Hi TheOne. I saw your note at the Village pump.
According to the logs, User:Shizhao deleted the image with a sumamry of "unknown", ie. no source was given. But looking at the deleted edits of that page, it's clear that you did say it was your own work. What happened (I think) was that an anonymous editor (an IP address) removed the licensing and summary information, making it look like it had no source information.
I guess this highlights several problems... one is that pages are subject to vandalism by anons (this is why it is a good idea to always put your own images on your watchlist, so you will notice if their descriptions are changed - if you log in at the commons, that is). A second is that uploaders should always be notified when their images are tagged "no source", so that they have a chance to provide a source (if this had happened, you would have been able to correct the vandalism). Another is that admins need to be vigilant in checking that a request for deletion is not in fact a form of vandalism.
I'm sorry this has happened to you. You are more than welcome to re-upload the image.
|File deletion warning||File:George_Bush_by_TheOne.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
|File:50 Cent 9 shots byTheOne.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.