User talk:Shustov

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Shustov!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Shustov!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:14, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


All images except the last one have been categorized. The last image is erroneous and should be deleted but I do not know how. Can anybody help me, please? Thanks, Shustov (talk) 06:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Municipa Services Building.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

This image was vandalized by an intruder who sneaked under my user name. I have restored the information. Shustov (talk) 21:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Municipal Services Building-2.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

This image was vandalized by an intruder who sneaked under my user name. I could not restore the information but will try later. Shustov (talk) 21:36, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Municipal Services Building-2.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:14, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

This image was vandalized by an intruder who sneaked under my user name. I could not restore the information but will try later. Shustov (talk) 21:42, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Municipal Services Building-3.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:26, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

This image was vandalized by an intruder who sneaked under my user name. I have restored the information. Shustov (talk) 21:43, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Upstream fitness[edit]

Hi Shustov. Why are you categorizing under category:Upstream fitness ancient sculptures which have nothing to do with upstream fitness, whatever this may be? Also, this cat description looks a bit too much like advertising. "Upstream fitness" does not yield significant hits on Google except for what I assume is your own webpage, http://www.ecs.csun.edu/~shustov/Upstream_Fitness.htm. Please note that the Commons should not be used for self-promotion. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 09:47, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Justrow. In this category, the ancient sculptures play the role of the male fitness standards established by the ancient Greek and Roman Gods and heroes. I know little about "significant hits on Google" but most of the images from the Category:Upstream fitness have been used in Wikipedia articles; see, e.g., w:ru:Приседания, w:el:Αθλητισμός, w:es:Equilibriocepción, w:pt:Aptidão física. Best, Shustov (talk) 23:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The pictures themselves are very useful, but I have some doubt about the usefulness of the category. Concerning Greek and Roman statues, I understand what you mean, buy fitness is not necessarily "upstream fitness". And say I add category:Proper bowels function to every picture depicting a healthy person? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 08:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
As you said, the fitness is not necessarily "upstream fitness". The last one has some specific features, namely: it targets, primarily, a human body physical performance (not a person's weight, its look or anything of the kind) and it fits, mostly, mature or aged individuals. The non-sculptural images in Upstream fitness have a dual value. On one hand, they depict rather ordinary sportive exercises and may be included in a number of related categories; on the other hand, those exercises are, to some extent, unique as been performed by a senior over 65 and, therefore, should be attributed just to Upstream fitness. Shustov (talk) 20:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
As it appears that Jastrow's concerns have not been resolved, I have nominated the category for deletion. TenOfAllTrades (talk) 02:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)


Category:Upstream fitness[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Upstream fitness has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Alleged misbehavior by TenOfAllTrades[edit]

A senior citizen in trying to slow down his process of aging by physical fitness exercises
Exercise programs such as Tai Chi are promoted by gerontologists to improve health in old age.

Case 1. At 08:01, 24 December 2008, User:Shustov added the left image from Categories: Gerontology | Fitness | Fitness training for seniors to the article Gerontology.

At 14:59, 5 November 2009, TenOfAllTrades removed the image with the inscription “rv banned editor”.

In less than an hour, at 15:46, 5 November 2009, User:Zach425 substituted the removed image with the one to the right from Category: Tai Chi Chuan.

As the matter of fact, the Wikipedia List of banned users [1] does not contain User:Shustov in it.

Due to foregoing, it looks like TenOfAllTrades created its private blacklist which, apparently, has been implemented in Wikipedia rather successfully (see the cases to follow).



Snapshot of a 65-year old elderly person practicing some special fitness technique
Physical fitness is an attribute required for service in virtually all military forces.

Case 2. At 20:06, 18 December 2008, User:Shustov added the left image from Categories: Gerontology | Fitness | Fitness training for seniors to the article Physical fitness.

At 13:59, 4 January 2009, TenOfAllTrades removed it with the summary “remove excess decorative image” but retained another image from Categories: 2000s swimwear | People of the United States Marine Corps | Sportspeople from the United States | Triathlon | Young men | Men of the United States | Male toplessness | Running shown to the right.

As the only image option for the article on physical fitness, it rather glorifies the United States Marine Corps special military training in general and Lance Corporal Anthony M. Madonia toplessness in particular than illustrates anything else.


Case 3. At 17:53, 19 December 2008, User:Shustov added the left image above from Categories: Exercise | Challenges to physical balance | Gerontology | Fitness | Fitness training for seniors to the article Vestibular system. At 03:32, 19 October 2009, TenOfAllTrades removed the image as “superfluous decorative image (?!)


An old man practicing weight training for physical fitness at gym
An elderly practicing some longevity fitness technique

Case 4. At 00:49, 24 December 2008, User:Shustov added the image on the left of an old man practicing weight training from Categories: Weight training | Gerontology | Fitness | Fitness training for seniors to the article Weight training.

At 03:34, 19 October 2009, TenOfAllTrades removed it as “superfluous, promotional image”.

The “promotional” of what, by the way? Does it promote any services or goods? Does it contains any names of people or businesses?


Case 5. At 20:37, 28 May 2009, User:69.108.101.89 added the right image from Categories: Exercise | Challenges to physical balance | Gerontology | Fitness | Fitness training for seniors to the article Longevity.

At 22:00, 28 May 2009, TenOfAllTrades removed the image without explanation.


At gym: a senior citizen's jumping for physical fitness exercise

Case 6. At 01:56, 24 December 2008, User:Shustov added the left image from Categories: Exercise | Acrobatics | Gerontology | Fitness | Fitness training for seniors to the article Jumping.

At 00:51, 4 September 2009, User:Mokele performed “Replacing image with much better one, illustrating frog joint addition and bone elongation”. Apropos, the “much better” in the sense of what? The taste?


A senior practicing equipoise

Case 7. At 22:46, 27 December 2008, User:Shustov added the right image from Categories: Exercise | Acrobatics | Gerontology | Fitness | Asana | Fitness training for seniors to the article Equipoise .

At 03:28, 19 October 2009, TenOfAllTrades removed the image as “decorative, promotional image” (?!).

At 18:38, 24 October 2009, User:79.67.66.242 undid the previous edit.

At 18:55, 24 October 2009, User:DMacks removed the image again.

At 16:45, 29 October 2009, User:69.108.112.170 restored that image.

At 16:57, 29 October 2009, TenOfAllTrades reverted edits by User:69.108.112.170.

At 01:48, 3 November 2009, User:ExplosiveArsenal reverted edits by TenOfAllTrades.

At 01:49, 3 November 2009, User:Glane23 (apparently, a sock-puppet of TenOfAllTrades) reverted edits by User:ExplosiveArsenal.

Will anybody help me to cleanup those articles, please? Thanks, Shustov (talk) 23:06, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Discussion of this matter may be found at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Shustov_v._TenOfAllTrades.[2] Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Withdraw your personal attacks[edit]

Wikimedia Commons is not a platform from which you can engage in misguided, factually-inaccurate personal attacks on other editors. Please withdraw the accusations, misstatements, and insults which you have posted here and on Category talk:Fitness training for seniors, or I will ask for you to be sanctioned here as well. TenOfAllTrades (talk) 02:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

If you mean my above topic is not accurate, please, point out what particular facts presented there you believe are not true and we will discuss them. By the way, if you wish to discuss the topic above, it would be more relevant to do it just there. Shustov (talk) 09:31, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
On enwiki, there is an excellent short essay titled You spat in my soup!. Your post above, and your response here, is an excellent example of what this essay talks about. Your claims are offensive and insulting, and throughout make wild and unsubstantiated assertions of conspiracy and sockpuppetry. I don't think it should be necessary for me to explain to you yet again that you're the inventor and sole proponent of your "Upstream Fitness" program and that your efforts to promote it across all the different language Wikipedias are unwelcome. Nor should it be necessary for me to explain again that you are banned from English Wikipedia for an ongoing pattern of disruptive behaviour and self-promotion, and that you are not permitted to edit (or worse, to edit war) to reinsert your content and pictures there, whether your are logged in or not.
The only thing that your statement above (and the duplicate post to Category talk:Fitness training for seniors, which I've already removed as inappropriate) demonstrates is your continued fantasy of persecution, your ongoing evasion of your enwiki block, and an assortment of violations of core user conduct policies: w:WP:NPA, w:WP:AGF, w:WP:CIV. These problems were explained to you at length on the English Wikipedia; you ignored the concerns and got yourself banned there. Remove or withdraw your offensive post, unless you genuinely believe that it does not violate the policies linked. If you truly can't see a problem with your message here, then my next post will be to this site's admin's noticeboard — we will have reached an impasse that requires outside intervention to resolve. TenOfAllTrades (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Let’s leave your You spat in my soup! alone. By now, you have refuted NONE of the facts presented in seven (7) cases of my comments. On the other hand, you are stating above: “…you're the inventor and sole proponent of your "Upstream Fitness" program”. Am I? Where did you find this information? Shustov (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, that was an unfortunate response. I have offered a detailed explanation of the situation. Please be aware that – in the future – it is considered an essential courtesy to notify editors when you make complaints (spurious and absurd or not) about them on a noticeboard. TenOfAllTrades (talk) 00:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Seriously, just stop. I've asked for administrators here to review your conduct. If you wish to make a comment, please offer a concise, evidence-based statement at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Concerns about Shustov. TenOfAllTrades (talk) 02:20, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Discussion of this matter may be found at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Shustov_v._TenOfAllTrades.[3] Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Revenons à nos moutons[edit]

Revenons à nos moutons (it is not a personal attack, just a French idiom; see, e.g., [4]). Namely: let’s talk about the alleged misbehavior by User:TenOfAllTrades in creating and implementing his private blacklist for Wikiwedia Commons images. If anybody wants to discuss my alleged "personal attacks", "self-promotion" or whatever, let's do it separately. Shustov (talk) 19:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Discussion of this matter may be found at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Shustov_v._TenOfAllTrades.[5] Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Shustov, you've posted above and at COM:AN/V. Please do as you've agreed and discuss this matter on the latter page. Reposting in User:TenOfAllTrades's user space after s/he removed your post and requested that you to not do so seems intended not to communicate, but provoke, since you know that TenOfAllTrades and others have read and responded to your comment. Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Walter Siegmund: I will fallow your advice. Shustov (talk) 20:42, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Shustov; allegations of bad behavior on other wikis is not a matter pertinent to Commons.[6] Consequently, further allegations of misbehavior by TenOfAllTrades, Finnrind, or other administrators on projects other than Commons, posted on Commons, may be a blocking reason here. New threads of this sort may be speedily closed. The proper forum may be m:Meta:Babel. However, I think that you would be well-advised to desist in your allegations of misbehavior and instead embrace the advice given you by Finnrind.[7] Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:45, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Walter Siegmund: It is just you not me who renamed my initial entry as "Alleged misbehavior by TenOfAllTrades". Further, you reduced the title to "Shustov v. TenOfAllTrades" as if it were my personal attack on innocent TenOfAllTrades; see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism#Shustov_v._TenOfAllTrades. Actually, my sincere intention was a fair discussion only; see [8], please. Again, it was just me who called everybody: "Let us stop pointing fingers" which was even the title of our discussion sub-section that was originated by me. Later, you changed the title for "File renaming and crosswiki image spamming". If you believe the proper forum for the "alleged vandalism by TenOfAllTrades", which is my point, and the alleged "crosswiki image spamming" by me, which is your point, may be a project other than Commons, why shouldn’t you transfer the problem to their attention? Thanks, Shustov (talk) 23:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry that you disagree with some of my actions. I choose not to act for you in this matter since I think that you would be well-advised to desist in your allegations of misbehavior and instead embrace the advice given you by Finnrind.[9] You've been warned to drop this matter on Commons; allegations of bad behavior on other wikis is not pertinent to Commons. Thank you, Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors on your userpage. I have removed your allegation.[10] Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

I agree with you in general: my userpage is actually not the best place for information like this. However, your allegedly attacked "editor" is persistently removing some of my image editing in Wikipedia after misusing his administrative privileges and disabling my ability to get engaged in a civilized discussion of the matter. I am not an attacker in this case, I am just on the defense mode. Shustov (talk) 20:15, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Do not attack editors on your userpage, and do not attack editors on your talk page or anywhere else. Your attempt to do so in your response is unfortunate and you would be well-advised to desist. Walter Siegmund (talk) 06:39, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Re: your edit to File:RRBargeSlipHeadworks.JPG.

I have no real idea whether the image belongs in Category:Earthquake engineering. I did not add that category as your edit summary suggests, I simply left it alone.

I cannot imagine, though, why you re-added the categories I removed. No individual image belongs directly in Category:Buildings by function or Category:Architecture by style (let alone putting two copies of the latter on the same photo).

I am perfectly happy with the removal of Category:Earthquake engineering, which I will leave alone, but these other categories I am removing again. - Jmabel ! talk 00:57, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

I am happy with you! Shustov (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


File tagging File:Collapsed_Cathedrale_of_Port-au-Prince.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Collapsed_Cathedrale_of_Port-au-Prince.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Collapsed_Cathedrale_of_Port-au-Prince.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

MGA73 (talk) 12:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

First image is licensed "All rights reserved". It is not the same image as the one you link to. Am I missing something? :-) --MGA73 (talk) 20:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
  • I see there: Additional Information - Attribution - Share Alike - Some rights reserved. It looks all right for me. Isn't it? Shustov (talk) 20:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
  • You are right, File:Collapsed_Cathedrale_of_Port-au-Prince.jpg should be deleted. Thanks! Shustov (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Elevated_highway_that_collapsed_in_Santiago.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Elevated_highway_that_collapsed_in_Santiago.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 12:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

I found out in http://www.flickr.com/photos/rlinfati/4397623227/in/set-72157623408423599/ that the author rlinfati gave his permission under conditions Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic. What is the problem? Shustov (talk) 18:59, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Residents_look_at_a_collapsed_building_in_Concepcion.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Residents_look_at_a_collapsed_building_in_Concepcion.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 12:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

In all fairness: it's not your fault. The Flickr user mistakenly licensed these as CC-BY-SA; these images of the Chilean earthquake are not his. See here, where he gives the sources. All of these are AP photos. Lupo 13:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
I followed your link and found out in http://www.flickr.com/photos/rlinfati/4398395558/in/set-72157623408423599/ that the author rlinfati gave his permission under conditions Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic. What is the problem? Shustov (talk) 18:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
Linfati can't give permission for photos that s/he did not take and to which he does not hold the copyright. Please look at the links under "Photos taked from:" in the upper left column.[11] Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
The image originally entitled "22 Residents look at a collapsed building in Concepcion" was uploaded to Flickr on March 1, 2010 by Rodrigo Linfati with the note: "Attribution-Share-Alike-Some rights reserved" (see the links above). Isn't this enough for a legitimate upload of the image to Commons? Shustov (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
It is photo 22 on the Boston Globe website and is identified as an AP photo.[12] Which site do you think is more credible? It is dated February 27. Rodrigo Linfati uploaded the image on March 1 and cited the Boston Globe website as the source of the photographs. No, it does not suffice that it was uploaded by Rodrigo Linfati with the note: "Attribution-Share-Alike-Some rights reserved". Please use good judgment. Walter Siegmund (talk) 01:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Tsunami Thailand-3.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tsunami Thailand-3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Walter Siegmund (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

This image is my own work of choosing a snapshot from the US government supported research video (see http://www.youtube.com/user/neesit, "Tsunami by NEESit"). Would you mind explaining your deletion, please? Shustov (talk) 23:03, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
The file was deleted by Oxam Hartog (talk · contribs).[13] It is a screen capture from near 1:14 in http://www.youtube.com/user/zairox#p/u/7/w9ygYqj4rVM. It is attributed to zairox at the website you cite. You have provided no evidence that it is a "US government supported research video".[14] Even if it were, that would not suffice. Only if it were the work of a US government employee as part of his/her duties would the result be {{PD-USGov}}. In no case does capturing an image or cropping it make it your work. Only if the resulting work contains a trivial amount of the copyrighted work may it be allowable (please see en:De minimis). Hence, the license you chose, {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}, is not correct. You may find Commons:Village_pump_archive-28#Common_Misconception helpful, also.
Most of the pictures and video that you find on the Web is not allowable on Commons. Please review COM:CB, and if you are not sure that a file is allowable, please ask at COM:VP before uploading it. This particular image was of such poor quality that it was arguably not useful, i.e., out of COM:SCOPE.
If you review this information and think that a deletion was incorrect, you may request undeletion. Walter Siegmund (talk) 00:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Act of baptizing.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:22, 10 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Act of baptizing by immersion.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Aerobics Oz Style - Clip 13.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Aerobics Oz Style - Clip 13.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Tabercil (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Whose right is violated here, please? Shustov (talk) 04:42, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Read Commons:Image casebook#Internet images - unless there is a clear statement indicating the material is copyright-free, we must assume it is copyrighted. Tabercil (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
As far as I remember, the file was marked with
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
  • share alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

GNU head Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License.

You may select the license of your choice.

. Is it no good? Shustov (talk) 04:57, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


Hi Shustov, do you have the explicit consent of the parents of the child shown in File:Morning beat.JPG to publish this photo? --Túrelio (talk) 07:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Is my consent as a grand-parent good enough? Shustov (talk) 07:38, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Likely. But in order to prevent repeated questions such as mine, I would recommend to put a hint into the description, provided you have no privacy problems with this. --Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Earthquake_Shelter.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Earthquake_Shelter.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diego Grez return fire 03:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

The file is not a subject of copyright violation because it is a snapshot from the video demo of the US government sponsored organization NEES (see also en:NEES, The George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation) which is in the public domain in the United States. The profile of the video from http://www.youtube.com/user/neesit#play/user/F297EF2ADDEAD86C/19/Yss4vn6ERj8 is presented below.
PROFILE OF THE VIDEO:
Name: NEEScomm
Channel Views: 15,989
Total Upload Views: 1,214,506
Joined: February 12, 2007
Last Visit Date: 4 months ago
Subscribers: 281
Website: http://www.nees.org
George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation
Cyberinfrastructure Center | NEEScomm | NEEScomm IT | Purdue University
Hometown: West Lafayette, IN
Country: United States
Shustov (talk) 10:28, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
US-government-sponsored != Work of the US federal government. There's a huge difference between them. Diego Grez return fire 21:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Nevertheless, under the Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR), general data rights clause (FAR 52.227-14), the government has unlimited rights in all data first produced in performance of or delivered under a contract, unless the contractor asserts a claim to copyright or the contract provides otherwise. Shustov (talk) 04:43, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Kashiwazaki_nuclear_plant.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kashiwazaki_nuclear_plant.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prince Kassad (talk) 17:22, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

I wonder: what is the Prince's reason for deletion? Shustov (talk) 00:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
You may join the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kashiwazaki nuclear plant.jpg. Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:02, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Earthquake_Shelter.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Earthquake_Shelter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diego Grez return fire 01:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Bldg 1ssss.gif[edit]

Hallo Shustov, thanks for uploading File:Bldg 1ssss.gif. I guess it is drawn by you, isn't it? At the home page you cite as source there is a higher resolution version - can you upload it here as a new file version (the link is near the bottom of the file page). Or did you intentionally only upload a low-res version here? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:47, 7 November 2011 (UTC) You forgot to answer. :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:00, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry for not responding earlier. You are right: I uploaded a low-res file intentionally but you can find a better one here: http://www.ecs.csun.edu/~shustov/CME_research.htm . Best! Shustov (talk) 07:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi Shustov, thanks for answering! May I know the reason for uploading a low-res here? Is it a technical reason or do you just not want to freely license the full version (which would be okay, of course)? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 12:46, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
I did it. Please, see my User page. Shustov (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
the big one scaled down
Ah, nice - but .. ehm..., sorry, next question: is there a need for a separate file? Usually we do not keep several versions of the same image since the bigger image can be easily adjusted in size. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:03, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
I have changed the sizes where I could but there is still the area out my reach now with the files in use listed here: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bldg_1ssss.gif. Would you mind to perform the nessessary changes there by yourself, please? Thanks. Shustov (talk) 09:13, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
A similar area is also here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bldg_1sss.gif. Shustov (talk) 09:17, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Damn, sorry for the word, I really did not want you to replace the file links since that was totally unnecessary. We could have simply uploaded the bigger version as a new file version under the name File:Bldg 1ssss.gif. Hmm... So, sorry for the work you had now, this really wasn't intended by my question.
I have replaced (they were in simple:Template:Earthquake engineering) the remaining uses (software takes some time to refresh) now, added some info from the old file page to the new one and deleted the small duplicate. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Pool jumping.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pool jumping.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 20:15, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Pool jumping.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pool jumping.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 16:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

File:To-seismic-sustainability-through-earthquake-protector.gif[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:To-seismic-sustainability-through-earthquake-protector.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diego Grez return fire 21:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)== File:To-seismic-sustainability-through-earthquake-protector.gif ==

Pay attention to copyright
File:To-seismic-sustainability-through-earthquake-protector.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diego Grez return fire 21:20, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 14:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)