User talk:Spiridon Ion Cepleanu

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Spiridon Ion Cepleanu!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Contents

Carte de la Dobroudja[edit]

Bonjour Spiridon,

Je n'ai pas très bien compris ton message : peux-tu me donner le lien vers l'autre carte de la Dobroudja qui existe déjà ?

Si tu veux m'envoyer une pièce jointe par e-mail, je crois qu'il n'y a pas d'autre solution que de répondre au courriel que je t'ai envoyé à l'instant.

En tout cas, c'est comme ça qu'on a fait avec celui qui avait inséré la légende et les noms en alphabet latin dans la carte. Et moi, j'ai transcrit les noms à partir du bulgare, donc en faisant les mêmes erreurs que Plamen Tzvetkov ? Aïe, aïe, aïe, la honte !!!

PS : Le petit animal n'est pas un triton mais un gecko :-DD

--Moumine 15:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Voilà, j'ai téléchargé la nouvelle version de la carte ; c'était bien ça qu'il fallait faire ? Encore un détail, je n'ai pas d'atlas sous la main, mais es-tu sûr que Constantsa s'écrit comme ça en roumain ? J'y comprends rien, mais je crois qu'en fait Plamen n'a pas transcrit, la mauvaise orthographe en roumain est tout de ma faute - lui n'a fait "que" dessiner la version originale en bulgare.
Pour le reste, je te répondrai par courriel :))
--Moumine 17:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:S.M.R.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Marmatia.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:22, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Nos Kaliakra.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Re: your email[edit]

First of all: I'm not an expert myself... And I don't speak French, sorry.

On the description page of every image is (or should be) a template, where you can add the description (in "description=" and other data about the image.
The date must be the date of creating the picture.
Put your name (or better: a link to your user page) after "author=".
I can't answer your questions about licensing: if it's your own work, simply add "PD-Self" to "permission=". Otherwise, you might ask here. - Erik Baas 23:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Jules Perahim[edit]

Bonjour Teofilo,

Les tableaux de Jules Perahim proviennent de ma collection d'images perso, je le connaissais personnellement, j'étais allé chez lui rue des Pyrénées à Paris. Au départ c'étaient des photos argentiques, puis j'ai tout scanné en entré en informatique.

D'autres images de ces tableaux circulent: certaines sur des sites qui en vendent, d'autres sur les sites des musées qui en possèdent.

Où est le problème ?

Cordialement, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 12:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Généralement, les droits de reproduction n'appartiennent pas au collectionneur, mais aux héritiers de l'artiste. Hier une personne a tenté de participer à l'article francophone sur Jules Perahim, et à la fin de sa contribution il était écrit : « Perahim est affilié à la société de droits d’auteur ADAGP. Les droits intellectuels, moraux et patrimoniaux de l’artiste appartiennent à son épouse Marina Vanci-Perahim, historienne de l’art, professeur émérite Université de Paris I – Panthéon Sorbonne. » (voir fr:Discuter:Jules Perahim). J'imagine que les musées qui publient des reproductions sous forme de cartes postales ou sous forme de pages sur internet doivent avoir obtenu l'autorisation de le faire auprès de l'ADAGP, probablement en payant ce qu'il faut payer en matière de droits d'auteurs. Teofilo (talk) 13:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
J'imagine que Jules Perahim vous a autorisé à prendre une photo pour votre usage personnel, mais pas pour diffuser la photographie sur internet. Si c'était le cas il vous aurait signé un document écrit vous autorisant à le faire. Teofilo (talk) 14:02, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Qu'il en soit ainsi ! L'ironique résultat est que dans l'article français, seul pourra figurer son horrible boulot de propagande stalinienne impersonnel ! le pire de lui ! Communisme + capitalisme = matérialisme, art zéro... Sp.M.

File:Alexandru_Ioan_Cuza.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alexandru_Ioan_Cuza.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alex:D (talk) 01:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

Păi dacă e aşa, de ce nu ai spus în descrierea imaginii că tu ai făcut-o? --Alex:D (talk) 15:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Dacă iei o imagine PD şi o modifici, ai dreptul să pui orice licenţă pe ce rezultă. Dacă imaginea e cu CC, GFDL, atunci trebuie păstrată licenţa. --Alex:D (talk) 23:17, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Harta cu insulele de pe Dunăre[edit]

O să te rog să modifici licenţa şi informaţiile imaginii File:Contested Islands between Romania and Ukraine.jpg întrucât originalul, creat de mine, are dublă licenţă: GFDL şi CC-Attribution-Sharealike, ceea ce înseamnă că trebuie să păstrezi licenţa şi să mă menţionezi ca autor iniţial.

În altă ordine de idei, harta ta arată foarte bine, păcat că nu ai realizat-o măcar ca PNG. --Alex:D (talk) 20:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

  • Din motive de ignoranta tehnica nu am inscris-o cum trebuie, intre timp am mai progresat, voi incerca sa fac cum spui. Mersi !--Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 14:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Marmatia.jpg[edit]

You marked File:Marmatia.jpg as your own work, and released it as {{PD-self}}, but it looks like a reworking of an old map (probably old enough to be public domain, but it still needs to be attributed clearly). Could you please correct the source information? Thanks. - Jmabel ! talk 23:43, 10 November 2009 (UTC)

Sure !

Answer: File:Marmatia.jpg is a scan from the Stieler's Hand-Atlas, map n° 18 (Austro-Hungary sheet 2), Ed.: Justus Perthes, Gotha, Germany, 1905

Thank you for your wiseness: you don't delete the file without discussion.

Gratefully, --Spiridon 83.113.250.71 Manoliu (talk) 09:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC) (new user file of Spiridon MANOLIU)

File:NavaStruma.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:NavaStruma.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:39, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I'm agree with the deletion because this picture doesn't represents the real Struma ship. Good wishes, --Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 17:53, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Dromon3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dromon3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Peter Isotalo 17:43, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I'm agree with the deletion because Peter Isotalo is right: I discover also the wrong legend of the picture while inspire my drawing. Good wishes,--Spiridon MANOLIU 13:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Spiridon Ion Cepleanu!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:29, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Chilia.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chilia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 08:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Principality of Pindus[edit]

Can you please specify which sources you used for creation of this map: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Pind-Meglen.png Thank you. PANONIAN (talk) 12:59, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I am only concerned that some users will propose your map for deletion if source for it is not specified. If you used an old map from military museum in Bucharest then you should describe that on map's page: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pind-Meglen.png

--- Done,--Spiridon MANOLIU (talk) 14:49, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Here you can see an example how I would describe my references on map pages: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sanjak_of_Novibazar.png As for maps, I have about 27,000 various maps in my computer, so we perhaps might exchange some of them. Anyway, what kind of maps you have? ethnic? historic? administrative? I am not able to find some good administrative map of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia (based on municipal administrative level), so it would be nice if you have something like that. PANONIAN (talk) 16:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I might be interested in ethnic maps of Yugoslavia that you have. I will send you mail and you can send me these maps of Yugoslavia. Also, since I have many maps, do you want that I send some maps to you? Just tell me what maps you need. PANONIAN (talk) 12:12, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

File:VlachsKrajinaMeyers[edit]

Hello Spiridon! I looked at this map File:VlachsKrajinaMeyers.jpg (which you've uploaded it)

and I found it very interesting. I was wondering, could you send me a non-cropped version of this map? I can't find it on the Internet, so I thought of sending you this message. You can send me the non-cropped version here: bomaniuss[at]yahoo.co.uk, or, even better, upload it here on Commons and send me the link. I would be very grateful if you can do this. Regards, --Bomac (talk) 18:32, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Sure, right now !  ;-) --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 08:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

File:LanguesRomanes.png[edit]

Bonjour. Comme je l'ai expliqué sur la page de discussion, ce schéma est à mon sens inexact, il faudrait le corriger je pense. Xic 667 22:03, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

--- OK, que suggérez-vous ? Cordialement, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 06:56, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Je pense qu'il faudrait 1) créer un nouvel embranchement au niveau gallo-roman donnant d'un côté les parlers d'oïl et d'autre part les parlers d'oc, et 2) rattacher le catalan à ce dernier bloc. Cela me paraitrait plus correct. Xic 667 10:05, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Tu en connais beaucoup ? Sur Wiki ou ailleurs ? Moi aucun... Le seul débat que je connais à ce sujet est celui que j'ai déjà mentionné, de ceux qui considèrent le catalan comme un dialecte occitan et point barre. Nier la forte proximité d'origine entre les deux (alors que l'influence ibérique est plutôt postérieure), je n'ai jamais vu personne le défendre (mais il y en a sûrement... Ah si les franquistes qui considéraient ou cherchaient à faire croire que le catalan est un dialecte du castillan, mais bon ce n'est pas très sérieux...). Je ne pense pas que cela pose de problème, cela correspond aux définitions et caractérisations habituellement données. Xic 667 20:18, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
Voilà, "céphé", regarde voir si ça te va. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 14:06, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Super, au moins tout le monde est content. Un détail, je trouve ça un peu curieux de nommer "parlers français" les parlers d'oïl, car il ne me semble pas qu'on les considère en général comme des dialectes du français, mais simplement que le français est un de ces dialectes (qui a "réussi" au dépens des autres), mais bon, ça reste un détail :D Xic 667 16:05, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Oui, et j'ai vu quelque part "franciens", avec "îledefrançais" comme dialecte, mais ça devait se référer aux parlers abstand, tandis que "français" et "occitans" se réfère aux langues ausbau (quoique pour l'occitan, du moins chez nous en Provence, l'ausbau est disputé entre les mistraliens et les occitanistes, oh fan ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:07, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

File:LimbiTraco-Ilire.jpg[edit]

Buna! Tocmai discutam aici nevoia de unele corecturi la harta de unde cred ca ati derivat versiunea romana, cand am dat din intamplare peste versiunea dvs. Ar fi excelent daca ati putea creea o varianta in engleza. Si o intrebare: ce surse ati folosit pentru schimbarile la harta originala? Ele trebuie notate (carte, autor, pagina) in sectiunea "Source". Legat de derivare, sugerez folosirea template-urilor {{Derived from}}, {{RetouchedPicture}} si {{DerivativeVersions}} pentru a lega imaginea derivata de original. Am facut-o deja la cele doua harti, ca sa vedeti un exemplu. Numai bine! --Codrin.B (talk) 20:11, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Am deschis mai multe discutii ca sa poata participa toata lumea si sa fie in contextul corect, aici: File talk:Paleo-Balkan languages in Eastern Europe between 5th and 1st century BC - Romanian.jpg--Codrin.B (talk) 21:10, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Eu unul, voi face o versiune engleza dupa 15 ianuarie (pana atunci am o lucrare de predat) si pâna atunci astept rezultatul discutiei. Cu bine,--Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 10:37, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Excelent, multumesc! Ar fi mai bine sa fie PNG sau chiar SVG. Chiar va invit sa participati la discutiile de la ambele imagini. Sarbatori fericite! --Codrin.B (talk) 15:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

File:488px-Bulgarian-Wallachian-Empire.jpg[edit]

You may wish to participate in this conversation: File_talk:488px-Bulgarian-Wallachian-Empire.jpg. Regards.--Codrin.B (talk) 17:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Am raspuns pe pagina mea. E bine sa pastram discutia intr-un singur loc. Fie aici, fie pe pagina mea. Daca e despre o imagine, cel mai bine pe pagina de talk a imaginii respective, chiar daca conversatia nu este in engleza.--Codrin.B (talk) 22:02, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Roman bust of a Dacian tarabostes, Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia - 20070614.jpg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

... and happy holidays! --Codrin.B (talk) 23:41, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Harti cu Dacia[edit]

Multumesc inca o data pentru harta lingvistica TDM in engleza! Nu stiu in ce masura ati fii interesat, dar va asteptam la proiectele legate de Dacia (invitatia mai sus), ca si membru. In mod special, e nevoie de o harta moderna cu asezari si fortarete dacice: Commons:WikiProject Dacia/Collaboration. Ca si surse, am dat de curand de doua lucrari moderne excelente si pline de harti Wanner, Robert (2010) - Forts, fields and towns - Communities in Northwest Transylvania from the first century BC to the fifth century AD si Oltean, Ioana Adina (2007) - Dacia: landscape, colonisation and romanisation. Ar fi minunat sa avem harti noi bazat pe cercetarea asta de ultima ora. Deabia astept sa colaboram. --Codrin.B (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Paleo-Balkan languages in Eastern Europe between 5th and 1st century BC.png[edit]

Cateva observatii:

  • As folosi numele Paleo-Balkan languages pentru ca e mai cuprinzator, are deja articol si e mai putin disputat -- OK
  • Intre Illyrian si lanuages par a fi doua spatii in loc de unul -- Aranjez asta usor.
  • Am adaugat informatii despre derivare si alte versiuni. E important sa fie acolo intotdeauna cand sunt derivari din si/sau legaturi cu alte imagini
  • Nu e nevoie de other Thracians, doar Thracians e correct -- Am scris "other" deoarece unii autori socotesc Dacii printre Traci...
  • Celtic si Greek cu majuscula -- OK
  • discuted nu exista ca si cuvant si oricum, orice dispute sau discutii pot fi avute pe pagina de Talk a imaginii sau in articole. Nu l-as pune acolo -- Bine, dar cum sa marchez faptul ca apartenenta Mesapienilor la acest grup lingvistic este disputata ?
  • Pentru ca toate marile au denumiri in engleza, ca sa fie uniform, as inlocui Pontus Euxeinos cu Black Sea -- Aici nu sunt de acord fiindca Black Sea/Mavri Thalassa/Kara Denizi este o denumire aparuta mult ulterior, si denumirile maritime de pe aceasta harta sunt toate antice.

Multumesc inca odata -- Cu placere, dar mâine ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC) --Codrin.B (talk) 20:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Aici nu sunt de acord fiindca Black Sea/Mavri Thalassa/Kara Denizi este o denumire aparuta mult ulterior, si denumirile maritime de pe aceasta harta sunt toate antice. -- Bine, dar cum sa marchez faptul ca apartenenta Mesapienilor la acest grup lingvistic este disputata ? Cu placere, dar mâine ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 20:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Bine dar, daca harta e in engleza, trebuie sa folosim denumirile in engleza. Altfel, putem face o harta in greaca sau latina. Idea mea cu harta in engleza, a fost pentru a fi folosita pe Wikipedia in engleza. Acolo nu exista en:Mesogeion, iar en:Pontus Euxinus e un redirect la Black Sea. Fiecare denumire a aparut la alt stagiu in istorie, si denumirea de dac, de ilir, de mesapian etc. Denumiri in engleza ca si Adriatic Veneti sau Aegean Sea au aparut in literatura academica in engleza din 1800 incoace. Denumirea antica la Adriatic Sea era Mare Superum, Mare (H)Adriaticum, in functie de perioada la care vrei sa te uiti. Deci nu putem ajunge la nici un numitor comun ca vechime in felul asta, dar inteleg ce vreti sa spuneti. Daca vrem o harta din punctul de vedere al romanilor, facem una in latina, sau in greaca. Dar eu am sugerat o harta in limba engleza, folosind termenii academici folositi in anul 2012 despre istoria acestei zone. De exemplu, asta e o harta a lumii, vazuta din prisma lui Herodot, dar are denumirile folosite in engleza azi: File:Herodotus world map-en.svg. Insa sunt multe variante ale hartii in alte limbi, listate la derivative works. Legat de mesapieni, dupa cum am zis, cei ce vor sa dispute, o fac in articole sau in alta parte. Partea cu other Thracians e si ea disputata, dar nu as creat forumuri de discutii in interiorul legendei unei harti. Oricum, dacii se califica la other Thracians si nu invers. In plus, harta originala nu folosea disputed sau other. Cei ce vor sa dipute, pot pune harti cu alte viziuni. Harta asta e bazata pe Duridanov sau aveti si alte surse care doriti sa le citati? Daca vrem sa facem o harta cu tot ce stim in 2012, trebuie sa o facem folosind mult mai multi autori, care trebuie citati la surse. Nu e graba. Oricand puteti contribui e bine. Doar e munca voluntara, nu? ;-) --Codrin.B (talk) 20:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Arata exceptional! Multumesc mult. Singura chestie, nu stiu daca as pune Greece acolo din doua motive. 1. Nici o alta "tara" nu apare deci nu e "in sync" cu restul, 2. Poate mai important, grecii nu erau chiar uniti deci nu putem vorbii de Grecia. Eventul puteti pune Greeks sau si mai bine nimic ca oricum e marcata zona lingvistica cu culoarea specifica. Ca idee general, dupa cum sugeram mai sus, am putea lasa harta asta ca "varianta Duridanov", si sa creem una noua, folosind toate informatiile disponibile in 2012. Toate sursele voi trebuie citate din sectiunea "Source", asa cum e facut aici de exemplu: File:Dacia around 100 AD - Italian.png. Multumesc!--Codrin.B (talk) 18:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
Momentan voi lasa totusi Greece (nu ca stat ci ca denumire geografica), din doua motive : 1-Greeks erau si prin alte parti, colonisti ; 2-Acum mi-e lene (sincer si pe sleau). Va las sa modificati fisa hartii în Commons cu mentiunile trebuincioase (Duridanov + Florin Constantiniu, Giurescu, Constantinescu, Iorga...), si voi desena mai târziu alte harti cu alte variante, daca îmi dati indicatiile necesare. Cu bine, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File:CARICMOLD.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CARICMOLD.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Acather96 (talk) 08:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi ! Manoliu has been my first wikipedian pseudonyme. If you want delete this old drawing, you can, because times passed since 20 years and it's no more so funny today... <:-(

Wishes, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 09:21, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

File:BranchesChristians.png[edit]

Bonjour,

Pourrais-tu ajouter un accent à Épiscopaliens et écrire XVIe siècle ? Merci. Smile Cœur (talk) 04:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Fait

File:Austr.Aborig.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Austr.Aborig.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Australian_Aboriginal_Flag.svg[User:Osiris (temp)|Osiris (temp)]] (talk) 09:57, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

It's stupid, this is only a flag as File:Australian Aboriginal Flag.svg (see [1])... But please, do ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 10:32, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Croatia (1868-1918).png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag of Croatia (1868-1918).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 20:58, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

West Ukraine[edit]

Please stop reverting that map. Read references section on map's page. According to presented references, West Ukraine included city of Chernivtzi, so that info is referenced and please stop removing it from the map. You are free to draw derivative version of this file and to upload it under different name if you wish. PANONIAN (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Plase would you rectify your map: in 1918 WUPR claims North Bukovina but NOT the soviet north Bukovina of 1940. Verify the primary soures please. Thank you, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
What primary sources? You did not presented a single source here. Please present sources and then we can talk. PANONIAN (talk) 19:55, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I mean the Austrian-Hungarian military maps, printed 1911, where the 1918 WUPR claims (and other border claims and border changes) are drawed in 1919, maps conserved in the Cartothèque de l'Institut de Géographie de l'Université de Paris IV-Sorbonne, 193 rue St-Jacques, 75005 Paris (<http://www.univ-paris1.fr/bibliotheque/bibgeo/cartotheque/>), where I was a student, and a scholar. I'm sure this sort of maps exist also in other universitary libraries, in the main towns of Europe. I think it's also possible to find reproductions on the web, for young people who knows the internet world. Primary sources are the documents of the time when some event arrived. Secondary sources are later studies, books and maps about this events. Today I don'l live in Paris, but if I return and if I'll have time, I can ask the exact referencies of these austrian maps. Wishes, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 20:25, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
You cannot possibly use source from 1911 to refer to event in 1918. I provided additional source for you that confirms that Ukrainians from Chernivtsi and Northen Bukovina proclaimed unification with West Ukraine Republic, please read my comment on this talk page: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:West_ukraine.png (that is proper place to discuss this issue). And by the way, if you are a scholar, you should know that Estonian language is Finno-Ugric, right? What is the issue with this map that you uploaded: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PaysBaltes-Langues.jpg PANONIAN (talk) 07:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
You misuderstand me : I'm not so stupid and lier you think, the austrian military maps are printed 1911 without WUPR claims, and in 1919-1920 the geographers of this time draw the WUPR & Romanian claims on these austrian maps. Later (after WW2) this maps were provided in Paris. About the 1918 events in Chernivtsi, three commitees proclaimed in november 1918 their unifications : the "ruthenians" (Ruthener) with WUPR, the "wallachians" (Wlachen) or "moldovans" (Moldauer) with Romania, and the bolcheviks (some young students, polish, ukrainian or jews) with Soviet Russia. But only the cities of Zastavna, Vashkivtsi, Vizhnitza and Iablonivtsa were temporarely under the WUPR control, and the border draw by your main source and you between ukrainian northern Bukovina, and romanian southern Bukovina, are established by a soviet-romanian commission in july 1940. You can verify all this if you want, or not if you don't ; if yes, you will do this for yourself and for Ukraine's history, not for my pleasure. At end, in French the expression "pays baltes" (baltic lands) mean geographically "of the Baltic sea" and have not linguistic sense (the linguistic sense concern only the expression "langues baltes"), and I wrote in the legend of this map : "Distribution géographique des langues dans les pays baltes : l'Estonien est finno-ougrien, les autres (actuelles ou éteintes) baltes. En outre un cinquième de la population en moyenne est constitué de colons russophones, surtout dans les villes" (you understand, isn't it?). Keep cool all this... Good work ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, but Wikipedia sources should be verifiable. That mean that nobody here, is obligated to trust what you say about info in some sources. It is you who are obligated to provide verifiable sources for other Wikipedia users. My map is based on several verifiable sources and you say that it should be changed only because you say that these sources are wrong. Things do not work like that in Wikipedia, so please provide an verifiable source that can support your claims. Furthermore, even if you indeed used an unverifiable source and if that source show what you say, there is no reason that Wikipedia does not have multiple maps based on multiple sources. If unverifiable source that you claim you used have different viewpoint about the subject, that is certainly not an evidence that verifiable sources that I used are wrong. PANONIAN (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Don't be sorry, but please work WITH the other contributors, not AGAINST them, even if you don't like their affirmations ; the different POVs must be presented and sourced, but not inevitably by the same contributor who write ; the problem is not WHO write this or this other information, but IT's or ISN't TRUE ! In the Czernowitzer Allgemeine Zeitung, Thursday, Novembre 7, 1918, on Gemeinsame Kriegs-Ausgabe. Czernowitzer Allgemeine Zeitung / Tagblatt. Donnerstag, 7. November 1918, S. 1 and also in the books of Emanuel Turczynski (Geschichte der Bukowina in der Neuzeit. Zur Sozial- und Kulturgeschichte einer mitteleuropäisch geprägten Landschaft (=Studien der Forschungsstelle Ostmitteleuropa an der Universität Dortmund 14). Verlag Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1993, ISBN 3-447-03295-2), Bukovina Handbook, prepared under the Direction of the Historical Section of the British Foreign Office No.6. Published in London, Feb.1919 and Kurt Scharr (Die Landschaft Bukowina. Das Werden einer Region an der Peripherie 1774-1918. Böhlau Verlag, Wien/Köln/Weimar 2010, ISBN 3-205784-63-4) everybody can find the story of the events in Bukovina in 1918, and I insist, the soviet-romanian border of June 28, 1940, IS NOT the border claimed by the WUPR in 1918, and the Bukovinian territory controlled by WUPR in Novembre 1918 IS NOT the northern Bukovina given to Ukraine by USSR in Juny 28, 1940. As a Wikipedian contributor, your duty is to verify this, not to denied my information taking pretext my "inverifiable" sources (today ALL is verifiable). Your source is verifiable, but about Bukovina it's WRONG, because it's a secondary, not a primary source. I'm not personnaly involved in this question, and i'm indifferent about the romanian or ukrainian POVs ; with time, the real FACTS at last ever rise to the surface ! Only is better for you, for your capacities as a scholar, a cartographer and a human being, if YOU search and do this yourself. Wishes again, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I cannot read German, so can you say which sentence from this source speaks about events in Bukovina? Also border of West Ukraine Republic in my map is different from border of Soviet Ukraine, so why you speak about it? Also, my map show borders that were claimed (and not controlled) by West Ukraine, so we should focus our discussion on that. And I did verified this by multiple sources that are posted in "References" section on my map's page. So, again: 1. something is not wrong only because you say so, and 2. if your sources are verifiable, please present them here (an scanned newspaper page in an language that is not understandable to most Internet users is not an example of verification of anything). So, you should: 1. present Internet links to verifiable sources, 2. quote proper sentences from such sources, and 3. translate these sentences into World language (English). PANONIAN (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I speak about it because the border of West Ukraine Republic in your map IS, in Bukovina, IDENTIC with border of Soviet Ukraine institued Juny 28, 1940. This is not wrong because "I say so" : I say so because it's wrong, and if you want to be right, you must draw your black line of the claims around the ENTIRE Bucovina, because WUPR claimed "Bukovina" without details about the border. I'm an old teacher who loves BOOKS (in PAPER), my languages are French, Greek and Romanian, the english language and the "Web" aren't my world, I must ask help to my students, so, if you want to have goodwill, you can verify this LITTLE problem of the border in Bukovina, an not loose your time crossing your swords with me. The border of West Ukraine Republic in your map, in Bukovina, anticipating the 1940 border of Soviet Ukraine, have a name in history : this is an "Anachronism". A day, you will understand. So long, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
I agree that 1918 border from this source is similar to 1940 border, but it is not identical. Also, presented source claims that it is an approximate border (which means that it does not have to be 100% correct). There is also no evidence that 1940 borders did not had aim to depict claims from 1918. Also, various sources that I used in "References" section of my map are all showing differently claims from 1918, which would mean that 100% exact borders of 1918 claims are not known. Your claim that West Ukraine "claimed Bukovina without details about the border" might be exactly an evidence for this, since various sources would provide various interpretation of what "Bukovina" might mean in this case. You also might want to know that another user (who have somewhat similar view as you) uploaded derivative version of my map here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:West_ukraine_2.png So, you can discuss with him how this derivative map version should look. I simply cannot agree with your proposed changes in original file version because these proposals are something what I consider as a derogation of my work, which should be based on existing verifiable sources and not on personal opinions and unverifiable claims of Wiki users (no matter if these users are claiming to be a scholars). This is virtual World and anybody can claim anything here. PANONIAN (talk) 20:11, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Well, we are in progress together. In 1918 "Bukovina", similary as Banat, were claimed by two ethnic groups living inside. Since the time sources, in the both territories, a tacite agreement exists, between the most moderate national leaders, about a taling and a border across the land. The situation in Banat was resolved, for the relative satisfaction of the two nations, by the international commission for borders. In Bukovina, the fall down of the WUPR under the polish and romanian offensives, give all the land to Romania, and all the Galicia to Poland (Ukrainians were not admitted at the Congress of Versailles for expose their claims and the "popular" aspect of WUPR feared the deciders : France, GB and USA). If you read english, sure you know A History of Ukraine, by P. R. Magocsi, University of Toronto Press (1996, ISBN 0-8020-0830), p. 420 about Bukovina. In Bukovina, the taling were realised only in 1940 in the context we know. So, you'll do what you want evidently, and for my part, I thing the better is to draw a dotted border as in your derivative version "West_ukraine_2.png", ant to upload this new map instead of the first, which is the starting point of our discussions. This is not a "claim", but a suggestion, OK ? "Don't worry, be happy" (Bob Marley), --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag-of-south-Azerbaican-2012.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag-of-south-Azerbaican-2012.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 04:51, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

File:AtlBalkrelig.jpg[edit]

Hi, Spiridon! This map is great, but I'd like to point out that in en:Prekmurje, Slovenia, the Protestant religion is predominant in some municipalities. See e.g. [2] (pg. 72, karta 22, in green). This has a great significance in this otherwise Catholic country. Can you please correct this? Thanks in advance. --Eleassar (t/p) 17:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC) OK, I'll do tomorrow, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

New deletion request on Aboriginal flag[edit]

Aboriginal flag it's copyrighted. Welcome to add your thoughts here. --SuperJew (talk) 14:57, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Please, done, if it's the rule. But all flags are in the same situation, isn't it ? Each one have a first creator, I presume ?--Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 09:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

File:MammouthMNHNb.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MammouthMNHNb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 15:17, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Je peux me tromper mais ton mammouth est une création de l'esprit, il est a priori protégé par le droit d'auteur. Je ne sais plus si une reproduction à l'identique de l'apparence d'un animal donne droit à protection au sens de la loi française.... S'il est effectivement eligible à la protection du droit d'auteur, Il faudrait alors savoir de quand il date et qui l'a réalisé, et savoir si ce dernier est mort depuis plus de 70 ans ou non... s'il est encore vivant ou qu'il a des héritiers, il faudra alors obtenir son accord de publication... Esby (talk) 18:18, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Je peux aussi me tromper, mais une reconstitution d'animal préhistorique, partielle (squelette, patte, aile...) ou intégrale (représentation creuse, comme ce mammouth) n'est pas une oeuvre d'art due à un auteur mais un artefact scientifique (le plus souvent du à une équipe), au même titre que Fichier:Bałtów Park Jurajski 001.jpg sur [3]. Il faudrait l'expliquer à FunkMonk... Dans ce cas précis (Mammuthus ) les reconstitutions ne sont pas des vues de l'esprit, mais la reproduction des spécimens trouvés congelés en Sibérie. Merci, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 14:49, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Episcopiile catolice din Romania[edit]

Stimate domnule Cepleanu, v-am scris un mesaj in pagina de discutii de la fisierul File:CathoRomania.jpg. Multe salutari, --Mihai Andrei (talk) 19:36, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Done today, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 07:42, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Rectified_Languages_of_Europe_map.png[edit]

Hi. I'm writing to you because you are the original uploader of the image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rectified_Languages_of_Europe_map.png

There are many possible improvements that can still be made of course, but at least a small improvement can be made if you change a few things:

The two Turkish areas in Bulgaria (in the very south and in the northeast) should not be solid brown, but interleaved with Bulgarian green. The same should be done for the Hungarian area in central Romania. And I guess Galician too, and maybe Catalan (both interleaved with the color for Spanish, obviously).

Like I said the map still wouldn't be perfect, but its accuracy would be higher. Of course language maps can never be accurate enough, but... oh well.

Thanks in advance if you change it. I wrote on the talk page of the file in Wikipedia too, about 2 months ago, but it seems it's the wrong place. Someone could read it and edit the image though, after all anyone can contribute. I could too, but I'd rather ask someone with better skills. 77.70.30.216 22:52, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks & OK, i'll try to do this better, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 08:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Br.Chilia1865.jpg & File:Moldova1483.jpg[edit]

File:Br.Chilia1865.jpg : Здравствуйте! По файлу видно, что он является частью карты Parte din Harta Principatelor Unite ale României de Pr. George Filipescu-Dubău şi Anton Parteni-Antonin, Iaşi 1865 Сама карта называется: Harta Principatelor Unite ale României de Pr. George Filipescu-Dubău şi Anton Parteni-Antonin, Iaşi 1865 Как она выглядит? И важны условные обозначения к ней. Так, к примеру, озеро Катлабух --- почему-то называется L. Rasuna(???); и названия населенных пунктов вокруг него...: Ismail (Тuscova), Doluchioi, Kisliza, Navodari (???), Zaharesti (???), Catlabuga.... Там, где вопросы, существовали и существуют озеро и населенные пункты совсем с другими названиями. Там на карте отображены как действительно существовавшие и существующие населенные пункты, так и названия, непонятно как там появившиеся. Возле населенных пунктов там трех'-четырех'-значные числа. Что они означают? Как вглядит эта карта полностью? Где (в каких изданиях, атласах...) она публиковалась? Какие еще сведения по этой территории могут быть у Вас ? Заранее спасибо, Kvitenol | 94745006

Здравствуйте dear Kvitenol. Harta Principatelor Unite ale României de Pr. George Filipescu-Dubău şi Anton Parteni-Antonin,Iaşi 1865 have 54 sheets, each one dimension 18 x 25 cm. Some concerning Moldavia (4, 5, 6, 7, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 32, 33, 34, 35 & 36), others concerning the statistic data (44, 45, 53 & 54) and between the first ones, Bukovina is showed on 4, 5, 13 & 14 sheets, russian Bessarabia is showed on 5, 6, 7, 15, 16, 17, 25, 26, 27, 34, 35 & 36. Rivers, relief & names are in black, limits of округи (judeţe : counties) & borders in colour. Austrian empire borders are yellow, Russian empire borders are green, United Prinipalities bordes are pink but each county have its colour. The names are sometimes different in front of the later or actual names, but identic with the oldest names (by example on the Descriptio antiqui et hodierni status Moldaviae from Dimitrie Cantemir, written & drawed in Russia for the academy of Berlin 1714-1716 : Rasuna is the moldavian name of the tatar Qatlapuh (today Катлабух), Oblucitsa the moldavian name of turkish Ismail (russian Тushkov, in romanian script Tuscova), etc... The numbers near the villages are the habitants. This map showed the historic Translvania, Moldavia, Wallachia & Dobruja, and I don't know if it was published because I think is only a headquarters & state tool.

File:Moldova1483.jpg : I was one of the collaborators for this work but you can delete this one (a rough copy) because the GOOD and final version is : File:Moldova (1483)-en.png on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moldova_%281483%29-en.png by ro:Utilizator:Andrein

The округи (judeţe : Кырлигэтура - moldavian Cârligătura, and others counties) have sometimes change their areas & names in the flood of time. Is it easy to merge the years between the different sources.

Thank you - Köszönöm to Oliv☮ Éppen hozzám? for the translation. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 12:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

File:RomanianResistance.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RomanianResistance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 16:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Again the same problem : a scientific public work (map for a Museum), retroactively seen by the present rules as an artistic copyrighted creation... OK, delete, delete ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 08:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

File:MapRegionsRomania.png[edit]

à instead of Ă in the Black Sea

Hi Spiridon,

there's a typo in File:MapRegionsRomania.png: The Black Sea is not "Marea Neagrã" (with circumflex) in Romanian but "Marea Neagră" (with breve, MAREA NEAGRĂ in capitals).

Could you please fix that?

Thank you very much and have a nice weekend —[ˈjøːˌmaˑ] 09:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Done. Danke, JøMa. Grüsse, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 11:07, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup și mulțumesc! :) —[ˈjøːˌmaˑ] 11:23, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


Belkovski, Filat, Dungaciu...[edit]

Asemenea aluzii am mai auzit dar niciodata de la Dungaciu sau Filat. Oricum, acum 15 ani, deci in 1999, nu putea sa fie vorba de 'o ameliorare a planului Belkovski" ptr. ca Belkovski a venit cu propunerea sa abia in 2004, acum 10 ani. Un schimb teritorial implicand raionul reni ar fi si foarte greu din moment ce majoritatea din raion e rusofona si probabil ostila unui asemenea schimb (desi etnic vorbind sunt aproape 50% romani/moldoveni). In orasul Reni propriu zis, de ex, populatia se imparte in 70% rusofoni, 15% vorbitori de limba ucraineana iar vorbitorii de limba romana sunt pe locul 3 - in jur de 13% [4].Constantzeanu (talk) 21:43, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Înseamnă că eu am confundat ce am auzit prin 99 (tot raionul Reni contra întregului raion Tiraspol), cu "scandalul cu foarfeca pe harta Moldovei" din 2004 (dar în 2004 eram la Constanța, nu în Moldova). Acum că-mi amintești de astea, cred că "scandalul cu foarfeca" era relativ la ceva mult mai modest : Rîpa de la Mîndrești contra șoselei Izmail-Odesa de la Palanca. Am o amintire și mai veche (cu un schimb și mai mare propus), din toamna 91, când am fost traducătorul ziaristului francez Jean-Baptiste Naudet, imediat după independență : se vorbea atunci de toată Transnistria contra unei suprafețe echivalente în Bugeac incluzând nu numai Renii, dar și Izmailul (care este aproape în întregime rusesc). Pe atuncea, populația rusă, ucraineană, bulgară și gagauză sincer nu mai știa ce să creadă între trimișii lui Druc care le spuneau că vor avea drepturi mari în cadrul României, și trimisii lui Lebed care le spuneau că România e o țară fascistă și că vor fi dați afară din casele lor... Cu bine, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Hungersnot ukraine.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hungersnot ukraine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Elya (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

"pls do not modify Ramsey Muir's work"[edit]

Hi Fakirbakir. Never I modify an art work. But Ramsey Muir is a cartographer, not an artist. I accept modifications on my maps if I'm wrong, why can we not modify a Ramsey Muir's work if something miss ? --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 23:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

I do not want you to modify my upload. I will not start a debate about historical issues. Please respect my request. Thank you. Fakirbakir (talk) 23:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
I respect your will but this is not collaborative. According with Muir and many other english maps from this periode, Vlachs are appearing only in the XIV c., many centuries after the break down of the roman influence in the Balkans. From where are they growing ? From some seeds in the ground ? All studies about languages and toponymics show a pastoral romance-speaking dispersed population (later melting with the Slavs, the Magyars, the Pachenegs and the Comans) on the both banks of the Danube... But I understand this is not your preoccupation... --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:24, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Uite așa se transmit cu credință greșelile pe Wikipedia, mai ales engleză : prin imposibilitatea de a le corecta, sursa fiind privită nu ca o bază de lucrare enciclopedică colaborativă, ci ca o icoană sfântă ale cărei erori trebuie transmise cu sfințenie, sau ca o proprietate personală a celui care a încărcat-o... Voilà comment on répand conscienceusement les erreurs dans le Wikipedia surtout anglophone : par l'interdiction de les corriger, la source étant considérée non comme une base de travail encyclopédique collaboratif, mais comme une sainte icône intouchable ou comme une propriété personnelle de celui qui l'a téléchargée... Too bad, păcat, dommage ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


File:Tesera Dromonia.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tesera Dromonia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Peter Isotalo 20:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)


File:DromonMicro.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DromonMicro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Peter Isotalo 20:55, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Don't edit other people's posts[edit]

I believe your intentions were good, but please don't edit other people's talkpage activities. I format my posts the way I prfer them and I don't believe it's a good idea to "trim" the chronology the way you did here.[5]

Also, please be careful about editing your own posts after someone has already replied to them.[6] Again, I don't think you intended any harm, but it's generally not a good idea to put your own posts in a new light after the fact. If you feel you forgot to mention something, add it to a new post.

sincerely,
Peter Isotalo 18:34, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

File:KlausIohannis2014.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:KlausIohannis2014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 13:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

You can not upload photos created/modified after other photographers original photos here unless those original photos are in the public domain. --Martin H. (talk) 13:36, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

OK, artists must live ! --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 16:27, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Roger Heim.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Roger Heim.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Roger Heim.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 13:36, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I draw this image since some pictures, and one of this pictures is in the public library of the MNHN (Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris). Author unknown. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:15, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Moldova judete.jpg[edit]

Good day! As far as I know, there was 10-th county - judetul Taraclia, that similar with modern Raionul Taraclia. Can you draw it? Chekist (talk) 14:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

File:StemaRomDinSerbia.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:StemaRomDinSerbia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 07:45, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Agree with the deletion. I uploaded this coat six years ago from [7], when it was a proposed coat for the Уједињени Власи Србије/Vlahii uniţi din Sîrbia coalition formed 2008, coat not adopted or abandoned, because today I can't find any source. The uploader, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Image formats[edit]

Hi, thank you for uploading images to Commons. Here's a tip: Use the right image format for the kind of image. As a general rule, this is JPEG for photographs, and PNG for most other kinds of images. Using the wrong format can bloat the file size and/or degrade the quality of the image. Most modern graphics applications will give you the choice between these formats among others. Smjg (talk) 23:29, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I'm working with an "old" Mac (sample Leopard system) & my Inkscape give images refused by Commons. I must change my computer & Inkscape first... when I will have the money ! ;-) Thank you, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 09:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Double-headed eagle of the Byzantine Empire.png[edit]

Hello! A very nice image, but if you want a really Byzantine eagle (instead of a "Byzantine" one) then you need to remove the sword and the globus cruciger. Original Byzantine images of double-headed eagles do not include either. Cheers, Constantine 19:41, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

OK, done, thank you. To ékava, euxapi6tw, --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 13:32, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Need to Hire Heraldry Artist[edit]

I am looking to hire an artist to create vector coats of arms for me. Please contact me at coadb@mail.com.

-John L.

File:Premongol.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Premongol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 11:18, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

I've renominated for deletion. Can you correct File:East-Hem 1200ad.jpg? It would be better stop mentioning my username on the comment section because new version is definetely not

according with my rectifications. The maps that recommended by me are good maps. File:East-Hem 1200ad.jpg is not good map but it's better than File:Premongol.png,File:PremongolEurasia.png, File:Premongol(2).png and File:Asia 1200ad.jpg.So i recommend you to update File:East-Hem 1200ad.jpg instead of File:Premongol.png. After updating File:East-Hem 1200ad.jpg ask admins to delete all spam files (File:Premongol.png,File:PremongolEurasia.png, File:Premongol(2).png and File:Asia 1200ad.jpg).

Using File:East-Hem 1200ad.jpg instead of File:Premongol is good idea but File:East-Hem 1200ad.jpg/new version of File:Premongol still needs major corrections. Can you change the borders?

Uyghur Khaganate fell in 840.

Yes I will do it this next days according with this indications, except on the low-Danube area, where the Cumans are later present (after the great mongol-tatar invasion) ; before 1200 they are present in the future low-Moldavia (actual Budzak), but the north-future-Moldavia were Iassic and Wallachia were a part of the Regnum Bulgarorum et Valachorum founded 1186. --Spiridon Ion Cepleanu (talk) 21:51, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
  • The en:Kara-Khanid Khanate was conquered by the en:Kara-Khitan Khanate but Wikipedia writes that the khanate fell in 1212. After the conquest of the Kara-Khitans Kara-Khanid Khanate might be controlled small areas. You need to clarfy it.

File:Pind-Meglen.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pind-Meglen.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Otberg (talk) 08:49, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Велика Србија.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Велика Србија.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zoupan (talk) 17:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

= Referitor la modificările aduse unor hărţi şi steme[edit]

Domnule Spiridon Ion Cepleanu, oricât vă apreciez munca pe acest site, vă rog nu modificaţi dacă nu aveţi date în plus, iar dacă le aveţi încercaţi a le posta prima dată pe pagina de discuţie a imaginii respective. În primul rând vorbind despre harta Regiuni Româneşte, unde aţi adăugat nişte steme, aţi modificat harta. Stemele respective le putem pune doar dacă sunt dovedite(deşi una din steme este a mea, respectiv cea a Crişanei, însă nu este o stemă istorică, voiam să desenez o variantă ce a fost propusă). Apoi harta am făcut-o ca o hartă istorico-etnografică, m-am axat mai mult pe latura etnografică şi istorică, nu a existat o regiune românească Pocuţia, nu există pocuţieni, bucovineni, aceştia sunt rezultatul unei cuceriri, există Moldoveni, iar Pocuţia a făcut parte din Moldova, pâna s-a renunţat la ea. Apoi, vorbind de stema Maramureşului, aş dori să citiţi articolul fiindcă l-am terminat însfârşit. Cum din păcate nu se pot identifica smalţurile nici în cazul Moldovei nici Maramureşului, fiind o duzină de variante, am prezentat ambele variante în cazul Maramureşului. Deşi dv aţi făcut o treabă bună cosmetizând stema, heraldica din păcate nu este un tablou, fiecare culoare are un cod şi o denumire aparte. Dacă dv modificaţi ea nu mai respectă regulile heraldice şi devine o emblemă. Modificarea dv pare în culoare naturală, din păcate culorile naturale au ajuns în heraldică în sec XVI şi nu se pot aplica stemei Maramureşului, însă eu o să o las. Vreau să vă spun că sunt mulţumit de modificarea făcută stemei Banatului, încercaţi a o face şi în cazul celei Ardealului(a lui Mihai Viteazu, cea de la 1848), dar dacă puteţi încercaţi a păstra culorile heraldice simple. Normal culoare pe culoare este o încălcare a regulilor heraldice, dar pare că este o constantă în Moldova, Transilvania, Ţara Românească şi Maramureş, negru(sable) pe roşu(gules), negru pe albastru. O zi bună ! Vasile iuga (talk) 10:45, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Domnule Cepleanu din moment ce nu putem fi siguri de smalţurile folosite, nici de existenţa crucii heraldice, deşi nu am neglijat subiectul, puteţi folosi fie stema cu argint, fie cea roşie, cea care foloseşte doar steaua şi semiluna. Aş recomanda cea roşie dacă tradiţia heraldică din România a adoptat această culoare, însă aici este o chestiune de opţiune. Moldova a folosit albastru, argint, roşu, reglementarea heraldică pe teritoriul României fiind destul de inexactă.
Deasemenea am reintrodus harta creată pentru regiunile româneşti. M-am dus cât am putut de tare în spate pentru a surprinde regiunile fără impactul lăsat de puterile străine, fără raptul Olteniei, Bucovinei, Basarabie, am încercat să redau regiunile naturale, medievale, unde s-a putut.Din moment ce există o grămadă de hărţi care prezintă evoluţia regiunilor, v-aş recomanda să modificaţi harta dv., pe care am înlocuit-o, pentru a arăta regiunile unite cu România şi rapturile teritoriale din 40. Şi aici Maramureşul ar trebui lăsat singur(fără Sătmar) şi prezentate : Transilvania, Crişana ,Oaş, Basarabia unită cu Bugeac, Bucovina. Toate ar trebui să fie de o culoare, iar vechiul regat de altă culoare. Nişte graniţe mai mici între ele şi graniţă mare pe conturul României Mari şi a vechiului regat.Apoi, în conturul Crişanei scrieţi ardeleni, în conturul Regatului vechi, răgăţeni, în conturul Ardealului, ardeleni, în conturul Maramureşului, maramureşeni, în conturul Oaşului, oşeni, în conturul Banatului, bănăţeni, în conturul Bucovinei, bucovineni, în conturul Basarabie, basarabeni. Apoi ultimul retuş ar trebui să fie în următorul fel; haşurat cu roşu zona ruptă de URSS, haşurat cu verde deschis zona luată de Ungaria, iar cu verde închis, zona luată de Bulgaria. Puteţi trage o săgeată de la fiecare zonă şi scrieţi Ţinutul Herţei, Cadrilater, Transilvania de Nord, Basarabia, Bucovina de Nord. Dacă doriţi, pot ajuta.În cazul Transnistriei cât şi al Timocului am haşurat zonele respective delimitându-le clar de restul, după cum puteţi observa regiunile sunt delimitate printr-o linie maro, fiecare.Însă din moment ce ele au fost locuite de români, fie şi mai puţin decât restul, nu le pot scoate total, nu ar fi corect din punct de vedere istoric, cât şi etnografic. Românii rar locuiau la câmpie în evul mediu, însă vara păşteau acele zone, populatia românească a fost întâlnită doar în zonele mai înalte şi în alte regiuni care acum fac parte din România, asta nu înseamnă că erau străini de zonele mai joase. Dar fiindcă ele nu au fost incluse într-o formaţiune prestatală, nici nu au făcut parte oficial dintr-un stat medieval le-am haşurat doar, după cum puteţi observa nu am trecut nici un oraş în zonele haşurate, nici un râu, doar cele ce izvorăsc din regiunile delimitate sau cele de graniţă.Departe gândul de a afirma că zonele respective nu sunt mai bulgare sau ucrainiene decât româneşti, însă cu siguranţă aceste popoare au regiunile lor pe care nu le contest cu acea hartă. Nu o să modific stema respectivă, oricum am folosit-o doar pentru a prezenta cum ar arăta crucea pe ea, aţi făcut o treabă bună, o las pentru cei care vor să folosească un bour de culoare mai naturală, nu neaparat pe wikipedia.Mă bucur că aţi avut ocazia să locuiţi în localitatea mea natală, vă urez multă sănătate şi mă bucur că găsesc oameni de bună credinţă care pot discuta, în sensul de a îmbunătăţi aceste informaţii, mai ales pentru cititorii români. Vasile iuga 23:03, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Domnule Cepleanu am adus harta la stadiul în care am spus că o să o aduc. Am redus zona haşurată în Transnistria, lăsând doar zona etnografică de la sud de râul Savranca. Am refăcut toate stemele care erau neterminate, am adăugat scuturile în funcţie de momentul când stema a apărut, pentru scuturile moderne am folosit scutul folosit de dv. la stema Banatului(inclusiv stema), am introdus culorile heraldice în vigoare la fiecare, folosind codurile pentru acestea. Am introdus stema dinastiei Dolha pentru Bârjava. Harta este gata, poate fi folosită. Vasile iuga (talk) 16:06, 16 May 2015 (UTC)