieber auf..[edit]

daß Du nicht gepunishesd wirst wegen Deiner ganzen illegal hochgeladenen Bilder für die es keine Erlaubnis gibt -- L' empereur Charles (talk) 15:35, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Ahh ich habe einen wunden Punkt getroffen, sorry aber mit Drohungen kommst du bei mir nicht weit. --Schängel (talk) 15:39, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Koblenz HW 83 8.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Koblenz HW 83 8.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kowelenzer (talk) 11:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

L' empereur Charles[edit]

Hello,

I noticed that your requested a CU for this user. I think there are several problems here:

  1. I think that you made this request because he made DRs about your files. It's a bad starting point, as you are personally involved. I am not judging on the validaty of the DRs themselves.
  2. You didn't talk to him about this. Please do so.
  3. You didn't even notice him about your CU request. Please do so. Yann (talk) 13:33, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Altes Kaufhaus[edit]

Lieber Schängel. Ich wüßte gerne, warum du den Zusatz "former Mittelrhein-Museum" entfernt hast. Das alte Kaufhaus war nun mal Jahre lang das Mittelrhein Museum , man kann das sogar auf der Fassade lesen, wenn man die Bilder heranzoomt. Ich persönlich halte solche Informationen auf einer Commons-Seite nicht für schädlich, im Gegenteil, sie können durchaus nützlich sein und außerdem sind derartige Anmerkungen auf Commons nicht selten. Grüße --Warburg (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Du hast den englischen Text in den Absatz “Deutsch” gepackt, das geht natürlich nicht. Außerdem finde ich, dass es dort nicht hingehört, sondern in den betreffenden Wikipedia-Artikel. Auch können die Bilder nicht mehr in die Kategorie zum Mittelrhein-Museum einsortiert werden, da es nicht mehr stimmt. --Schängel (talk) 17:29, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Sinnlose Rahmen[edit]

Lieber Schängel. Wozu sollen die Rahmen denn gut sein? Die ergeben in den Artikeln nur häßliche Doppelrahmen und sind auch nach der entsprechende Commons-Richtlinie nicht erwünscht. Das Überschreiben ist nach Com:CROP auch erlaubt. Grüße --Ras67 (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Also ich empfinde das nicht als häßlich und schon gar nicht als störend, eher im Gegenteil. Für eine Änderung sehe ich daher keine Notwendigkeit. Aber du kennst dich gerne vorher mal mit dem Ersteller der Grafiken besprechen. --Schängel (talk) 08:40, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Kaiser Wilhelm I[edit]

hallo Ich schreibe, um Ihnen zu sagen,dass seine Stiefel über das kaiserliche Deutschland, sind wirklich, Fantastisch :)

Ich fragte mich, ob sie unter unzähligen Websites ohne chopyright oder Copyright abgelaufen, ist, es geschafft, zu finden und laden Sie die seltene Fotografie König Wilhelm I. König von Preussen so was (Entschuldigen Sie mein Deutsch, aber ich habe sie Google Translator und ein paar Worte zu schreiben, nicht über gezielte) Ich erwarte Ihre Antwort, guten Abend :) --95.232.80.33 19:44, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Leider ist die Übersetzung völlig unverständlich. Please write in english. --Schängel (talk) 06:30, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
the fine if I write in Italian languages ? --82.54.92.250 12:06, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
No sorry english only. --Schängel (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
ok,, I wanted to ask, if you can, or you have Rare Photographs of Kaiser Wilhelm I of Prussia and William II of Germany, As This and Einweihung des Reichstages (5. Dezember 1894)

however, I would chieerti if he managed to find the same images, but no copyright or copyright expired? --87.15.94.209 22:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

No sorry I don´t have more photos. --Schängel (talk) 08:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
ok thanks of 'information, thank you telling Vàt a fàr Sburàr

--82.50.38.104 12:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)