User talk:Sebleouf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
English: Welcome to the Commons, Sebleouf!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 13:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Dmitriy_Byakov.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Dmitriy_Byakov.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kimse (talk) 21:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Sebleouf!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:13, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Check pour WLM[edit]

Merci (quand même :) pour ton message ! Je t'ai répondu à la suite. --Wikinade (talk) 13:15, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Merci (de nouveau) <mode dans mes petits souliers> Je ne voulais pas donner de travail supplémentaire… :/ --Wikinade (talk) 13:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:F54 Nancy Pharmacie-Victor-Jacques.jpg[edit]

Le Lucien Bentz mort en 1944 n'était pas architecte et n'était qu'un homonyme ! comment un professeur de sport né en 1916 aurait-il pu construire un édifice en 1903 ??? Même sans comprendre le luxembourgeois, on peut se rendre compte que les datent ne sont pas concordantes ! (talk) 22:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Pas de soucis, mais j'avoue qu'en ce moment c'est énervant ces délétions systématiques de photos de bâitments visibles depuis le domaine public, mais systématiquement supprimée pour "droit à l'image" (talk) 22:23, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Hôtel de ville, Villeurbanne.jpg[edit]

Hi, my comment in the edit summary was not a joke, you *must* use a regular DR for this - Jcb (talk) 14:55, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikitten[edit]

Red Kitten 01.jpg

For the great WLM checker :)

Léna (talk) 16:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Château de Rochemaure 3.jpg[edit]

Salut, Je pense qu'il y a eu une erreur dans ton édition : il s'agit bien du château de Vogüe, et non de Rochemaure. J'ai corrigé la fiche du fichier. Sans doute faut-il également corriger la redirection...

Base Mérimée/Base Palissy[edit]

Sebleouf,

merci de ne pas modifier les références aux notices de la base Palissy qui concernent des objet classés situés très souvent dans des édifices eux-mêmes classés. Les notices de la base Palissy apportent des informations beaucoup plus pertinentes sur ces objets que celles de la base Mérimée qui restent bien des fois fort générales. Par ailleurs, la base Palissy comporte des immeubles par destination tels les vitraux... Cordialement. GO69.

Bases Mérimée/Palissy[edit]

Sebleouf,

on ne gagne rien à se dévaluer. Je suis persuadé qu'à la base de toute contribution il y a de la bonne volonté, le désir de partager ses connaissances et d'apporter sa petite pierre à la formidable entreprise qu'est wikipédia. Ma politique en matière de relations humaines et de communication : essayer d'avoir toujours la plus haute estime de mon interlocuteur, ce qui n'est possible qu'en s'appréciant un minimum. Chacun a de la valeur et bien plus que le résultat de nos entreprises, c'est la démarche de progression et l'esprit dans lequel elle s'opère qui apportent à chaque individu et à la collectivité. Alors, pas d'automutilation, d'autocritique gratuite. On positive et on repart de plus belle. A très bientôt au détour d'une page de wikipédia. Cordialement. GO69.

Erreur sur les chapelles de Mougins[edit]

J'ai défait tes corrections sur la chapelle Saint-Barthélémy de Mougins car le changement de catégorie que tu as effectué était erroné. Je ne sais pas si tes autres modifications étaient opportunes ou non. Tu as du être trompé par le nom d'autres photos que j'ai mis dans la Category:Chapelle Notre-Dame-de-Vie de Mougins car en fait je me suis trompé dans le nom de 10 photos. J'ai demandé un renommage. Bien cordialement.--Berdea (talk) 10:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Catégorie à "Checker"[edit]

Sebleouf,

OK pour la précision sur le verbe "to check". Je vais à présent systématiquement vérifier les notices Mérimée, les copyvio pour les monuments contemporains et remplir le type de protection, ce que je réalisais déjà pour mes propres fichiers et que tu as pu constater. Sinon, une question: comment fait-on quand la notice Mérimée est fausse ? Je m'explique: le fichier Cathédrale Saint-Pierre d'Annecy.jpg versé par Nukri Komin représente le même monument que celui de la base Mérimée. Cependant, si le descriptif de la base est bon, l'image correspond à l'église voisine: N.D. de Liesse. Je pense ajouter une ligne sur la page wiki dédiée à la collecte de ce type d'erreur et solliciter que le fichier soit renommé. Par ailleurs, un certain nombre de noms de fichiers versés ne correspondent pas au monument. J'ai par exemple solliciter la transformation de La cathédrale Saint-Michel de Carcassonne 01 (et 02.jpg) en La basilique Saint-Nazaire de Carcassonne 01 (et 02.jpg) en changeant avant ton message la notice Mérimée. En l'espèce la notice mérimée correspondait bien au nom du fichier mais pas à l'image versée. Sinon, étant donné que je me suis inscrit au projet Monuments Historiques et que la pluspart de mes contributions portent sur le sujet, cela aurait été sympathique d'avoir connaissance avant des modalités pour enlever la mention "to check" car je catégorisais depuis pas mal de temps les fichiers orphelins ayant trait aux monuments historiques même hors Wiki Loves Monuments 2011. Mais bon, mieux vaut tard que jamais. Enfin une dernière question: que faire des fichiers d'objets classés référencés avec une notice du monument également classé les contenant ? Très cordialement. GO69.

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Merci pour le boulot ! Je suis content de voir que t'as levé le pied ;) ~Pyb (talk) 00:09, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Suppression de catégories[edit]

Salut. Apparemment, tu as jeté le bébé avec l'eau du bain en faisant certains check, en supprimant la catégorie principale, comme [1] ou [2]. J'en ai vu d'autres, mais je n'ai pas tout vérifié... Sylenius (talk) 17:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Sebleouf,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 00:56, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

A vérifier[edit]

Pardonne-moi ... regarde mon doute exprimé ici ! Amicalement - Marc ROUSSEL - --Markus3 (talk) 17:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Renommage[edit]

Ch'alut, tu pourrais me renommer [3] en "File:Chapelle de Notre-Dame-de-la-Pape", c'est surement sont nom (c'est pas chapelle de crépieux en tout cas). Merci. --Nouill (talk) 15:10, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Checking WLM[edit]

Salut ! Est-ce que tu penses que je peux m'auto-checker ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:12, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Je confirme que ça ne fait guère avancer le schmilblick ;) ✓ Fait pour l'image du jour. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 18:29, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Eglise de Saint Lucien (Zahana).jpg[edit]

Merci de m'indiquer les raisons de la suppression de mon image du concours. Salutations. --Faycal.09 (talk) 21:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour. Je m'excuse tout d'abord de l'avoir supprimé sans vous prévenir. Il semble, d'après la liste sur Wikipédia, d'après Mérimée, que cette église n'est pas un Monument historique. En effet, il ne semble en avoir que dans les wilayas d'Oran et d'Alger. Donc a priori l'image est hors-concours. Toutefois, elle demeure une bonne contribution à Commons :) Encore désolé pour l'avoir "évincé un peu sauvagement". Cordialement, Sebleouf (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Merci pour le message et pour la réponse. J'ai mis l'image car pour moi c'est un lieu historique du moment qu'il était construit lors de la période coloniale française de l'Algérie. Malheureusement je n'ai pas pu le mettre dans le volet Algérie car apparemment et malheureusement il n'y avait que trois pays représentant l'Afrique et l'Algérie n'y était pas, je l'ai mis dans le volet France puisque qu'il a été construit par la France. Très fraternellement. --Faycal.09 (talk) 16:40, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
C'est une belle intention que tu as eu là, pas de doute. L'année prochaine (s'il existe un classement spécifique des monuments en Algérie), tu pourrais pourquoi pas proposer la participation du pays au concours international, voire même, mais là je suis peut être trop ambitieux, créer un Wikimedia Algérie (voir ici) avec d'autres contributeurs du coin. Je suis sûr qu'il y a moyen de faire de belles choses dans ton pays :) Sebleouf (talk) 16:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Merci pour l'attention et pour ces informations forts utiles. Je prend note de tous ça et je verrais avec d'autres confrères si c'est possible. Très fraternellement. --Faycal.09 (talk) 16:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hôtel de ville de La Rochelle[edit]

Bonjour, Pourquoi as-tu supprimer la catégorie monument historique France... ?

Out of competition[edit]

Bonjour,

une bonne part des photos que j'ai versée pour WLM a été effectivement catégorisée par mes soins "out of competition". Cela procède d'un choix délibéré, car ce qui m'intéresse avant tout dans cette aventure n'est pas tant d'espérer gagner quelque chose par extraordinaire, mais de contribuer à faire découvrir par l'image la richesse et la diversité du patrimoine français, tout en souhaitant que la France soit parmi les premiers contributeurs en nombre de fichiers chargés car je pense que nous pouvons être très fiers de l'héritage patrimonial dont nous sommes tous dépositaires et responsables de la conservation.

Pour autant, je ne crois pas faire partie des personnes exclues du concours, si du moins ma lecture du règlement s'avère correcte. En effet, je ne rentre pas dans les catégories évoquées par la phrase suivante: "Sont exclus de toute participation au concours tous les salariés de Wikimédia France et les membres de l’association ayant organisé le présent concours, ainsi que les membres du jury et leur famille."

C'est très gentil de me proposer tes services, mais je crois que c'est un peu tard. Certains fichiers ont été soudainement catégorisés "out of competition" sans que j'intervienne ... C'est dommage, car autant j'aime à faire les choses librement, dans un souci de partage, autant je déteste être contraint alors que je ne pense pas enfreindre quelque article du règlement. Des fichiers ayant trait au portail sculpté de Beaulieu-sur-Dordogne ont fait un aller-retour dans cette catégorie par exemple ...

Je laisse sciemment quelques fichiers en compétition, soit qu'ils concernent des monuments qui me sont particulièrement chers, soit qu'à défaut d'être le témoignage d'un art photographique consommé, dont je ne connais qu'à peine les rudiments, ils illustrent des oeuvres maîtresses de la sculpture médiévale occidentale.

Gagner au poids pour avoir versé le plus de fichiers ou une illustration d'un monument non illustré jusqu'à présent ? Je contribue tout au long de l'année et n'ai pas besoin d'un concours pour être motivé ponctuellement. La compétition ? très peu pour moi. Le partage du savoir par l'image ? oui, avec si possible un effort esthétique à la mesure de mes possibilités et un peu de sensibilité.

J'espère avoir répondu à tes interrogations.

Cordialement.

--GO69 (talk) 18:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Sebleouf,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:22, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

T'es sur le coup Smile[edit]

Merci ! --Agamitsudo (talk) 16:23, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

File renaming[edit]

Hello Sebleouf,

You moved File:Taşlı Köprü - Vıcıtırın 01.jpg to File:Vojinovića Bridge overview, Vučitrn, April 2010.jpg with the reason: File renaming criterion #4: Change meaningless bio-names into binomial scientific names. Can you explain to me why it is meaningless bio-names. The file is in use in tha article Taşlı Köprü from the Turkish wiki. It be usfull also if you check the file history before renaming. Geagea (talk) 23:44, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Silver Whisper to Seabourn Pride[edit]

  • Hello! File renamed, thank you, --PjotrMahh1 (talk) 04:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Isarsteg Unterföhring[edit]

Tnhank you for renaming the files --Bjs (talk) 18:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Filename[edit]

Please do no longer do renamings such as these. The name is meaningful in the Limburgish language. Or is there a policy in place to discriminate minority languages? --Ooswesthoesbes (talk) 08:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Stade de Gerland - Virage Sud.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stade de Gerland - Virage Sud.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 08:40, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Merci pour l'update ^^[edit]

That's cool! --Aga (d) 12:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Sebleouf,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:28, 6 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Sebleouf,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Sebleouf,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Dennis van Niekerk[edit]

Hi, thanks very much for using one of mmy image. I have reverted your substantial crop of my original. Instead, I have uploaded your cropped version as a new file. Please do that in the future if the changes in cropping an image significantly affect the original so that users can have access to both. Thanks -- KTC (talk) 07:19, 26 September 2014 (UTC)