User talk:Szczebrzeszynski

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Szczebrzeszynski!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

File:Jan_Krenz_Polish_conductor.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jan_Krenz_Polish_conductor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

shizhao (talk) 07:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Illustrationes Florae Novae Hollandiae[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for uploading better version of those pages. Can you please update the source= parameter to state where you got them from?

Hesperian 23:17, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

It was a screenshot from the file:Illustrationes florae Novae Hollandiae.djvu

I don't know how to update the source= parameter. Please help me Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 03:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Tell me where you got the better versions that you uploaded. Hesperian 03:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
I have found it in the same category "Illustrationes florae Novae Hollandiae" Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 05:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Okay. This it is from the same place really, just processed differently. Hesperian 06:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 989058ed66318c28ee525db792dc5ecf[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token ff1f69a7e9b1f1e392eb4f7a722b1222[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 5b63f20147031aea4a41691e28270254[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:100 złotych 1934 r. AWERS.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File:100 złotych 1934 r. REWERS.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File:50 złotych 1929 r. REWERS.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File:50 złotych 1929 r. AWERS.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

RE[edit]

  1. The file you told me, doesn't exist.
  2. However, the other files, have been already fixed.

--Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 12:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome :-) --Filnik\b[Rr]ock\b!? 11:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Szczebrzeszynski!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 02:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Wisłoujście1642.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Wisłoujście1642.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 07:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

BTW. Z kolegą Masurem nie pogadasz. Już miałem z nim podobne przeboje, np. dotyczące zdjęcia sprzed 110 lat (wg niego: oczywiście autor mógłby żyć jeszcze i domagać się odszkodowania ;). On trzyma się ściśle prawa ale nie rozumie jego ducha. Na co już starożytni Rzymianie zwracali uwagę, że w sytuacjach wątpliwych należy zawsze najpierw zadać sobie pytanie: jaka była intencja ustawodawcy. Jedyna rada: nie przenosić rzeczy co do których mógłby się czepiać z naszej wiki... Niech tam sobie siedzą. I broń Boże w nich nie grzebać bo to zwraca uwagę. Ja już sobie odpuściłem. Pozdrawiam Electron <Talk?> 10:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
1. weryfikowalnosc. Na podstawie jakiego zrodla mozesz stwierdzic, ze ta mapa przedstawia co przedstawia? 2. podobnie: jak mozesz stwierdzic, ze nie jest to wspolczesna kopia? Tego nie wiadomo. A wystarczyloby podac zrodlo/autora. Niestety ładujacy na plwiki tego nie dopilnowal. A wyglad stary to nie jest zadna przeslanka - przypominam, ze tworzymy encyklopedie. A ladujacy na plwiki ogolnie mial klopoty z takimi podstawowymi zaleceniami. Masur (talk) 11:22, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Uratowani... (jak rzekł pewien bohater Seksmisji :). Chyba, że kolega Masur coś tam jeszcze wymyśli. Dla chcącego nic trudnego. Pozdrawiam :) Electron <Talk?> 11:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Ta wypowiedź w dyskusji k. Masura nie była skierowana do ciebie. Oczywiście Ty nic nie jesteś temu winien. Zwróciłem tylko uwagę na niską wartość linków zewnętrznych jako źródeł (w związku z jego wypowiedzią w mojej dyskusji). Miałem na myśli to, że trzymanie się przez niego kurczowo podawania tych linków wobec ich dużej płynności nie jest zbyt mądre. Bo dajmy na to za 10 lat i tak większość z nich będzie nieaktualna. Tak było w przypadku jednego z plików, które przeniosłem z białoruskiej wiki na commons gdzie ładujący podał jako źródło "Radio Swaboda" i oczywiście po kilku latach nie można już zdjęcia tam znaleść... No to k. Masur skasował go z Commons bo "nie ma źródła". A tak przecież będzie z wieloma tutaj zamieszczonymi plikami za kilka lat... Tak więc czy to źródło podamy czy też nie to wiele nie zmienia (po za tym, że zwykle na początku można sprawdzić z grubsza czy faktycznie taki plik tam leży i to jest to o czym tam piszą ale po kilku latach to będzie zwykle link martwy). Żebym nie był źle zrozumiany - nie jestem za tym aby takie pliki nie można było ładować na commons. Bo dojdziemy do paranoi - tych plików z netu to jest przecież tutaj większość. Pozdrawiam Electron <Talk?> 13:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Mohr mit Smaragdstufe Grünes Gewölbe Dresden.jpg[edit]

Hallo Szczebrzeszynski (deutsch ist OK für Dich, wenn ich das richtig sehe?) – ich habe o.g. Bild gerade auf die alte Version zurückgesetzt und Deine Version aus der History gelöscht, weil nach Deiner Ersetzung durch ein völlig anderes Bild die Urheber- und Lizenzangabe nicht mehr stimmten bzw. ganz fehlten. Wenn Du ein besseres Bild unter einer freien Lizenz hast, lade es bitte separat hoch, dort kann dann auch die korrekte Angabe zum Autor, Genehmigung, Herkunft usw. drinstehen. Danke! --Elya (talk) 08:20, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Przenoszenie[edit]

Przenoszac pliki nie zapominaj o uzupelnieniu ich opisow (czasami tzreba skopiowac je z hasla, a ktorym siedza grafiki) oraz, co czasami potrzebne, ładowaniu ich pod bardziej opisowymi, informatywnymi nazwami. Najwygodniej chyba tworzyc nazwy wg formatu: Miejsce-co.ext. Np. Strzelno-rotunda Prokopa kropielnica.jpg . W ten sposob bardzo ulatwia sie pozniej tym, ktorzy edytuja haslo i moga od razu po nazwie z grubsza okreslic co przedstawia plik oraz ulatwia wyszukiwanie plikow na Commons. Poza tym - dzieki za pomoc w przenoszeniu! Masur (talk) 10:53, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

  • Wkurzają mnie idiotyczne nazwy, ale ich nie ruszam, bo mogę nieświadomie namieszać tak, gdzie je zastosowano. Gdyby istniał mechanizm pokazujący, gdzie pliki użyto, sprawa byłaby prostsza.
    • istnieje. Kazdy plik, w menu po lewej ma link do "linkujące". Linkujace sa tak samo widoczne jak wejdziesz na strone opisu pliku (mowie o tych z plwiki) - sa one wylistowane pod spodem. Ale nie musisz sie przejmowac, ze zmieniasz nazwe przenoszac, a w haslach zostaje stara. Zanim admini skasuja przeniesiony plik z wiki, upewnia sie ze w haslach bedzie poprawnie wyswietlany ten z Commons. Mozesz im pomoc, jak do kazdego pliku ktory przeniesiesz na Commons, wstawisz na plwiki (mowie o pliku na plwiki) szablon {{NowCommons|nowanazwa.ext}}.
  • Przy okazji potwierdzam spostrzeżenie poprzednika: często poprawiam obrazki np. z walącymi się pionami na zdjęciach architektury. Raz efekt jest widoczny od razu, raz po dniach, czasem wcale. Albo pokazuje się na powiększeniu, ale nie na miniaturze. Co robić?
    • baza danych musi sie odswiezyc, a czasami to trwa nieznosnie dlugo. Nic sie nie martw, to ze nie wyswietla sie tobie, nie znaczy ze tak jest. Ewentualnie mozesz w swoich Preferencjach na Commons (u gory po prawej), w opcji "Gadżety", włączyc sobie: " Add a "*" tab to the top of the page which lets you purge the cache of the page.". Wtedy pojawi ci sie taka * na gorze w menu (obok edytuj i innych) i klikajac ja, mozesz przyspieszyc odswiezanie sie nowej wersji. Pomaga tez czyszczenie cache'u przegladarki (ctrl+r w firefoxie).
  • Jeszcze jedno: Czasami widzę, że ktoś bezmyślnie zawiesił kilka lub kilkanaście identycznych lub prawie identycznych obrazków. Mechanizm {{ek}} w Commons nie działa. Co robić? Przykład: Muzeum Instrumentów Muzycznych w Poznaniu.
    • Zatem jak obrazki sa identyczne (i tylko dla takich mozna to uzyc), mozesz wtsawic w jeden z nich szablon {{duplicate}} ({{duplicate|nazwaduplikatu.ext}}). Jak sa serio identyczne, jeden z nich zostanie skasowany po tym, jak admin upewni sie, ze duplikat nie jest nigdzie uzywany. Masur (talk) 13:13, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Do Flickra ja uzywam tego. Sam sprawdza licencje, importuje dane etc. Zacial sie? Masur (talk) 06:16, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Pamietaj prosze, zeby na plwiki do przeniesionego pliku koniecznie wstawic szablon {{NowCommons|nowanazwa.ext}}! Masur (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
    • to chyba o jednym zapomniales, bo bym nie pisal :) Ale ok. Jak wiesz to najwazniejsze, a zapomniec sie zdaza kazdemu :) Masur (talk) 18:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Witkacy[edit]

Witam. Świetnie, że mamy już reprodukcje dzieła Witkacego, ale wszystkie wymagają korekty, bo do wszystkich dodałeś zamiast daty opis before 1939, podczas gdy wszystkie mają na stronie http://www.pinakoteka.zascianek.pl podaną datę roczną. To ważne, czy obraz powstał w 1921 czy 1939... a strona źródłowa dziś jest, ale kto wie - jutro może jej nie być... I wtedy znalezienie dat będzie wymagało sporo zachodu. Dziękuję i wszystkiego dobrego w Nowym Roku! Cancre (talk) 16:23, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Dziękuję raz jeszcze. Ja też przesłałam kilka obrazów Witkacego, które znalazłam na innych stronach - zwłaszcza przydatne są portrety, bo można je potem wstawić do hasłach o osobach, które są na nich przedstawione (np. pl:Stefania Tuwimowa). Cancre (talk) 12:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Witkacy Pejzaz Australijski 1923.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:01, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright status: Image:Wycinanka2.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Wycinanka2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

A.J. (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright status: Image:Wycinanka1.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading Image:Wycinanka1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

A.J. (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Uwaga: PD-ineligible dotyczy wyłącznie naprawdę bardzo prostych kształtów, poniżej pewnego progu oryginalności. Te wycinanki już tego nie spełniają i wymagany jest dowód, że wykonawca zmarł 70 lat temu, lub że są równie stare i anonimowe. A.J. (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Tydzień się oczekuje na odpowiedź. Odpowiedzi udzieliłeś szybciej, tyle że niestety była to odpowiedź stwierdzająca, że po pierwsze: utwór nie jest w domenie publicznej, po drugie: szanse na uzyskanie zezwolenia są nikłe. Najpierw mnie objeżdżasz za pryncypialność, a potem za niedotrzymywanie terminów? Ale termin ten dotyczy sytuacji braku rozstrzygnięcia, a tu rozstrzygnięcie jest, tyle że niekorzystne (Commons:Speedy deletion). Poza tym tyle razy obrywałem za coś, co nie jest moją zasługą (prawo autorskie), że mogę tylko westchnąć. A przecież te wycinanki są na pierwszy rzut oka artystyczne; co za to powiedzieć o tej laleczce, która też w końcu wzbudziła wątpliwości? Nawet jak ją moja luba przebrała w ręcznie robione ubranka? Pozdrawiam! A.J. (talk) 13:11, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Niestety, wielu popełnia tą pomyłkę: szablon {{PD-Poland}} dotyczy wylko i wyłącznie fotografii. A jeśli już chcesz próbować zmyślać i oszukiwać "system", to lepiej udawać że się wykonało wycinanki samemu, bo potem trzeba będzie jeszcze podszywać się pod zmyśloną autorkę i wysyłać jakieś potwierdzenia do OTRS. No i możesz mi wierzyć lub nie, ale mnie również uczciwość skłania w takich przypadkach do kasowania zamiast przymykania oka na zasadzie "a kto się niby przyczepi?". No i reprodukcja skanerem niczym się nie różni od pstryknięcia. Jeśli chodzi np. o tą wycinankę, też można by pomęczyć fotografa o zgodę autora czy też autorki wycinanki (jak sobie przypominam uzyskął ją wyłącznie ustną, a zgodnie z zasadami Commons powinna być przesłana do OTRS). A.J. (talk) 17:24, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

wszyscy producenci ciupag, koszyków, drewnianych koników, słomianych plecionek zostaliby zrównani z Kulisiewiczem, Dudą-Graczem czy Eibischem.

Zgodnie z polskim prawem już dawno są zrównani. Za Art. 1 ustawy:

  • Przedmiotem prawa autorskiego jest każdy przejaw działalności twórczej o indywidualnym charakterze, ustalony w jakiejkolwiek postaci, niezależnie od wartości, przeznaczenia i sposobu wyrażenia [czyli: rysunek przedszkolaka jest objęty taką samą ochroną jak obraz profesora akademii sztuk pięknych]
  • Ochrona przysługuje twórcy niezależnie od spełnienia jakichkolwiek formalności. [czyli: nie musi się nigdzie zapisywać, rejestrować ani zastrzegać]

Czyli ów groźny duch unosił się nad udstawodawcami długo przed powstaniem Wikipedii :) Cel tych zapisów jest zapewne taki, żeby zabezpieczyć interesy jakiegoś Nikifora, który coś tam sobie dłubie nawet nie wiedząc, że to może być Sztuka przez duże S. Czasy się jednak zmieniają, Nikiforów ubywa, za to są miliardy twórców, więc niewykluczone, że trend się odwróci i prawo autorskie w kolejnej nowelizacji przestanie być automatyczne i przywiązane do utworu od chwili powstania. A.J. (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Jozef Mecina-Krzesz Portret pani J 1912.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Category:Crooked House, Sopot[edit]

Witaj!

Myślę, że powinno być Category:Crooked House in Sopot, Poland. Ponieważ na Commons jest kilka miejscowości o tej nazwie: Category:Sopot. Są w Polsce wsie, które zwą się Rzym i Paryż. Ale ten Rzym i Paryż to inna liga. A nasz Sopot nie wyróżnia się na tle imienników. To znaczy, chciałem powiedzieć... Nie jest aż tak sławny. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 20:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Ależ z "życzeniem". Po prostu sugestia z argumentami. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 16:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Słowo o Jakubie Szeli[edit]

Cześć! Są może w tej książce jakieś inne ilustracje?. Jeśli tak to przydały by się do ilustracji tekstu na Wikiźródłach. Jakbyś je mógł zeskanować i wrzucić na Commons to byłoby super. Pozdrawiam Electron <Talk?> 23:19, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Faktycznie szkoda, że nie umarł wcześniej (to tak czarny humor ;). No cóż trzeba jednak uszanować jego prawa jako autora i poczekać jeszcze 2 lata, niestety... Po za tym pewnie kolega M. na pewno by się na to od razu rzucił ;). Ale możesz to ewentualnie zeskanować do późniejszego wykorzystania. Powiadają: 2 lata jak dla brata. Szybko zlecą.
Jest jeszcze jedna możliwość, coś takiego -> File:Czerwony Sztandar 09 1940.jpg, ale wątpię aby to wtedy wydawano, chociaż kto wie? Tekst politycznie był chyba dla nowych naszych rozbiorców dość poprawny, rzekłbym nawet, że słuszny ideologicznie ;)...
Pozdrawiam Electron <Talk?> 13:44, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
OK. Byłbym wdzięczny. Mój adres prześlę ci mailem. Electron <Talk?> 14:09, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Svetitskhoveliplan1.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:18, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Svtitskhoveli plan from the side.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 19:19, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Szczerbiec Coronation sword of Poland.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Szczerbiec Coronation sword of Poland.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--— Kpalion(talk) 13:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated License[edit]

Deutsch | English | Italiano | മലയാളം | Português | +/−

Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Svtitskhoveli from the side1.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 14:01, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Kraków, St. Andrew.JPG[edit]

Dzień dobry. To, moim zdaniem, nie jest słuszna poprawka. Teraz ma się wrażenie, że kościół "leci" w prawo. Zdjęcie było robione na raczej szerokim kącie (34 mm w aparacie cyfrowym), więc takie zbiegi są normalnym efektem i nie da się ich wyprostować poprzez obrócenie zdjęcia czy inne manipulacje. Nie wiem, jaka opcja została tu użyta, ale coś jest nie tak z proporcjami. Może by obrócić obecną wersję o jakiś 1 stopień w lewo? Cancre (talk) 13:25, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Warsaw March weather.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:55, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

commons:Geokodowanie[edit]

Witaj. Dzięki za ogromny wkład w uzupełnianie fotografii warszawskich. Przy okazji zerknij na powyższe i w miarę możliwości zastosuj? Trochę twoich zdjęć opisałem współrzędnymi. --Hiuppo (talk) 12:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Dziękuję za odpowiedź. Generalnie to jest tak, że geokodowanie zdjęć ma sens z uwagi nie tyle na to, że można zobaczyć gdzie zostało zrobione, a fakt, że patrząc na mapę można zobaczyć, czy są na commons jakieś geokodowane media w pokrewnej lokalizacji. Często powtarzany zarzut na pl.wiki to marny stopień zilustrowania haseł - a tu geokodowanie jest nam pomocne. Kliknij kiedyś na takie zdjęcie ze współrzędnymi np. na google mapy i poczekaj chwilę aż toolselver załaduje zdjęcia. Zobaczysz różnicę ;). Pozdrawiam, --Hiuppo (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Katyn Massacre monument Jersey City.jpg[edit]

Hi Szczebrzeszynski,
problems are not solved by removing a warning-tag. I can open a formal deletion request, if you prefer that. Who is the sculptor of that monument (surely neither you nor the Flickr-user)? Did he die 70 years ago (surely not)? The statue in the image is neither de minimis. nor covered by COM:FOP#United States. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Katyn_Massacre_monument_Jersey_City.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Katyn_Massacre_monument_Jersey_City.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:44, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Spróbuj je wrzucić na pl-wiki. U nas FOP obowiązuje. Nasze prawo nie rozróżnia też, gdzie to było zrobione i przez kogo (w sensie: czy to nasz czy "inastraniec" popełnił fotkę) tak więc z prawnego punktu widzenia byłoby wszystko OK. I byłby precedens, pewno trzeba by było się poszczypać z k. Masurem ale nasze prawo jest w tej dziedzinie mniej restrykcyjne niż amerykańskie :)... Electron <Talk?> 13:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
In case this was addressed to me, I don't speak Polish. --Túrelio (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

pl-wiki, ale jak?[edit]

Myśl przednia, ale jak to zrobić? Toolserver Magnusa defaultowo kieruje na commons, a tam czyhają już krwawe zbiry. Ściągnąć na swój dysk, to plik straci flickr-dziewiczość. Commons helper tez przenosi tylko w stronę commons. Ale i tak dzięki za życzliwość. Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Kiedyś jak nie było tych "helperów" to robiło się to po prostu ręcznie. Ale zwykle przenosiłem z pl-wiki na commons: po prostu kopiowałem wszystkie opisy ze strony pliku i dawałem link na dawną nazwę pliku na pl-wiki (to dla niedowiarków - admin zawsze może sprawdzić, czy to co podałeś jest prawdą; nawet po skasowaniu pliku ma do niego dostęp). I wszystko było OK. Można tak zrobić i w odwrotną stronę. Takie postępowanie ma sens zwłaszcza gdy automat potwierdził już licencję pliku na Flickr - nikt się potem nie będzie czepiał gdyby została ona potem zmieniona (co jest tam możliwe). Dobrze by było dać uwagę w opisie dlaczego to zostało przeniesione do nas coby ktoś z powrotem nie przenosił na commons.
Ostatnio na pl-wiki była dyskusja czy nie zamknąć możliwości ładowania pliczków na pl-wiki -> [1] ale szczęśliwie to nie przeszło :). Jak chcesz to możesz ją przeczytać. Podałem tam m.in. kilka dodatkowych możliwości, które daje nasze prawo autorskie a których nie ma w prawach innych państw badź są kwestionowane na commos. Electron <Talk?> 08:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kasperle_Zelt_Theater.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kasperle_Zelt_Theater.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Kasperle_Zelt_Theater.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

AndreasPraefcke (talk) 09:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Czartoryscy[edit]

Ale dlaczego psuć? Zdjęcie ewidentnie "leciało" w lewo. Oczywiście, że obrót w prawo odbył się kosztem lewego kraja zdjęcia (bo teraz on jest krzywy), ale w końcu chodzi o budynek Muzeum, a nie o fragment kościoła jezuitów. Cancre (talk) 17:57, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Niewątpliwie najlepiej robić jest takie zdjęcia, by nie wymagały poprawy, to jasne. Zresztą omawiane tutaj zdjęcie nie jest moje, więc nie będę się tłumaczyć za autora :-) A efekt "walenia" się... obawiam się, że ze względu na lokalizację tego konkretnego budynku nie da się go wyeliminować (chyba że ma się super-profesjonalny obiekty prostujący wszelkie zbiegi). Pozdrawiam, Cancre (talk) 20:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
Niestety, to prawda... Większość jest co najmniej wątpliwej jakości, ale cóż zrobić? Czasami okazuje się, że jakiś pozornie słaby o obrazek jest bardzo cenny, bo np. uchwycił wygląd budynku przed renowacją. Albo po prostu jest jedynym, jaki posiadamy. Tutaj na commons obowiązuje taka zasada, że usuwane są tylko te zdjęcia, które naruszają zasady (prawa autorskie, "obyczajność" itp.). Wszelkie inne, nawet marne, ze skrajnymi wyjątkami, są zachowywane. Co oczywiście nie znaczy, że takie "knoty" musimy wstawiać do artykułów w Wikipedii. Cancre (talk) 18:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Vassilieva_-_Paris_cafe.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vassilieva_-_Paris_cafe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 14:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Jean Effel books.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Jean Effel books.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 14:46, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Muzeum_Narodowe_Gdansk01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Muzeum_Narodowe_Gdansk01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Muzeum_Narodowe_Gdansk01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 08:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

  • ok, jesli chodzi o to zdjecie, to jakos dotarlem do zrodla (ktorego ty oczywiscie nie podales): http://galeria.trojmiasto.pl/Muzeum-Narodowe-w-Gdansku-328.html i po kliknieciu w znaczek (c) wskakujemy na strone: http://galeria.trojmiasto.pl/rules/?cc gdzie jest napisane: Zgodnie z licencją creative commons - uznanie autorstwa - użycie niekomercyjne 2.5 Polska - a jest to licencja niezgodna z wolnymi licencjami, poniewaz NIE dopuszcza uzycia komercyjnego. Tak jest podpisana fotka. Jest napisane takze: Każdy z tych warunków może zostać uchylony, jeśli uzyska się zezwolenie właściciela praw autorskich. - czyli autora zdjcia (tu: MK), a nie administratora portalu. Drugie zdjecie nie wiem skad pochodzi nawet, ale jak to ten sam portal, to zasady sa zblizone. Masur (talk) 11:06, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Bractwo_sw_jerzego_gdansk.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bractwo_sw_jerzego_gdansk.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Bractwo_sw_jerzego_gdansk.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 08:52, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

  • A to pochodzi stad: http://galeria.trojmiasto.pl/Bractwo-Sw-Jerzego-382.html?s=bractwo%20jerzego&pozycja=0 - warunki jak wyzej. Czekamy na zgode autora. Masur (talk) 11:07, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
    • Ale ja wiem, ze bylo - przeczytalem je i 1) zgode, o ile w ogole (bo nawet nie bylo mowy o wolnej licencji) wyrazil administrator, co 2) jest w sprzeczosci z ich wlasnym zapisaem z ich wlasnej strony internetowej (tam wyzej wkleilem link), ktora mowi, ze innych warunkow udostepnienia moze uzyczyc autor (zatem nie wiem po co zgoda od admina). Juz pomijam takie fakty, ze licencje w plikach sa typu: Ja, właściciel praw autorskich, nie bylo podane porzadnie zrodlo do pliku, ani porzadnie podany autor (jak teraz). Kolega z OTRS, ktory "klepnal" ten ticket, najwyrazniej sie pomylil. Masur (talk) 13:44, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Dolega-Mostowicz[edit]

Czy moge cie prosic, zebys poprawil ten portret jeszcze raz? Zrobiles facetowi zeza poprzez dodanie bialych punkcikow w oczach. To zupenie niepotrzebne. Poza tym, widac od razu, ze to jest retusz komputerowy.[2] Pozdrawiam. --- Poeticbent talk 19:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

File:1938_Alexandra_Exter,_illus._for_Panorama_de_la_cote.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:1938_Alexandra_Exter,_illus._for_Panorama_de_la_cote.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lupo 12:41, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Aleksander Gierymski Żydówka z pomarańczami.jpg[edit]

Good job! I wonder when the Nazis will delete it, as they did with This Nazi poster. Best regards, Rembecki (talk) 13:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC).

File:Spencer Tunick Amsterdam.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Spencer Tunick Amsterdam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Badzil (talk) 15:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Cesarzkarolhabsburg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cesarzkarolhabsburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

"Verticals"[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ALwow_-_Kawiarnia_Szkocka.jpg&action=historysubmit&diff=39696997&oldid=27954563 Rough work --Aeou (talk) 19:32, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Ronchamp_Notre_dame_du_Haut_1954.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ronchamp_Notre_dame_du_Haut_1954.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Groucho NL (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Ronchamp-ville-chapelle.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ronchamp-ville-chapelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Groucho NL (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Перспектива[edit]

Rynek Lemberg 2009 1.JPG

Пане Szczebrzeszynski, маю до Вас претензію. Вже не перший раз спостерігаю, як Ви завантажуєте нові версії файлів, прибравши з них вертикальне перспективне скорочення. Воно ніби нічого такого, але в багатьох випадках зображення після цього виглядає просто жахливо. Для прикладу подаю зображення дому Бандінеллі. Хіба ви не бачите, що повністю спотворено пропорції? Для чого така груба робота? --Сергій (обг.) 16:41, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

File:ErnstToch.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ErnstToch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

howcheng {chat} 05:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

File:ElliottCarter.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ElliottCarter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

howcheng {chat} 05:22, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Winnie the Pooh Disney MGM.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Winnie the Pooh Disney MGM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

141.84.69.20 20:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Winnie-the-Pooh overload.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Winnie-the-Pooh overload.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

141.84.69.20 20:32, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Jerzy Waldorff Polish writer.jpg[edit]

Zgłoszono [3] naruszenie praw autorskich do zdjęcia, które Ty załadowałeś (File:Jerzy Waldorff Polish writer.jpg). Czy możesz ustosunkować się do zarzutu? Jeżeli masz pod ręką książkę, z której skanowałeś, sprawdź, czy nie było tam zastrzeżenia praw autorskich (zazwyczaj bywa we wszystkich książkach). Jeżeli było zastrzeżenie, podana przez Ciebie licencja nie ma zastosowania i należy zdjęcie usunąć z zasobów Commons. Poproszę o odpowiedź na plwiki. Pozdr., Mulat (talk) 11:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Dzięki[edit]

Dzięki za poprawianie perspektywy w moich obrazkach. pzdr Panek (talk) 09:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Szczebrzeszynski,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:10, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Andrzej Grabowski (by Loeffler).jpg[edit]

Wszystko ok? A co z tym drugim: File:Andrzej Bronisław Grabowski Autoportret 1862.jpg? Masur (talk) 21:28, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Polish_Army_Soldiers_1951.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Polish_Army_Soldiers_1951.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Calliopejen1 (talk) 18:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

File:MGU_Moscow_State_University.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MGU_Moscow_State_University.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.131.15 14:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Lomonossov_University_main_bldg.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lomonossov_University_main_bldg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.131.15 09:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Moscow_Lomonosov_State_University_01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow_Lomonosov_State_University_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.139.62 19:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Usunięte zdjęcia[edit]

Wobec wyraźnego sprzeciwu wobec usunięcia wspomnianych przez Ciebie plików, poddaję je procedurze COM:DEL.

Z poważaniem, A.J. (talk)

File:Henryk Berlewi 1966.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Henryk Berlewi 1966.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.J. (talk) 10:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Krakowiacy i Górale Schiller Daszewski 1950.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Krakowiacy i Górale Schiller Daszewski 1950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.J. (talk) 11:01, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

File:TorosRoslin statue.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:TorosRoslin statue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Moja angielszczyzna kuleje, więc w długim zdaniu trochę się pogubiłem.

Oczywiście: treści z Wikipedii można (z zachowaniem warunków licencji) kopiować w komercyjnych gazetach; ale jeśli jest to zdjęcie pomnika stojącego na ulicy w kraju, któy nie ma wolności panoramy, to nie. Więc biednym Francuzom, Amerykanom i innym narodom z równie zamordystycznym prawem usuwa się ich współczesne pomniki (przy "współcześności" rozciągniętej nawet na 70 lat od śmierci autora), a ci zamiast na swoich ustawodawców gniewają się na nas, czego nie rozumiem, ale cierpliwie znoszę, jeśli to akurat ja się narażam na ich gniew.

Żeby nie było, że jakimś strasznym usuwaczem jestem: narobiłem niedawno przyłożyłem ręke do pozostawienia obrazu pewnego ukraińskiego malarza - batalisty, bo wbrew temu co chciał zgłaszający do usunięcia, był on chroniony tylko przez 50 lat po śmierci autora. Ale gdyby ten artysta tworzył w Polsce, musiałbym go jednak usunąć i czekać na jego obrazy aż do 2015, bo Polska wydłużyła okres ochrony, wszystkim, a Ukraina jedynie niektórym utworom. Oj ile ja zebrałem cierpkich słów jak wyrzucałem obrazy Witkacego... ale szczęśliwie niedawno dożyliśmy i doczekaliśmy się Category:Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz. A.J. (talk) 16:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Józef Hen Polish writer.jpg [edit]

Pojawiło się zgłoszenie dotyczące tego pliku. Pozdrawiam, Plushy (talk) 12:14, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Józef Hen Polish writer.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Józef Hen Polish writer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

78.133.178.94 07:57, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Witam, ponieważ nie jestem w stanie ogarnąć procedur Wikipedii i wypełnić ich w 100% zwracam się do Pana z prośbą o usunięcie ww. fotografii. Właścicielem majątkowych praw autorskich do fotografii Danuty B. Łomaczewskiej jest pan Konrad Ciszkowski, a wyłącznym dystrybutorem licencji do fotografii autorki jest agencja fotograficzna East News, w której imieniu proszę jak na wstępie. Z poważaniem, Marek Zajdler

File tagging File:UZIEMBLO1.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:UZIEMBLO1.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:UZIEMBLO1.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Plushy (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Abraszewski flowers small.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abraszewski flowers small.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abraszewski flowers small.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Abraszewski Bayview.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abraszewski Bayview.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abraszewski Bayview.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Abraszewski gray mansion small.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abraszewski gray mansion small.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abraszewski gray mansion small.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Abraszewski playland small.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abraszewski playland small.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abraszewski playland small.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Nadezhda mandelshtam.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Nadezhda mandelshtam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 19:55, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Petras Vaiciunas.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Petras Vaiciunas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 21:14, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:41, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:49, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Moscow State University fireworks.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow State University fireworks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ShinePhantom (talk) 08:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. odder (talk) 22:28, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Hej — uprawnienia, które Ci przyznałem, powodują, że wszystkie Twoje edycje są automatycznie oznaczane jako sprawdzone (ang. autopatrolled) i obok nich nie będą już pojawiać się czerwone wykrzykniki (zerknij np. na polskie Wikicytaty, żeby zobaczyć, jak wyglądają niesprawdzone edycje); jeśli zaś chodzi o logowanie do Commons, to można logować się wpisując hasło z innego projektu (np. Wikipedii) — widzę, że masz jedno konto na wszystkich projektach (tzw. SUL, Single User Login). Nie wiem, czy dobrze zrozumiałem Twoją wiadomość, więc gdyby jeszcze coś było niejasne, śmiało pytaj. Pozdrowienia, odder (talk) 13:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Wybacz, ale nie rozumiem Twojej wiadomości; co rozumiesz pod pojęciem logowania się? Żadna z Twoich edycji ani żaden z przesyłanych przez Ciebie plików nie wymaga uzyskania zgody żadnej osoby; uprawnienia autopatrollera powodują wyłącznie, że Twoje edycje są automatycznie oznaczane jako sprawdzone (coś w stylu wersji przejrzanych w polskiej Wikipedii). Odnoszę wrażenie, że mijamy się w rozumieniu wpływu tych uprawnień na Twoje codzienne edytowanie; w tym miejscu (w j. niemieckim) wszystko jest dokładnie opisane. odder (talk) 21:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Agnieszka Duczmal Polish conductor.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agnieszka Duczmal Polish conductor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 22:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Gia kancheli.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Gia kancheli.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Niklem (talk) 08:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

File:ShveikInLviv.jpeg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ShveikInLviv.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jafeluv (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Domena publiczna[edit]

Witaj, zauważyłem że wgrałeś w zeszłym roku obraz należącym do Samuela Finkelsteina zmarłego w 1942. W Polsce prawa autorskie wygasają po 70 latach 1 stycznia następnego roku czyli dla artysty zmarłego w 1942 jest to 1 stycznia 2013. Proszę pamiętaj o tym na przyszłość.Plushy (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:42, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Szczebrzeszynski. You have new messages at Stefan4's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 09:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:03, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

File:State Tretyakov Gallery New Building.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:State Tretyakov Gallery New Building.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Clarissy. 18:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

File:2008-09 Moskau Friedhof Leonid Kogan.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2008-09 Moskau Friedhof Leonid Kogan.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Clarissy. 21:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Gaddafi feminist.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gaddafi feminist.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

HCPUNXKID (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 20:54, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Iglesia de Santa Catalina, Gdansk, Polonia, 2013-05-20, DD 05.jpg[edit]

Czesc Szczebrzeszynski, thanks a lot for the improvements on the file. I hope you don't mind that I made them from the RAW file and also fixed the area around the window (overexposure, tricky contrast, CA). You have some nice pictures in your user page, pozdrowienia, Poco2 09:07, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Jakość zdjęcia[edit]

Nie przesadzajmy z tą ciemnością - po prostu kontrast jest za mocny (zdjęcie robione było dawno i człowiek dopiero się uczył ;) ), ale w tej nowszej wersji niektóre elementy wyglądają jak z komiksu... Wieży Wrocławskiej chyba nie mam na zdjęciach - zdaje się, że albo miałem ograniczony czas albo mi się oświetlenie nie podobało. Zdjęcie stare wgrałem na nowo tutaj [4] - Pozdrawiam --Pudelek (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 09:01, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Ty i Ja monthly.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ty i Ja monthly.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Taivo (talk) 11:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

File:The same but different.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:The same but different.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 13:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 23:05, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 18:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)


File:Witold Wirpsza Polish poet.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Witold Wirpsza Polish poet.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

A.J. (talk) 10:34, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Adam Shemesh.Self-portrait.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Adam Shemesh.Self-portrait.JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Adam Shemesh.Self-portrait.JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aelita 1924 still 02.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aelita 1924 still 02.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Aelita 1924 still 02.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2014 (UTC)