User talk:Sten

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File:2008 07 Botanical Garden Meran 71340R0350.jpg|[edit]

Hello Sten,

Indented line

I am a graphic designer in the USA and would like to use one of your Acai Berry photographs (Lycium-barbarum-fruits) in a package design I am creating for the Stash Tea Company here in Portland, Oregon. Please reply to me at my email address: gh@acmegd.com to discuss. Thanks. –Greg Holly / Acme Graphic Design Hi Sten, thanks for quick reaction.
I've added info accordingly in en and de and the the link to wikispieces.
Just inform me about further changes on my discussion page and I will adapt the respective files.
Best wishes for the new year --Lord Koxinga (talk) 20:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Sten,
Thanks a lot again for your very fast reaction on my upload (according the history of a file I've checked in and edited it was about 2 minutes). Since I'm a civil engineer (thats about nature too, but not in that way) I've categorized all those uploads under unknown plants to make sure, that someone is catching them.
My intention is to provide whatever I have on my harddisks – and is not private – to everybody.
So whenever you find some stuff to edit, just do it. It will go the right way sooner or later.
Best wishes and appreciating your collaboration in wikimedia. --Lord Koxinga (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Archives[edit]

See Archive 1 (contents until 15 July 2009)

Valg af licens[edit]

Hej Sten! Commons er i gang med at skifte licens og i den forbinelse skal der tages stilling til en række billeder. Fx File:Aesculus-hippocastanum.JPG. Jeg tænkte på, at hvis du valgte den licens, du bedst kan lide, så kunne den måske sættes på alle eksisterende billeder i Category:Images by User:Sten from da.wikipedia med bot? --MGA73 (talk) 15:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Hej MGA73, Jeg foretrækker den licens, som hedder: "Multi-license with CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL". Det er stor sindet af dig at rette licensen på alle mine billeder, så de bliver bragt i overensstemmelse med både mit ønske og de nyeste licenser. Tak for det!--Sten Porse (talk) 21:41, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hej Steen, ja det er lettere, hvis licensen er ens på alle billederne. Men inden jeg retter, så er det denne her du mener? {{self|CC-BY-SA-3.0|GFDL}}? Man kan også bruge fx {{self|Cc-by-sa-all|GFDL}}. Der bør nok også indsættes en "author=Sten" ind i skabelonerne for at undgå misforståelser fordi det er min bot, der har overført mange af billederne. --MGA73 (talk) 06:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Jeg tror det bedste er {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0|GFDL|author=[[User:Sten|Sten Porse]]|migration=redundant}}. Parameteren migration=redundant burde forhindre andre mere eller mindre fejlbehæftede botter i at lave yderligere ændringer (f.eks. foreslå at udgive TO gange under cc-by-sa-3.0). Tjekker botten i øvrigt om der er flere (næsten) ens licensskabeloner på samme side, f.eks. en {{self|GFDL}} og også en {{GFDL}}. Jeg har observeret at andre botter ikke har styr på dette, f.eks. [1] (se ikke kun diffen, men hele kilden, hvor det fremgår at brugeren på korrekt vis har foretaget opt out). {{cc-by-sa-all}} er vist lettere omstridt - der er delte meninger hvad den egentlig skal dække over, så det er nok bedste at undgå den - evt. til fordel for {{Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}. Nillerdk (talk) 07:22, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Jeg har lige fået at vide, at man ikke bør fjerne fx en 2.0 og erstatte med en 3.0 så en "all" eller "3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0" er nok det bedste. --MGA73 (talk) 13:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hej MGA73 og Nillerdk. Jeg kan ikke gennemskue de teknikaliteter, I diskuterer, men jeg er benovet over, at I orker at gøre alt det for mig! Mvh. --Sten Porse (talk) 07:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Så skulle de meget gerne være rettet alle sammen. Jeg fandt endda 3 helt uden licens (File:Maquis in Turkey.jpg, File:Maquis and garrigue in Corsica6.jpg og File:Maquis and garrigue in Corsica5.jpg). Håber alt er ok nu. Fremadrettet skal du bare give billederne den licens du foretrækker. --MGA73 (talk) 22:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Mange tak!--Sten Porse (talk) 08:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

If you are dealing with categories here you may find "hotcat" of interest. My Preferences -> Gadgets. Thanks & regards --Herby talk thyme 17:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for making me aware of your "hotcat". As a matter of fact I do use it, when I categorize my own pictures. Adding categories to pictures that are already uploaded is a different matter, though, so I'm doing it manually.--Sten Porse (talk) 17:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
No problem & thanks for your work, regards --Herby talk thyme 17:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Sten!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 02:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

I have checked, corrected and supplemented. All seems to be Ok now?--Sten Porse (talk) 09:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I answer for Multichill. Hej Sten! Du skal ikke regne med at Multichill svarer selv - han har nok at gøre med at svare på sure opstød! Jeg glæder mig over, at det nu er blevet lettere at finde disse 20-30 af dine flotte fotografier. Du har efter min overbevisning kategoriseret helt korrekt. Endnu engang tak for dine værdifulde bidrag. Nillerdk (talk) 10:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Ingen årsag. Det er min glæde og stolthed at være med her. Derfor ser jeg også en ære i, at andre bemærker, kritiserer og retter "mine" ting. Tak for din positive måde at svare på! Mvh. --Sten Porse (talk) 11:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vaccinium-spp.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vaccinium-spp.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Gruznov (talk) 12:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Permission given by the author, Sten Porse (see description)--Sten Porse (talk) 15:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Bible-translation-se.png[edit]

Det är just den typen av arbete vi håller på med på Wikisource! :)

Se s:sv:Sida:Bibelöversättningarna av år 1536 band I 050.jpg

När alla sidor är transkriberade, sätter vi sedan ihop det till en hel bok! -- Lavallen (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Aegilops-speltoides-habit.jpg[edit]

bin hocherfreut über dein Süßgras aus Alyki und frage mich, ob du da noch mehr dergleichen auf Thasos gefunden und fotographiert haben könntest? Wäre fein für eine ausführlichere Beschreibung der dortigen Vegetation. -- Haubi (talk) 15:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Danke für deinen Hinweis. Die Fotos hatte ich bereits angesehen, jedoch nicht soweit angeklickt, dass ich auf deinen Namen gekommen wäre. Bist du mit meiner deutschen Beschreibung von Aegilops zufrieden? Was ich besonders suche, ist Bewuchs an den Magerstandorten, wie z.B. des Aegilops. Mehr über "mein" Thasos findest du im deutschen Wikipedia unter Thasos. Danke und Gruß -- Haubi (talk) 11:28, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Die deutsche Beschreibung findet sich unter deinem Foto in "Category:Flora of Thasos". Bitte erkläre mir kurz dein System der Einordnung deiner Fotos in "Egology of Thasos" oder "Flora of Thasos". -- Haubi (talk) 06:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Phrygana auf Thasos[edit]

Hallo Sten, wärst du einverstanden, wenn ich unter der Kategorie Thasos, Unterk. Ecology of Thasos, Phrygana, einige der von dir erwähnten Pflanzenarten einsetzen würde? -- Haubi (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Bild File:Trifolium-campestre-flowering.jpg[edit]

Lieber Sten,

Ich habe Ihr Bild File:Trifolium-campestre-flowering.jpg in Medicago lupulina umbenannt, da es offensichtlich zu dieser Art gehört (sehr kurze Blütenstiele, Blüten fallen am Ende der Blütenzeit aus, typische Früchte). Mit freundlichen Grüßen, -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 21:10, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Das Bild File:Trifolium-campestre-flower-head.jpg habe ich soeben in gleicher Weise zu Medicago lupulina gesteckt. -- Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Prunus serrula[edit]

Hallo Sten,

auf Deinem Foto von Prunus serrula File:Prunus-serrula.jpg sind im Vordergrund Blätter zu sehen, die meiner Meinung nach nicht zu dieser Art gehören. Sie hat schmalere Blätter, typische Kirschblätter. Der Stamm, der zu sehen ist, ist aber relativ sicher Prunus serrula. Falls Du wieder in den Botanischen Garten gehst, könntest Du den Baum nochmal ansehen? Viele Grüße, --Don Manfredo (talk) 21:51, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Bestimmung von Image:Geranium-molle-flowers.JPG[edit]

Hallo Sten,

Ich habe das von Ihnen als Geranium molle bestimmte Foto Image:Geranium-molle-flowers.JPG zu Category:Geranium pyrenaicum verschoben und die Beschreibung entsprechend verändert, und zwar wegen folgender Merkmale: Die Blütenbätter der Pflanze sind viel länger (etwa doppelt so lang) wie der Kelch. Die Blattlappen sind sehr breit und die Blüten überragen ihre Tragblätter weit. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:47, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

A faint resemblance[edit]

Hi! Concerning this, are you aware of Kachkars (Armenian stone-crosses)? Sardur (talk) 11:00, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Pleasure! Sardur (talk) 22:11, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Prunus-avium.JPG[edit]

Hi, this image (File:Prunus-avium.JPG) is missing a source. Would you mind adding the info-template? Thanks, Amada44  talk to me 16:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Done!--Sten Porse (talk) 15:05, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
great! Thanks! Amada44  talk to me 15:17, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Image use[edit]

Hi

We are writing a book on spices and herbs.

The title is “Krydderleksikon med urter og smakstilsetninger” (Encyclopedia of spices and herbs). Print run is 5000 copies and the book will be published in May this year. It will be illustrated with photos of all the plants.

Most of the photos are already provided for but we still miss some picture.

We have found your photo of Vitex agnus castus on the Internet and we wonder if you kindly will let us use the photo in our book.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vitex-agnus-castus-foliage.JPG

For more information about us and the book please contact us on: post(a)vegaforlag.no - www.vegaforlag.no

Best regards Gitte

Translation help[edit]

Thank you.[2] Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Sten-Porse-2008.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sten-Porse-2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– Adrignola talk 20:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

That's quite all right (this photo has been exchanged with a more updated one)!--Sten Porse (talk) 19:15, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Astragalus-glycyphyllos-foliage-flowers.jpg[edit]

Hi Sten,

I moved your image File:Astragalus-glycyphyllos-foliage-flowers.jpg tentatively to Category:Vicia sepium, because Astragalus glycyphyllos has never got red flowers. The location where the image was taken (Botanical Garden!) and the rather wide leaves might leave some doubt, but the species is extremely common, rather variable and the flower look exactly right. I also changed the description. I hope that I got the Danish part of it right. Best regards --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 20:09, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


{{MldAs there is no Freedom of panorama in France. Yours sincerely Jean-Fred (talk) 00:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

As can be seen, my only action was the turning of the picture. Consequently I have no relationship neither with the subject shown in the picture nor with the fact that the picture was taken. So please go on: remove the picture! Sten Porse 2011-11-26 18:29.

your picture[edit]

Please turn your picture: Coastal Pinus brutia forest on the east coast of Thasos. Thanks -- Haubi (talk) 10:23, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Why should I turn that picture? I mean: the picture is showing horizontal water, while the boles of the trees are perpendicular - quite as the situation was at the time, when the picture was taken. The layers of marble on the coast, however, are tilted, but that is the result of some very old, geological processes. So explain your wish, please.--Sten Porse (talk) 21:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Humor.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Humor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ices2Csharp (talk) 10:59, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION[edit]

Hi!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).

I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting some photos in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use them in my book.

Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the pictures will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.


The 2 photos which I would use are:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Actinidia-arguta-foliage.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vitis-coignetiae.JPG


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request…

My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com


Bye,

Edoardo

Asking about a Picture[edit]

Hello! I saw a photo from you and would ask for some more informationen (if it possible!) about the plants are showing on the picture. I'm very interestes in the determination of plants, but I really don't know what is it for a plant in the top right corner? (There are some more specimens in the pic).

Sincerly, Genesis12 (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

PS: Thank your for that great work!

Copyright status: File:Deschampsia-cespitosa-tufts.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Deschampsia-cespitosa-tufts.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 23:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Sten-Porse.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sten-Porse.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

heb [T C E] 10:05, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Prosartes-hookeri-habitus.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prosartes-hookeri-habitus.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 23:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Prosartes-hookeri-flowers.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prosartes-hookeri-flowers.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 23:53, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Symphytum[edit]

Hallo Sten! Die beiden Fotos File:Symphytum-caucasicum-flowers.jpg und File:Symphytum-caucasicum-flower-close.JPG zeigen ganz klar Symphytum asperum. Bei Symphytum caucasicum müsste der Kelch insgesamt länger und deutlich weniger als auf die Hälfte seiner Länge geteilt sein. Ein Bild, das dieses Merkmal schön zeigt, ist beispielsweise das folgende: File:Blue comfrey - geograph.org.uk - 1279031.jpg. Zur weiteren Information auch die Bearbeitung der Gattung Symphytum in der Flora of the U.S.S.R.. Grüße --Franz Xaver (talk) 12:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Franz Xaver,
Vielen Dank für deine Berichtigung. Ich habe das nicht gewusst!

Grüsse --Sten Porse (talk) 12:57, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Luzula-sylvatica.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Luzula-sylvatica.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Acather96 (talk) 18:02, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Hvordan kommer man igennem med et spørgsmål?[edit]

Trophy.png Godt du støtter wikipedia
Jeg ville gøre opmærksom på en overvejende typografisk fejl i Ugens artikel om Sisimiut. Jeg kan SLET ikke finde en vej ind og HELT umuligt at oploade nogle screenshots, jeg havde lavet af situatonen. Nu er det endt med en kommentar midt i teksten, som jeg i hvert fald selv kan læse, når jeg finder Sisimiut frem. Hvordan SKULLE jeg have gort? Morten Svensson svensson@dadnet.dk Morten Svensson (talk) 13:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)