User talk:Smell U Later

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Smell U Later!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

File:1В12.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:1В12.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 16:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:2C21_Обжимка.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2C21_Обжимка.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:2C21_Обжимка.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 16:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


File tagging File:Zhalo01m.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Zhalo01m.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zhalo01m.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 23b089ed39fd95adecef092a816e3ca7[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Object_563.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Object_563.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 18:34, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

File:1K17 Szhatie.jpg[edit]

Hello, I think you not read carefully yet, the author already allow to use his picture in Copyright Policy in license cc-by-sa-3.0. I can understand why you put that template in picture outright because I member in here to and I know many picutre upload to commons recently have a "weird" info and we don't have time to read them all, so just let think this never happen when the discussed close, I'm a patrol member too you know. Nice to met another member who always want keep Wikipedia clean.Tnt1984 (talk) 08:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

I answered in discussion thread. I read that lincense, and many files from this blog (because of strange license) were deleted from Commons... Best regards, Smell U Later (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

File:ZRK Sosna.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ZRK Sosna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.2.55.213 12:20, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

File:ASU-76.jpg[edit]

Hello!

If you transfer images from picasa to Commons, please do not fprget to insert the {{picasareview}}-tag. This is very essential for keepting this image for a longer time. Thank you for your support!

You can use this tool for creating a complete structure.

Regards, High Contrast (talk) 23:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't knew that. Thank you :). Smell U Later (talk) 07:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Непонятная гусеничная машина РВиА Польши[edit]

Święto Wojsk Rakietowych i Artylerii 2012. Regina.jpg

Здравствуйте. Вот это что за чудо на шасси, видимо, ПТ-76, не знаете? Заранее спасибо. СЗОТ, но что вы знаете по поводу 152-мм гаубицы обр. 1930, которую в Мотовилихе называли «КМ»? Черновик 2-го тома НПСВК не предлагать, некоторые данные оттуда противоречат имеющимся фактам. Вот вам фотка для затравки: [1]. С уважением, Ain92 (talk) 17:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Шасси не ПТ-76. Шасси - LPG (модифицированная база 2С1 польского производства). Судя по количеству антенн и командирской башенке - это какая-то командно-штабная машина. По поводу гаубицы увы, ничего такого я не знаю :(. С уважением, Smell U Later (talk) 07:21, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Если верить ен-вики, получается КШМка для 155-мм САУ "Краб". А в архивах завода у вас случаем знакомых нет? Ain92 (talk) 10:37, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
    • Вполне возможно. Тем более, что на фото подписано, что это РВиА Польши. Проблема не в наличии знакомств, а в том, что там нифига не найти, очень тяжело искать по старым системам вообще хоть что-то, особенно довоенным. С уважением, Smell U Later (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
      • Поправка: строго говоря, не КШМ, а КМУ. Печалька. Как вы считаете, это связано с плохой организацией, нежеланием фирмы нормально финансировать архив или какими-то объективными причинами? Не знаете, в РГАЭ по тем же темам искать инфу проще? Я просто, проводя небольшое исследование, де-факто открыл доселе практически неизвестное исторической науке орудие Второй Мировой (и тут же умер от скромности Clin). Когда оформлю результаты в виде поста в ru-artillery, сообщу вам на почту. С уважением, Ain92 (talk) 20:11, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
        • Ну если плохая организация и нежелание/невозможность финансирования - это необъективные причины, то других нету. В специализированных архивах инфу на мой взгляд искать легче. С уважением, Smell U Later (talk) 10:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)