User talk:SchuminWeb/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
SchuminWeb

Ben Schumin at Iwo Jima Memorial.jpg

Current


Archive 1


New message


Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

SmarTrip

Hi Ben, and welcome to the Commons! Just letting you know that I nominated Image:WMATA SmarTrip Card.jpg for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests. dbenbenn | talk 03:15, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

featured pic

Just wanted you to know I nominated resistin redicatz for featured pic cause I think it's a really good picture. --Bachrach44 19:35, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Valley Mall (Harrisonburg).jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Valley Mall (Harrisonburg).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 20:17, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

  • I see no problem with this image. I took the picture, and complied with everything when I first uploaded it. Schuminweb 15:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:480x640-20050924-15thStNW-ConstitutionAveNW-Protesters.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:480x640-20050924-15thStNW-ConstitutionAveNW-Protesters.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 02:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Image categories

Hi. I edited the categories for Image:Cross County Mall Kmart.jpg which you uploaded. Some, such as putting the image in Category:1899 were clearly inappropriate. Were the categories automatically generated? If so you might wish to check them when uploading. Thanks, -- Infrogmation 15:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Indeed, they were auto-generated. I'll be more vigilant next time. Schuminweb 08:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

MetroRail map with silver line

Hey. On the MetroRail map you made with the Silver line added, is there any chance you could clean it up a bit so the Silver-Blue-Orange triplex doesn't overlap with Red past L'Enfant Plaza? I was thinking you could narrow the triplex so it fits in the width of a typical duplex. --Kitch 18:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Girls by the pool.jpg

I think this image should be deleted, cause nowhere is stated, that women on picute agreed for it's pulication!

--WarX 17:00, 13 December 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:World_Can't_Wait_J4_Demo.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:World_Can't_Wait_J4_Demo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Frumpy 20:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. Schuminweb 02:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


Image:I-81 va exit 3.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:I-81 va exit 3.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Image:I-81 s near I-64.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:I-81 s near I-64.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Image:I-081 sb exit 300 03.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:I-081 sb exit 300 03.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 03:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bush_hates_Borf.jpg

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 19:28, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. Schuminweb 19:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Oscar the Grouch

Hello Ben Schumin. We would like to publish this image of "Oscar the Cat Grouch puppet at the Smithsonian National Museum of American History" in a Sociology textbook. Would you please contact me at jillenge@yahoo.com for details? I would like to obtain your permission to publish this photo. Also wondering if you have a higher resolution file of the photo. Thank you. -Jill the preceding unsigned comment is by JillEnge (talk • contribs)


Image Tagging Image:Bobby_Fisher_Memorial_Building_tag.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bobby_Fisher_Memorial_Building_tag.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:40, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fixed. Schuminweb 00:30, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Million Worker March

Hello. We would like to publish this image of "Demonstrators gather outside the Hotel Washington at the end of a march, as part of the Million Worker March" in a Sociology textbook. Would you please contact me at jillenge@yahoo.com for details? I would like to obtain your permission to publish this photo. Thank you. -Jill

Train at Largo Town Center.

Hi, which Largo is this? Cheers, Mikereichold 19:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

In the case of Image:Train at Largo Town Center.jpg, it is referring to Largo, Maryland. Schuminweb 03:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Greyhound Bus 6080.jpg

{{Copyrighted free use provided that}} is missing required copyright provision in Image:Greyhound Bus 6080.jpg
Hello. I noticed that page Image:Greyhound Bus 6080.jpg does not include the required copyright provision in {{Copyrighted free use provided that}}, causing it to display only instructions, not a valid copyright restriction containing a required provision. Please add the required copyright provision, or remove the tag {{Copyrighted free use provided that}} (or other tag that redirects to {{Copyrighted free use provided that}}). Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)


Image:James Madison statue.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:James Madison statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 08:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Affinity_group_collateral_damage.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Affinity_group_collateral_damage.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. ShakataGaNai Talk 05:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 025134ed2823fd7f5185f7601688c999

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Image:Potomac_hall.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Potomac_hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

86.66.240.170 20:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

RE:Deletion request

You nomination here needs to be reviewed. Cheers, --Meldshal42? 22:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Don't be surprised

This imaage: Image:Goddess of Democracy replica.jpg will one day be tagged for deletion because statues in the u.S are not subject to freedom of panorama. Just a friendly note. Evrik (talk) 15:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:RMS Queen Elizabeth at sea.jpg

If Image:RMS Queen Elizabeth at sea.jpg is unfree, why it is in National Maritime Museum. Britannic (talk) 03:55, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

It is very possible for something to be in a museum and still be unfree. Check copyright notices before uploading. SchuminWeb (talk) 15:33, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

File:CunardAd.png

This image was originally upload at English Wikipedia. Then I moved it to Commons.Britannic (talk) 21:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, SchuminWeb!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:10, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

License for File:Sinking Cap Trafalgar.jpg

I had change the source of the File:Sinking Cap Trafalgar.jpg to another page that show us more imformation about the image. It also show us that the age of the author is plus 70 years. So this image is in public domain. You can go and check it out. Thank you —Britannic (talk) 19:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token e16d36c2bc3b14e9013519121d2ec6f0

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Inquiry

Where would I put photographs of Washington Metrorail destination signs? In the rolling stock category? Or an entirely new category? Woogers (talk) 03:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Are you referring to the train destination signs? Generally speaking, if you aren't sure, add them to Category:Washington Metro, and I or someone else will figure out where they ought to go. SchuminWeb (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Done and Done. Woogers (talk) 02:44, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Damn, you got a whole bunch of cool destination signs that usually don't get used. Wish I'd strayed from the Red Line a little bit that weekend. Nonetheless, though, love the photos. I categorized them by location, but two some of them, where I just tagged with the line, I was unable to figure out what station I was looking at, and wasn't going to try and guess. For File:Huntington Dest.jpg, I know it's either Pentagon City or Crystal City, but I have no idea which because all the signage is illegible or blocked. For File:Arlington Cemetary Dest.jpg, there are numerous stations that it might be. SchuminWeb (talk) 03:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Huntington is Pentagon City, Arlington Cemetary is L'Enfant Plaza Woogers (talk) 03:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Cropped images

Isn't it more appropriate, if there's a desire for the original image, like in File:WMATA Fort-Totten-sb-arrive.jpg, to move the cropped image to another name?--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


File:Cross County Mall Kmart.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cross County Mall Kmart.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

File:Delaware Memorial Bridge toll plaza wide.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:01, 26 September 2009 (UTC)


File:IdoraDanceHall1920.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IdoraDanceHall1920.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 00:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


copyvio-uploads by Matthewhuerta

Hi SchuminWeb,
in case you are Ben Schumin, I've corrected the copyviolating claims of the uploader of File:Bethesda Station.jpg, File:CAF 5000 Series Train at Pentagon Station.jpg, File:Mt Vernon Sq-7th St-Convention Center Station.jpg and File:Rosslyn Station.jpg. Please take a look whether it is acceptable for you now. --Túrelio (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Much better. I'll upload the hi-res images and do any other category work for it. SchuminWeb (talk) 19:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Oh, one more thing - the Rosslyn photo was already re-uploaded by me as File:Rosslyn station showing upper level platform pylons.jpg. SchuminWeb (talk) 19:23, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I've tagged the new upload as dupe. Gone. --Túrelio (talk) 19:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Is File:Reagan National Airport Station in 2009.jpg also from you? And how about the other uploads from this user? --Túrelio (talk) 19:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
The other uploads aren't mine. I can't determine the source of the other images, though at first I thought it possibly came from Oren's Transit Page.
Also, I've re-uploaded the "Pentagon" image as File:WMATA 5000-Series train at Rosslyn station lower level.jpg, since the image is incorrectly identified. That was definitely taken at Rosslyn. Photography at Pentagon station is illegal due to its being within the Pentagon Reservation. SchuminWeb (talk) 19:34, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
I could locate the source of one more of his uploads, File:Franconia-springfield metro station.jpg, which was fully (C). --Túrelio (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Somehow, I'm not surprised that another image turned up copyvio. I think for safekeeping, I'm going to remove the other Matthewhuerta images from en.wiki. SchuminWeb (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes, might be safer. I'm still hoping he answers my question on his talkpage. --Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

And what a surprise - found one more of mine in his contributions: File:King Street Station Pylon.jpg. SchuminWeb (talk) 20:27, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Image deletion File:GER_J70.jpg

Hi Schumi, there seems to be no counter to my assertion that File:GER_J70.jpg is a copyright violation. How do I now get it deleted? Thanks Ozdaren (talk) 12:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

You've done everything you need to. Deletion on Commons just takes a really long time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Thanks110.23.247.91 21:58, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Balconies

Hi Schumin, good work sorting through them. Just wondering if I got it right here? Isn't the portico the entire structure? BTW it would be nice to have a category for all the iconic views of both floors, such as File:SumGardenTour.JPG. Not sure on how to name it though, e.g. "General views of South Portico (White House)". -- User:Docu at 21:47, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

"Under the South Portico (White House)" for balcony type images and "South Portico (White House)" for general views might work. What do you think of that? I added a few more of the later here. -- User:Docu at 13:11, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

The way I've defined things, "South Portico" refers to the structure built in 1824 (minus the second floor balcony), and then "Truman Balcony" specifically regarding the 1948 balcony. I think we can probably refine things a bit further, and that photos not specifically of the balcony area but of the whole South Portico area should just go under the South Portico category and skip the Truman Balcony category altogether. Then images specifically of the first floor level porch should also go under the South Portico category.
I agree that there should be a category for general southern views. However, I don't think we need to add an additional category. Category:White House South side seems to fit the bill for that purpose.
We probably could stand to do some more reshuffling on these images, though, since there is a bit of overlap on what is what in the various categories. I would probably make it where images specifically of the South Portico go there, and then anything that is the general view should go in the White House South side category. I believe nothing we do will be perfect, but will certainly go a long way towards organizing things. What do you think? SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:47, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Given the amount of images of the White House, a lot of categorization about various rooms and locations can be done. Personally, I wouldn't hesitate to create new categories. The descriptions and categories we use should relate to the terms generally used to describe the building (names and uses of rooms change though).
Some time ago I added a few categories to Category:West Wing (it was already quite well organized, but probably got flooded with more images since it was created). Personally I found some interest in categorizing various images of similar perspectives in different years - even if recent years are somewhat "overrepresented" ;)
It can help to create a category with a name and a short description for a type of images, eventually someone might suggest a better category name (or we find it in some of the image descriptions) and we can move it there. -- User:Docu at 08:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Magsaysay 8c US Commemorative.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:WTC Towers Memorial.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 03:19, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Old Sparky.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 07:37, 24 May 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Teofilo (talk) 14:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


File:Winning_the_Gold!.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Winning_the_Gold!.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tabercil (talk) 22:50, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Sultan4.JPG

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sultan4.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Sultan4.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 00:27, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Paperback_books_on_coffee_table.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paperback_books_on_coffee_table.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ξxplicit 19:36, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Hogtie_with_handle.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hogtie_with_handle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

senhor Martins (talk) 22:24, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

You're now a filemover

Hi SchuminWeb/Archive 1, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • For guideline when to rename a file, please see Commons:File renaming and Commons:File naming.

Geagea (talk) 23:01, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

File:L&Bbarnstaple.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:L&Bbarnstaple.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Damiens.rf 14:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Mountain_Dew_Throwback_2010.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mountain_Dew_Throwback_2010.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– Adrignola talk 14:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Forest & Kim Starr

Dear SchuminWeb, Forest & Kim Starr donated almost 60.000 photos to Wikimedia Commons. Some of these images might not be entirely in scope, but it's a waste of your time and a waste of my time to start nominating these images. Multichill (talk) 12:21, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Bad file rename

Hi SchuminWeb. This is to remind you that you should follow the renaming guidelines when moving files. The following moves do not appear to be in accordance with the guidelines: [1][2] Reason: Commons:File renaming#What files should not be renamed?. If you disagree with the this note, disregard it and let me know your reason. Thanks, --ZooFari 18:12, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

File:HotDogEatingSign.JPG

This is really not like an advertisement in a newspaper, but rather is a wall mural (see Category:Murals in the United States), and therefore is not a case for speedy... AnonMoos (talk) 14:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Misleading edit summary

Also, your edit summary on this file was unfortunately quite misleading. "Marking as possible copyvio" normally means adding no-source or similar, not a speedy delete tag! -- AnonMoos (talk) 15:12, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Actually, due to the way Freedom of Panorama exists in the United States, photos of copyrighted materials, even if permanently installed (like a mural, an advertisement, or a statue) are still copyrighted and the photo is considered a derivative work of the original work. Thus the copyright holder of the original work (the statue, mural, advertisement, etc.) is the owner of the content in the photo, unless it's out of copyright for other reasons (like age). It's not like in other countries where there is complete freedom of panorama. Freedom of panorama applies only for buildings in the US. Thus images like that are indeed copyright violations, and thus are subject to speedy deletion on Commons. English Wikipedia can only use such things under fair use. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
However, it's still quite a different situation from a photograph of an advertisement in a newspaper or whatever, and it's unfortunate that the justification you gave didn't seem to display any knowledge of the difference -- and also that your edit summary was misleading... AnonMoos (talk) 19:29, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
That was also a canned edit summary. It is autogenerated by the "Quick Delete" gadget, and so I have no control over the edit summary. It's also not worth stopping use of the tool in order to craft a custom edit summary. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:25, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
If the tool makes you add a deletion rationale which makes you seem like you don't understand the copyright issues involved, plus a misleading edit summary, then it's of extremely poor quality, and its use should be discontinued immediately. AnonMoos (talk) 21:41, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Cryptic_Room_Mural.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cryptic_Room_Mural.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Eis_report2.jpg

  • Copy and paste from your deletion request page

I have the feeling that this isn't the uploader's own work, aside from the annotations. If this were actually something that wasn't a company's actual form, there would be no reason to redact the operator's name (which matches the name of the uploader), and the name of the call center. Someone can make something free to replace this copyvio one, I'm sure. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

  • Hey Ben: Actually, it is my own work. It's a very common performance report for an agent. The company and the location where it was generated no longer exists but I can assure you it's my document and I uploaded it, basically as an example on the topic of call centres, to show a typical example of how an agent's performance is quantified. --Achim Hering (talk) 21:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)