User talk:T2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "Appeal requested per block reason: Abusing multiple accounts: sock of I-210, see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/T2"
Decline reason: "That is not really a valid reason to request an unblock. The link you provided proves that you are in fact a sockpuppet. Declined. Tiptoety talk 03:08, 19 October 2009 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

What I'm supposed to do? --T2 (talk) 06:01, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I mean't to say another chance requested. --T2 (talk) 06:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
All of my edits are completely constructive and not disruptive. --T2 (talk) 06:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
How is incorrectly mass-changing the capitalization of categories and uploading new versions of files with negligible changes (and often reverting those changes) constructive? Also: it took nine revisions, two of which were reverts, to make these small changes? What I see happening here is more a waste of resources than anything constructive. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 23:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
That's because I'm not so sure on what am I'm doing here. --T2 (talk) 02:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I don't deserved to be blocked for sockpuppeteering. --T2 (talk) 06:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
But you are socking...so. Tiptoety talk 07:58, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
What about SchnitzelMannGreek (Talk)? [1]. He was blocked for making death threats and also abusing multiple accounts and then he gets unblocked for assuming good faith. Editors deserve a another chance when they made their apologies and promises on not doing it again at all. --T2 (talk) 20:36, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
You have been blocked indefinitely. Please find something else to do with your free time. --Rschen7754 (talk) 01:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
You're currently not a administrator. --T2 (talk) 01:56, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
I am speaking for the community. --Rschen7754 (talk) 02:54, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Category:Interstate_73_in_Michigan[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Interstate_73_in_Michigan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Imzadi 1979  07:47, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Category:Interstate_73_in_Ohio[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Interstate_73_in_Ohio has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Imzadi 1979  04:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)