User talk:Stunteltje

• /archive 2007
• /archive 2008
• /archive 2009
• /archive 2010
• /archive 2011
• /archive 2012

Category:Georgi Mamarchev (tugboat, 2009)

Hi Stunteltje!

The Bulgarian tugboat Georgi Mamarchev was built in 2009 - according to its category. But is this correct? The vessel doesn't look this new. Can you check this, please? Thanks, regards, High Contrast (talk) 11:30, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Good point. I fixed it. --  Docu  at 11:39, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Happy new year! The correct year is 1972 [1], regards --Rolf H. (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you all for help! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:13, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Bodenseeschiffe

Hallo Stunteltje, würdest Du uns bitte wieder ein paar Kategorien basteln zbs. [Category:Überlingen (ship, 2010)] + [Category:Überlingen (ship, 1935] Siehe bitte [2] Hartelijk dank -- Biberbaer (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

 Done --Stunteltje (talk) 08:54, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Stunteltje, vielen Dank, dass Du die Kategorien für die Bodensee-Schiffe Überlingen (1935) und (2010) und Lindau (1958) eingerichtet hast. Darf ich Dich bitten, auch die letzten beiden SubCats zu bilden? 1) aus Category:Ships of Lake Constance > Category:Friedrichshafen (ship, 1952) und 2) aus Category:Konstanz-Meersburg ferry > Category:Hegau (ship, 1957). Es eilt aber nicht. Vielen Dank und Grüße --Ameichle (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Hartelijk dank! --Ameichle (talk) 17:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Stunteltje, Du hast die Cat:Konstanz-Meersburg ferry entfernt wegen HotCat. Ich bin ein Greenhorn und verstehe das nicht, auch mit Help. Kannst Du mir kurz sagen, was ich bei der Cat. besser machen kann? Danke und Gruß --Ameichle (talk) 21:50, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Wenn die Schiffe in die Category:Konstanz-Meersburg stehen, ist is übercategorisiert wenn auch bilder von die Schiffe in Category:Konstanz-Meersburg stehen, Dass ist alles. --Stunteltje (talk) 22:31, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Fishing boats at Hastings, 1967 - geograph.org.uk - 1319217.jpg

How can a picture taken in 1967 show a boat built in 2002? Rmhermen (talk) 04:02, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Not, simple. I assume there was another ship with that licence and name involved. I'll have to look for old administation files. Hope I can find them. Thanks for the message. --Stunteltje (talk) 08:37, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

list of ships

Hi Stunteltje,

At the above page, I added a list of ships found in the category. If you prefer, I can place it somewhere else or remove it entirely.

I started experimenting with various ways to build and format such lists (see Category talk:Ships). --  Docu  at 05:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Very nice, thanks. Maintenance (adding ships) automated? --Stunteltje (talk) 07:21, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes. If ships are added to the related categories, eventually they should appear there. --  Docu  at 03:41, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

ENI nummers en Binnevaart schepen

Hoi Stunteltje, Zal ik zoveel mogelijk doen hoor! Het groete aantal zeeschepen in verhouding tot binnenvaartschepen komt doordat ik die vroeger niet zo waardeerde. De laatste tijd fotografeer ik alles wat voor de lens komt zodat we wikmedia zo groot mogelijk kunnen maken. Groetjes, Alf

Met dank voor de inzet!! Op die manier steken we straks De Binnenvaart nog naar de kroon. Wij kunnen namelijk meerdere foto's per schip kwijt. Als ik weer eens over de Nieuwe Maas vaar pak ik ook alles mee. --Stunteltje (talk) 12:41, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Flag/shipyard

Please see Category talk:Ships by registration country. --  Docu  at 05:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata

For a small start at the new Wiki, please see Wikidata:Wikidata:Property_proposal#Ships. --  Docu  at 06:05, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

File:13494-Lis-04-fotoSchip.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

File:13494-Lis-03-fotoSchip.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:23, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Ships built at Arnhemse Scheepsbouw Maatschappij, Arnhem

Category:Ships built at Arnhemse Scheepsbouw Maatschappij, Arnhem has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cycn (talk) 14:14, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Category:Atlantic_Performer_(ship,_2011)

 

Category discussion notification

Category:Atlantic_Performer_(ship,_2011) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

62.30.53.94 19:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

mis-cat

A while ago, but... you added categories to this picture - it's a completely different ship, with different exterior, different hull, different number of masts, different location... In short: Thanks for the work, but please check more carefully in the future because mis-categorized pictures won't be found more easily than un-categorized pictures. :o) Cheers, Ibn Battuta (talk) 16:51, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Weißen Flotte Dresden

Hi Stunteltje, Category:Weißen Flotte Dresden doesn't make sense to me -- what's your idea behind it? (by the way, it should be "Weiße", not "Weißen") Regards, --X-Weinzar (talk) 21:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

In a lot of descriptions at images I found the expression. So I made the category with that name. (And I am not a native speaker of the language and at school this part of the grammar was always difficult for me. So thanks for the correction, I'll change it.)--Stunteltje (talk) 06:02, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Boat_Abel_Tasman.jpg Wrong IMO

Sorry about the mistake. My concentration was directed to the center of image. --Ivan T. (talk) 18:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

No problem at all. I make my own mistakes and always hope that somebody will recognise and correct them. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Madeira

Hello, Stunteltje. You have new messages at Darwinius's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.