User talk:Takabeg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

User talk:Takabeg/Archive2011
User talk:Takabeg/Archive2012
User talk:Takabeg/Archive2013

English: Welcome to the Commons, Takabeg!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 14:06, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

About Copyvio files[edit]

Hi Takabeg! You marked some of the photos that you think is a violation of copyright.Bildiğim kadarıyla,TSK fotoğrafları OTRS izinli ve sizde birçok fotoğrafı yüklemişsiniz.Ecevit fotoğrafı ve World Press Photo Hollanda Ulusal Arşivlerinde mevcuttur ve bunun birçok somut örneği var. [1] ve [2]. Cyprus Dispute karikatürü yine aynı şekilde Kanada Kütüphane ve Arşivlerinde ID numaraları ile mevcut. Fatih Sultan Mehmet Fotoğrafında haklısın sanırım.Telifli. --Maurice07 (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Selam, Maurice07. I cannot think that the original copyright holders of them are the governments of the Netherlands and/or Canada. Takabeg (talk) 10:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Haklısınız sanırım. Ben yazar sahibi 1943 yılında vefat ettiği için PD-old altında bir sorun olmaz diye düşünmüştüm.Yine de siz benden daha tecrübelisiniz.İyi çalışmalar.--Maurice07 (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Sanırım 1 January 2014 tarihinde kamu malı olacak :) Takabeg (talk) 23:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Pic date[edit]

I have to check this, nevertheless the specific picture on various historical papers is described as such (arrival of Pr. George). So, by now the possible period taken could be any day from May 1919 to Sep. 1922.Alexikoua (talk) 10:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Kitap[edit]

? Takabeg (talk) 02:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Resimler kamu malı. Kapakta başka hiçbir özgün resim de yok. Bu yüzden telif hakkı ihlali olmaz, yanlış mı düşünüyorum?--Rapsar (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Boyleler de varmis Takabeg (talk) 02:38, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Tekini silinmeye aday gösterdiğim, diğer ikisi de kendi çekimi gibi duruyor.--Rapsar (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Diğerleri kim? Ans. şahıs değiller sanırım, onlar da aday artık :)--Rapsar (talk) 21:20, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Rica ederim sıkıştırma değil de ufak bir hastalığım var pek gidemiyorum bir yerlere bi de arabam bozuldu bir de üstüne taşınma olayı falan var onun da üstüne vizeler falan var 1.ler bitiyor 2.ler başlıyor kusuruma bakma o yüzden :/--Reality 23:45, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Doğru sözlere ne denilir? Teşekkür ederim. --i.е. v-mail 09:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Poplavok park and the Circular park[edit]

Yes Poplavok is within the Circular park.--Preacher lad (talk) 07:34, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Yenikale - Arsameia[edit]

Hi Takabeg! Renaming the files around Arsameia is ok. But giving the Picture file:ArsameiaYenikale.JPG the new name file:Arsameia.jpg is like having a picture of Rumelihisar and giving it the name Istanbul.jpg. Could you please tell your friend Rapsar to give it a correct name. Greetings --Kpisimon (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

file:Arsameia.jpg is completely wrong name. Because the image is not Arsameia (Eskikale) but Yenikale. Daha önce de Rapsar'a söylemiştim ve demin tekrardan söyledim. Takabeg (talk) 18:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thanks --Kpisimon (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#User:Takabeg[edit]

For your info. Jcb (talk) 21:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Recipients of the Medal of Independence with Red-Green Ribbon[edit]

Bu ne biçim inceleme ? Category:Recipients of the Medal of Independence with Red-Green Ribbon (Turkey) almak için Category:Members of the First Grand National Assembly (1920-1923) olması şarttır. Birde 23 Ekim 1923 mi daha erken 21 Kasım 1923 mi ? Takabeg (talk) 10:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Soru sorma veya gösterme biçiminize lütfen Bu ne biçim inceleme? türünde devam etmeyiniz..! Bu türde kelimeler ile mesaj yazacaksanız, lütfen hiç yazmayınız. Hasan Pamuk şeklinde yeni bir madde açılmıştı ve bende onun devamında, taşıma yaptıktan sonra kullanıcının yaptığı değişiklikler ile ilgilenirken oluşmuş hataymış. Dilerseniz gereken yerlere konuyla ilgili bildirimde bulunabilirsiniz veya engelli olduğunuz için bildirmenize yardımcı olabilirim. --i.е. v-mail 12:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
İlginç. Diğer kullanıcılar böyle tepki göstermiyorlar. Çünkü onlar en:Wikipedia:Assume good faith biliyorlar. Sonuçta okuyuculara zarar vermemek lazım. Takabeg (talk) 14:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Ben Vikipedi'ye siz bana Bu ne biçim inceleme? diyesiniz diye katkı yapmıyorum. Ayrıca İyi niyet varsayın politikasını da iyi biliyorum ve kusura bakmayın ama böyle iyi niyet olmaz. Ben size "Bunlar ne biçim sözler?" desem iyi niyet mi var sayacaksınız? Lütfen iğneyi artık kendinize batırınız. Ayrıca iki defadır (Muhtemelen sayfanız izleme listemde mi, diye kontrol etmek için olduğunu düşünüyorum.) yanıtları kendi sayfanıza yazıyor, benim sayfama yazmıyorsunuz. Ben size yalnızca yukarıdaki tarzda sorular ile soracaksanız yazmayın dedim. Sonra yazdıklarınızda bir sıkıntı yok ki..! --i.е. v-mail 16:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Taksim protestoları[edit]

Merhaba Takabeg. Nasılsın? Önemli bir istekte bulunacaktım, Gezi Parkı olaylarını görmüş olmalısın. Maddesi Türkçe Vikipedi'de açıldı. İngilizcem yetersiz, İngilizce Vikipedi'de sen de maddesini açabilir misin? Reuters ve BBC gibi yayın organlarında ilgi görüyordu en son bu olay. Sevgilerimle.--Bermanya (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Ve aleyküm. Seni kırmak istemedim ama haber niteliğindeki madde yazmıyorum. Takabeg (talk) 16:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

İzmir Suikastı[edit]

Selamlar. Buradaki kitap sende var değil mi? Tarama yapman mümkün mü konuyla ilgili sayfaları? Kullanayım maddede.--Rapsar (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Gerçi kitabın tamamı konuyla ilgiliymiş :)--Rapsar (talk) 11:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Evet. Tamamı konuyla ilgili. Takabeg (talk) 11:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Ankara'daki yargılamalarla ilgili resim var mı peki? O başlık resimsiz kalmasın :)--Rapsar (talk) 16:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Bir de sana zahmet Ankara'daki yargılamalarda kimler yargılanmış (daha doğrusu beraat edenlerin isimleri) diye bakar mısın? Hiçbir yerde bulamadım.--Rapsar (talk) 16:13, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Burada diyor ki: 40 kişi İzmir'de, 57 kişi Ankara'da yargılandı. İzmir'deki 40 kişi tamam; ancak buradaki 9 kişi Ankara'ya sevkedilmiş. Bunları da dahil ederek Ankara'daki 57 kişi rakamına da ulaştım en nihayetinde :) Ancak verdiğim bağlantıda toplam 97 kişi yargılandı diyor. Muhtemelen bu sevk edilen 9 kişi, hem Ankara'da hem İzmir'de saymışlar ve 97 bulmuşlar. Tek yok bunları senin o kitaptan teyit etmek :)--Rapsar (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Burada Millî Mücadelede İttihatçılık kitabını tavsiye etmiştim. PDF'ini buldum, okuyacağım.--Rapsar (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
İlgili kitaplar depoda, yani şu an elimde değil. Birde ölü fotoğraf meselesi ne oldu ? Konsensüs konusu netleştirilse iyi olacaktır. Gereksiz tartışma çıkmasın. Takabeg (talk) 01:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Sen hiç Türkçe Vikipedi'de bir konsesüs oluştuğunu, hatta tartışmanın sonlandığını gördün mü? :)--Rapsar (talk) 07:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Selamlar tekrardan. Aldın mı acaba Karabekir'in kitabını? Yahut Ankara'da yargılananların isimleri var mı elinde?--Rapsar (talk) 16:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Seni yine rahatsız edeceğim ama aldın mı kitabı? :)--Rapsar (talk) 06:19, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Depoda. Takabeg (talk) 06:29, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Selamlar. Hâlâ mı? :) Madde için lazım.--Rapsar (talk) 15:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Mehmed Cavid Bey[edit]

Cavid Bey daha yaygın değil mi?--Rapsar (talk) 08:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Yaygin. Takabeg (talk) 08:51, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Madde 20[edit]

Bi teklifin varmı? --Cekli829 (talk) 06:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Umarım kabul edeceklerdir. Ancak sadece Azerbaicani Wikipedia'dan değil, diğer kanal ve kuruluşlardan da teklif gelirse iyi olacağını düşünüyorum. Takabeg (talk) 09:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Şu makale, web sitesi güvenilir mi? Kaynak olarak kullanabilir miyim?--Rapsar (talk) 11:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Siteyi incelemedim ama ilk bakışta Ermeni POVi var sanki. Makalenin kendisi GÜVENe göre, kullanılabilir, bence. Kız da fena değil. Takabeg (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Ahhahhahah :))) Kim Kardashian'a benzettim ben de :) Makalede dediğin gibi bir sıkıntı göremedim ben. Yine de site sana tanıdık gelir, aman ha dersin diye bir danışayım dedim. Kaliteli makaleler var yalnız.--Rapsar (talk) 13:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
2015'te PD olacak. Takabeg (talk) 02:34, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

  • Bu ve bu camii nerede? Kategori ve dosya adı için lazım.--Rapsar (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Birincisi Bursa Ulu Camii, ikincisini tanıyamadım. Takabeg (talk) 14:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

re:Nanking Massacre[edit]

Please do not abuse the term NPOV. NPOV does not mean to eliminate any point of views. And I don't think the naming "Japanese committed atrocities in Nanjing massacre" implies any point of views. It simply states a fact which is endorsed by postwar military tribunals. --MtBell (talk) 21:12, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Please remember that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Though 长谷川's role in Nanjing Massacre is not mentioned in a wikipedia article, it does'nt spare his guilt. According to postwar memoirs by Japanese officers, his fleet killed tens of thousand civilians and unarmed soldiers who was then crossing the Yangtze River. --MtBell (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Please remember that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Though 长谷川's role in Nanjing Massacre is not mentioned in a wikipedia article, it does'nt spare his guilt. According to postwar memoirs by Japanese officers, his fleet killed tens of thousand civilians and unarmed soldiers who was then crossing the Yangtze River. --MtBell (talk) 21:17, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not a reliable source, but Wikipedia is not field for propagandas. First of all, you have to edit articles of wikipedias (English, Chinese, Japanese etc...), and then shall we solve disputes in Commons. And do you know notable survivors of the Nanking Massacre ? I'm planning to create sub categories (participants, survivors, researchers etc.. ) of People associated with the Nanjing Massacre. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Well, I am the major contributor to the Chinese article on Nanjing Massacre. So I am surely qualified for the discussion. But could you also, as what you have demanded me, show me your contribution in any related articles, in English, Chinese or Japanese, to prove you are also qualified to talk on this controversial topic. --MtBell (talk) 21:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
I changed the category under the name "Japanese related to atrocities in Nanjing Massacre". This is my final position. If you have any question about the role of these Japanese in the massacre, please leave me a message and I will show you the literature. --MtBell (talk) 21:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Japanese related to atrocities in Nanjing Massacre". is too POV-pushing name. As you know, even in Chinese Wikipedia, Participants to the Nanking Massacre is used. Please stop POV-pushing categorization. Please !Takabeg (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
If you consider "Japanese who participated in Nanjing Massacre" as appropriate, this name also looks fine to me. But I have to reject being criticized as a propaganda-purposed editor. I hope you can read the Chinese article zh:南京大屠杀 which provides more sources and details than any other versions in the entire WP, not even to mention the ja version in which any photo showing Japanese atrocities is rejected. --MtBell (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I can accept neither Chinese national POV nor Japanese national POV. Takabeg (talk) 21:49, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I am really disappointed to see that you insist starting an editing war. What a shame. --MtBell (talk) 21:54, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

New sections[edit]

Hi Takabeg. If you add a new section, please ensure that the edit summary is not bogus as in this example. Even just removing the section link (of the section above) in the edit summary is better than leaving as is. --Leyo 09:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Taşlı Köprü ?[edit]

Selam Rapsar. File talk:Taşlı Köprü - Vıcıtırın 01.jpg hakkında bilgin veya görüşün var mı ? 03:06, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Selam. Benim bilgim yok, kullanımına da rastlayamadım.--Rapsar (talk) 09:51, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Please, come here to solve this question. Current name is obviously wrong, and i would love to close this question. --WhiteWriter speaks 14:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Japanese war crimes[edit]

There is a discussion that involves you at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Japanese war crimes pictures. SpinningSpark 16:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

You can use talk pages. Takabeg (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Then perhaps you wouldn't mind if all your controversial edits were reverted while it is discussed? SpinningSpark 18:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't understand why you feel my edits "controversial". You can explain your point of view at talk pages. Takabeg (talk) 18:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Selamlar. File:Ahmet Ustel.jpg ile ilgilenebilir misin?--Rapsar (talk) 16:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Ve aleyküm. sinematurk.comda bulunuyor ama daha küçük... Takabeg (talk) 02:44, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Photos taken during the Second Sino-Japanese War[edit]

I noticed that you have tagged "no source" to many photos of the war and these photos would be deleted quite soon. I am reverting all you speedy deletion requests to these photos.

Please be aware that any photo, either taken by Chinese or Japanese, during the war which ended in 1945 is public domain according to the copyright laws of China and Japan. Unless you have proofs showing that the copyright has not expired and is holding by another nationality, please DO NOT start any speedy deletion request, because most of them are clearly public domain. Please be very cautious with these historical photos which are widely used accross various Wikipedia projects. --MtBell (talk) 10:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

They are not speedy deletion. It's very cleat that there are no sources for images. As long as I know, administrators will give users time. If you (and/or I, other users) can provide sources, they will not be deleted. Note: {{PD-China}} doesn't cover photos personally taken before 1945. In any cases, sources have to be provided. Takabeg (talk) 10:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Your requests lead to speedy deletion. The China copyright law guarantees all anonymous photos in public domain 50 years after their creation. If you can't provide the author's name and a publication date which is later than 1946, it is fair to assume its copyright expired. --MtBell (talk) 10:58, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Even if we claim that photos are anonymous work, we need original sources. Do you understand ? Anyway I don't think admins delete them speedily. When nobody cannot provide sources for them, they cannot become permanent. Unless nobody provide original sources, other users will delete them in the near future. P.S. Please stop personal attack like this. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 11:03, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Does it bother you if I share the same opinion with another user? Blocking others' mouths is more dangerous than blocking a river. Look at what you have done first. --MtBell (talk) 15:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
Probably you don't know Comment on content, not on the contributor. I strongly recommend you to learn rules and spirit of Wikimedia. Cheers. Takabeg (talk) 22:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that you've talked of "random links". Could you explain if your uploads are from "random links" or original publication:

--MtBell (talk) 22:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

We cannot call them random links. Because I took images from those links. And {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} is valid to both images. I personally think {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} is problematic tag, because copyrights of most of them are accepted abroad. But this tag is convenient for commons users at present. In any cases, {{PD-China}} is different from {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. When the image was taken before 1946 by Japanese photographer, to use {{PD-Japan}}, we have to prove the date of creation of that image. On the other hand, we have to prove the date of publication to use {{PD-China}}. Do you understand ? Takabeg (talk) 23:53, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Mr Takabeg, now it is clear that you are quite familiar with {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} and you began to use this tag long ago. Why did you nominate Deletion requests/File:Bodies of Chinese massacred and burned by Japanese troops in Nanjing (Murase Moriyasa's photo).jpg for deletion in the name of "copyvio" and pretend unfamiliar with that tag? I would not say you are playing double standands but I am informing you that I will not discuss with a dishonest person in the talk page any more. If you want to challenge the copyright status of those PD-China photos, just go and start a deletion request with your "proofs", and we will meet there. --MtBell (talk) 01:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Dosyalarda Azerbayacan / Dağlık Karabağ sınıflandırılmaları[edit]

Siz de tarafsız değilsiniz. Anlaşılan, siz de Ermeni milliyetçliği yapıyorsunuz. Peki dosyaların düzeltilmesini, niye "maalesef" olarak algılıyorsunuz?

Niye tarafsız olmadığımı iddia ediyorsun ki. Dağlık Karabağ Cumhuriyeti'nin olsun, Azerbaycan Cumhuriyeti'nin olsun, sonuçta iki POV için Nagorno-Karabakh geçerlidir. Yaptığın işinin taraflılığını ve yaptığım işimin tarafsızlığını anlayabildin mi ? Takabeg (talk) 07:52, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

Replied on mine. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs 14:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

I've requested a file merger for "Japanese Naval Landing Force, waiting for attack order with wearing a gas mask.jpg", since both images are pretty much the same. There isn't a need for two separate files on Commons, and your version has better quality, so we will keep the image you have uploaded, and replace the older image which is of lower quality. If you do have anything to ask, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or on the file talkpage. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs 07:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Selamlar[edit]

Selamlar ve iyi bayramlar Takabeg. Category:Sabahın Bereketi ve Category:Gül FM sorunlu gibi, ilgilenebilir misin müsait olduğunda?--Rapsar (talk) 09:23, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Daha önceden yayımlanmışsa, benim bildiğim kadarıyla da OTRS izni gerekiyor.--Rapsar (talk) 07:56, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces in Battle of Shanghai 1937.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces in Battle of Shanghai 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:57, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

İzmir Suikastı[edit]

Selamlar. Bu madde üzerindeki çalışma tamamlandı ve kaliteli madde adayı gösterdim. Bir inceleyip, fikir belirtebilir misin vaktin varsa?--Rapsar (talk) 09:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Kirk Kerkorian.jpg[edit]

I wonder what's unclear about its copyright? The photo is from 1977 and there is no known copyright to it. --Yerevanci (talk) 02:39, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Administrators will control the image. Takabeg (talk) 03:13, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, thank you, that answered my question. --Yerevanci (talk) 03:28, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

OTRS[edit]

Takabeg merhaba, umarım keyifler yerindedir. İtalyanca vikipedi'de pek çok gökcisminin fotoğrafları için (wikisky) izinler alınmış (OTRS kaydı yapılmış) ve sayfalarında kullanmaktalar. Ancak bu fotoğraflar wikimedia commons'ta yer almıyor!! Dolayısıyla doğrudan kullanamıyorum. Aynı OTRS numarasıyla bizim de kullanabilme olasılığımız var mıdır? Örnek için buraya bakabilirsin. Saygılar, görüşmek üzere. --CRea80 (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Ve aleyküm selam. Diğer wikiprojelerde kullanılan OTRS doğrudan doğruya Commonsta da geçerlidir. Ancak gösterdiğiniz örnekte yer alan it:Template:Copyright Wikisky 'e baktığım kadarıyla Il permesso non include l'uso dell'immagine da parte di terzi, neanche per scopi non commerciali. yani sadece Wikipediyaya izin verildiği, gayri-ticari amaçlı olsa bile üçüncü şahıs tarafından kullanılmasına izin verilediği belirtiliyor. Dolayısıyla it:Template:Copyright Wikisky ile İtalyanca Wikipediyasına yüklenmiş olan dosyaların buraya taşınması mümkün değildir. Ama anladığım kadarıyla yerel wiki projelerine (İngilizce Wikipedia olsun, Türkçe olsun...) aktarabilirsiniz. İyi çalışmalar. Takabeg (talk) 23:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Teşekkürler. İyi çalışmalar. --CRea80 (talk) 07:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Takabeg. You have new messages at File talk:Jandarma Türkiye Gendarmerie Turkey logo.png#OTRS.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Unutmadan sorayım istedim[edit]

  • Elbette izleyebilirsiniz ama merak ediyorum da izleme listenizden çıkmaya ne zaman nail olurum acaba? --i.е. v-mail 01:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
İzleme listenize almamış olabileceğinizi düşündüğümden; burada ve burada oy kullandım ve gerekçeleri belirttim. Bu konuda, size binlerce örnek dosya verebileceğimi bildiğiniz halde tavırlarınızı ve sizi anlamakta güçlük çekiyorum. İncelemeelemani yani beni tamamen kişisel bir mesele haline getirdiğinizi görüyorum ve buna üzülüyorum. Bu nedenle size de haber vermek istedim. --i.е. v-mail 04:55, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
Birde şunu gördüm. (Reality'nin tezi) veya buradaki ücretsiz logoları yüklesem? --i.е. v-mail 05:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

TSK ve DzKK[edit]

Taka merhaba,

Galiba bir sıkıntımız var. Mümkünse bizim köy çeşmesine bakar mısın? White Cat'in bir takım şüpheleri var, OTRS etiketinin hiçbir işe yaramadığını ve resimlerin Commons'dan silinebileceğini belirtiyor. Açıkçası benim de içime kurt düştü. Lisans konusunda benden daha çok bilgilisin, ne düşünüyorsun?

Görüşürüz.

--Bermanya (talk) 11:46, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Ve aleyküm selam. Aslında Commons'taki dosyaların kalıp kalmaması yerel Vikipedilerdeki tartışmalardan etkilenmiyor. Mesela En Wikide de bazen Commons'ta yer alan dosyalar üzerinde tartışmalar yaşanıyor. Ancak En Wikinin maddelerinde kullanılıp kullanılması kadar verileiblir, ama onun ötesi burada konuşulmalı. Commons'ta da Commons:Köy çeşmesi var. Eğer koşullar Commons'a uygun değilse (kanımca, ticari kullanımına açık olan Wiki projelerindeki kullanılmasına verilen izinde ayreten ticari kullanımına açıktır ya da kapalıdır diye belirtilmesi gereksiz) ve OTRS izinlerine bakabilenler olmaz derlerse hepsi silinmeli. Gerç Beyaz Kedi burada kalsın demiş. Sonradan mı şüphelemeye başladı ? Takabeg (talk) 06:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Taksim Kışlası[edit]

İlgili içerik ve fotoğraf için özel olarak konulmayan bir uyarının Taksim Kışlası fotoğrafını bağlamadığını düşünüyorum. Fotoğrafın çekim tarihi dolayısıyla telif hakkının olmadığını görüp kullanmış olma ihtimalleri yüksek. Fotoğrafın kim tarafından çekildiğini de bilmediğimden Witt'in eserin günümüzdeki telif sahibi olup olmadığını net olarak öğrenmek için iletişim kurmak gerekiyor. İçerik İngilizce ve benim İngilizcem yetersiz, sen sorar mısın? --Cobija (talk) 13:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

File:SevresSignatories.jpg[edit]

Hello Takabeg,

What do you think about this edit? Geagea (talk) 07:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Adil kullanım[edit]

Selamlar,

Birkaç hafta önce sana mesaj atmıştım ancak cevabını benim mesaj sayfama değil de kendi mesaj sayfana eklediğin için tesadüfen görmüş oldum. Mesaj sayfan izleme listemde olmadığı için mesaj sayfama uğramanı tavsiye ediyorum. TSK'nın tüm fotoğrafları siliniyor, ayrıca Türkçe Vikipedi'de bütün adil kullanım dosyalarının silinmesi kuvvetli ihtimal.

Yasaların bu açıkları sebebiyle Vikipedi'nin büyük bir darbe yemesi ne acı.

Görüşürüz.

--Bermanya (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Ticket:2012071110005537 ve Template:Attribution-TRGov-Military[edit]

TSK'dan ticari kullanıma, türevlere ve serbest dağıtıma izin veren (özgür lisans kriterlerine uyan) bir şekilde dosyaların kullanımına izin vermesi için yapılacak müracaatta kullanılabilecek metnin oluşturulabilmesi için Türkçe Vikipedi'de bir alt başlık açtım. Buraya katkıda bulunabilirsiniz memnuniyet duyarım. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 16:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Nasılsınız?[edit]

Verdiğiniz ara biraz uzun oldu galiba. -Esc2003 (talk) 10:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)


2014 ![edit]

Christmasornaments.png * * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:00, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Sapka inkilabi[edit]

Takabeg, Türkiye ilgili fotograflari yüklediginiz icin tesekkürler. Sapka inkilabini gösteren bir resim yükleyebilirmisiniz acaba? Bu cok güzel: [3], veya her hangi halk evin önündeki sapkali insanlar, bunun gibi [4]. Önemlisi, yolda sapka giyen normal insanlar olsun, sapkali Mustafa Kemal Pasadan var bir sürü. Alman "Sapka inkilabi" makalesine yerlestirmek istiyorum. Varsa sevinirim. Selamlar --Zoylab (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Political_parties_in_the_Russian_Empire[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Political_parties_in_the_Russian_Empire has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Etnik[edit]

Selam. Müsait olduğunuzda bir süreliğine uğrayıp tartışmaya katılabilir misiniz? --Esc2003 (talk) 11:03, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Sabiha Gokcen with flight cap.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sabiha Gokcen with flight cap.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 19:43, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Ataturk and Gokcen at Metris.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ataturk and Gokcen at Metris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Ataturk Elazig 1937.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ataturk Elazig 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Proudbolsahye (talk) 20:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Sabiha Gokcen with coat.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sabiha Gokcen with coat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Proudbolsahye (talk) 08:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Kemal Aydın[edit]

Günaydın Takabeg, Aşağıda linkini verdiğim Kemal Aydın galerisindeki resimler 50'li yıllarda çekilmiş. Çeken bilinmiyor; fakat Kemal Aydın, o zamanki spor fotoğrafçılarının gazete için çektikleri resimler dışında, sporcuların da resimlerini çektiklerini ve bunları o sporculara genelde parayla sattıklarını söylüyor. Bu resimlerin çoğunu satın aldığını iddia ediyor. Bu resimleri, bu argümanla, hangi lisanslama ile koruyabiliriz. Bana yardımcı olursan, sevinirim.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Kemal_Ayd%C4%B1n?uselang=tr Sevgiler--Gemalmaz ileti 05:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Salih Omurtak.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Salih Omurtak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Btmpnr01 (talk) 08:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Mustafa Kemal and Fikriye.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mustafa Kemal and Fikriye.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mavrikant (talk) 13:17, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Soma resimleri[edit]

Selam, Sayın Mustafa Karaman ?, Eğer Soma fotoğrafları kendi çalışmanız ise cc-by-3.0 uygunsuz lisansıdır. Takabeg (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Selam. Resimleri ben değil, kardeşim(Mustafa Karaman) çekti. Onun adının yer alacaği şekilde örnek bir resmi düzenleyebilirseniz sevinirim. Eğer böyle birşey mümkün değil ise kendim çekmiş gibi de düzeleneyebilirim. Rukiye ile ilgili olarak Türkçe Vikipedi'ye mesaj bıraktım. Teşekkürler. --Mavrikant (talk) 14:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Hmm. O zaman {{own work}} değil. OTRS yoluna başvurmanızı tavsiye ederim. Çünkü aksi halde her an silinebilirler. User:Taysin yardımcı olacaktır. Takabeg (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Bi de Mustafa Kemal'in yanındaki bayanın Rukiye olduğunu nereden çıkardınız ? Bildiğiniz gibi Yeni Şafak gazetesi Fikriye olarak gösteriyor ve Külür Bakanlığı'nın sitesi ise o bayanın kimliğinden bahsetmiyor. Ayrıca oradaki bayanın başı açık değil. Eğer gerçekten 1926 yılında çekildiyse Mustafa Kemal'in yakınının kapalı olması tuhaf. Takabeg (talk) 16:06, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Tarihçi bir arkadaşım resimdeki kişinin herkes tarafından Fikriye hanım zannedildiğini fakat, aslında Rukiye hanım olduğunu söyledi. Resmin tarihi itibariyle kişinin Fikriye hanım olamayacaği ortada. Rukiye hanım olduğunu benzerlik dışında iddia edemem. --Mavrikant (talk) 16:42, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Sonuçta yalan söyleyerek bir şeyi yaptırmak faydasız ve zararlıdır. Mesela Musti offinsive değil. In short please don't tell a lie. Takabeg (talk) 00:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Original caption[edit]

The photo "Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces in Battle of Shanghai 1937.jpg" was taken by unknown photographer and does not actually have the original caption; it was the author of the book who added the caption for his book. The photo has been used in many places with added captions; I therefore use the description from the current version of the photo on Wikimedia Commons. STSC (talk)

The photo was taken by a Japanese photographer to be published by the Japanese Navy (probably for war propaganda). So we have to keep original caption. Probably you want to use this image to prove the usage of chemical weapon by Japanese Army during the Battle of Shanghai. But unfortunately this image is irrelevant of chemical attacks. As long as I understand, both China and Japan had chemical weapons and both sides used it in the Secpmd Somp-Japanese War. I read a document that says the Shanghai Naval Landing Force had chemical weapons in 1945. However I couln't find any documents and any reliable sources that says this unit had it during the Battle of Shanghai. In the Battle of Shanghai, both side had information that their enemies (China and Japan) had chemical weapon. So Chinese side send the Student Coprs of the Chemical Shool to Shanghai, Japanese side also used gas masks. As you know, the Shanghai Naval Landing Force was the garrison of Shanghai International Settlement and their primary duty was the defence of Shanghai International Settlement, where were densely inhabited area. The Chinise officials and Chinese amateur webcites created and are creating forged caption and pasted and are pasting them to published Japanese photographs, and their forgeries were reveled. They lost faces and people start thinking that even the usage of chemical weapon might be forgery. It's dangerous. We have to prove some event not by forged caption but with document and reliable sources. In conclusion, your cheating actions are harmful not only for readers of Wikipedia but also for history. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 14:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
You should AGF, and I don't want to get into any political argument. I would be happy to keep the original caption if any; the main point is: Can you prove which is the original caption on the photo? STSC (talk) 16:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry but I don't have any political argument. I've control small part of your contribution, and found this action on the article en:Comfort women in English Wikipedia. It dawned on me that your purpose is not creating encyclopedia, but spreading propaganda for your own nationalistic POV. I highly recommend you to read en:Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and en:Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion Takabeg (talk) 04:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

COM:AN/U[edit]

বাংলা | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Македонски | മലയാളം | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−


float  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

STSC (talk) 13:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Could you please take a look at my comment at the bottom of [5] and indicate if you agree? whym (talk) 12:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Parallel categorization[edit]

Thx for the note. I've posted an explanation as to why parallel listing is helpful. See Category talk:Donghuamen Incident ContinentalAve (talk) 22:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)