User talk:Schlaier

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Schlaier!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Dein Löschantrag[edit]

Hallo Klaus!

Ich habe mich diesem Löschantrag von dir angenommen und diesen entsprechend deines Wunsches ausgeführt. In Zukunft kannst du für Duplikate deiner Fotos folgendes tun: Einfach {{duplicate|Begründung UND Link auf das "korrekte" Foto}} beim zu löschenden Bild einfügen.

Ansonsten vielen Dank für deine Beiträge und viel Spaß beim weiteren Hochladen von Bildmaterial!

Mit bestem Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 21:21, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

Bilder drehen[edit]

Hallo Schlaier, kannst du nach dem Hochladen einer gedrehten Version noch kurz kontrollieren, ob nicht jemand in der Zwischenzeit {{Rotate}} in die Bildbeschreibung gesetzt hat? Sonst kommt Rotatebot und dreht das Bild wieder auf den Kopf, passiert bei File:Fernsehturm Berlin Alexanderplatz.JPG, File:Tegernsee Klosterkirche.jpg und File:Botanischer Garten17.jpg. Natürlich kannst du auch einfach die Vorlage Rotate einsetzen (z.B. {{Rotate|90}} für 90° im Uhrzeigersinn) um deine Bilder zu drehen. Danke und Gruss,--Luxo 11:34, 30 December 2009 (UTC) Hallo Luxo, vielen Dank für Deinen Tipp. Künftig werde ich einfach die Vorlage Rotate verwenden, dann dürfte sich das Problem erledigen. Herzlichen Dank für die Unterstützung. Beste Grüße - Schlaier


Kunstmuseum[edit]

Hallo,

du hast ein paar schöne Fotos vom Kunstmuseum eingestellt. Nur deine Datei "File:Stuttgart Kunstmuseum und Altes Schloss rechts.jpg" ist falsch benannt. Das rechts ist das Neue Schloss :-)

Grüße --Pjt56 (talk) 22:10, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Ptj56, vielen Dank für Dein Lob und: verflixt! Das stimmt ja! Mist, den File-Namen kann ich wohl nicht mehr ändern, oder? Naja, zumindest stimmt die Beschreibung des Bildes. Sorry für das Versehen... LG und einen schönen Abend wünscht Dir Schlaier (talk) 22:19, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Schlaier, doch, kannst du. "rename|Stuttgart_Kunstmuseum_und_Neues_Schloss_rechts.jpg|wrong description" in doppelt geschweiften Klammern {{}} und ohne die Hochkommas einfügen, dann kümmert sich ein Admin um die Umbenennung. Ebenfalls noch einen schönen Abend --Pjt56 (talk) 22:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Perfekt! Vielen Dank für den Tipp. Das habe ich sogleich umgesetzt. Herzliche Grüße und Gute Nacht! -- Schlaier (talk) 22:59, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Stankt Johannisrain bei Penzberg 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Stankt Johannisrain bei Penzberg 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Syntax bei Datumseingabe[edit]

Hallo,

bitte achte beim Hochladen deiner Bilder auf die richtige Syntax bei der Datumseingabe, sonst wird es nicht richtig angezeigt. Habe es hier mal "repariert" [1], [2], [3]. Grüße --Wladyslaw 08:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Wladyslaw, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich werde Stück für Stück alle meine Bilder durchgehen. Dieser Fehler wird höchstwahrscheinlich nicht nur bei diesen dreien passiert sein. Ich wünsch Dir noch ein schönes Wochenende! Viele Grüße -- Schlaier 09:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Stürzende Linien[edit]

Hallo, ich habe heute deine Serie von Kandidaturen auf Commons:Quality images candidates gesehen. Um die Chancen deiner Kandidaturen zu erhöhen solltest du deine Bilder von Gebäuden evtl. vorher entstürzen (siehe Stürzende_Linien). Ich erledige das gerne mit ShiftN, die Automatik funktioniert meist sehr gut, andernfalls kann man die Parameter manuell über Schieberegler anpassen. Viele Grüße --Berthold Werner 16:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Hallo, da hast Du sicher recht. Ich hab mir das gleich angeschaut und war begeistert. Leider gibt es ShiftN nicht für meinen Mac – weißt Du eine gute Alternative für Apple-User? Herzliche Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende wünscht Dir Schlaier

Ne, beim Mac bin ich völlig ahnungslos. --Berthold Werner 12:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karolinenplatz 2 Skulptur.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karolinenplatz 2 Skulptur.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sweet Brown Snail am Bavariapark und dem Verkehrszentrum des Deutschen Museums in München an der Theresienhöhe Schwanthalerhöhe Westend.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sweet Brown Snail am Bavariapark und dem Verkehrszentrum des Deutschen Museums in München an der Theresienhöhe Schwanthalerhöhe Westend.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stuttgart Staatstheater 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuttgart Staatstheater 9.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paviane Papio Tierpark Hellabrunn 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paviane Papio Tierpark Hellabrunn 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schnifis Umgebung 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schnifis Umgebung 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

München Alter Nordfriedhof Maxvorstadt 45.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! München Alter Nordfriedhof Maxvorstadt 45.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Büste Galileo Galilei am Galileiplatz in München Bogenhausen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Büste Galileo Galilei am Galileiplatz in München Bogenhausen.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kloster Benediktbeuern Durchgang 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kloster Benediktbeuern Durchgang 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stankt Anton im Montafon Haus Berg2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stankt Anton im Montafon Haus Berg2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Stankt Johannisrain bei Penzberg 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Stankt Johannisrain bei Penzberg 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oktoberfest 2009 Löwenbräu Bierzelt.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oktoberfest 2009 Löwenbräu Bierzelt.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Theatinerkirche Innen1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Theatinerkirche Innen1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hel Strand Beach 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hel Strand Beach 7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

St Jakobsplatz München Haus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Jakobsplatz München Haus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Alte Börse München Eingang.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Börse München Eingang.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hello[edit]

Thank you Schlaier for kind message.

Sorry for answering in english. I've no problem (umgefähr...) um die deutsche Sprache zu verstehen, but using basic english is easier to me.
I'm very interested by your pictures, and I think you understand very well the purpose of "Quality Images" in "Commons".
I continue, for my self, to learn a lot by submitting pictures, looking at the marvels made by others, and by "judging" images. I try to be honest and not to discourage with my "decline" votes explanations.
As you can see, I'm not very "old" here, but I upload many pictures and I am happy with that. I try to help too in categorizations or captions, because I think nice photos must be useful, and "Commons", in my opinion, is not "only" a beauty contest !! By submitting my own pictures in QIC, I try to offer nice pictures to the users, because of many bad pictures in "Commons".
Please don't hesitate to ask if you need, I'll be happy to help you, even if I'm only an "amateur", and not a great specialist, nor in "Commons", neither in photography.
Bis bald !--Jebulon (talk) 08:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bludesch Kirchturm Sankt Nikolaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bludesch Kirchturm Sankt Nikolaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stuttgart Kunstmuseum mit Königsbau rechts.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stuttgart Kunstmuseum mit Königsbau rechts.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tegernsee am Kloster Tegernsee.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tegernsee am Kloster Tegernsee.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paläontologisches Museum Munich 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paläontologisches Museum Munich 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

München Siegestor.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! München Siegestor.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Museum Brandhorst Treppe3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Brandhorst Treppe3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Krolewo Bienen Bees 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krolewo Bienen Bees 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Weg Montjola See.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weg Montjola See.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Neue Mitte Ulm Sparkassengebäude Stephan Braunfels.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neue Mitte Ulm Sparkassengebäude Stephan Braunfels.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hel Seehund.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hel Seehund.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Munich - Maria column 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Munich - Maria column 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Frauenkirche-bei-nacht.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenkirche-bei-nacht.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Frauenkirche-dresden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenkirche-dresden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Need a consultation[edit]

Could you please check this photo, is it sharp? Others voted it is not sharp, and I think it has the same sharpness as this one stated as sharp. Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:43, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lichthof Justizpalast Muenchen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichthof Justizpalast Muenchen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Loriot_Vicco_von_Bülow_Ausstellung_Filmmuseum_Berlin_2008.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Loriot_Vicco_von_Bülow_Ausstellung_Filmmuseum_Berlin_2008.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Miss-Sophie (talk) 12:07, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Bild-Verwendung[edit]

Hallo Schlaier,

Oktoberfest-Löwenbräu-Bierzelt-2009

Das Bild vom Bierzelt wurde bei Hurraki, Wörterbuch in leichter Sprache, verwendet.

Oktoberfest

Dankeschön!

Das freut mich!

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Schlaier,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

unpräzise Bildangaben zu Schinkels »Königin der Nacht«-Bühnenbildentwurf[edit]

Hallo Schlaier!

Dieses Bild hier

 https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Karl_Friedrich_Schinkel_Die_Sternenhalle_der_K%C3%B6nigin_der_Nacht_B%C3%BChnenbild_Zauberfl%C3%B6te_Mozart.tif

entspricht nicht dem Original, denn es wurde »geschönt«. Im Besonderen wurden der vertikale Knick quer durch die Bildmitte wegretuschiert und die Farben kräftig verstärkt. Ich finde, das sollte in der Beschreibung erwähnt werden. Was ist denn die Quelle? Selbst photographiert? Auch diese Information fehlt. Anderenfalls stimmt ja die Lizenzangabe nicht (»This is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art.«)...

Ich habe einen Originalscan (JPG 4495×3398), den ich gerne hochladen würde, will aber »Bildkonflikte« vermeiden. Hast Du Vorschläge? -- Lemzwerg (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Lernzwerg, wenn es so problematisch ist, dann bitte löschen. Herzliche Grüße--Schlaier (talk) 14:51, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Das ist ein Mißverständnis! Ich finde die Retuschen an sich gut – nicht jeder will das etwas schäbige Original –, jedoch sollten sie als solche gekennzeichnet werden, um Irritiationen zu vermeiden. Im übrigen habe ich gesehen, daß eine unretuschierte Version bereits auf commons hochgeladen wurde – dort werde ich meine hochauflösende Version hinzufügen. -- Lemzwerg (talk) 19:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)