User talk:Shardan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image Tagging Image:Tavolara_3.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tavolara_3.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 16:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Please don't forget to put license tag(s) on these image. --EugeneZelenko 15:32, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Same for Image:200px-Qadesh2.png, Image:200px-Qadesh3.png and Image:200px-Qadesh1.png |EPO| 13:50, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Scultura_nuragica_in_bronzo.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 11:17, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:DomusDejanaMontessu.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 11:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Image:Megawal67.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 12:05, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Qadesh1.png[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 11:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Qadesh2.png[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 11:14, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Qadesh3.png[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 11:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Curatorie5.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Curatorie5.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


Image:800px-Alghero capocaccia.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Please note that if you won't provide a valid license in 7 days your image will be delated and if you upload a lot of images without licenses you may be blocked from editing wikimedia-commons. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)


Image:NuragheSant'Antine.Sezione.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Shardan!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


File:Nuraghe2i.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Nuraghe2i.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Marcok (talk) 18:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Categorizzare correttamente[edit]

Ciao Shardan. Ho visto che alla foto della roccia ad elefante hai aggiunto la categoria "Sardinia". Questo è sbagliato. Il sistema delle Categorie non è globale, ma gerarchico. Si va da categorie sempre più generiche (sopra-categorie), verso categorie sempre più specifiche (sotto-categorie). La categoria che va messa è quella più specifica possibile. Quello che devi fare è controllare che la categoria specifica in cui vuoi inserire la tua foto sia collegata a ritroso in una catena di categorie sempre più generiche, e che questa catena sia corretta. Nel caso specifico: se per questa foto della roccia ad elefante di Castelsardo esiste la Category:Elephant rock of Castelsardo, che è una sottocategoria di "Castelsardo", che è una sottocategoria di "Municipalities in province of Sassari", che è una sottocategoria di "Sardinia", che è una sottocategoria di "Regions of Italy", che è una sottocategoria di "Italy", NON è necessario che tu metta tutte queste categorie, perchè così facendo tu appesantisci solo (inutilmente) tutto il sistema e in modo particolare queste categorie generiche con soggetti specifici che sono già collocati al posto giusto altrove. Categorie generiche debbono avere solo sotto-categorie e non immagini. Infatti se tu clicchi ad es. la Category:Sardinia, ci troverai tutte le sue varie voci e categorie specifiche più l'ingombro di foto non categorizzate (che qui non servono a nessuno perchè nessuno se le verrà a cercare), comprese quelle che tu hai aggiunto (che già stanno altrove, in Castelsardo). Aggiungere una o più categorie ad una foto non è privo di conseguenze, ma significa che essa comparirà in tutte quelle categorie che avrai messo; e insalate di ogni genere di foto che figurano in categorie generiche non servono proprio a nessuno, e difatti vanno smantellate e non incrementate (come del resto viene detto nell'avviso). Chi cerca una chiesa di Castelsardo la cercherà sotto Castelsardo e non sotto Sardinia. Altre categorie vanno aggiunte solo quando si trovano fuori dalla catena (p. es. per una chiesa di un determinato paese, la categoria di rimando ad un artista; o una categoria storica; ecc.). Spero di averti chiarito il sistema. Ciao! --DenghiùComm (talk) 18:18, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Ciao Shardan. Mi fa piacere che sorridi al mio nome, perchè quando l'ho scelto era proprio quello lo scopo (non bisogna mai prendersi troppo sul serio...!). Quanto al sistema delle categorie, anch'io all'inizio non ci capivo una mazza; poi un po' per problemi reali di immagini mal-categorizzate, e un po' con l'aiuto e la correzione di altri, ora ne sono diventato quasi un esperto, tanto che da giugno sono impegnato in questa opera colossale di riordino di tutta l'Italia (per ora solo i comuni, province, regioni e frazioni; più in là passeremo ad altri marasmi quali sono gli stemmi, le carte geografiche, la geografia, ecc.), al punto che gli amministratori mi volevano eleggere nel loro gruppo (incarico e potere che per ora ho rifiutato...). Allora per ritornare alle categorie voglio precisarti: devi distinguere tra Foto e Categorie. Le foto - come ti ho già detto - debbono essere categorizzate nella categoria più specifica possibile; se questa manca, o tu la crei, o tu categorizzi la foto nella categoria generica subito superiore. P.es. la foto di un vicolo di un comune va categorizzata in [Category:NomeDiQuelComune] oppure in [Category:NomeDellaProvincia in cui rientra quel comune]. Per una Categoria invece le relative categorie debbono essere almeno due: quella generica immediatamente superiore, e quella specifica immediatamente inferiore. In tal modo per una categoria garantisci il collegamento in catena delle sopra- e delle sotto-categorie. Per i comuni italiani - ti ripeto - sto concludendo il riordino globale, quindi per te la categorizzazione non dovrebbe presentare problemi: basta che prendi un comune parallelo della stessa provincia, lo apri e ci copi-incolli le stesse categorie. Comunque per la Sardegna non ti preoccupare, perché già l'ho tutta sistemata e verificato che le relative catene siano corrette. Le regioni (e relative province e comuni) che NON ho ancora riordinato sono: Toscana, Umbria, Lombardia, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Veneto; quindi se devi fare dei copia-incolla, usa tutte le altre regioni ma non queste. Se ti viene difficile capire che catena vi è per un determinato argomento, basta che tu le esplori cliccando sulle sopra- e sulle sotto-categorie di quella stessa categoria, che troverai sempre in fondo alla pagina. Così ho imparato io il sistema: scegli una categoria che ti piace e sali sempre più sù in categorie sempre più generiche, oppure scendi sempre più giù in categorie sempre più specifiche. Riguardo invece la cancellazione di foto, questa non ti è data (come non è permessa a me, almeno fino a quando non mi daranno i poteri di un admin): la cancellazione va richiesta. Se si tratta di una categoria, semplicemente crei la nuova categoria con il nome giusto, ci passi tutto il suo contenuto, e una volta svuotata completamente la vecchia categoria, per questa richiedi la cancellazione immediata scrivendoci in cima fra doppie parentesi graffe bad name|nome corretto della nuova categoria. Per una foto ti conviene anche ricaricarla in modo giusto e per quella sbagliata scriverci in cima fra doppie parentesi graffe duplicate|nome della foto corretta oppure di nuovo usare il bad name. Se hai altri dubbi, fammi sapere. Buon lavoro! --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 21:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)


File:100px-Pisa-Stemma.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:100px-Pisa-Stemma.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Quibik (talk) 16:34, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Piena del Tevere[edit]

Ciao Shardan. Ho trovato questa tua foto che mostra una piena del Tevere. Poichè non vi hai indicato la data dello scatto, ma l'hai caricata nel 2009, mi chiedevo se per caso non si trattasse della piena del dicembre 2008. Qualora tu confermassi questa cosa, potresti per favore sostituire l'attuale categoria generica "Category:Floods of Tiber" con quella più specifica di "Floods of Tiber december 2008" ? Te ne sarei molto grato. Se invece si dovesse trattare di una piena di un altro anno, allora lascia tutto così. Ciao e grazie! --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:50, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Grazie Shardan. Almeno "storicizziamo" le acque...! ;-D Mi sono permesso di precisare la descrizione. --DenghiùComm (talk) 21:12, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Stolen Picture[edit]

Hi,

Just wanted to let you know that your picture http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Snob_food.jpg is being used on http://www.culinaryschools.org/yum/forbidden-fruit/ in violation of your license, except if you have given them permission. Cheers --Piksou (talk) 15:29, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

They actually cite wikipedia at the bottom, but that is not even close of what the licence requires. I am no expert in terms of legal rights, maybe you could find some help on the Commons Commons:Village pump. The first step is probably to e-mail them, complain and request at the very least a proper credit with your name. --Piksou (talk) 08:13, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

File:DomusJanas6.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DomusJanas6.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pill (talk) 00:54, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

File:PozzoPedrucanopoli1.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PozzoPedrucanopoli1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pill (talk) 16:29, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token 7e128fac8faae6896efc7f24f7658462[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

7e128fac8faae6896efc7f24f7658462

File:ArciereNuragico1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


File:Pugilatore1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)


File:Head of warrior from Bulzi (Sardinia).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:43, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CollageXmonteprama.jpg[edit]

Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:CollageXmonteprama.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Yann (talk) 11:49, 24 December 2012 (UTC)