User talk:StellarD

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, StellarD!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Bisbee, Arizona and Conchise County, Arizona[edit]

Since Category:Bisbee, Arizona is completely within Category:Cochise County, Arizona, when you added Conchise County, Arizona to photos, they are now showing up in both categories. When it comes to places like cities and counties, only the smallest location is required to categrorize a photo, unless that location is split among counties. --Mjrmtg (talk) 11:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing that out, I am new here and was unaware of that rule. I will go back and remove images from that category. Best, StellarD

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Underlying lk (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Duplikat[edit]

Hallo, ich habe File:Cafe Wortner.jpg zur Löschung vorgeschlagen, weil ich das vor ein paar Tagen schon als File:2012 Wien 0267 (8332094945).jpg hochgeladen habe und wir das nur einmal brauchen. ;) lg darkweasel94 10:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Dasselbe für File:Salm Braeu.jpg, das gibt es schon als File:Wien 033 (4042567169).jpg. Aus dem "Wien"-Album von Janos Korom habe ich alles hochgeladen, was urheberrechtlich geht, d.h. bitte zuerst schauen, ob wir das schon haben. darkweasel94 10:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)