User talk:Sevela.p/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.


Welcome to the Commons, Sevela.p/Archive 1!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Contents

Your edits

Hi, thank you for edits like this. But please be so kind and do not change the first line any more. Thanks. -- aka 11:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Are you sure, that this is correct? I dislike it. This is like advertisement. If you want to communicate to readers, that you can change licence, after some negotiation, you should do it in permission and not on the margin of infobox. But OK, I stop change your the firt line.--sevela.p 11:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Trevor Linden

Hi. I have deleted the Trevor Linden photo. Despite your work in transferring it and getting all info correct, the license on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Linden_trevor041118.jpg is too suspicious and I have tagged that image with a "no source" template. If you can get a solid source on that image, only then can you upload it here. With best regards, Fred J 15:30, 2 September 2007 (UTC) If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.

Ok, I agree with you.--sevela.p 15:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Paleo ptg lascaux unicorn.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Paleo ptg lascaux unicorn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 15:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Lviv FP

Hello! You voted on my pictures of Lviv on FPC [1]. Now, somebody, who don't like this image (and maybe me) want to delist it month after featuring and nominating to POTD. What do You thik about it? Maybe You vote to keep FP for my photo! See here: [2] Thanks!!! --Lestat 09:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Citroen

The image has been deleted here before: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Andr%C3%A9_Citro%C3%ABn.jpg --Polarlys 19:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Maybe, it was deleted, but I didn't know if this is same image. Reason in deletion request was no source. There was source. For future use check usage, link to this image is/was on the 3 wikis.--sevela.p 20:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:DOBNER.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:17, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Tsing Ma Bridge.jpg

Hi, you recently moved this picture to commons. The picture previously had a different name on English Wikipedia. When you moved the picture, you changed the references in the English Wikipedia articles to Image:Tsing Ma Bridge.jpg. Unfortunately, there was already an image of the same name at English Wikipedia. I cannot figure out any way to make a page use the commons image instead of the English image. I tried using [[commons:Image:Tsing Ma Bridge.jpg]], but that only makes a reference to the commons image without showing it. I'm not sure what the best way to deal with this, and am wondering if you know of any guidelines for dealing with this sort of problem. Thanks. -- Sam 16:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your observation. So, I will rename Image:Tsing Ma Bridge.jpg to Image:Tsing Ma Bridge (1).jpg. I think then it should be ok.--sevela.p 16:52, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Upravné verze obrázků

Zdravím. Nezdá se mi přiliš šťastné nahrávat výrazněji upravené verze obrázků přes původní verze, pokud úprava není jen vyladěním obrázku, ale zásadnějším zásahem do jeho pojetí, jako tomu bylo v případě Image:Karštejn-1591.jpg. Od toho máme v infošabloně parametr other_version, aby mohlo více verzí téhož obrázku kooexistovat pod různými názvy a aby si případní uživatelé mohli pro různé účely vybrat ten, který je vhodnější. Já kupříkladu upřednostňuji, aby díla vystavená či umístěná v exteriéru byla fotografovaná spíše v přirozené perspektivě tak, jak je vidí běžný návštěvník, a aby byl z obrázku přiměřeně zřejmý i kontext umístění. Jiné požadavky ale budou na takový obrázek, má-li se stát nikoli fotografií díla, ale jakousi jeho kopií (jaká se hodí třeba do článku o hradě Karlštejně). --ŠJů 00:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Mě osobně vadí, že na Commons existuje tolik podobných obrázků. Chápu, že tvůj argument s přirozenou perspektivou a budu jej akceptovat, ale stejně si myslím, že stávající obrázek Image:Karštejn-1591.jpg je použitelnější pro články. Nedokáži si představit kdo a proč by si mezi touto verzí a původní, vybral tu původní. Prostě mi přišlo logičtější ten soubor přehrát. Takže se omlouvám za přidělanou práci jej znovu nahrát. Přístě to víc promyslím. S pozdravem sevela.p 16:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Category:Communist labour camps in Czechoslovakia

Kolegové, prosím o Vaše vyjádření k následující kategorizaci v Commons. Už delší dobu si navzájem revertujeme s uživatelem Soman v Category:Communist labour camps in Czechoslovakia zda to má být podkategorie Category:Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy. Já se domnívám, že ano, vzhledem k tomu, že se KSČM plně neodpoutala od své minulosti a je to legální pokračovatel(ka) KSČ. Už mne tyhle revertovací války nebaví, tak bych chtěl znát váš názor. V případě, že je to zbytečné, přestanu s tím, pokud si myslíte, že ne tak mne podpořte. Já si se svým názorem úplně jistý nejsem, ale uživatele Soman, podle jeho příspěvků (extrémně levicové strany po celém světě) považuji za zaujatého. Díky za vaše názory. --Krokodyl 21:02, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Ač má Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy hodně společného s komunistickými pracovními tábory asi nebude úplně nutné ji řadit pod její kategorii. Podle mě naprosto dostačuje, že je kategorie Category:Communist labour camps in Czechoslovakia řazena do kategorie Category:Communism.--sevela.p 08:22, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Díky za vyjádření, upravil jsem to, vytvořil Category:Communist Party of Czechoslovakia dal jsem do ní jako podkategorii Category:Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy, což uživatel Soman podle očekávání revertoval. Jsem však moudřejší a do revertovacích válek nepůjdu a nechám to na jiných :). Zdravím --Krokodyl 09:03, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

NovaSlunecniSoustava.jpg

hi, i don't think it is useful to transfer czech version of english poster from cs to commons - i can't see any use for that. could you explain, what was your reason for doing that? cheers Power 13:03, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Other use can be for all project in Czech (Wikisource, Wikibooks, Wikiquote, Wiktionary, Wikiwersity, Wikinews). I think all images should be on Commons.--sevela.p 19:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Josef_Václav_Frič_(1).jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Josef_Václav_Frič_(1).jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Code·is·poetry 14:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

What do you want? This image has source. I removed template {{no source since}} from this page.--sevela.p 15:52, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Malouda-2.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Malouda-2.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GeorgHHtalk   10:08, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Maloudachelsea.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Maloudachelsea.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

GeorgHHtalk   10:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Intarzie-Mařík-Mucha.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Intarzie-Mařík-Mucha.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Image:Bekyně mniška - housenka.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Bekyně mniška - housenka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Fvlamoen 07:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 5dfee4c5c767318faeebe1b1e913692d

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Coats of arms of Kolín District

Pokud se právě rozdělují znaky do kategorií podle okresů, tak bych při té příležitosti doporučoval uvážit, zda to je vhodný vzor názvu kategorie, protože okresy žádné své znaky nemají (a předtím v kategorii znaků kraje nebyly jen znaky kraje, ale především znaky obcí kraje). Nebylo by přesnější dělat kategory typu "znaky obcí xxx okresu" atd., aby bylo možno zahrnout do jedné nadkategorie všechny znaky obcí a do jiné znaky krajů? --ŠJů (talk) 15:53, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Dobrý nápad, ptal jsem se i Zirlanda, který měl velký podíl na znacích měst, a souhlasí s tím. Tak já to nějak zkusím začít dělat podle toho sytému. Mělo by to vypadat Category:Coats of arms of cities in Kolín District. --sevela.p (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Díky za vstřícnost. Jen ještě je třeba dořešit, aby do toho systému zapadly i znaky obcí, kterou nejsou městy ani městysi a nevejdou se pod pojem "cities" ("of municipalities"?) a v těch pár statutárních městech, co se člení, ještě znaky městských částí nebo obvodů. --ŠJů (talk) 00:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
To jsem si sice vědom, ale myslím, že zatím to bude stačit tak, jak to dělám. Později se to může doladit. Jde mi teď zatím o hrubé rozkategorizování. --sevela.p (talk) 12:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Tak to jo. --ŠJů (talk) 13:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

ŠJů je možná spokojen, ale mi se to teda nelíbí. Název "Coats of arms of cities in xxx District" je IMHO ještě více zavádějící než "Coats of arms of xxx District", a to zejména protože nezahrnuje vesnice. Před takovými velkými změnami, které provádíš bych teda silně doporučoval diskusi, která by měla vést k nalezení vhodného názvu kategorie. Proto prosím zastav další přesuny, dokud se lepší název nenajde. --Daniel Baránek (talk) 21:40, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Právě jsem na tu novotu narazil, takže se taky naléhavě vyjádřím. Znaky podle okresů jistěže ano, to je při jejich cílovém počtu nanejvýš vhodné a přiměřené, ale název kategorie s "Cities" je hrůza. Zhruba ekvivalentní pojmu "city" mohou u nás být tak ty dvě desítky statutárních měst, ostatní jsou jenom towns, o vesnicích nemluvě. Čili když tak Coats of arms of municipalities of XY District. Osobně bych se držel ještě jednoduššího Coats of arms of XY District, ale vypadá, že na předešlém, tučně zvýrazněném, se bez problémů shodneme (koneckonců pro SK tu na Commons, tuším už něco podobného mají). Pro příštích pár dní jsem svolný ty kategorie s "Cities" z nezbytí použít, ale ne dlouho. Mohl by to tedy pak někdo z kolegů botem přeházet? --Miaow Miaow (talk) 22:33, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Z hlediska výstižnosti názvu souhlasím samozřejmě s Danielem. "of cities" je ještě méně přesné než "of district", a nevím o ničem zásadním, co by bránilo věcně přesnému "of municipalities". Jedinou výhradou může být, že tři předložky "of" v jednom názvu kategorie se v angličtině, co vím, považují za stylistickou neohrabanost, kterou je vhodné nějak jazykově obejít. Zároveň chápu, že hledáním vhodného názvu by nemělo být zdržováno ruční třídění podle okresů. Neumím anglicky tak dobře, abych vycítil všechny jemné nuance významů vazeb s předložkou "of", ale nezdá se mi dobré, aby "znaky čehokoliv v kraji" byly pod názvem, které lze přeložit také jako "znaky kraje". --ŠJů (talk) 01:53, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Nejsem proti Coats of arms of municipalities in XXX District. Nebylo by zde 3x of a název by byl naprosto přesný. Zatím budu pokračovat v cities, protože ruční kategorizace je poměrně pomalá. Později se mohou kategorie přejmenovat pomocí bota. Případné návrhy či připomínky pište sem.--sevela.p (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Teď jsem objevil Category:Coats of arms of municipalities by country a jsou zde v podkategoriích povětšinou názvy jako Coats of arms of municipalities of Brussels, Coats of arms of municipalities of Flevoland, takže v rámci jednotnosti jsem pro název, co navrhl Miaow Miaow, Coats of arms of municipalities of XY District--sevela.p (talk) 07:03, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Battisti.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Battisti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Jalo 15:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Horní Počernice CoA CZ.gif

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:06, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Violcand.jpg

You missed this note:

  • Braque died in 1963 and his paintings will enter the public domain worldwide in 2034. Do not upload to en:Wikimedia Commons. / Fred-Chess 13:03, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Image deleted. A.J. (talk) 09:18, 30 July 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Pomnik Sobieskiego we Lwowie.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Pomnik Sobieskiego we Lwowie.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Masur (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Instytut Ossolinskich Lwow22.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Instytut Ossolinskich Lwow22.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Masur (talk) 14:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

As well as:

I know its nor your fault, cos they are missing that info at polish wiki. Masur (talk) 14:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Zoo Lešná

Zdarec barde. Celkem o nic nejde. Jen jsem zaregistroval, že jsi k mým fotkám přidal jakousi podivuhodnou licenci. Nejsem si zcela jist, ale svými fotkami disponuji já. Dal jsem tam, pokud si pamatuji volnou licenci. Sakra ty koumáku snad by jsi mi to mohl alespoň vysvětlit. --Ervinpospisil (talk) 20:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Ahoj, je pravda, že jsem tam dělal trochu pořádek, ale teď jsem procházel tvé obrázky z té složky a licence zůstala u všech taková, jakou jsi dal při nahrání. Kdyžtak mi sem hoď odkazy na ty obrázky, kde je ten problém. Díky a pokud jsem se někde spletl, tak se omlouvám a rád to napravím. --sevela.p (talk) 06:23, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Villages of XX District

Úvodem veliká pochvala a poděkování za akci "vlajky", to dlužím ještě od minula. :-) Přeřazení obcí o úroveň níž je v podstatě taky krok správným směrem (zpřehlední nám kategorii okresu pro různé kostely, kaple, pomníky padlých atp.), ale důrazně oponuji pojmenování kategorie. Když tak, jedině Municipalities a společnou pro ne-města i města. To rozlišování mělo a má smysl na úrovni kraje, kde pomáhá rychle vydělit města coby tu nejzávažnější skupinu. Na úrovni okresu už by si všechna ta území měla být rovna a měla by být dostupná na jeden pohled. --Miaow Miaow (talk) 18:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Aha, mohl bys to prosím začít třeba ve středočeském kraji a já bych ti s tím pak pomohl?--sevela.p (talk) 12:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Díky, pokusím se něco s tím StČ provést, ale bude to dle časových možností (dneska?, zítra? pozítří?), prostě ne za hodinu. --Miaow Miaow (talk) 12:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
To je jedno, já na to teď taky nemám čas. Ale spíš bych to chtěl vidět ukázkově. Pokračovalo by se postupně. Kdyžtak to zkusím z Municipalities.--sevela.p (talk) 15:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Species names

Hi Sevela - species names are always, repeat, ALWAYS, in lower case! So category links are in the format [[Category:Larus|vegae]] not [[Category:Larus|Vegae]]. Please don't capitalise them! - thanks, MPF (talk) 15:27, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Sevela.p!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:15, 10 February 2009 (UTC)


Category:Bohemian Paradise Geopark

Category discussion notification Category:Bohemian Paradise Geopark has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 22:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Daichi satellite.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daichi satellite.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Uwe W. (talk) 09:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


File:Daichi satellite graph.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daichi satellite graph.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Uwe W. (talk) 09:41, 4 June 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Letov_S-328.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Letov_S-328.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Letov_S-328.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Suhadi Sadono (talk) 18:27, 12 July 2009 (UTC)


File:Thaumetopoea_pinivora.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Thaumetopoea_pinivora.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 18:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Vítězslav_Kyšer.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vítězslav_Kyšer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vítězslav_Kyšer.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 20:13, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Russia space monument.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Russia space monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Justass (talk) 18:08, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

L&M

I saw that you took a photo of L&M cigarettes last year (I assume you smoke them). I noticed there were a few European photos of packs but not any from America. I went ahead and took a photo of what a carton looks like and a single pack of what I smoke. File:Lm menthol carton pack.JPG. Let me know what you think or if you'd like any more photos. Mike Halterman (talk) 11:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, I guess you could take a snap of other packs or single cigarettes. If you take some pictures that will be great.--sevela.p (talk) 12:57, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Here's one I took at a gas station today. File:Lm us selection.jpg. Mike Halterman (talk) 05:51, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Nice, but your photos are kind of blurred. This is caused by your camera or light? --sevela.p (talk) 10:02, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Maybe both. I cropped the photo and it was kind of blurry anyway because it was from a phone camera. Is there any way it can be retouched? Mike Halterman (talk) 10:50, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I have no idea how to remove blurry. I think any graphics software can do that. --sevela.p (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm a bit inexperienced for that. :) Mike Halterman (talk) 17:12, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
A new L&M flavor was introduced in the United States last week. File:Lm bold carton pack.JPG and File:Lm bold pack cig.JPG are the photos. :) Mike Halterman (talk) 07:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Europe parliament images

Hello, you have transferred from from en:wiki File:Marta Andreasen EP.jpg that come from Europe partliament, but according to EU parliament webpage policy [3] they dont allow derivatives, nor commercial usage and according to Commons licensing policy are subject of speedy deletion. Please read more about this issue here Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:EuroparlTag --Justass (talk) 21:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Thats correct, see Commons:Deletion requests/Template:EuroparlTag. The image on en.wp must be a very old remaining. The EU parlament once allowed for commercial reuse in their website disclaimer but never for derivatives. That was an example of a typical press license. --Martin H. (talk) 23:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Paleo ptg lascaux unicorn.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paleo ptg lascaux unicorn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

---Nard the Bard 06:40, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Cleavage czech.svg

Zdravím, mockrát díky za přeložení obrázku i za uvítání. S pozdravem --Elm (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Dotaz

Ahoj! Narazil jsem na takto popsaný obrázek: [4]. V provním momentě jsem zareagoval takto: User talk:Filip Albert#RUR.jpg, pak mě ale napadlo, že jsou možná nějaké standardní postupy nebo šablony. Poradíš? Dík! --Gampe (talk) 09:25, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Označil bych to šablonou {{subst:nsd}}, která žádá doplnění zdroje. Autorovi potom vložíš do diskuse {{subst:image source|File:RUR.jpg}}. Ještě by bylo dobré z popisu obrázku odstranit či opravit nepravdivé a nepravděpodobné informace: šablona {{Own}}, datum, {{PD-self}}... Pokud autor nedodá po týdnu zdroj, bude obrázek některým ze správců odstraněn.--Sevela.p 12:13, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Tak podzemnik to tam už vložil.--Sevela.p 12:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Dík!--Gampe (talk) 15:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

History of the Czech Republic and some of subcategories

Category discussion notification History of the Czech Republic and some of subcategories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

--ŠJů (talk) 18:21, 20 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Pozvánka_na_výstavu_2_Bastion.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pozvánka_na_výstavu_2_Bastion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eusebius (talk) 11:07, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Pozvánka_na_výstavu.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pozvánka_na_výstavu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eusebius (talk) 11:09, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Pozvánka_na_výstavu_UTIA.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pozvánka_na_výstavu_UTIA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eusebius (talk) 11:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Recent category work

Hello Sevela! You have recently been working on categories related to the cuisine of the Czech Republic. I don't understand edits like [5]. While česnečka certainly is a popular Czech soup, it is wrong to say that garlic soup is a Czech invention (there are certainly also French garlic soup and maybe others). Would you please work over you recent edits to correct this? Nillerdk (talk) 15:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I don't say that garlic soup is a Czech invention but it belongs to Czech cousine. So I added garlic soup to Category:Soups of the Czech Republic. Category:Garlic soup can be add to Category:Soups of France or Category:Cuisine of France also. I made edits like this to move images to the lowest subcategory. I don't see any problem.--Sevela.p 16:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, I see you logic, but think about this: Bread is certainly part of Czech cousine, right? It would however not be clever to add Category:Cuisine of the Czech Republic to Category:Bread and at the same time removeCategory:Cuisine of the Czech Republic from all files depicting bread as part of a dish. If you find Category:Cuisine of the Czech Republic too crowded, why don't you create new categories like Cesneska, Segedinsky gulas, Svickova (sorry about spelling mistakes). Some of your edits have made it more difficult to find photos of Czech cuisine. (BTW, it is not a problem for a dish to be in Category:Cuisine of the Czech Republic & Category:Knedliky. It is technically COM:OVERCAT because Category:Knedliky already is in Category:Cuisine of the Czech Republic, but it is ok due to the fact that the two categories apply to different parts of the file: Knedliky to the Knedliky and Category:Cuisine of the Czech Republic to the whole dish). Just my thoughts. Cheers --Nillerdk (talk) 16:24, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
I see your logic too but in the case of garlic soup there are no big differences between Czech Česnečka (or Česneková polévka) and garlic soup from other country. It's simply soup where garlic is primary ingredient. --Sevela.p 16:45, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Catedral de Santa Maria de Tui 05.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Twitter_Tweet.JPG

Was bitteschön soll an dem Screenshot unfrei sein? --FrobenChristoph (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Twitter hasn't free licence. So screenshot isn't free also.--Sevela.p 15:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Hi Sevela.p, you have tagged this image as {{copyvio}}. Images tagged as {{PD-ineligible}} in good faith are, however, no candidates for a speedy deletion. If you want to challenge the judgement of the uploader whether an image is below or beyond the minimal threshold of originality, you have to open a deletion request for it. In this particular case, however, I agree with the uploader that this image is ineligible for copyright as the depicted text is a quote from the 15th century and as typefaces and simple geometric shapes are ineligible for copyright. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Ok.--Sevela.p 16:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Twitter logo.svg Wenn du einfach keine Ahnung hast, wieso lässt du nicht das Stellen von Löschanträgen. Offensichtlich ist die Twitter-Grafik hier seit längerem unbeanstandet akzeptiert und ich wäre sehr dafür, dass ein Administrator die Löschdiskussion schließt --Historiograf (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry but I don't understand German. But this logo is only text. No graphic shapes. I really believe this screenshot isn't free.--Sevela.p 16:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Du kannst glauben, was du willst. Irgendeine Ahnung hast du jedenfalls nicht. You don't have any knowledge from copyright issues - so KEEP QUIET --FrobenChristoph (talk) 02:14, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand why you are so snarky. I reverted my speedy deletion request and started standard deletion request where everybody can take view to this image. I try to be polite.--Sevela.p 11:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for File:Bread_machine_Gallet(2).jpg!. Please, look this ru:Хлебопечка. --Shliphmash (talk) 05:37, 27 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Galaxy_in_Andromeda_with_M_32.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Galaxy_in_Andromeda_with_M_32.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tryphon 17:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Podily.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Podily.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This, that and the other (talk) 07:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Freckle Girl

I saw that you had added a picture under the "Freckle" article, the one with the two girls. Those "girls" are actually me. I was wondering where you got the picture? Do I know you?

Hi, this picture was originaly uploaded to English Wikipedia by user Freckles2006. I only moved it to Commons. Try to ask Freckles2006 where he got the picture. --Sevela.p 09:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Šablona User contrib

Ahoj, mám prosbu o pomoc/radu: Pokusil jsem se po vzoru své osobní stránky na české Wiki předělat nálepky/userboxy i tady na Commons, ale při pokusu o jakékoli vložení počtu editací jsem ztroskotal. Zkoušel jsem šablonu {{User contrib}} předělat nejdřív přímo do mého vlastního userboxu, pak jsem zkusil vytvořit svoji variantu celé šablony {{Bazi contrib}} (kvůli barevnému stylu), ale ani to nefungovalo. Prostě se mi na stránce nechce načíst konkrétní číslo. Dokonce už ani s původní šablonou {{User contrib}}. Přitom vidím, že Tobě na vlastní stránce funguje. Tušil bys, kde se děje chyba? --Bazi (talk) 14:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Ahoj, vím kde je chyba. Musíš tam to číslo ručně zadat jako první parametr, samo to bohužel neumí (nebo to není možné). Jinak tu šablona {{Bazi contrib}} ti nedoporučuji, protože takovéto šablony by neměly být ve jmenném prostoru šablona ale jako podstránka. Navíc jde použít šablonu {{User contrib}} podle tvých představ změnou barev pomocí parametrů. V tvém případě:
{{User contrib|200|border=gold|info-bg=#ffff80|id-bg=gold|id-font=#FFFFF}}
dá:
200+ This user has made over 200 contributions to Commons.

--Sevela.p 19:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Díky, nabyl jsem, nevím proč, dojmu, že když ta šablona má natolik dlouhý a složitý kód, tak že si to číslo snad i zjistí ze statistiky sama. Škoda. Ještě jednou dík za pomoc k prozření. V takovém případě jsem si to rovnou udělal i bez šablony. --Bazi (talk) 21:27, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Mormegil (talk) 19:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

EXIF datum

Zdravím. Narazil jsem na tuto dva roky starou editaci. Doplnoval jsi tam mimo jiné datum údajně podle EXIF, ale v EXIF datech tam vidím jiné datum, březnové. A není to ani datum uploadu, to se liší o 10 dní. Zkus si vzpomenout nebo prověřit, jestli to je jen nějaký ojedinělý omyl, nebo jestli nešlo třeba o nějakou chybu bota a není podobných chyb víc. --ŠJů (talk) 07:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Ahoj, tak to vůbec netuším, jak se tam ta chyba dostala. Je možné, že chybu u dělal ten nástroj, ale je taky možné, že jsem se upsal. Mrknu se ještě na podobné editace, co jsem tenkrát udělal. Díky za upozornění. --Sevela.p 07:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Picasa CC-BY / Commons CC-BY-SA

Hi Sevela.p,

I see the uploaded license didn't match and I've corrected it here and on the other recently uploaded files. Could you look into this and use the same license here ? –Krinkletalk 23:38, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I copy and past it, I'll make it up. Thanks for your notice.--Sevela.p 23:51, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

HotCat and image notes

I can't reproduce this. I'll need more info to track this down. What browser and which skin are you using? Lupo 07:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Figured out what happened. See MediaWiki talk:Gadget-HotCat.js#Remove notes. Lupo 09:08, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello! Please help

Hello there! Please can you help me on Wikimedia Commons? Actually I work mostly on Wikinews, but here I require your assistance. Moreover, can you explain me what are userboxes? How can I have them on my User Page? Thanks--Sainsf (talk) 10:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello, userboxes are small colored box designed to appear only on a Wikipedian's user page as a communicative notice about the user, in order to directly (or even indirectly) help Wikipedians collaborate more effectively on articles. Further informations here.--Sevela.p 11:19, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

Sevela.p,

thank you for helping me to upload the File:Litterocknine.jpg. I accidentally did a mistake and the picture I uploaded wasn' t very good.

Thank you, --патриот8790Say whatever you want 13:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

File Renaming

Why do you rename files without allowance ? --89.155.50.215 13:03, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know what you mean.--Sevela.p 13:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Navajoa photos

hello Sevela.p, these 3 images File:Navajoa peeblesiana ssp fickeisenii sb 468 fredonia az1.jpg, File:Navajoa peeblesiana var maia s cameron az1.jpg and File:Navajoa peeblesiana var menzelii rp 116 hualupai hilltop area az1.jpg were deleted by me some days ago as they come from http://www.hajek-kaktusy.cz/modules.php?name=galerie&akce=album&id=12 a copyrighted website. I warned User talk:Jikoun, but it seems he uploaded them again at cs:wikipedia without a proper source. Cheers. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice that.--Sevela.p 22:47, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Sevela.p!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)