User talk:Tiefkuehlfan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tiefkuehlfan!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

File:Frozen - birthday cake (13198667713).jpg[edit]

Hi. regarding these two successive edits, I'd like to point out that the cake is not frozen, so the category you added is inappropriate. Further, you removed Category:Frozen (2013 film), which is the theme of the cake. I haven't reverted your changes yet because I wanted to verify with you the purpose of the changes. Could you elaborate about these changes please? Mindmatrix 18:36, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Fotos von Gefrorenem[edit]

Hallo Tiefkuehlfan, nach den Fotos scheinst du ja aus dem Waldviertel zu sein :-) - aber eine Frage zu den anderen Fotos: Was für eine Motivation ist das, Tiefkühlkost zu fotografieren? - ich finde es nicht schlecht, aber man findet das halt selten :-) --gruß aus dem Wienerwald K@rl (talk) 12:23, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Es war nur so eine Frage, da es ja nicht alltäglich ist :-) --gruß K@rl (talk) 09:38, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Street categories[edit]

Hi Tiefkuehlfan!

As regards this your edit, I would like to point out that when a local name is used as a street name in the official adress system, we categorize such a place also as a street even though it is not a "street" in strictu sense. (Only squares have a separate categorization structure.) I. e. some parks, gardens, paths, staircases, islands, secluded places or even small quarters can be categorized as "streets". Try to check RÚIAN or if you are not sure. Thank you. --ŠJů (talk) 13:05, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Golf Resort Karlštejn[edit]

Pískovna u Golf Resortu Voškov, pohled z druhé strany.jpg


how do you know, that the picture presented to right is in GRK?--Juandev (talk) 21:28, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

And the fact that sand mine is next to it is a good reason to place it into its category? Why?--Juandev (talk) 20:00, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Categories on Commons[edit]

I dont have to damage your enthusiasm to Wikimedia Commons, but after your answers I would say you dont know, how our categorisation tree works. In the case of places we categorise pictures to the category of place, if they were taken on the place or they are depicting such place. Thats why pictures of sand quarry cant be in the category of golf resort. Even the quarry is next to it, it is not in it.

So thank you very much for the work you did about it. In the case of the category of sand mine "Pískovna u Golf Resort Karlštejn" is probably not an official name of this sand mine (pískovna stands in Czech for sand mine). In this case I would propose to use English nomenclature and it could by something like Category:Sand mine (municipality). Unfortunately this mine lands in 3 land areas at the same time. I will ask Mr. ŠJú, how to do it.--Juandev (talk) 22:36, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Würstel.JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 20:35, 19 December 2014 (UTC)