User talk:SuperTank17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Trycatch (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Star 200 in Polish military service.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Star 200 in Polish military service.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 00:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Category descriptions[edit]

Hello!

Can you please write meaningful descriptions for these two categories: [1] and [2]. Thank you in advance. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 15:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:9K33 Osa[edit]

Congratulations for this new category chaos produced by you. Please be more careful with creating redirects and stop creating those "abc/xyz"-categories. --High Contrast (talk) 14:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

The OSA category system has been restructured: Category:Osa surface-to-air missile system. All your ideas have been packed into it. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 12:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Renault FT[edit]

Hello!

There are two mistakes in Category:Renault FT. Do you find them? --High Contrast (talk) 10:48, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Two mistakes? All I did was change the name because these tanks were never actually designed FT-17. The name was coined later in the literature on the subject and for years author after author repeated this mistake. For more information read the Nomenclature section in the en:Renault FT article.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 12:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
No, I do not mean the new category name. The new name is definately ok but look closer in the new subcat-structure. There are still 2 mistakes (done by you). Do you find them? --High Contrast (talk) 12:35, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
You mean the sub categories which were labeled under the letter R even though they should be labeled under the letters P and M respectively? I just fixed that. If that's not it than I must say I am quite stumped.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 12:41, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Well, this was another mistake. One still remains: "Category:Renault FT light tanks in Polsih service" - I think you mean "Category:Renault FT light tanks in Polish service", don't you? --High Contrast (talk) 13:11, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
0_o For some reason I did not notice that. Regardless, I fixed it.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Because you are from Poland such thing shouldn't happen :-) Give me a short notice on my talk page of you want non controversial deletions like this. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 23:51, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Re: Policyjny Autosan H7-10I[edit]

Ten autobus to jednak Autosan H7-10I na bazie pierwszej generacji H7 (przed Soliną). Poczytaj hasło "Autosan H7" w Wikipedia Polska. Był produkowany na bazie starszej generacji, bo była tańsza w produkcji. Ta wersja powstawała w latach 2005-2006, czyli okresie zmiany generacji. Marek Banach (talk) 06:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Propozycja utworzenia kategorii[edit]

Witaj, rozważam ostatnimi czasy możliwość utworzenia specjalnej kategorii grupującej samochody zarejestrowane w Polsce jako pojazdy zabytkowe. Czyli kolokwialnie mówiąc, z żółtymi blachami. Trochę takich fotek w ostatnim czasie porobiłem, szukam tylko odpowiedniej nazwy. Masz podane en-4 więc może coś zręczniejszego zaproponujesz ;) Oldtimers in Poland chyba odpada, bo nie każdy zarejestrowany jest właśnie oldtimerem, nie jest to zbyt precyzyjne określenie. Vintage cars in Poland chyba z tego samego względu. Nie mam więcej pomysłów póki co. Kategoria niewątpliwie by się przydała, gdyż są to samochody wpisane do rejestru zabytków, segregowałaby w elegancki sposób i odróżniała te wypieszczone i zachowane w oryginale od reszty. Pozdrawiam, Pitak (talk) 12:31, 4 July 2012 (UTC).

Głódź i LWP[edit]

Nie dość że robisz głupawą kategorię to jeszcze Głódzia wstawiasz do LWP. Ta wiedza to podstawa podstaw.[3] --keriM (talk) 21:24, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

  • By nie dyskutowac o niczym to: po wstawieniu przez Ciebie tabelki COS sie zrobiło ze "nie ma informacji o źródłe". W 2007 roku nie było jezce tabelek ale informcja o źródłe istniała. Jako że nie jestem biegły w "technikaliach" poprosze o poprawe opisu zdjęcia bo je co "ambitniejsi" wytną--keriM (talk) 16:42, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
    • HI HI - komu to tłumaczysz?:) Przecież to Ty "zgubiłeś" autora i musiałeś poprawić samego siebie:). Co do kategorii - rzeczywiście - nie Ty ją zakładałeś. Co do daty zdjecia - parę miesięcy po objęciu stanowiska przez Głódzia. Taka ciekawostka - stojący na zdjeciu w "czarnuchu" major miał wielki problem jak zameldowac swój batalion. Chodziło o pierwze słowa. Normalnie powiedziałby:Panie generale mjr X melduje.... Kościelne forpoczty poinstruowały go jednk inaczej; powiedział: księże biskupie generale (oczywscie nie tylko ten Pan był problemem, ale i kolejnośc biskup-generał :)). Niby nic, a rozterka duża w dobie transformacji ustrojowej:)--keriM (talk) 18:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Please...[edit]

... keep category names short. Superfluous appendices like in your recent category work with these categories:

  • Category:Renault FT light tanks in Polish service -> Category:Renault FT in Polish service
  • Category:Renault FT tank in the National World War I Museum -> Category:Renault FT in the National World War I Museum
  • Category:Renault FT light tanks in Czechoslovak service -> Category:Renault FT in Czechoslovak service

The short form should be sufficient. Thanks for your support. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 18:24, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry I was just using what I thought was the accepted norm for naming categories about tanks and other such vehicles. I was not aware that the Commons:Categories for discussion/2009/10/Category:AMX-32 tanks discussion reached a conclusion (finally).
However I think the cateogires for tanks in service with armed forces should retain at least the "X tanks in Y service" form as it makes more sense.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 18:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Does make more sense? Really? --High Contrast (talk) 18:48, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
My point is that using the name of the tank itself, for example "Renault FT", makes sense for a category about the tank model in general but saying "Renault FT in Polish service" just feels off. I know I'm not doing a good job explaining it but "Renault FT in Polish service" seems to imply that either only one Renault FT tank was in service with the Polish armed forces or that all the pictures in that category are of the same Renault FT light tank.
It's your call I won't mind either way I'm just telling you what I think about this.
Regards. - SuperTank17 (talk) 19:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Category:Agata radiolocation station, Category:Bożena radiolocation station[edit]

Hello! Please remember: write valid descriptions for newly created categories. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 07:34, 26 July 2012 (UTC)


Can you provide more information about the "Category:Bożena radiolocation station"? Please remember: write valid descriptions for newly created categories. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

File:North Vietnamese T-54s and a T-54A or Type 59.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:North Vietnamese T-54s and a T-54A or Type 59.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 16:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

File:T-80UD and T-62 4.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:T-80UD and T-62 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DS (talk) 22:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Category redirects[edit]

Hello!

Obviously, you are not able to create non-malfunctional category redirects [4] (please note your redirect-loop!). If you continue your category work, nominate those old category redirects for speedy deletion or contact me on my talk page directly in order to get them deleted. Will you do so, please? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

BTW: You made heavy mistakes with your catgory work again [5]. Be more careful! --High Contrast (talk) 20:20, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Again and again[edit]

User talk:SuperTank17#Category descriptions! Browse your recently created categories and do so, please. --High Contrast (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 22:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Statue of tank in Gorky Park 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Statue of tank in Gorky Park 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.Savin 20:13, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Żuki[edit]

Witam. Wydaje mi się, że to jego najlepsza rozdzielczość. Nie znam się na tym jednak za bardzo. Jeszcze sprawdzę. Pzdr. MOs810 (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Re: Zdjęcia z obu stron i File:Polski Fiat 125p MR'80 - Kraków (1).jpg[edit]

Cześć. Zdjęcia robię "przy okazji" - nieraz przechodząc obok czy przejeżdzając. Jako spotkam coś moim zdaniem ciekawego to pstrykam fotkę i idę dalej. Robię to dla przyjemności, przy okazji wzbogacając tutejsze zbiory. Do pstrykania całych sesji wolę wykorzystać swój samochód czy też auto znajomego, nie zaś przypadkowych ludzi.

A co do PF-a - nie pamiętam już dokładnie, bo właśnie spotkałem go w trakcie przejażdzki rowerowej. Ulicy Ci dokładnie nie podam bo nie jestem sobie w stanie przypomnieć, ale było to gdzieś w okolicach Prądnika Czerwonego. Była to boczna uliczka na jednym z blokowisk - prowadziła pod dość strome wzgórze gdzie były domy jednorodzinne. Pitak (talk) 19:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

File:2011-10 Mierzęcin 04.jpg[edit]

Tylko zwiększyłem dokładność kategorii z "Ursus tractors" na 330, bo to niewątpliwie jakaś wersja 30-ki (wszystkie powinny być podkategoriami 330). Pibwl (talk) 20:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Nie mam nic o Ostrówkach. Pibwl (talk) 10:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Traktor[edit]

Tak mi się wydaje. To ten sam co Rybaki (Kaszuby) (8).JPG. Pzdr. MOs810 (talk) 17:43, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Hungarian T-72 tanks.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hungarian T-72 tanks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fakirbakir (talk) 23:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: File:Ursus C330 - deska rozdzielcza.jpg[edit]

Poszukam na komputerze, w tej chwili nie mam jak zdjęcia zrobić bo eksponat w rodzinnych stronach ;) pozdrawiam, Pitak (talk) 17:41, 13 October 2014 (UTC).

KAMAZ vs. KamAZ[edit]

Hello. I'm not sure about an accurate transliteration of the historical abbreviation of the plant, but its modern spelling is all upper-case, check the official website. So for the 1990s and later models one should prefer present-day all-capital version. Thank you beforehands. Ain92 (talk) 09:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Autosan H6-ZK.jpg oraz File:Konwój.jpg[edit]

Ze zdobytej przeze mnie informacji wiem, że jest to Autosan H6-10.03. Zwiadowca 21 20:10, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Scale model of a police car based on an FSO Warszawa M20-57 or 200 of Milicja Obywatelska.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Scale model of a police car based on an FSO Warszawa M20-57 or 200 of Milicja Obywatelska.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vikiçizer (talk) 16:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)