User talk:Sreejithk2000/Archive 6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
← Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 →

Contents

Cameron Diaz

Hi Sree - why did you redirect my Cameron Diaz file to MyCanon's, instead of the other way around? I uploaded the photo first, and I'm the photographer - I would like these photos to be in my own contribution history as opposed to MyCanon's, which is not an unreasonable thing to ask and expect since I've been contributing here since 2006. MyCanon has other work of mine that are duplicates, such as Emma Watson, Sarah Silverman and Chris Colfer. Would you please undo the redirect to MyCanon's and have his duplicate re-direct to mine? --David Shankbone (talk) 12:21, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I took the one with the better file name. Anyways, since your reason made sense, I have made changes as you requested. Can you please mark the other images with the correct {{Duplicate}} tag? --Sreejith K (talk) 12:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you I appreciate it. --David Shankbone (talk) 05:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Duplicate image

Hi!
The image File:Paras Arora.B.jpg is a duplicate image of File:Paras Br Arora.jpg. Can you please do the necessary stuff. (New here. Dont even know what is done in such case.) §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done Duplicate image deleted and redirected to the other. Thanks for helping. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:00, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
My pleasure! Is there any tool in Commons which can help in tagging images? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
I am using AjaxDeleteExtraButtons to add extra buttons on the sidebar on the left. You can see a working example at User:Sreejithk2000/vector.js --Sreejith K (talk) 12:21, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Doesn't this have a "no permission" and "copyvio" template? As of now i know and use only these two. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:55, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Dont bother. Got that option from My preferences > Gadgets. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 22:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Could you spare some time and reply here... User_talk:Animeshkulkarni#File:AnandPatwardhan.JPG? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 05:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Bushra Ansari Photo

I have responded to the deletion request for the Bushra Ansari photo on the nomintaion page.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Bushra_Ansari1.jpg

Please advise accordingly for the next step. Thank you Basheera Masih (talk) 21:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

By the way I am still waiting for your reply on this. Basheera Masih (talk) 11:21, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
You mentioned that you have sent an email to Ms Ansari about it. When you get a reply, please forward that to OTRS --Sreejith K (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks again. Will let you know as soon as I get it from her. Basheera Masih (talk) 01:33, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Just got her confirmation and sent to OTRS already. Basheera Masih (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 04:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 04:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Gloriosa (1).jpg

What happened with my file description? --Dezidor (talk) 17:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

There were two different files with the same name in commons, so I split the page into two. You can see the two files are now available as File:Gloriosa.jpg and File:Gloriosa (1).jpg. Now since your file was overwritten, the original image description was retained. Would you mind cleaning the page and correct the copyright holder's name and license? --Sreejith K (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Images for Zarb-e-Sukhan and Ehsan Sehgal

  • Hi Sreejithk2000, I need your help relating images for articles Zarb-e-Sukhan and Ehsan Sehgal. I am not familiar to up-load images, the images which have been up-loaded by my immediate family, I think there is some error, I cannot access properly, therefore I need your kind help to make it correct in exact procedure.Images file is here. These all images are my own work,and have been published at google this. I hope you will spare a little time to fix that. Sorry wiki link is creating problem.Thanks. Justice007 (talk) 14:09, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Zarb-e-Sukhan.jpg looks like a book cover and you will have to ask the publisher to send an OTRS email confirming the free license. I will go through the rest of the images as time permits. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:23, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

Thanks Sreejithk2000 for your quick actions on file that I've tagged Copyvio. If you're looking for more files to delete, there's more here ! Thanks again. Benoit Rochon (talk) 11:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

I am going through Category:Copyright violations where we already have a backlog. Since the mediawiki deletions are quite slow, it might take a while before all of them gets deleted. But they all will soon be. Thanks for the message. --Sreejith K (talk) 11:49, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Iraq scud DDST8911778 JPG.jpg

Please do not delete duplicate images before they are universally replace on all other Wikis.

If you don't, you are creating chaos.

Thank you in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 20:01, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

It was not a manual deletion. I used the "Process Duplicates" button. Isn't that supposed to take care of the universal replacement? --Sreejith K (talk) 04:32, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
No, you should wait until the image was replaced on every Wiki by the other one. --High Contrast (talk) 14:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Sephardi Jews - mosaic.PNG

Why did you speedydelete this image? It's used in a lot of articles, uploader wasn't notified and it could easily be fixed by removing/replacing images. This is just stupid. Multichill (talk) 21:46, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

I hope you are not disagreeing to the fact that this image is a copyright violation at its present state. User:Dzlinker put a speedy delete tag on it instead of a DR. I do not know why he did not notify the uploader. If I had seen that the image is used widely, I would have converted it to a DR, but I did not pay attention to that. An oversight from my part. Sorry. --Sreejith K (talk) 10:16, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the deletion of Namal Rajapaksa.jpg

Can you please tell me whats the real reason behind deleting Namal Rajapaksa.jpg from Wikimedia Commons,I am sure that you have delete this for No valid reason,Prior to the deletion you could have inform me about this,but you didn't,that's very bad of you,Mr Indi Samarajiva is the Copyright holder of this works and he has Published this under CC-BY-2.0,and Whats Next you cant deny that,If you are denying this,Please bring forward a Clear Reason.If Not I will re upload this same image within another 2 days...Thank you in advance

http://www.flickr.com/photos/indi/4695481158/ <- Flickr Photo. MediaJet (talk) 01:03, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Indi.ca is listed at User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors which means that this user probably does not know copyright of all the images he has uploaded to flickr. For reference, his id is 85113745@N00. Even if you upload the image again, chances are that the images will get deleted again, if not by me, by some other commons admin. --Sreejith K (talk) 10:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Very Well then Why dont you delete these Photographs

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&target=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.flickr.com%2Fphotos%2Findi%2F

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:LinkSearch&limit=250&offset=0&target=http%3A%2F%2Fflickr.com%2Fphotos%2F85113745%40N00%2F MediaJet (talk) 16:39, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

That's a huge lot. I will handle them one by one. Thanks for the links. --Sreejith K (talk) 12:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Excuse me, sir.

Excuse me, sir. File:통합진보당 공식 로고.gif and File:통합진보당 로고.svg is Non Free image. According to ‘Unified Progressive Party’(통합진보당; UPP) twitter, UPP logo can not fair use. And the logos─including image─ is not PD-text logo. For more information, see the UPP's copyright policy:

서비스를 이용함으로써 얻은 사이트 또는 타인의 지적재산권을 사이트 또는 타인의 사전 승낙 없이 복제, 송신, 출판, 배포, 방송 기타방법에 의하여 영리목적으로 이용하거나 제3자에게 이용하게 하여서는 아니 된다

Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 06:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Please raise a deletion request if you disagree. --Sreejith K (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
..Because of this, I use {{Copyvio}}. But you reverting my contribution by reason of PD. It is an obvious Copyvio. So, I should be glad to know the reason. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 16:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


File:Animax3.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Animax3.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SreeBot uploaded this and you are its operator, which is why I have left the deletion notification on this page. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 17:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

I am not familiar with Singapore law on COM:TOO, so I would keep mute on the DR. Thanks for raising a DR and informing me about it. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:29, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Exact duplicates

Hi, there has been a mistake in processing files labeled as {{duplicate}}, File:Lousame, Lousame..svg, Vilacoba.svg etc were not exact duplicates of the nominated files. So a speedy process like {{duplicate}} is not appropriate, a normal deletion request is required. :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Agreed, they were not exact duplicates. But they were superior versions. Do you want me to revert those changes? --Sreejith K (talk) 12:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
I was just trying to work out the reason for the different versions (I think they were all uploaded by the same person?), when they disappeared ;-). The outlined areas were noticably different shapes, was that just inaccurate tracing of borders or borders from different eras? If the uploader had indicated that the first versions were a mistake then I wouldn't worry, but I think it was someone else who nominated them. Yes undo a couple of them so we can check them out.
I was also going to mention the PNG/JPG "duplicates" (File:Carantonha,_de_Lousame.png, Ces, Lousame.png) I think uploaded by the same user (and nominated as duplicates by the same user that tagged the SVGs). If the JPGs were created from the PNGs then I would keep the PNGs (and visa versa), but it appears the tagger created a new JPG from the PNG and uploaded it over the old JPG, then nominated the PNG as duplicate. I think I would tend to revert the overwrite of the JPG, and keep the different JPG/PNG pairs, and link them as "other versions". --Tony Wills (talk) 13:10, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, undeleted one. See File:Lousame, Lousame..svg and File:Parroquia de Lousame, Lousame..svg. To me, the second version is not accurate at all and we probably does not need it as a better version is available. But if you think we should not delete it for that reason, we can use the {{Superseded}} template instead.
The second certainly appears more precise (more detailed borders) but I have no idea whether it is more accurate (some borders are moved a lot). I had a brief look but wasn't sure about what reference either version was based upon, nor noticed any discussion (but then I can't read Spanish). Yes I agree that {{Superseded}} is much better, if they need to be deleted then we should see a discussion citing the reference sources first. --Tony Wills (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
I don't see any similarity between File:Carantonha,_de_Lousame.png and File:Ces, Lousame.png. Is the link wrong or am I missing something? --Sreejith K (talk) 19:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, my post was a bit hurried. I was talking about the pairs File:Carantonha,_de_Lousame.png (before being made into a redirect) / File:Carantonha, de Lousame.jpg, and File:Ces, Lousame.png / File:Ces, Lousame.jpg. Both pairs I removed the dup tag from, but you must have been processing the first one at the same time and it ended up as a redirect. --Tony Wills (talk) 22:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

File:BlaueReiter.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BlaueReiter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:39, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete request for a propietary image

This image == File:Pico_navas.jpg == is mine, as it can be seen at http://www.navasdelpinar.com/multimedia/galeria/, and it is under a Creative commons license by-nc-nd, as it can be read at http://www.navasdelpinar.com/licencias/, and some user called "cucaña" uploaded it by his name. I request the deletion of this image as it is not compatible with the cc licenses of wikipedia.

OK, got the situation now and deleted the image as copyright violation. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:29, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hello. I'm an old contributor of the wiki project, but i've been inactive for years. In 2006 i uploaded 8 images and put my full name as the author of them, and it appears in the file history. When somebody makes a search in the google engine for my name, has as return thousands of pages because of that. So a uploaded the files again and made the changes on the links over the wiki in all languages. But you made redirects of four of them and the google refuses in delete them from their cache, because the pages "still exist". Is it possible to delete this redirects? Thank you.

File:Bandeira CamposdoJordao SaoPaulo brasil.svg
File:Bandeira Guaratingueta SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
File:Bandeira Lorena SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
File:Bandeira SaoJosedosCampos SaoPaulo Brasil.svg
Srfortes (talk) 03:11, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done - Deleted all of them. Please not that it might take some time for these results to get cleared from google cache. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you again. Srfortes (talk) 16:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Madrid Metro maps

Hi, first of all, sorry for my bad english :) I saw you didn't delete the images of the Madrid Metro. I've talked to the author of the images here, he agrees for the deletion. Of course those images are not an exact or scaled down duplicate of the images I linked, because he doesn't know hot to use graphic programs (he told me, no offense!). And he didn't know how to ask for the deletion. And maybe neither do I. Should I had used another template or give another reason for de deletion? --Teoamez (talk) 09:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

{{Duplicate}} template should only be used if the images are exact duplicates. Here, you should either use {{Superseded}} to force users to use the other image or nominate it for deletion saying that a better alternative is available. --Sreejith K (talk) 09:48, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Barreiro, Varela, López e Axeitos.jpg

Hi!, I have added links to the legal advice of the website in the deletion request's page. I hope that this information could be useful. Bye!, --Elisardojm (talk) 07:37, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I just wanted to make sure. One thing I wanted to clarify before deleting is whether the flickr user really owns the copyright or not. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Of course, I know the Flickr user and I have asked him about the photo and he had confirmed that he don't have the rights. I can resend the mail to you (it's in galician but I can make a translation for you) or, if you prefer, you can make a comment in the photo in Flickr. Bye!, --Elisardojm (talk) 07:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh, can you put this message in the DR page (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Barreiro, Varela, López e Axeitos.jpg) as well? --Sreejith K (talk) 08:04, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Really, I will put it at night because in this place I don't have permission to open Flickr ;), when I have writed it I will notify you here. Bye!, --Elisardojm (talk) 08:09, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi!, I have put the mail from Flickr in the DR page, it's in galician, if you need a translation give me a message. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 22:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Original uploader ≠ author

Hi Sreejithk2000. If the original uploader is not the author such as in this case, it should better be removed from the author field. --Leyo 21:51, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

I agree. I did not think about it when I did a few quick cleanups. Thanks for the note. --Sreejith K (talk) 10:09, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Vandal account: User:Ford TTT

Hello,

we have Polish Wikipedia main page under attack from this account, pls. block this user - (s)he substituting pictures by commercial rubbish. Lajsikonik (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The user has been blocked by Odder. I have just cleaned up his contributions. Hope everything is looking fine now. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:49, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

I just wanted to drop by to thank you for this. It's really appreciated! Salvio giuliano (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Dr. Joe Vitale.jpg and other pics

Hi Sreejithk2000, I have permission from Dr. Vitale and Mr. Martinez to use the following:

File:Dr. Joe Vitale.jpg , File:Bert Martinez on Fox News.jpg, File:Money For Lunch.jpg and File:Bert Martinez on Money for Lunch Set.jpg

Mr. Martinez has sent an email giving permission.

Is it easier to just reload and use different photos?

Please help!

Amy (Amyxcell (talk) 17:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC))5/28/2012

If they have sent an email to OTRS, they will soon be restored after verifying. Please give it some time. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Sicilian Flag.svg

Hello! Could you restore the File:Sicilian Flag.svg? This image is not the exact or scaled-down duplicate of File:Flag of Sicily.svg, the Sicilian Triskelion in the center is quite different. You should check the file history. Thanks. --Angelus(talk) 17:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done - They look quite similar although not exact copies. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you. :-) --Angelus(talk) 17:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Padmarajan during his early days.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Padmarajan during his early days.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SpacemanSpiff 14:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aegis Hipster.jpg

Please take care about rest of user uploads. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done --Sreejith K (talk) 19:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Yjenith

Hello Sreejithk2000 Sorry can you look at the contributions of this user, there are pictures that are waiting to review them User Yjenith Please Look this page http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Yjenith —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.254.230.210 (talk)

There are tons of uploads from him. It will take a long time to review all of them. But when you nominate an image for deletion, please specify a valid reason, else it is just a waste of time. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:07, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello Sreejith2000 Sorry my fault that I saw gave him Check that a valid photo —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.254.230.210 (talk)

Can you please register in Commons and edit with a valid id? Or at least please sign when you add comments. It is difficult for me to identify who messaged me. --Sreejith K (talk) 17:13, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Game053535335 Hello Sreejith2000 I have a user in Commons this user is my —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.254.230.210 (talk)

Admin wanted

Sorry! I dont know where to report.
This user User:FSII seems to be uploading 100s of same image with different names. See his uploads. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 09:57, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Calm yourself. It's a speed and stability test for my new upload application that improves significantly on upload tools like Commonist. -FASTILY (TALK) 10:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Okay! Whatever! I happened to find Vandalism's noticeboard and reported you there. Reply there too. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 10:08, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Glad that it is resolved. --Sreejith K (talk) 10:41, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio deletion

Have you considered replacing File:Роторная электробритва НХ-2012 Fanat.jpg with an alternative through CommonsDelinker? -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 12:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

No. For one, it was tagged {{copyvio}} and not {{duplicate}} and no indication of a free image was given on the page. Two, the file was not used anywhere. See Delinker log for the file --Sreejith K (talk) 17:13, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
The file was used on 4 places. I replaced them. Copyvios should be replaced if possible. Usage was a generic electric razor. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 22:59, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Filemover

What is the min. requirement for granting filemover rights to users in commons. Vensatry (Ping me) 07:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Mostly its about convincing an administrator that you know the renaming criteria quite well. They judge you by your number of edits and the number of times you have requested files for renaming and was successfully renamed. Either of these numbers should be high enough. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:07, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Is there a way to find out the date in which an image was uploaded to a website. Vensatry (Ping me) 07:12, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
A lot of people user Wget, but this might not work in Windows. For Windows, try something like WinWSD WebSite Downloader. I cannot advocate any as I have never used any such tools. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
I need to figure out the problem with File:Taapseecf1.jpg. You might want to see this discussion as well. Vensatry (Ping me) 08:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Does not look like a lot of people trust cinefundas on their copyright claim. I have commented on the DR. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Angrois (Santiago de Compostela)

Las fotos son mías, la página web angroisbarriojimbo es mía, el facebook es mío. ¿Cuál es el problema? --Isidoro Castaño (talk) 18:28, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Translated using Google translate: The photos are mine, the mine angroisbarriojimbo website, facebook is mine. What is the problem?
Can you please file a request at Commons:Undeletion requests. You might have to send a permission email to OTRS to get the file undeleted. Please specify the file name when you do this. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:45, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

BTW of this, Sreejithk, please could you explain why you deleted it? Deleting on uploader's request is not a valid reason for deleting a file, especially if it was correctly licenced. Even if the file is unused that's not a valid reason for deleting. A file should be deleted in case of 1. is not freely licenced; 2. is a copyright violation; 3. is out of scope. Unuse is not per se a valid reason. I don't want to overturn your administrative action, but could you please consider apply for an undeletion request (unless there are other factors I don't know as to date?). Thank you -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Author requesting deletion of his recently uploaded unused file is a valid reason for deletion. See MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown. If this should not be accepted as a reason, then that is a policy change. I do not want to undelete this file without having a consensus. But since you wish to undelete this, I am filing an undeletion request quoting your interest and opinion. Lets see what other admins think --Sreejith K (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
See Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:00876_Arch.C3.A4ologischen_Ausgrabungen_auf_dem_Michaelerplatz_vor_der_Pfarrkirche_in_Sanok._Zustand_am_15_Mai_2012.JPG --Sreejith K (talk) 05:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
I decided to restore the file. You did the right thing since I believe 7 days is a reasonable timeframe for images to be asked for deletion if unused. However, I believe it was a case of nationalism that caused the image to be slated for deletion 4 days after the uploading. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 06:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
please remove image now, last warning Silar 06:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
No. As stated before, once you release an image to us, it is not going to be removed. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Silar, I think I should ask you this. Why do you want to delete this file? --Sreejith K (talk) 08:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Shreejith, I am sorry but Author requested deletion of page is not the way you intend it. Once the uploader has released the photo, it's unrevokably licenced. The thing you pointed, Author requested deletion of page, occurs when someone different than the author uploaded the pic and its legitimate author asks for it to be removed. This is not the case, 'cause author himself was the uploader who released it. This file should never have been deleted on this ground. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:58, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
In the situation you provided above, we usually say no permission or plain copyright violation. I wouldn't call it "author requested deletion" since it implies he/she did the work when it was proven that it is not. But we been told before if someone uploaded an image, and realized they cannot use that license or made an honest mistake within a week or two, it would be alright to delete (especially if it is a new user). In this case, this user has uploaded for years and continued to upload even after this image. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:30, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes, user cannot be safely considered a newbie. Mind you, I am not making Sreejithk guilty of anything, I guess that none of us is safe from making mistakes, I just wished to know why that file had been deleted on such flawed grounds. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 09:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Delinker

You’re right about this. I misunderstood that these BSicon*.svg files were always left to manual fixing, since their most important usage is within diagrams which are built by templates that call only part of the filenames. Having the Commons delinker fixing the remaining redirects is a boon. Once all redirects are fixed, is it necessary to nominate the unused redirect page manually? -- Tuválkin 08:39, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Normally you do not have to do anything manually, but somehow this file did not make it to User:CommonsDelinker/commands. I have added it manually. Now we just have to wait till the bot picks it up. You can nominate it for deletion once the replacement is made. The deletions are not automatic. It has to be nominated. --Sreejith K (talk) 08:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Oops. I did not notice that it is a BSicon file. CommonsDelinker will not pick these ones out. We will have to do manual replacement. Sorry about that. --Sreejith K (talk) 08:46, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
We always fix it manually, when we rename stuff, in the diagrams made from templates. But the delinker could very well fix stuff like interlinks to/from file pages about image derivatives. Also, I noticed you been changing RP4 to SKRZ-G4 in some of the templates. Pls don’t, as the renaming isn’t complete yet. We’re (I’m) on it. -- Tuválkin 09:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Alright. I will not make any more changes. Let me know if you need any help. --Sreejith K (talk) 10:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Sainz1996.jpg

I have restored this file because your deletion was illegal due to the fact that the old image was not replaced universally. Please be aware of how to handle duplicate files: please read what admins have to do here {{duplicate}}. Be also sure to transfer all relevant "old" information from the "old" image, e.g. descriptions in different languages. Thank you in advance! ---High Contrast (talk) 10:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I am using the MediaWiki:Gadget-AjaxQuickDelete.js duplicate handler and I am assuming that it is adding the universal replace entry in CommonsDelinker page correctly. If it is not, then that should be investigated. Regarding merging the details, it does not seem that I missed much, did I? --Sreejith K (talk) 10:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
It seems your tool had a delay. You have missed the Finnish description. I have added it. --High Contrast (talk) 14:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Ok, got it. Will be more careful next time. Thanks. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Angrois (Santiago de Compostela)

Envio permiso a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, --Isidoro Castaño (talk) 15:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

I am not sure which image you are talking about, but if the permissions are received at OTRS it will be appropriately handled. Thank you for your patience. --Sreejith K (talk) 18:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

हिन्दी भाषा में सकारात्मक योगदान के प्रति मेरा अटूट विश्वास

  • मैंने विकिपीडिया पर तथा हिन्दीनेस्ट जैसे प्रसिद्ध वेबसाईट पर अपना योगदान किया है।
  • मैंने पहली बार दूसरे विकी टेम्प्लेट का हिन्दी में अनुवाद किया -- जिन्में कामन्स के दायरे से बाहर टेम्प्लेट और उसी तरह मेटा-विकी की नोटिसें जैसे कि केंद्रीय प्रबन्धन नोटिस (हिन्दी सूचना) जैसे कैई टेम्प्लेट तथा सूचनाएं शामिल हैं। मेरी ही अनुवादित हैं।
  • हर साल विकिमीडिया विकिमेनिया सम्मेलन आयोजित करता है और मैंने देखा है कि 2011 के विकिमेनिया तक कोई हिंदी योगदानकर्ता कार्यक्रम और सूचना, आदि के हिंदी में अनुवाद के बारे में शायद सोचा ही नहीं। सौभाग्य से 2011 के समय मैंने सम्मेलन की सभी सूचनाओं का हिन्दी में अनुवाद किया जिन्हें आज भी विकिमेनिया 2011 श्रेणी:हिंदी में देखा जा सकता है।
  • मैंने कामन्स पर हिन्दी भाषीय सदस्यों की अप्लोड की हुई चित्रों पर अपने अनुवाद द्वारा निर्णय लेने में मदद की।
  • मैंने कई लोगों को हिन्दी विकिपीडिया से अवगत करवाया और योगदान की प्रक्रिया समझाई।
  • मैंने हिन्दी विकिपीडिया पर कई लेख लिखे हैं।

पिछले कुछ दिनों में मेरे कुछ मित्रों ने मेरी कुछ अनुवादित टिप्पणियों के प्रति उंगली उठाई है। जाने अनजाने में मुझे मानना पड़ेगा कि मुझ से कुछ-कुछ जगहों पर भूल-चुक हुई है जिसे मुझे इस प्रकार से सुधारना होगा कि भविष्य में ये न हो बल्कि मैं सकारात्मक एवं उल्लेखनीय योगदान पर अग्रसर रहूँ। मैं यही करना चाहूँगा और इसी सन्दर्भ में मैं अपनी कुछ हिन्दी निबंधों/लेखों/ योगदान का ब्यौरा दे चूका हूँ। Hindustanilanguage (talk) 03:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC).

Good that you understood your mistakes and even better that you admitted making them. I hope you will become a good contributor from now. Wish you all the best. Don't hesitate to ask for help. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Pictogram voting info.svg Info My assertion is to list a few areas of many meaningful contributions in Hindi I've made on Commons and elsewhere on the Wikis. "Will become a good contributor from now" statement should not misconstrued as a negation of good work done always despite any aberration that might have been discussed.Hindustanilanguage (talk) 19:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC).

hi translation

I was wondering if you'd be interested in Template:Assessments/translate/hi translation. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 23:23, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

My hindi is not good enough for helping with translations. But I have sent message to a few active Hindi Wikipedian's and I hope they will soon start working on the template. Thanks for the note. --Sreejith K (talk) 05:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi all, I tried to translate a portion of the template but it seems to a complex file composed of many sentences including comments not having impact on the display and actual text. As compared to this, templates such as Categorize are easy to translate, and I've done already. I suggest if somebody copies the key sentences/core sentences impacting the display ( leaving aside code, comments and sentences not impacting the display ) and pastes them on this sandbox replacing the partially translated template as it exists now, may be I can be of some help . Hindustanilanguage (talk) 19:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC).
A message pertaining to the above exercise may also be posted on my talk page. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 04:32, 6 June 2012 (UTC).

File:Arms of Sir Robert Bell Knight Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer copy.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arms of Sir Robert Bell Knight Lord Chief Baron of the Exchequer copy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FASTILY (TALK) 09:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)


File:BBC Radio 4 Extra.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:BBC Radio 4 Extra.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Your bot has uploaded this file and you are its operator, which is why I am notifying you. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 16:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Deleted file

Hi!
I had tagged this file File:Elena Kupchyna.jpg for copyvio today. It was hence deleted i guess. The uploader seems to have posted some message on this file in place of the actual file. I got the same msg on my talk page. (I dont know whats wrong here. Was the image deleted and the uploader recreated the page and posted his msg there?) I cant figure out maybe as i cant see deleted files. It seems the User:BelarusMFA has copyrights and is willing to freely upload the files to Commons. Would you please look into this? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Restored image and converted {{copyvio}} to Deletion request. The user will have to email permission to OTRS to save the image. --Sreejith K (talk) 14:04, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification of possible copyright violation for File:Zona Franca Bouzas.jpg

Dear Sreejithk2000, Yesterday I have Uploaded the File:Zona Franca Bouzas.jpg. The file is property of the Consorcio de la Zona Franca de Vigo, entity located in Vigo in what i work. The press Department told me to upload the file in his profile so we don´t violate the copyright. Please, tell us what i have to do to restore the file in the profile. Thank you in advance. --Natalvarino (talk) 10:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Can you please ask your company to email OTRS stating that they are releasing the image under an appropriate free license? Please use the email templates listed on the OTRS page. --Sreejith K (talk) 10:45, 8 June 2012 (UTC)


File:Walmart Canada Logo.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Walmart Canada Logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

You are the bot's operator, and I thus put the notice on this page. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 14:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Steam locomotives in Chabówka

Hello. Could you restore this category? We have a problem with IP railway vandal, who marks English-named categories for deletion and keeps moving all the pages to Polish-named Category:Lokomotywy parowe w Chabówce. There are possibly some other problems like this one, but I have no time to track it all at the moment. Pibwl (talk) 16:09, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done - Restored and redirected to the polish equivalent. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:29, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. Pibwl (talk) 21:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Heavy & Chudo (De derecha a izquierda).jpg

Sreejithk2000, I tagged the file for speedy delete, because the file was uploaded for promotional purposes, that is ouside the project scope (also explained in the Criteria for speedy deletion). The image was included in the article Heavy & Chudo at es:Wikipedia, tagged for speedy delete.

I'll revert your edition, because the file clearly meets the Criteria for speedy delete and the only article that the image is used will be (re)deleted. Amitie 10g (talk) 05:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Removing deletion tags from pages is not a good practice. I have deleted the image nevertheless. --Sreejith K (talk) 06:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Railway vandal

Could you undelete Category:PKP class Pt31, Category:PKP class Tw12, Category:PKP class TKt1, Category:TKp T2D Slask, Category:PKP class TKp? It's safer to undo all changes you see in railway topic made by IP, and block IP adress in similar cases instantly - it saves some work. Pibwl (talk) 21:30, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

It looks like all these has been undeleted already. Did I miss something? --Sreejith K (talk) 05:21, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
I think they weren't when I last saw them :-) Thanks anyway. Pibwl (talk) 10:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey you

Hey you deleted a file I asked not to be deleted; see File talk:1bc36.png. Face-smile.svg In all seriousness, I don't really care, but you might want to have a conversation with the user who was upset with me over it. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:27, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Ok, restored it and put a message on the file page itself. I am not quite sure how to prevent other admins from deleting it as a duplicate. --Sreejith K (talk) 11:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

1941 Packard photo

Good day. Thanks for your attention at finding and deleting duplicate files! I wanted to leave you a note that I reversed your deletion of File:1941 Packard 120 Convertible Sedan.jpg. The reason was that this version was older (having been on Commons more than a year longer), had a clearer title, and was better categorized (eg, specific "Category:1941 Packard" rather than the vague "Category:1941" at the duplicate). I redirected duplicate File:1941 Packard 120 Convertible Sedan (5015355221).jpg there. Other things being equal, when there are duplicate files I generally keep the older one. If the two versions are categorized differently, I suggest consolidating the better cats on the version to be kept. Thanks again for your work. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 13:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your edit looks fine. I took the one with better contents in the AjaxQuickDelete popup. I usually do merging of contents, especially the categories. I am maintaining a page of duplicates now User:Sreejithk2000/Duplicates. If you wish to help, please have a look. --Sreejith K (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)