User talk:Ssolbergj

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Troubles with lions[edit]

I'm thinking about decent alternatives. The first is a slight edit of Sodacan's lion, and the second looks a lot more like the lion that turned out to be copyright protected one. The last, being based on the official design of the city, is not under copyright. I've tested it in the Belgian state arms. Adelbrecht (talk) 10:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, another lion is needed. I uploaded the bruges lion, with a new head, tail and paws. What do you think about it? - Ssolbergj (talk) 14:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Personally, I'm quite fond of the head and paws of the Bruges lion. I like the more "deformed" look of it, and it works the best in certain heraldry. Your adaptation has its merits too. Perhaps we should use different lions depending on the coat of arms? The Bruges lion fits quite good with my designs for the Belgian provinces, and I will probably use your adaptation in my Napoleonic arms. What will be used for the Belgian royal and state arms, I think we'd best leave that to Katepanomegas so there's a unity of style. I'll phase out my adaptation of the Sodacannic lion, and replace it with either of the two Bruges lions where I see fit, but first I'll work on replacing the existing copyright infringements.
Oh, could you perhaps adapt your new amalgamated head to the supporters? I'm not that fond of the top part of the head of the Sodacannic lion, in here for example. Adelbrecht (talk) 16:12, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
What I don't like about the Bruges lion is the lower part of its mane, which clearly was drawn to suite the huge cross which hangs around the original lion's neck. There is also a lack of detail on top of its head due to the original crown. The shading on its claws is also a bit crude. - Ssolbergj (talk) 16:33, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
You're right. I didn't really notice in my haste to replace the lion. It's not that noticeable unless really looked at closely. I'll see if I can reshade it, add an ear and a curl to the head without butchering it. I'll replace the files in which I've used it already later on, though. First priority is saving my files from deletion. :p Adelbrecht (talk) 16:51, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Sorry to barge in here, but I'd go for the lion based on Sodacan's with a different head. In my opionion it simpler and more universally applicable thann the Bruges lion. But they're your files. :-) Sir Iain (talk) 21:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

I've added yet another sodacan tail and head to the bruges lion. These look better than the previous ones IMO. - Ssolbergj (talk) 00:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I really like this one. Adelbrecht (talk) 10:41, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Another depiction of your favorite myth?[edit]

File:Untitled(Charles Christian Nahl).asp.jpg -- AnonMoos (talk) 05:36, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Haha, I'm not sure. :) - Ssolbergj (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
I really like your Euler chart of European Military Integration. It is very helpful to envision the various national participation. I do believe you should check out the NATO membership, though. While Malta had a MAP program at one time, they never joined. Cyprus had also been vetoed by Turkey and therefore has not aceded to NATO. I hope this is helpful. Thanks for the diagram, though. Julien Houle (talk) 22:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I fixed the NATO membership like you said. - Ssolbergj (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I really like your coats of arms, particularly EU ones.... How do you do? Can you do one for me?

Copyright violation[edit]

File:Coat of Arms of the Netherlands.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Coat of Arms of the Netherlands.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

77.164.22.132 17:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms of the Netherlands.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Coat of Arms of the Netherlands.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 22:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Hey! I really like your coats of arms! could you do something for me? --37.117.8.46 18:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Karlspreis.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karlspreis.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:59, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Ssolbergj,

I was wondering if you checked the various memberships shown on your European Defence Integration euler diagram. Some of them have missing members, for example, the NATO group should include Albania and Croatia which are the newest members and have been admitted as of 1 April 2009. There should be 28 members in all. This is meant to be constructive criticism and hope it is taken that way as I really admire your work.

Julien Houle (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2013 (UTC)


eagle and black raven in sweden coat of arms[edit]

Hello, I hope you are well I read with interest a 1944 book entitled Dynastien Bernadottes vapen och det svenska riksvapnet Arvid Berghman.

It tells us that the Napoleonic eagle crest disappears in 1826 (not 1844) to make way for a black raven sitting on a lightning (like an eagle) until 1885 the raven becomes an eagle but with the black beak and legs and golden eagle returns in 1908 while gold.

This text is identical to the arms of the Union Sweden-Norway. Coat of Arms of the Union between Sweden and Norway.svg


Good day to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 07:54, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Bjelbo lion[edit]

Hej!

You've been doing some really great work with your heraldic lions. I wonder if you'd care to improve the Bjelbo arms Armoiries Suède ancien.svg with a lion like the one from Oscar II's arms Blason Oscar II de Suède.svg or the lion of Bulgaria. EU Member States' CoA Series- Bulgaria.svg Thank you, and thanks again for your ongoing work in heraldry! Wilhelm meis (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Someone just showed me this one, which will do quite nicely. Wilhelm meis (talk) 17:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC) Armoiries Suède ancien 2.svg

File:Arms of Canada.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Arms of Canada.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 19:41, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 13:03, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Nordic Battle Group lion[edit]

I'd like to suggest a couple corrections to File:Coat of Arms of the Nordic Battlegroup.svg. According to Henrik Klackenberg (Statsheraldiker) and Vladimir Sagerlund (Heraldic Artist), the coat of arms officially retains its genitalia, while the sleeve patches used by the military differ in that way from the registered coat of arms. (Here is Riksarkivets version.) Sagerlunds comments to Göteborgs Posten can be found here. I believe also from the blazon that the tongue should be silver and the teeth should be red (the lion is armed gules but not langued gules). [Nevermind that, looking at their own images here and here, they seem to consider a red tongue and silver teeth to be consistent with this blazon, but it should have genitals.] Thank you, once again, for your help! Wilhelm meis (talk) 18:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

EUMETSAT map of Member and Cooperating States[edit]

Hi, I am not a graphic expert, so i did not dare updating the very nice map. Estonia is a member state since June 2013. Could you please update the map when you have time? I updated the EUMETSAT entry into the Italian and German Wiki. --Smd13 (talk) 10:23, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Flag Belgium brussels.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag Belgium brussels.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Werieth (talk) 23:12, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Belgium brussels iris.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Belgium brussels iris.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dereckson (talk) 20:51, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Insigne minus Turciae.svg[edit]

File:Insigne minus Turciae.svg

Is this your "impression" of the proposed coat of arms? If not, where did you find the image? -- Infestor  TCF 22:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

It is based on File:1925arma.gif. I have not seen the actual blazon, but the rendition I uploaded almost certainly follows it. - Ssolbergj (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Members of the Order of the Seraphim[edit]

As the creator of the collar of the order, as well as many other components of the Swedish coats of arms, would you be willing to also make the coats of arms of the members of the Order of the Seraphim seen in this DR? Most of them already have the necessary components on Commons and just need to be put together. Fry1989 eh? 04:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 06:01, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:India (orthographic projection).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:India (orthographic projection).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ankr93 (talk) 08:53, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Armory of the European Union[edit]

Could you check this page? Cheers.--Carnby (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

SVG version of the UN Emblem of France[edit]

Since nobody answered me in the lab, I would ask you to recreate this emblem in SVG, taking this CoA for example, since you seem to have good skills in vector graphics (especially as far as heraldry is concerned). Kind regards and thanks in advance.--Carnby (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Australia (orthographic projection).svg[edit]

Hello, Ssolbergj

Please see this edit, I think very generic maps like this should be in Public domain, some users have already tagged theirs maps with {{PD-self}}. Could you refuse your copyright to PD-self? This will simplify using them in functional templates on Wikipedia. Regards, --Rezonansowy (talk) 12:06, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Paris-tours.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris-tours.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.176.82 11:27, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Various German Imperial Arms[edit]

Hi, remember the discussion back in October 2011 [1] when I pointed out factual heraldical errors in your versions of the Imperial German arms? You actually wanted to correct them but it's been 2 years now nothing has happened. Meanwhile your pictures are present in several wikipedias presenting false information to readers and infact some have taken over a few of the errors in their derirative work. So again I would like to kindly ask you to correct these issues soon, otherwise a deletion request must be filed to prevent further spread of errornous information. For correcting the errors it would be best to have a look into Ströhls blazon descriptions. Greetings, --David Liuzzo (talk) 23:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Council of the EU logo.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Council of the EU logo.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Hi, you tagged this file as PD-self. Actually, I dare to doubt that you are the author of this design. This is government insignia and needs proper licence tagging. Thank you if you could update the file. Unfortunately, myself I have no time to research the EU licensing conditions but sincerely doubt this is a free image. Most likely move back from Commons to Wikipedia. Regards, kashmiri 18:27, 1 March 2014 (UTC) 18:26, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Council of the EU logo.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Council of the EU logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 09:18, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

File:United_States_(orthographic_projection).svg[edit]

Hi! Could you please either 1) make a new one that also covers Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands, or 2) make a separate one that also covers those U.S. territories? Niceley (talk) 06:09, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Fake SVG Objects[edit]

Could you kindly as per immediately desist uploading raster graphics in SVG wrappers - unless you can state a very specific reason for this. Your attention to this matter is highly appreciated. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 09:20, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Do you have an example? - Ssolbergj (talk) 14:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:EscudoTGU.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:EscudoTGU.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:EscudoTGU.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:07, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Request[edit]

Having seen your work on global maps, i want to ask you if it would be possible for you to do an orthographic projection for these islands File:Mauritius (+claim islands).svg (excluding Réunion island) with Mauritius island centered. In fact i already done these one File:Mauritius (orthographic projection).svg, File:Mauritius (orthographic projection with inset).svg previously, but i couldn't include islands which are claim by Mauritius, as i made these map using File:MDG orthographic.svg (which is centered on Madagascar), we need one which is more centered toward the east to be able to represent all islands correctly. I would suggest to highlight islands which are part of Mauritius in Green (i.e Mauritius, Rodrigues, Saint Brandon, Agalega) and islands which are claim by Mauritius in any other color (i.e Tromelin, Chagos Archipelago) and upload the file as an updated version of this one. The reason for creating this orthographic projection is to use it in wikipedia infobox and relevant articles, together with this map so that readers will not only have a detailed map of these islands but will also be able to locate them on the global map more easily. I could have done it myself but i don't how to centered these islands on the orthographic projection, i tried to search for a suitable one where the western Indian Ocean is centered from these Category:SVG locator maps of countries (globe location map scheme), Category:SVG locator maps of countries (green and grey globe scheme) which i could have modify, but unfortunately i didn't find the right one. As the western Indian Ocean will be centered on the map which i requested, it will also be useful for other purposes. Thanks.Kingroyos (talk) 19:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC)