TUSC token a336e1d8433e90553d4a6c3a4cadd840 
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 1d5fb4bdfbc111cb0596e4fcaac9bae2 
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Canadian Register of Historic Places Template 
Thanks for taking the time to create this template.
Canadian Registrar Canadian Register of Historic Places Parks Canada.
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot
Category:Paintings in the Canadian War Museum 
|Hello, Skeezix1000. You have new messages at Labattblueboy#Category:Paintings_in_the_Canadian_War_Museum's talk page.
Bloor Street bridges 
|Hello, Skeezix1000. You have new messages at Russavia's talk page.
Chapel(s) Royal 
Sorry, I had advanced brain fade at around 2 am my time, couldn't think what to do with the top of the category or where to seek help or . . . . so Thanks. You want Chapel Royal to be unused because you think it better that the name (plural) matches that in Wikipedia? regards, Eddaido (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- Not a very good name: fr:Chapelle royale: attracting problems. --Foroa (talk) 08:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Union Railway Depot 
I am only here sporadically, so I'm not sure if I'm doing this right -- please bear with me if this isn't the place to leave a message.
On 27 March I uploaded an 1894 architectural drawing for the previous incarnation of Toronto's Union Station. I uploaded the image to wikimedia commons and added it to the "Original Union Station (Toronto)" page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_Union_Station_%28Toronto%29
Today I went to the "Original Union Station (Toronto)" page, but the architectural drawing I'd uploaded was gone. All that was there was the alt text which appeared to be a link. I clicked on the link, but instead of taking me to the drawing it took me to an upload page. I assumed that meant I had messed up somehow when I uploaded the drawing, so I uploaded it again.
It was only after I was done that I discovered your earlier version of the drawing and the notice of the deletion.
You can probably understand why my version required a fair bit of digital clean-up if you see where it came from: http://archive.org/stream/canadianarchitec02onta#page/n358/mode/1up
Your image may well be cleaner, but I think my resolution is higher. I'll leave it with you to decide if you are going to delete my version of the drawing again. If you do, please ne sure to add your image to the "Original Union Station (Toronto)" page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_Union_Station_%28Toronto%29
- You are correct. I am not a graphics person, so they looked like duplicates to me, except yours had not been cleaned up (and everything else being equal, we usually keep the version of a drawing uploaded first, regardless of who uploaded it). I always do check to see if an image is being used before deleting it, but this time I either missed it (or deleted it shortly after you added it to en.wiki as there can be a lag time). Having looked at them again, your upload sufficiently different (other than just clean-up) that we should keep both. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. Sorry for any incovenience. Skeezix1000 (talk) 15:08, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
a heads-up 
In 2011 you participated in Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb_(de-adminship 2). That discussion ended with User:Jcb losing his administrator privileges.
This note is to inform you that User:Odder proposed Jcb have unconconditional access to administrator privileges restored.
Commons:Administrators/Requests/Jcb (readmin) is scheduled to close on May 20th.