User talk:Stanlekub

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Hubble deep field.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:Galaxies.

EugeneZelenko 8 July 2005 04:16 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Bouton_astro_ébauche.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bouton_astro_ébauche.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 19:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Bouton_astro_catégorie.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bouton_astro_catégorie.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 19:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Chamaeleon_carte.svg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 18:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

✓ Done, I forgot this one, sorry. --Stanlekub 07:18, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


Image:Complete neuron cell diagram.svg[edit]

Salut ! Juste un mot rapide pour signaler ce qui me semble est une erreur de frappe sur l'image donnée en titre : sauf langage spécifique que je ne connait pas, le mot noyeau n'existe pas en français, on dit noyau. Cordialement, --Stanlekub 16:32, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

C'est réglé. Merci pour l'info! Berrucomons 12:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)


Image:Oort_cloud_Sedna_orbit_french.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Oort_cloud_Sedna_orbit_french.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Karelj 20:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Visiblement, la personne ci-dessus n'a pas vu que l'image a été traduite en français. Je viens de le signaler sur la page de vote. Un conseil, cependant : dans la partie "Description" ou "Source", il vaut mieux préciser "Translation of Image:Machin.jpg", ça aide à voir l'origine de l'image. La demande de suppression sera bien vite cloturée. A+, le Korrigan bla 23:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Angiospermes arbre3 fr.svg[edit]

Salut,
C'est une merveille ta Image:Angiospermes arbre3 fr.svg.
Si tu fais les autres, je passe fr.wikifrance à ton image.
Amitié Liné1 08:17, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Hehe
Ton Image:Angiospermes arbre3 fr.svg est une amélioration de Image:Angiospermes arbre3.png
Mais il reste:
Désolé, ca fait beaucoup de boulot ;-)
Amitié Liné1 09:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


File:Huygen probe-decent nasa FR.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Huygen probe-decent nasa FR.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Uwe W. (talk) 22:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Image:Eclipsing_binary_star_animation_2.gif[edit]

The picture does not match reality. Algol A (class/mass/radius) - B8V/3.59/2.3 and Algol B - K0IV/0.79/3.0. Thus Algol B (orange) should be a little more Algol A (blue), and have a larger radius of the orbit. In the picture, however, Algol B is much smaller than Algol A. In addition, the orbits of A and B (radii) should differ by 4.5 times.