User talk:The Bushranger

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, The Bushranger!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Sukhoi Su-33[edit]

re: Sukhoi Su-33; thanks for fixing the former/current error in the graphic. I changed now the color to blue/red (blue= current, red= former) as I am now standardizing most of the Military Aircraft Operators maps. Noclador (talk) 21:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)


Brooksville, Florida; Incorporated and otherwise[edit]

The description in pic I took (File:Suncoast Trial Bridge over FL 50-2-.jpg) is actually correct. The Brooksville City Limits are much further east from where that photo was taken. Florida State Road 50 in this area is considered the northern border of Spring Hill, Florida, while the north side of SR 50 is generally considered Unincorporated Brooksville, except of course in the gated communities of High Point and Brookridge. ----DanTD (talk) 01:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Ahhh, thanks for catching that. I didn't realise that! - The Bushranger (talk) 02:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:Fighter Squadron 64 (United States Navy)[edit]

Hi, I redirected the above category, because VF-64 was redesignated VF-21 in 1959, see Category:Fighter Squadron 21 (United States Navy). This website [1] gives an excellent overview over the zillions of redesignations of US Navy aircraft squadrons. It is even more complicated due to the fact that the US Navy (officially) does not recognize a direct lineage with disestablished squadrons if a new squadron is formed with the same designation and nickname [2]. Thank you and Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 22:48, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


TUSC token 9c0a7610fd167ea34d981f81429c982a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:YO-51_on_ground.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:YO-51_on_ground.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sridhar1000 (talk) 09:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

File:YO-51_on_ground.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:YO-51_on_ground.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sridhar1000 (talk) 09:31, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Heads up - aircraft type/registration cats[edit]

My apologies if you are not the relevant editor; otherwise please pass on to more suitable forums etc. I'm aware of all the discussion about aircraft type cats in image descriptions [3], but at least one editor seems hell-bent on going in the opposite direction to the consensus - eg [4].

FYI, on another subject, have you seen my edit to this talk [5]. PeterWD (talk) 10:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)

Fw 190 - BV 141[edit]

Hi. I just look at these pictures :

For you, this is the BV 141. But i'm not sure : on the first picture, you can see a landing gear on the under the fuselage. And on this picture, you can see there's no landing gear positionned on this place. So i think the both pictures are a FW 190. What do you think ?--Sammyday (talk) 03:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

  • I'm shure, this is a Fw 189, not a BV 141! Бг (talk) 03:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
    • Huh, good catch there! That is a pretty bizzare arrangement of the tailguns, though...is it possible it shows a Fw 189 testing the Bv 141's rear gun arrangement? - The Bushranger (talk) 20:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
      • Did the Bv ever had a tailgun ?--Sammyday (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 22:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! :) - The Bushranger (talk) 04:54, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:18fsf16.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:18fsf16.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa 18:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Joey Hand Le Mans 2011.jpg[edit]

Hi Bushranger. I see you've uploaded this flickr photo and used Joey Hand in the filename. I'm wondering what makes you think that Hand is driving the car; I'm 95% sure it's Dirk Müller. Joey's helmet is mostly white on the front. Thanks. Spyder_Monkey (talk) 03:19, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

    • Well, my reasoning was it was Hand's car and I was uploading it for Hand's page, so...No objections to a move being made since it turns out I mis-guessed who was behind the wheel at the time! Perhaps a move to "[team name] Le Mans 2011" might work? - The Bushranger (talk) 18:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Collection of seashells.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Collection of seashells.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 21:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Regis-St. Joseph's Hall.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Regis-St. Joseph's Hall.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Michaeldsuarez (talk) 17:49, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Better source request for File:USS Caron sinking.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:USS Caron sinking.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.


English | മലയാളം | Русский | Svenska | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Stefan4 (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletions[edit]

Hello,

When nominating an image for deletion, you must inform the uploader. Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:43, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Ah, I've gotten used to en.wiki where it does that automatically, thanks. - The Bushranger (talk) 22:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:F-16CG of the 18th Fighter Squadron.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:F-16CG of the 18th Fighter Squadron.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 09:45, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Heads up[edit]

I think you made a mistake in your rename request here. --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 01:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Ouch, I forgot the '3=' for the third parameter. Thanks for the catch! - The Bushranger (talk) 02:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Renaming[edit]

Hello, I have done lots of requests from you, and I'd like you to request filemover! If you are filemover, you don't have to use {{Rename}} anymore, and you can do it right away. You can request filemover here. Hope you like my fast moving, --레비ReviSUL Info 09:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll look into that. :) And keep up the good work! - The Bushranger (talk) 09:25, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi The Bushranger, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | +/−

--Steinsplitter (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! - The Bushranger (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

File:NASA 324641main galex-20090403-516.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:NASA 324641main galex-20090403-516.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stas1995 (talk) 22:11, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Category: Interstate TDR[edit]

Hi, I followed the Template:USN target drones aircraft pre-1945 to edit the category.Chesipiero (talk) 06:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)