User talk:Stebunik

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Stebunik!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Stebunik!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:58, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

watermarks[edit]

Hi Stebunik,

Watermarked images are discouraged by policy, so please don't watermark images. See [1] --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Watermark Crown CA.png This image contains digital watermarking or credits in the image itself. The usage of watermarks is discouraged. If a non-watermarked version of the image is available, please upload it under the same file name and then remove this template. If watermark is removed by editing the original version of the image, ensure that the removed information is present in the image description page, and then replace this template with {{Attribution metadata from licensed image}} or {{Metadata from image}}, whichever is appropriate to the image.

Caution: Before removing a watermark from a copyrighted image, please read the WMF's analysis of the legal ramifications of doing so, as well as Commons' proposed policy regarding watermarks.

If the old version is still useful, for example if removing the watermark damages the image significantly, upload the new version under a different title so that both can be used (e.g. [[File:Mount_Everest.jpg]] → [[File:Mount_Everest - no watermark.jpg]]. After uploading the non-watermarked version, replace this template with: {{superseded|File:Mount Everest - no watermark.jpg|image without watermarks}}, replacing the italicised name with the file name in question.


العربية | català | čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | eesti | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | română | русский | slovenščina | svenska | ไทย | українська | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

I will delete my watermarked pictures, but I cannot, however all my watermarked pictures are free too. If you delete watermarked pictures, I shall give others withouth watermark. --Stebunik (talk) 00:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Stebunik, by uploading a new version (without watermark) of the same image, you can achieve the same. No special permissions needed. But the hint also was for the future and expected future uploads. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 06:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Strle_Anton-18.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Strle_Anton-18.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Strle_Anton-18.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 17:43, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Strle_Anton-18.jpg[edit]

Why do you do problems with this picture? Catholic newspaper Družina from Ljublana is owner of this picture. He sent me this picture for use and gave universal license. I asked them for it and they sent me today picture and text about professor dr. Anton Strle, Serv of God and theologian. Director is my friend and sent to me wishing, that I write something about this Serve of God. This photo is free license in common. Let you not delete this file! Yuo can delete only those my pictures with Watermark. They all have however free license too. --Stebunik (talk) 19:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

You are asked to please forward your written permission to Wikimedia. See COM:OTRS. Thats the standard procedure for that case. --Martin H. (talk) 23:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
If necessary (watermark) let you delete picture. If not necessary, do not delete! --Stebunik (talk) 07:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


Copyright status: File:Perko Lojze-Grozde 99.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Perko Lojze-Grozde 99.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Eleassar (t/p) 12:20, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

The file is missing the information of the author of the oil on canvas (picture itself) and the year when it was created. You are also asked to please forward the written permission of your brother to Wikimedia. See COM:OTRS. That's the standard procedure for that case. --Eleassar (t/p) 12:20, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
My brother wrote to me permission for free license of photo. But there were some private notice too. So I asked him for new letter only with permission. If procedure is so complicate, in futur I will well think about uploading on Wikipedia! You do not beleive on my word nothing! --Stebunik (talk) 07:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Twice free license[edit]

File:Perko Lojze-Grozde 99.jpg|base

I have permission for sending on Wikipedia. Twice gave it my brother the photograph. He cannot use that complicate procedure to send it to commons. If you send to me e-mail, I can send it to him and he will answer with permission. He does not understand that complicate procedure.
Permission gave to me painter too, Lojze Perko. He wrote it with his hand in my exercizes-book. He has not however computer and he cannot send e-mail neither to me nor to Wikipedia. Than you for understanding! --Stebunik (talk) 18:58, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Original Message -----

From: Blaž Jelen To: Janez Jelen Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 8:55 PM Subject: Dovoljenje


Dne 13. VI. 2010 sem v Celju na Evharističnem kongresu fotografiral sliko, ki jo je narisal Tomaž Perko. Na njej je naslikan blaženi Lojze Grozde. Dovoljujem, da se ta moja fotografija in vse, ki sem jih napravil na evharističnem kongresu v Celju. uporabijo na Wikipediji in tudi v druge poštene namene. Blaž Jelen, 27. julija 2010.

Email[edit]

Hello,

I recieved your email and yes I deleted the picture because the license is missing, the permission for the file should be handled as above you should send the letter to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and they will undelete the file.

Ow yeah just for the record, please stay calm when you write a email, the next time you send me a email like this I will make a complaint and let a other administrator look at it and he can decide how to respond on it. I'm very happy to help out, and explain everything until the end of time but I will not tolerate emails like that.


Best regards,

Huib talk Abigor @ meta 20:36, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Lincense[edit]

I did not understand, why you canceled picture of Grozde. Now I have all licenses: from photograph and from autor of picture. My brother is photograph and he wrote new e-mail:


Original Message -----

From: Blaž Jelen To: Janez Jelen Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 8:48 PM Subject: Re: Dovoljenje

Dne 13. VI. 2010 sem v Celju na evharističnem kongresu fotografiral sliko, ki jo je narisal Tomaž Perko. Na njej je naslikan blaženi Lojze Grozde. Dovoljujem, da se ta moja fotografija in vse, ki sem jih napravil na evharističnem kongresu v Celju. uporabijo na Wikipediji in tudi v druge poštene namene. Blaž Jelen, 27. julija 2010

P.S.: After this e-mail I will write license of autor too. He has not e-mail, so wrote with hand in my exercize-book his license. --Stebunik (talk) 20:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

I must go to sleep now. When I have time, I will at-write the license, that gave to me autor Tomaž Perko in Slovenia on 11. VIII. 2010. He made that picture in 1992. The title of picture was in Wikimedia commons: Perko Lojze-Grozde 99.jpg I was angry, because you do not trust in me and so canceled that picture in Infobox. Be in peace. --Stebunik (talk) 20:54, 17 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Huda-jama 2009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Huda-jama 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--— Yerpo Eh? 06:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

PS: ne vem od kje ti ideja, da so naslovnice knjig javna last, ampak zagotavljam, da je napačna. — Yerpo Eh? 06:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

V "poštene namene" (fair use) se avtorsko zaščitena slika lahko uporablja, če ilustrira predmet članka, torej v primeru naslovnice članek o knjigi (ne pa o splošnejšem pojmu, torej je tvoja uporaba naslovnice za ilustracijo članka o Hudi jami neprimerna). Vendar to velja za posamezne Wikipedije, ne v Zbirki. Tukaj avtorsko zaščitenih vsebin pod nobenim pogojem ne sprejemajo. Ustno dovoljenje za svobodnejšo uporabo v Zbirki ni dovolj, z lastnikom avtorskih pravic morata opraviti postopek, opisan na Commons:OTRS (lahko v nemščini če jo bolj obvladaš). — Yerpo Eh? 13:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
In v čem je ta postopek, če lahko poenostaviš? V čem je bistvo? Ti postopki se mi zdijo zelo zapleteni.--Stebunik (talk) 14:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Stvar ni nič posebnega. Na kratko, nosilec avtorskih pravic mora poslati e-mail sporočilo z dovoljenjem na navedeni naslov. Sporočilo mora izrecno opredeliti samo na katero sliko se nanaša in eno od prostih licenc - GFDL ali CC-BY-SA 3.0 (torej ni dovolj "dovoljujemo uporabo v Wikipediji"). Te omogočajo prosto uporabo gradiva. Zgled za že sestavljeno sporočilo je tukaj oz. v nemščini tukaj, lahko mu ga skopiraš z izpolnjenim nazivom licence in imenom datoteke, on pa ga podpiše in pošlje. Na opisno stran od slike medtem dodaš tekst {{OTRS pending}}. Vse ostalo bodo postorili drugi, ko bo e-mail prišel. — Yerpo Eh? 16:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Hvala.--Stebunik (talk) 16:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Stajićevo Livade-stables2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

{{OTRS pending}}--Stebunik (talk) 19:34, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

== I gave already free license, when I gave my own work: File:Stajićevo Livaed-stables2.jpg

This is my own work. Free license, I gave already, when I gave it to Commons. I give free license once more. --Stebunik (talk) 18:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Strle_Anton-18.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Strle_Anton-18.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Strle_Anton-18.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Captain-tucker (talk) 19:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

I could not locate any OTRS ticket related to this image in the permissions queues. If you have a valid permission please email it according to COM:OTRS. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

Stajicevo Livade-stables2.jpg[edit]

Maybe I forgott to give free license, but it is. It is my own work and so do not delete it - Contribution 3. I replaced old work with the same work, but with license. --Stebunik (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Strle[edit]

I have not courage to disturb Publisher, who sent me file Strle_anton-18.jpg. He was so kind, that sent me literature, texts and pictures. I think, in this moment is a time for patience, not for deleting. Thank you. --Stebunik (talk) 07:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Strle_Anton-18.jpg[edit]

I recieved this file from Publisher Družina with wish, that I give it in Wikipedia. I do not understand that very complicate procedure, they do not understan too. They send me text and picture, from Publisher and Editor. I think it is more as enough. --Stebunik (talk) 18:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Strle - only one picture[edit]

I riceived from Družina Publisher and with permission this only file of Strle Anton, for info-box. So it is necessary for honeste use, because only one file. --Stebunik (talk) 22:21, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Cebela-2001-Slo.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cebela-2001-Slo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yerpo Eh? 19:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

If necessary, let you delete this file. It is for one user, who requested it. --Stebunik (talk) 08:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Categorization[edit]

Hi. Thank you for uploading images of several places in Vojvodina. However, I would suggest that you use more specific categorization for your images instead simply "Vojvodina". There are separate subcategories for most settlements in Vojvodina and for other appropriate subjects. For example, proper categories for this image are "Mužlja" and "Education in Zrenjanin" (or if some settlement does not have its separate category for education, then image should be included into category "Education in Vojvodina", but not into main "Vojvodina" category). So, I suggest that you try to use this way of categorization in the future because otherwise other users are forced to do that instead of you. Just a friendly suggestion. PANONIAN (talk) 17:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

License for Grozde of Perko[edit]

Here is license for picture of Tomaž Perko. He wrote with his hand permission for his picture with his hand.

File:License-Perko Grozde.jpg
Free License for picture of painter Tomaž Perko in Slovenian with his hand to me on 11. VIII. 1910 in Grahovo.

--Stebunik (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Tapai1 JP2.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tapai1 JP2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 22:51, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Permission for file Tapai JP2.jpg and Tapai1 JP2.jpg (the same file, but I photographed from far and near the same picture) is here (Tápai István wrote it in Hungarian): File:JP2 Tapai-permission.jpg

Permission in Hungarian free license from author for picture of JP2 praying, which i photographed

Perko and Tápai have not internet, so wrote both with own hand. When I meet Perko, he shall write more for free license yet. He enjoys, that his picture is published on Wikipedia and on other places (1st Slovenian Eucharistic Congress in Celje 2010, newspapers, books etc, for honest use overall)

--Stebunik (talk) 21:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Does the permission fulfill the requirements of Commons:Project scope#Required licensing terms? Is permission given for modification of the work and for commercial reuse? Or is it what I read: Commons:Fair use/honest use? --Martin H. (talk) 21:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
Yes: honest use is egual to fair use. --Stebunik (talk) 20:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Permission is given for every use. If my declaration is not enough, let you write formular and autor will rewrite it. He wrote: I drew picture of JP2. Can be used for honest domain. Tápai István 9. V. 2011. --Stebunik (talk) 03:29, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
V tem primeru - enako je bilo pri Perkovi sliki Lojzeta Grozdeta - je dano dovoljenje v vse namene in povsod. Oba sta celo izrazila ustno željo, da se slika objavi. Ne vem, zakaj potegovati te podrobnosti, ki postanejo vprašljive šele tedaj, ko se pojavi dvom. Kdo pa drugi jamči za resničnost podatkov, če ne jaz, ki sem jih dal gori? Ali pa sem zahteval, da se obnovi slika, za katero je bilo jasno, da ne more pridobiti potrebnih licenc? Izgleda, da so take vrste slike nekomu napoti. Če sem jaz tako diktiral, sem mislil, da je tako potrebno. Avtor je samo to napisal, kar je mislil, da je potrebno, da se slika lahko objavi povsod in vse namene. Nihče pa ni mislil na to, da lahko postane tarča dlakocepstva.--Stebunik (talk) 00:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pagoda-Nerodom-I_1904.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pagoda-Nerodom-I_1904.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ras67 (talk) 13:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC) File Pagoda-Nerodom-I_1904.jpg is public domain, because is older as 100 years (from year 1904 I scanned, Die katholischen Missionen) --Stebunik (talk) 21:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

When I write about Cambogia, I will use it. Please, let somebody declare: exists maybe this pagoda yet now and publish that picture! --Stebunik (talk) 03:33, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Stebunik, če klikneš na besedi "its entry" lepo piše, zakaj je bil podan predlog za brisanje. Kar si naložil je slaba kopija slike Pagoda-Norodom-1904 Cambodia.jpg in res ni potrebe, da bi bile obe tukaj. Avtorske pravice niso sporne. Novejše slike kompleksa so v angleškem članku o tej temi. — Yerpo Eh? 07:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Slika v črno-belem Pagoda-Nerodom je samo prividno boljša. Če dobro pogledaš, je slika v sivi oziroma rjavi tehniki mnogo natančnejša, saj se vidijo tudi odtenki črk v gotici. Črno-bela slika ni izbrisala le črk, ampak tudi fine nijanse z originalne slike. Zato bi bili potrebni obe verziji: siva je bolj natančna, črno-bela pa lepše izgleda. Poleg tega ima ena originalen napis v gotici, druga je pa brez njega. --Stebunik (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Ne vem, kaj je "originalnega" glede tistega napisa v gotici. Res je star, ampak je del publikacije, ne fotografije, ki je verjetno še starejša. Dokler je glavni predmet datoteke fotografija, je ta konkreten napis postranskega pomena. Kar se lepote tiče pa je tukaj sploh nepomembna (važna je samo natančnost reprodukcije), tako da to ni argument za ohranitev obeh datotek. — Yerpo Eh? 08:15, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Ogledal sem si tisto mojo originalno skenirano sliko kakor tudi malo prirejeno. Opazil sem, da pri tisti prirejeni ni mogoče videti večje ločljivosti, pri moji pa jo je mogoče videti. --Stebunik (talk) 18:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Ne razumem. Obe sta dostopni v visoki ločljivosti - original datoteka in popravljena, enako kot ta slaba kopija. — Yerpo Eh? 19:21, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Jaz sem šel gledat na stran o Srebrni Pagodi, ki si jo Ti naznačil. Jaz višje ločljivosti nisem mogel odpreti (tiste, za katero piše, da jo je nekdo 11. maja 2011 malo popravil). Mislim pa, da Ti misliš na tisto, kar sem jaz skeniral. Če pa je komu všeč, naj briše. Veseli me, da je tista iz leta 1904 omenjena na njihovi strani. Jaz ne bi brisal nobene: če se pa drugim zdi, pa naj. --Stebunik (talk) 19:26, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
Brez skrbi, obe se da odpreti v polni ločljivosti, iz članka je samo en klik več. — Yerpo Eh? 11:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Pope Paul VI.[edit]

Could you please elaborate your conclusion "This photo was official photo of Pope in parochial offices round 1963 and so became public domain". Why should it be PD now? --Túrelio (talk) 18:27, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Because it was exposed for public use and it is not artificicial picture. It was exposed in public place and it is in public domaine now too, I think. If it is not so, excuse me and delete it. Now it is my exemplar. I photographed this picture too; it shall be free license, maybe?--Stebunik (talk) 19:04, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
What do you exactly mean by "was exposed for public use"? If you want to claim it per Freedom-of-panorama exemption of Serbia, please look here, whether it fulfills the conditions. --Túrelio (talk) 19:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Please, let you explain it in simple and easy language. Thank you!--Stebunik (talk) 19:34, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
I don't understand why you are saying that. You wrote "it was exposed for public use". I asked you, what do you mean by that.
Photographies are protected until 70 years after the death of the photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 19:56, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Protected is, when is photographer known. How can be photo protected, when photographer is unknown? It is photography of Pope Paul VI and it was exposed during his life. It is now my photography, in my posession, because it is donated to me today from paroch of Titel and Lok. I give my photography as free license. Why not? I have photographed this photography too and I will give it on Wikipedia - I think, that than it shall not be problem.--Stebunik (talk) 21:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
"Protected is, when is photographer known" - No, that is not generally true. There are special regulations for truely anonymous works. But even anonymous works are protected. And it is very unlikely that an such officially looking shot of a pope is really an anonymous work. A work is not anonymous because you or I don't know the name of the artist/photographer. --Túrelio (talk) 09:09, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Pope_Paul-VI.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pope_Paul-VI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Jubilaeum-2000_Pope-JP-II.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jubilaeum-2000_Pope-JP-II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:43, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Koledarcek9-bga_Janez_Hocevar.TIF[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Koledarcek9-bga_Janez_Hocevar.TIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Koledarček je bil izdan konec leta 1943 za leto 1944. Torej je star letos 71 let. Slika je bila objavljena takrat in se torej lahko obnovi.--Stebunik (talk) 09:21, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

File:CrnaBara_church-school.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CrnaBara_church-school.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Sziveri-Janos.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sziveri-Janos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:54, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Sziveri-Janos_1983.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sziveri-Janos_1983.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 14:56, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Hocevar-Bg_2010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hocevar-Bg_2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:MJB-by-writing.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MJB-by-writing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:03, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

MJB-by-writing.jpg is made from my sister Marija round 1968 year with her photoaparat. She permissed to me for all here photos an for this too to use them with free license on Wikipedia and overall. --91.148.64.153 19:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
MJB-by-writing.jpg is made from my sister Jelen Marija round 1968 year with her photoaparat. She permissed to me for all here photos an for this too to use them with free license on Wikipedia and overall. --Stebunik (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
Živjo, čeprav je bila ta slika že izbrisana, se lahko obnovi, če pošlješ e-mail z njenim dovoljenjem ali sken njenega pisnega dovoljenja na naslov, naveden na strani COM:OTRS. Če potrebuješ pomoč, sporoči. --Eleassar (t/p) 19:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Danes sem dobil pisno dovoljenje od avtorice slike, moje sestre Marije Jelen. Tukaj ga dodajam. DOVOLJENJE - PERMISSION Inbox


Blaž Jelen <hmeljar@gmail.com> Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:24 PM To: Janez Jelen <mukimaka@gmail.com> Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original

Slovensko:

DOVOLJENJE Jaz, Marija Jelen, dipl. ing. agr., sem avtorica te slike, ko moja mama Marija Jelen-Brenčič MJB tipka na pisalni stroj Underwood. Slika je nastala okrog leta 1985. Dovoljujem, da se ta slika objavi na Wikipediji in povsod drugod pod "prosto licenco".

Marija Jelen, dipl. ing. agr Šalek, 28. januarja 2013


English:

PERMISSION I, Marija Jelen, dipl. ing. agr., I am the author of this picture, when Marija Jelen-Brenčič MJB writes on the typewriter "Underwood". The picture was made around 1985. I give permission for the publication of this image, on Wikipedia and elsewhere under the "free license".

Marija Jelen, dipl. ing. agr Šalek, 28th January 2013


File:MJB-by-writing.jpg

Pozdravljen. Dovoljenje je videti ok, vendar ni navedeno, katero prosto licenco. Lahko uporabiš licenco CC BY-SA 2.5 SI ali katero drugo. Predlagam, da sestra izpolni obrazec na COM:OTRS/sl, potem pa ga pošlješ na permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Hvala, lp. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Licenca za File:MJB-by-writing.jpg naj bo (licenca Creative Commons Pripis Dovoljenja-Razširjanje pod enakimi pogoji 3.0). Hvala.--Stebunik (talk) 11:05, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Grozde_Lojze_martyr.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grozde_Lojze_martyr.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Guido-Fontgalland_Bild-napis.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Guido-Fontgalland_Bild-napis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Bogdanffy-Szilard_7.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bogdanffy-Szilard_7.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Tapai_JP2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tapai_JP2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Joze-Poljanec_Stepinac.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Joze-Poljanec_Stepinac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:1943_Stepinac01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1943_Stepinac01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

In this year will pass 70 years, when Stepinac,s letter was published. So I please you, to restoring. --Stebunik (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Pij-IX.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pij-IX.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Pope-Cornelius_Callist1a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pope-Cornelius_Callist1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:38, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Drina'-1_Tapai.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Drina'-1_Tapai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Perko-Grozde_1992.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Perko-Grozde_1992.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 15:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:GabrijelBukatko.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GabrijelBukatko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Brencic_Podlipa-dom.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brencic_Podlipa-dom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

This picture is created from my father about 1937, so I give permission. --Stebunik (talk) 12:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Dedek-407 Czelesztin pic1.TIF[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please help, give you the appropriate license. I do not understand it, is too complicated.--Stebunik (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)


File:Celestine-I Dedek.TIF[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please help, give you the appropriate license. I do not understand it, is too complicated.--Stebunik (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Dedek-407 Czelesztin pic.TIF[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please help, give you the appropriate license. I do not understand it, is too complicated.--Stebunik (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Celestine-Dedek.TIF[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please help, give you the appropriate license. I do not understand it, is too complicated.--Stebunik (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Let you give categories, because I can not it. Thank you very much!--Stebunik (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Sixtus-III Seppelt.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Picture File:Sixtus-III Seppelt.jpg is in public domain, because edited already in 1933 in book of
  • F. X. Seppelt –K. Löffler: Papstgeschichte von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Josef Kösel&Friedrich Pustet, München 1933, page 34. I scanned it. Maybe is photo older yet. I think, that this picture is from serie of Popes in Basilica di San Paolo fuori le mura, Roma. Let you write corresponded free license! Thank you very much! --Stebunik (talk) 23:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:


File tagging File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | +/−

The File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly.

Eleassar (t/p) 13:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Stebunik, pozdravljen. Svoje vprašanje si postavil na napačno mesto (v predlogo), zato sem ga skopiral na, upam, ustreznejše mesto: Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg. Da boš vedel, kje iskati odziv wikimedijine ekipe. MZaplotnik my contributions 22:28, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hvala ti. Jaz se na te reci kratkomalo ne razumem. Dobil sem od njih nekaksen odgovor, pa so mi postale stvari le se bolj zapletene.--Stebunik (talk) 19:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Nekdo od vaju z bratom naj pošlje e-mail na permissions-commons@wikimedia.org z izjavo o avtorstvu in strinjanju z objavo pod prosto licenco. Tule in tule (čisto na dnu strani, pod 'DECLARATION OF CONSENT') so vzorci dopisov, vstaviti moraš le ustrezne podatke. Poslani e-mail je zelo pomemben, ker bo ekipi na Zbirki služil kot dokazilo o avtorstvu fotografije. Srečno, MZaplotnik my contributions 07:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Stebunik. You have new messages at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

I did not find notice about File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg Let you explain. Thank you!--Stebunik (talk) 19:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 22:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

File:St-Rupert-martyrs Mavsar-chapel 06.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:St-Rupert-martyrs Mavsar-chapel 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 10:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I am author of File File:St-Rupert-martyrs Mavsar-chapel 06.jpg. I agree with deletion, because this file has inscription. I uploaded the same file withouth inscription. --Stebunik (talk) 08:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am sorry but per Commons:Deletion requests/File:St-Rupert-martyrs Mavsar-chapel 06.jpg, the file is not free because it depicts a copyrighted sculpture. I've tagged it for speedy deletion. It may be undeleted after a consensus for this is gained at COM:UDR. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Celje center 2006.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Celje center 2006.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Celje center 2006.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Could you please explain ...[edit]

Could you please explain why you erased the thread I introduced to Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests? You erased it less than four hours after the sole comment to it. It hadn't been closed, and had only been open less than a day. Geo Swan (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

If it was erased, it was by mistake, I would it not. I sent only explainig, which files I will, that they remain and which files I made by mine.--Stebunik (talk) 08:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
I restored it. Geo Swan (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
No one seems to have understood your last note
you put my answer
Some of these works are my own works.
OK. So please list the photos you personally took.
There, where I made great inscriptions on photos, I wish not to undelete.
If you mean you put your own notes on copies of photos taken by someone else then the underlying copyright of the original photographer would take precedence. You need their permission to use their underlying image.
These photos I will upload once more.
If the underlying image is copyright you should get the permission of the copyright holder first
The others are photos of mine (withouth inscription) and I wish to restore them. I write: my picture, restore it! From Strle I wish it to restoring for honest use (info-box for article).
As above, you need to list the images you took yourself. These should be restore-able, provided you licensed them under a free license.
I have permission from Redaction of Družina, it is from their archive. Some pictures are scanned from newspaper from 1904: (scanned)
Individuals who have given you their permission have to use our One Ticket System, COM:OTRS, to confidentially inform us they gave their permission.
Please ask them to send their permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
The church-school in Crna bara is my photo from older photo.
If the older photo is so old it is no longer under copyright you can upload a photo of it. If it is merely old, but still covered by the original photographer`s copyright, you can`t use it here, without their permission.
It can be used as native house of Bogdánffy Szilárd by his biography. I can not, what a license.
Sorry, I don`t understand this.
JMB writing is photo of my brother. My brother gives me permission for use as free license, so the picture of Bertone too.
As above, you would need your brother to write to OTRS with their permission.
Please ask them to send their permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Good luck Geo Swan (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

I will answer, when I have time. It is complex thing.--Stebunik (talk) 20:38, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
  • If you do submit individual undeletion requests feel free to let me know. Good luck! Geo Swan (talk) 16:16, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

"honest use" or "fair use" ...[edit]

I took a look at a few of your recent uploads. The street images you took yourself of the clerics are fine. Congratulations!

File:Pogacnik-Joze Jakac.jpg claims "honest use". In English we have a concept "fair use". The commons doesn't ever allow uploading of "fair use" images. The English language wikipedia, and many other language specific wikis have rules that allow for limited use of fair use images.

If your fair use image complies with the rules for honest use on the sl.wikipedia.org, you should upload it there -- and then request its deletion here. Geo Swan (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Same applies to File:Stanko-Cajnkar.jpg

If you have the right permission to use File:Strle-Anton.jpg then you should ask them send it to the OTRS email address above. Alternatively, you could upload the image to sl.wikipedia.org. Geo Swan (talk) 21:32, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

When can we use "honest use" and when as "fair use"? I will to use Strle, Cajnkar, Pogačnik in other Wikipedias too, but only in articles, that speak about them. If I understood, it may be done. Or?
By files MJB-by-writing.jpg , Strle-Anton.jpg and JP II.jpg, is the thing otherwise: there I received permission for use pictures as in "public domain" from authors.--Stebunik (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
It is one of the rules of the http://commons.wikimedia.org (this site) that it will never host fair use images -- under any circumstances.
Other projects, like http://en.wikipedia.org and http://sl.wikipedia.org can set different rules about fair use. Here are the rules for fair use at the English language wikipedia -- non-free content criteria. There are probably similar rules at http://sl.wikipedia.org.
Images that are considered "free" -- like the very fine images of those young people you took yourself -- can be uploaded to the commons, and then used on any site. Or they get to remain, for potential use.
Images that aren't free would have to be individually uploaded to each separate wiki where they are used.
On the english language wikipedia, fair use images get deleted one week after they are removed from the (last) article where they are used. The uploader has to explain why the image can't be replaced by a free image. And there are some quality control volunteers who are quite aggressive about challenging whether fairuse image meet the non-free content criteria. They will, for instance, even argue that images of prisoners who face life imprisonment were "replaceable" with a free image.
With regard to File:MJB-by-writing.jpg, File:Strle-Anton.jpg and File:JP II.jpg -- you will find that, eventually, you will have to ask your contacts to confirm the permission to the OTRS email address I offered above.
Good luck Geo Swan (talk) 01:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Bergoglio-BuenosAires 2008.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:19, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

I need help in this case, because I do not understand, how to give corresponded license. I am according, if you give license. What a license can we give to this file? Tank you very much. --Stebunik (talk) 21:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Celje center 2006.JPG[edit]

I wish for File:Celje center 2006.JPG to be undeleted. I am author of this file and of inscription too. --Stebunik (talk) 08:51, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi, you should post your requests for undeletion at COM:UDR. Regards, --Eleassar (t/p) 09:23, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jelen-Janez Bucka.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jelen-Janez Bucka.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Eleassar (t/p) 11:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Pozdravljen. Ali si to sliko napravil sam ali jo je Janez Jelen? Iz opisa slike ni popolnoma jasno. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Eleassar, prepričan sem, da je Stebunik dejansko sam Janez Jelen, slovenski salezijanec na delu v Vojvodini. Stebunik, izbriši moj komentar, če se ti zdi, da posega v tvojo zasebnost. M♦Zaplotnik my contributions 15:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Imaš prav. --Eleassar (t/p) 18:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)


File:Pogacnik-Joze Jakac.jpg[edit]

You've uploaded a derivative work We're sorry, but File:Pogacnik-Joze Jakac.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative of a non-free work, please explain why on the file description page. In case the file has already been deleted, you may contact the administrator who deleted it or make an undeletion request.


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Hrvatski | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 20:31, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Strle-Anton.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Strle-Anton.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Strle-Anton.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 20:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Stanko-Cajnkar.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Stanko-Cajnkar.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Stanko-Cajnkar.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 21:00, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Anton-Trstenjak.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Anton-Trstenjak.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Anton-Trstenjak.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 21:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File:License Perko-Grozde 1992.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:License Perko-Grozde 1992.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 21:05, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 22:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Celje-Grozde relikvije.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Celje-Grozde relikvije.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Celje-Grozde relikvije.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 07:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Celje Bertone 24.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Celje Bertone 24.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Celje Bertone 24.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 07:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Pogacnik-Joze Jakac.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pogacnik-Joze Jakac.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 18:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

your picture 1903_emperors-2.JPG[edit]

Hi Stebunik, I tried to find out where you got the picture from. It must be a book because it says underneath "S. 192" (page 192). I made some annotations in wikipedia commons (mouse-rollover) and found out that in the right bottom corner of the picture the chinese signs read:
陝西 和記 照相館照
Shaanxi (Shensi) Hutchison Studio photos
And at http://www.katalog.wienbibliothek.at/
I found some sort of book(?) title: (I searched for manuscripts/"Handschriften" from Linhardt, Adolf

Bestand HandschriftenLibrary Info
1.Person Linhardt, Adolf, 1887-1954
Titel Ein chinesische Gemälde
Verlagsort o.O.
Datumsangabe(norm.) o.D.
Umfangsangabe 1 Bl., o. U., hellblaues Papier
Formatangabe 4° (Quart). 8° (Oktav)
Begleitmaterialien Zeitungsausschnitt eines chinesischen Gemäldes mit 16 Staatsoberhäupter,
die über die Gestalt der Erde beraten
1.Serientitel Teilnachlass Adolf Linhardt
Fussnote zw. Zeitungsausschnitt 1, 2 und 3 maschinschr. Ergänzun; vor dem letzten
Zeitungsausschnitt eh. Bleistiftanmerkung von Unbekannt
Ausreifung Reinschrift
Fachgruppe Zitate
Übergeordn. Serie Linhardt, Adolf: Teilnachlass Adolf Linhardt.
Interne ID-Nr. LQH0136236
But this text says the picture is a cut-out from a newspaper.
Can you help me answer my question?
Greetings from Duisburg, Germany--Dudy001 (talk) 19:06, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Informations about picture

"Die 16 Staatsoberhaupter beraten ueber die Gestalt der Erde"[edit]

In a newspaper, in which is this picture, writes: Die katholischen Missionen, Illustrierte Monatschrift im Auschluβ an Lyoner Wochenschrift des Verreins der Glaubensverbreitung, herausgegeben von einigen Priestern der Gesellschaft Jesu. Empfohlen von mehr als 50 hochw. Kirchenfürsten. 32. Jahrgang Nr 8. Mai 1904. I scanned this picture from Newspaper Die katholischen Missionen on 2 November, 2010. Picture is on side 191. On side 192 is written: Miszellen.

Ein chinesisches Gemälde. Von einem deutschen Franziskaner, P. Arsenius Völlig, Missionär in Schensi (China), geht uns die Photographie eines eigenartigen chinesischen Gemälde zu, das wir heute (siehe Bild S. 191) unsern Lesern vorführen. Dasselbe trägt die Aufschrift: „16 Staatsoberhäupter beraten über die Gestaltung der Erde.” Das Bild ist in mehr denn einer Hinsicht recht interessant. Nach alter chinesischer Vorstellung ist China der Mittelpunkt der Erde, alle andern Länder sind nur Inselchen im ringsum flutenden Ozean und ihre Herrscher gegen den Herrn des Himmels nur kleine Vasallen. Aber inzwischen hat China einiges gelernt und ist zur Erkenntnis gekommen, daβ die „Teufel des Westens“ bei der Beherrschung der Welt doch auch ein Wort mitzusprechen haben und China nur ein Reich wie andere Reiche ist. Deshalb sitzt hier Kaiser Kuangfü bescheiden mitten unter den andern Königen und Herrschern, deren Namen in chinesischen Schriftzeichen einem jeden beigegeben sind. Bezeichnend ist die auffallende Hervorhebung des Kaisers von Japan, der allein vor allen steht und die erlauchte Versammlung anzureden scheint.

Das Bild hat, wie der Missionär betont, einen besondern Wert dadurch, daβ es ein getreues Porträt des Kaisers von China bringt, das sonst nur sehr schwer zu erlangen ist. Gilt es doch bei den Chinesen als eine Profanierung des „Sohnes des Himmels”, das Bild des Kaisers auch nur zur Verehrung herzustellen. Nur der Name des Kaisers darf auf kostbaren Tafeln öffentlich zur Verehrung aufgestellt werden, wie es auch heutzutage in China allgemein Brauch ist. Die einzige photographische Platte des Bildes befindet sich in Singan-fu, der Hauptstadt der Provinz Schensi. --Stebunik (talk) 14:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Undeletion requests[edit]

Hi, something seems to have gone wrong with your edit at the UDR page. I have reverted the edit, because you deleted a lot of comments by others with it. You have probably edited an old version of the page. Jcb (talk) 20:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Publisher Ognjišče gave permission. It is picture in little resolution.--Stebunik (talk) 07:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:MJB-slika2.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MJB-slika2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 20:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Publisher Ognjišče gave permission for this picture of info-box with little resolution.--Stebunik (talk) 07:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Jozef-Vandor MK.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jozef-Vandor MK.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 00:28, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

This file was on internet newspaper Magyar Kurir, where it is written, that it is free.--Stebunik (talk) 07:12, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Senbric-cerkev.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Senbric-cerkev.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

This file is my own and has license O.K.--Stebunik (talk) 09:23, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
En: I found, that this church is not on list of those, which cannot be published. -

Sl: Pregledal sem tisti seznam, kjer je seznam cerkva, za katere je treba dovolenje lastnika zaradi tega, ker je kulturna dediščina ali nekaj podobnoega. Cerkev v Šenbricu ni med njimi. Ne vem, če ima še kaka država tako izvirnost: spet en zakon, ki je originalna bedarija v današnji demokratični družbi - podobno kot tisti propadli nepremičninski zakon. Ne razumem, v čem bi bil problem, da je zopet pod udarom slika te cerkve, saj sem podal ustrezne licence. Podobno je tudi s sliko "File:Grozde-Perko_1992.jpg", ki je zopet izginila, čeprav je avtor Perko poslal posebej dovoljenje kot je bilo zahtevano in je celo na Commons.--Stebunik (talk) 08:25, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

File:Jelen-Janez Bucka.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jelen-Janez Bucka.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 23:39, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

To sliko sem posnel jaz in dam licenco, ki je primerna - ali je attribution3? V čem je problem pri tej moji sliki, res ne vem. Povezano pa je tudi z menoj, ker sem bil tam tudi dve leti v službi. Poudarek in sredina slike pa je na osebi - ono drugo je le ozadje. Mislim, da je to na prvi pogled jasno tistemu, ki to hoče videti. Sicer pa ima moj aparat avtomatsko nastavljanje.--Stebunik (talk) 08:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Concile de Lyon et excommunication de Frederic II.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Concile de Lyon et excommunication de Frederic II.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:27, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

@Jarekt:, I think {{PD-scan}} is appropriate here. Regards, ℳ₪Zaplotnikcontribs 12:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gornik-Gora-spomenik.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gornik-Gora-spomenik.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Ne razumem, v čem je problem pri File:Gornik-Gora-spomenik.jpg. Spomenik je bil postavljen že 1896. leta in je (menda) njegova slika javna last. Podobno je bil File:Orsini-roma-stemma.jpg napravljen že okrog 1850, in je na ta način javna last. Tisti, ki ga je morda malo idealiziral, pa tudi daje dovoljenje za objavo, če navajamo vir. V čem bi bil potem problem - zlasti pri tem drugem, ko je avtor grba umrl že pred več ko sto leti?--Stebunik (talk) 11:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Letter to Jarekt[edit]

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

(Slovenian:)Ne razumem, v čem je problem pri File:Gornik-Gora-spomenik.jpg. Spomenik je bil postavljen že 1896. leta in je (menda) njegova slika javna last. Podobno je bil File:Orsini-roma-stemma.jpg napravljen že okrog 1850, in je na ta način javna last. Tisti, ki ga je morda malo idealiziral, pa tudi daje dovoljenje za objavo, če navajamo vir. V čem bi bil potem problem - zlasti pri tem drugem, ko je avtor grba umrl že pred več ko sto leti?--Stebunik (talk) 11:34, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

(English) : I do not understand, what a problem by File:Gornik-Gora-spomenik.jpg. I own photographed this monument, so I gave my license. Monument is constructed already in 1896 and so is in (I think) public domain. The picture is so little, that it is not prevalent: in middle is monument. File:Orsini-roma-stemma.jpg is made round 1850, and so it is in public domain. If you can find the original in that book, please, scan it, because I have not that book. Who idealized file, gives permission. Question, if he made it with permission, I think. I do not understand these licenses. If you can, give correspondent license. Thank you very much for an answer. Yours ever Stebunik.

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Stebunik. You have new messages at Jarekt#.7B.7BAutotranslate.7C1.3DFile:Gornik-Gora-spomenik.jpg.7Cbase.3DImage_license.2Fheading.7D.7D's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

--Jarekt (talk) 02:18, 17 November 2014 (UTC)