User talk:Sebastian Wallroth

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Ross Mayfield photo[edit]

Thanks for the photo of Ross Mayfield. I noticed there was no photo during his keynote, but now there is. Well done. edward 14:34:06, 2005-08-06 (UTC)

Kunowice[edit]

danke für deine Bearbeitungen/Ergänzungen! ...Sicherlich Post 16:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Danke für den Dank! ;-) --Sebastian Wallroth 21:39, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Category:Elbe in Cuxhaven[edit]

Moin Sebastian,
ich kannte diese Category bis jetzt nicht, Frage, was ist mit Elbe in Cuxhaven gemeint, die Stadt oder der Landkreis und alles was in der Elbe schwimmt oder wo die Elbe zu sehen ist? Tschüß --Ra Boe 14:23, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

...wo die Elbe zu sehen ist. -Sebastian Wallroth 14:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
im Bereich Cuxhaven bis zur Oste?!
willst Du alles machen oder soll ich meine Bilder anpassen?
Tschüß --Ra Boe 14:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Für Cuxhaven habe ich nur markiert, was ich eindeutig für die Elbe gehalten habe. Ich arbeite mich alphabetisch durch. Ich bin gerade bei Dresden. --Sebastian Wallroth 15:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Ich habe mal "meine" Schiffe gemacht. Aber noch mal, was ist mit Cuxhaven gemeint. Es gibt noch Bilder Elbe und Otterndorf, also Landkreis Cux.
Dann lege doch eine Kategorie "Elbe in Otterndorf" an. Die passt zwar nicht in die Category:Cities by the Elbe, aber das macht ja eigentlich nichts. --Sebastian Wallroth 15:45, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
So bin mal alle meine Fotos durchgegangen. Tja gute Idee, werd ich gleich machen ;-)) --Ra Boe 17:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Transfer[edit]

Hallo Sebastian, wenn Du Bilder nach commons unter neuem Namen verschiebst, sollten diese in den Artikeln angepasst werden. Fiel mir gerade bei den Breisacher Münsterbildern auf. gruss Geograv 22:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Wuppertal[edit]

Zur Info: Wuppertal liegt nicht in Rheinland-Pfalz sondern in NRW. --Atamari (talk) 13:34, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Völlig richtig. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)


File:Agostino_di_Duccio.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agostino_di_Duccio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

h-stt !? 19:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Radebeul Lößnitzgrundbahn[edit]

Nur mal so interessehalber: Wieso hast du File:BahnhofLossnitzgrundvomTodhubel.JPG nach Commons transferiert? --X-Weinzar (talk) 15:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Weil, wenn das Bild schon rumliegt, dann auf Commons. Da gehören Bilder hin. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Bei nem anderen Radebeul-Bild habe ich das auch grad gesehen. Meiner Ansicht nach ist das eine überflüssige Arbeitsbeschaffungsmaßnahme, solange du nicht vorhast, das Bild in einem Artikel anderswo zu verwenden. Wenn jemand anderswo einen Artikel schreibt, dann besorgt er sich die entsprechenden Bilder schon selbst, aber deswegen müssen wir nicht im Voraus gleich alle Bilder nach Commons transferieren. Besser fände ich es, du sprichst die entsprechenden Leute direkt an, warum sie ihre Bilder nicht gleich auf Commons hochladen wollen. Damit packt man die Sache an der Wurzel an. Gruß --X-Weinzar (talk) 12:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
An der Wurzel wird auf der Upload-Seite der deutschen Wikipedia bereits gerüttelt: "Datei hochladen? Am besten gleich auf Commons!" Das könnte meines Erachtens viel prominenter platziert sein, aber sei's drum. Du magst es für eine überflüssige Arbeitsbeschaffungsmaßnahme halten, aber wenn's mir Spaß macht? --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 20:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Ich wüsste halt tausende wichtigerer Sachen, deswegen hier die Nachfrage ;-) Hätte ja auch sein können, du weißt nicht so genau, dass dein Tun "relativ" überflüssig ist (meiner Ansicht nach). Mach halt, wenn du trotzdem Lust drauf hast. Ich bspw transferiere auch öfters Bilder, aber von Flickr. Wäre das vielleicht ne Aufgabe für dich? In Wikipedia nach Artikeln ohne Bilder oder mit grottigen Bildern schaun und dann auf Flickr bessere finden? Gruß --X-Weinzar (talk) 17:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Datei:Wappen Bad Liebenwerda.svg[edit]

Danke erst mal für die Arbeit, sieht schon gut aus, aber ein wenig Nacharbeit sehe ich noch: Die Herzen sind zu langgesteckt, das Schild auf dem Turb unten bitte runder, Die Schatten-Striche rechts bitte gleichmäßiger... Dann ist es gut! Liebe Grüße --LutzBruno (talk) 08:14, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Hallo LutzBruno, gibt es eine genauere Beschreibung für das Wappen als die Blasonierung? Gibt es andere Vorlagen? Die Striche sind in der Vorlage ungleichmäßig - ich will nicht allzusehr davon abweichen. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Wappen Bad Liebenwerda.png300px

Hallo, also das Wappen ist ja Teil des Logos, zu welchem hier knapp eine Gestalltungsrichlinie dargestellt ist. Aber werde noch mal graben, denn ich hatte mal eine offizielle Beschreibung des Wappens... bis dahin Grüße --LutzBruno (talk) 12:23, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Hab schon mal die Farbe des Turms geändert. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 12:33, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Noch eine Anmerkung: Du bist nicht der Nutzungsrechteinhaber, deshalb nur {{PD-Coa-Germany}}. Die png-Vorlage ist nach wie vor ohne Quellenangabe (eigentlich löschfähig), eine quellenlose Datei kann folglich niemals eine gültige Quelle für ein Derivat daraus sein. Wenn der Urheber des Wappens unbekannt ist, sollte man das auch so dokumentieren. Der png-Hochlader ist es mit Sicherheit nicht und auch der svg-Hochlader hat es nicht erfunden. gruss Rauenstein (talk) 19:47, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

file:Wappen Landkreis Dahme-Spreewald.svg[edit]

Hello. I'm not expert in German Landkreis heraldry, but colours in that file (above) are different from the original file. You have given stronger colours what I think it not good for readership. Authors of the CoA had special intention to give that pastel colours. It's my only small suggestion. Second case: The small part of beak near to tongue is red and should be gold (yellow) like in the original file. Respects. JDavid (talk) 08:53, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the notes. The colors are nowhere defined. Now use this ones: blue #0092dd, red #f00000, gold #fcdb00, green #009944, silver #cccccc. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:10, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
In raster file is: blue #005a9e, red #df4b36 (I really don't like this kind of red:|), gold #f8c400, silver #aaa9a9. I don't see green at all. Please write in my User talk:JDavid. JDavid (talk) 11:58, 19 June 2009 (UTC)


File tagging Image:Else buschheuer from left.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Else buschheuer from left.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 12:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Hauptbahnhof_Tuebingen.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hauptbahnhof_Tuebingen.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hauptbahnhof_Tuebingen.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Suhadi Sadono (talk) 11:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)


File:Die_Linke_zur_Europawahl_2009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Die_Linke_zur_Europawahl_2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 10:40, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Oauth logo.svg may be deleted[edit]

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | +/−

The Oauth logo.svg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 23:56, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I've added the CC BY-SA license to the logo page on our website: http://wiki.oauth.net/Logo. You may use this logo on Wikipedia. ---Chris Messina (talk) 22:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Georg_Freiherr_von_Rheinbaben.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Georg_Freiherr_von_Rheinbaben.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 06:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Template:States of Germany (dynamic)[edit]

Ja, ich habe durchaus Respekt für die Arbeit vieler Benutzer hier. Es besteht aber kein Zweifel, dass das Template als redundantes und somit überflüssiges Kategoriensystem innerhalb der Kategorien gelöscht wird. Insofern hätte es natürlich auch ein Bot machen können. Als Argument für das Behalten anzuführen, dass das Anlegen viel Arbeit verursacht hat, ist Deine persönliche Sicht und nachvollziehbar, aber kein Sachargument. Diese Art von templates waren und sind für das Kategorisieren von Artikeln innerhalb commons gedacht, nicht für das Kategorisieren von Kategorien. P.S. ich habe 2005/2006 mal einige tausend Lagepunktkarten für Gemeinden aus opengeodb extrahiert und hochgeladen. Das wird nun seit langem automatisch generiert. So gesehen ist die Zeit, die man hier investiert, immer relativ. Rauenstein (talk) 18:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Das hast Du verwechselt: Das das Anlegen viel Arbeit gemacht hat ist mein Argument dafür, gefragt oder benachrichtigt zu werden, wenn es eine Diskussion darüber gibt.
Was ich nicht verstehe ist, warum Du Dir so viel Arbeit damit machst, Informationen zu VERNICHTEN. Wenn Du nicht verstehst, warum jemand die Querverweisinformationen in Kategorien sinnvoll findet, ist das ok. Aber warum steckst Du Deine Energie nicht in das zusammentragen von Informationen? Darum geht es doch bei der Wikipedia. Löschen kann man immer noch. Zum Beispiel in zehn Jahren, wenn sich herausstellt, das die Querverweise schädlich sind. Was ich nicht glaube. Aber bis dahin kann man was Konstruktives machen anstatt etwas Destruktivem. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 19:32, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Man kann nicht ohne breite Zustimmung, Meinungsbild o.ä. das gesamte Kategoriensystem mal eben verdoppeln, weil man das als Einzelner schick findet - dazu noch im Klickbunti-Format mit 16 Wappen. Werte das Entfernen bitte als *Wehret den Anfängen*. Vernichtet wurde gar nichts, denn das auf commons eingeführte und seit Jahren funktionierende Kategoriensystem besteht ja nach wie vor. Und um das Zusammentragen von Informationen musst Du Dir in meinem Fall ganz bestimmt keine Sorgen machen. Rauenstein (talk) 21:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC) P.S. Es ist im Normalfall davon auszugehen, dass ein Benutzer selbstverfasste Artikel, hochgeladene Fotos, angelegte Vorlagen, templates usw. auf der eigenen Beobachtungsliste hat (noch dazu, wenn es sich um einen so beträchtlichen Umfang wie im speziellen Fall handelt). Wenn über sieben Wochen nach dem Löschantrag keine Reaktion vom Ersteller kommt, liegt die Vermutung nahe, dass er eine mögliche Löschung in Kauf nimmt. Eine Pflicht, Autoren über Löschanträge zu informieren, besteht nicht.
Sehe gerade, dass Du erneut mit den Doppelkategorisierungen beginnst. Ich werde selbstverständlich wieder reverten. Rauenstein (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Tja, da bin ich wohl an den Falschen geraten. An Deiner Gutsherrenart hätte ich ja auch gleich sehen können, dasss Dir die Wikipedia gehört. Darf ich Dich in Zukunft direkt fragen, wenn ich hier etwas ändern möchte? Ich war in dem Irrglauben, dass so demokratischer Firlefanz wie Meinungsbilder erstmal abgeschlossen sein müssen und dass man hier Gleicher unter Gleichen wäre, der entsprechend respektiert wird. Naja, noch bin ich nicht zu alt, um zu lernen. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:05, 22 September 2009 (UTC) P.S. Die Rauensteins kommen und gehen, aber die Wikipedia bleibt.
Du stellst im Alleingang das Kategoriensystem auf den Kopf, weil Du gern bunte templates magst und wirfst mir Gutsherrenart vor. Nicht zu glauben. Vielleicht solltest Du nochmal dringend überdenken, ob Du im richtigen Projekt bist. Rauenstein (talk) 00:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


Schriften der Welt[edit]

Sersn, in diesem Bild http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5b/WritingSystemsOfTheWorld_de.svg ist ein kleiner Rechtschreibfehler, bei "Chinesisch" über China fehlt das n. Falls du noch ne leicht editierbare Version hast ... MfG Wolf

Danke für den Hinweis. Ist erledigt. Bei SVG-Dateien reicht ja ein einfacher Texteditor, um Tippfehler auszumerzen. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Ein Fehler: Malaysia ist grün eingefärbt, d.h. arabische Schrift. Das war in grauer Vorzeit mal so, aber die sind längst auf lateinische Schrift umgeschwenkt. Gruß 155.56.68.215 12:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Sebastian Wallroth!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token d84f99417391a5ba38527faaf9e6137b[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File tagging File:CCCeBIT_Bundestrojaner.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CCCeBIT_Bundestrojaner.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 23:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)


Hi Sebastian Wallroth,
could you comment at File:Rivero Odro.jpg at which the alleged author now has stated that he isn't the author. --Túrelio (talk) 08:40, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Lizenzentfernung[edit]

Hallo. Du hast hier zwei Lizenzen entfernt (die beiden CC). Ich denke mal, das war unbeabsichtigt (weil in der Zusammenfassungszeile nichts darüber steht) beim Aufräumen der Dateiseite. Nur als Hinweis darauf zu achten, dass Lizenzen nicht verloren gehen. LG --Quedel 23:23, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Alter_Stadtteil.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alter_Stadtteil.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 13:06, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Panoramafreiheit[edit]

Hallo. Wie ich sehe, machst du dich dabei, die Seite zu übersetzen. Bitte beachte dabei, dass du nicht einfach übersetzen darfst, da du sonst eine Urheberrechtsverletzung begehst. Bei Übersetzungen wäre ein Import der Seite notwendig. Wer das auf Commons macht, weiß ich gerade nicht, müsstest du mal nachfragen. Dann noch eine ganz große Bitte: überprüfe jedes einzelne Land auf Aktualität. Es gibt leider auf der englischsprachigen Seite ziemlich viele veraltete Links und veraltete Rechtsrahmen. Teilweise hatte ich schon Dinge dabei, wo nach Commons es erlaubt wäre, aber vor 5 Jahren eine Änderung gab und es nicht mehr erlaubt war. --Quedel (talk) 17:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Quedel, dass mit dem Import verstehe ich nicht. Ich will es gerne veranlassen, kann aber keine Anleitung dazu finden. (hier hätte ich sie vermutet.) Die französische und die portugiesische Version scheinen auch mehr oder weniger „nur“ Übersetzungen der englischen Version zu sein. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Sebastian Wallroth, super, da hast du dir ja ganz schön Mühe gemacht!
Anschließend an Quedels Hinweis: von welcher Seite aus hast du denn übersetzt? Die englische?
Ich dachte auch schon öfters darüber nach, die Seite zu übersetzen. Das Problem sind nur, wie ich finde, die vielen Unterabschnitte zu den Ländern. Wenn man die alle übersetzt, dann müsstest du oder andere Leute auch immer die englische Seite beobachten, um bei Änderungen dort diese Seite wieder anzupassen. Wie wäre es denn, wenn statt der Liste einfach nur einen Verweis auf die englische Seite wäre? Im aktuellen Zustand sollte auf jeden Fall noch ein Warnhinweis hinzugefügt werden, dass die deutsche Version unvollständig ist. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 18:23, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hallo Saibo, tja, das mit dem Überwachen muss dann halt sein. Das Thema interessiert mich zur Zeit sehr. Ich würde nach und nach alle Autoren, die an der englischen Seite mitgearbeitet haben anschreiben und um eine Update-Überprüfung bitten. Das könnte ich dann alle Jahre wiederholen. Gern könne wir das auch zusammen machen. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Alter Stadtteil.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Alter Stadtteil.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

- Darwin Ahoy! 03:47, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Not you, actually, but Globus1 from wiki-de. You just transferred the file.--- Darwin Ahoy! 03:49, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Datei:Maerkische-oderzeitung.svg[edit]

Bitte die Rechtschreibung korrigieren. Der Zeitungskopf sich: "Märkiſche Oderzeitung" (langes ſ). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.241.29.161 (talk • contribs) 2011-06-26T10:28:51 (UTC)

Meinst du den Dateinamen? Sonst gibt's keine Probleme? ;-) Falls es dir um den Dateinamen geht, der wird deswegen besser nicht geöndert. "s" ist eine gültige umschreibung für "ſ", oder nicht? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 16:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Erledigt. Danke für den Hinweis. Seid wann ist denn das korrekte ſ enthalten? --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 21:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Blick über Ouro Preto.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blick über Ouro Preto.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Blick über Ouro Preto.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Cecil (talk) 22:13, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Lizenzen bei Aufräumarbeiten[edit]

Hi, bitte sowas nicht machen. Die Bilder wurden vom Benutzer unter CC und GFDL freigeben. Deine Änderung lässt es nun so erscheinen, als hätte er nur GFDL gewählt und der Rest wäre durch die Migration dazugekommen. Und das entspricht nun mal nicht der Wahrheit. Bitte als Migrationsparamter 'redundant' wählen und die CC-Lizenzen stehen lassen, wie der Autor sie gewählt hat. -- Cecil (talk) 12:36, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Sebastian Wallroth,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Frankfurt a O Kunstgeschichte 1912 001.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Herzberg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Herzberg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sreejith K (talk) 07:11, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

File:2006-03 Frankfurt (Oder) 28.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:01, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

File:AStolz Bozen.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AStolz Bozen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 09:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Logo Haus des Freien Wissens und Community Stützpunkte.svg usw.[edit]

Hallo Sebastian, sind diese Logos (trotz geringer Schöpfungshöhe) nicht CopyrightByWikimedia? --Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Jepp - bin noch am arbeiten --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:38, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Vorlage ist diese: {{CopyrightByWikimedia}} . --Túrelio (talk) 14:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
Danke --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 14:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 23:24, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:WikiConference Yerevan 2013 082.JPG and File:WikiConference Yerevan 2013 063.JPG[edit]

Thank you for entering the Silhouette and Coloured Light photo challenges. Unfortunately these picture were uploaded before the challenge period. If you have another image that is new to Commons and can upload during December then that would be suitable (it doesn't have to be taken during December, though it is great if people feel inspired to take new pictures just for the challenge). Cheers, Colin (talk) 12:58, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for noticing me. --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 13:43, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ur-Baukran Kaiser (Brun) TK B (Museumskran AG-KBM).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ur-Baukran Kaiser (Brun) TK B (Museumskran AG-KBM).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ur-Baukran Kaiser (Brun) TK B (Museumskran AG-KBM).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Krd 12:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


Category:Aerial photographs of Frankfurt (Oder)[edit]

Hallo Sebastion, ich sehe gerade, dass Deine Bilder vom Oderturm herunter nicht wirklich in diese Kategorie gehören. Aerial photographs sind aus der Luft heraus, nicht von einem Gebäude herab gemacht. Ich schlage vor, Du steckst die Bilder in Category:Views from Oderturm Frankfurt (Oder) analog z.B. zu Category:Views from KölnTriangle. Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Gute Idee! Guten Rusch! --Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:47, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014[edit]

File:Embarrassed couple.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Embarrassed couple.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rezonansowy (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Oderpromenade Frankfurt (Oder) 2014.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Oderpromenade Frankfurt (Oder) 2014.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 17:14, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Sebastian Wallroth,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Re-edition of the Photowikimeetup in Wikimania 2014[edit]

Hello Sebastian Wallroth! in the case that you are also visiting this year's Wikimania in London, you may be interested in attending the new edition of the photowikimeetup that took place in Hong Kong last year, and where you listed up. As the preparation is not yet settled, you are more than welcomed to take part in the discussion here. All the best, Poco2 17:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz[edit]

WLE-Deutschland-2014.jpg

Hallo Sebastian Wallroth,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. Am kommenden Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross)