User talk:Tm/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

File:Light_bottle.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Light_bottle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 10:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)


File:EmmyAwardsHeadquarters.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:EmmyAwardsHeadquarters.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 11:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


File:B-52 over Guam.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:B-52 over Guam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--MGA73 (talk) 17:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


File:Evelina_Pereira.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Evelina_Pereira.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

81.193.131.240 08:06, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


File:Eveline_Pereira_at_the_catwalk.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eveline_Pereira_at_the_catwalk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

81.193.131.240 08:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your input on these pictures! --Eusebius (talk) 19:44, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Railway lines of Portugal --> Railway lines in Portugal

Olá, como querias mudei todas as fotos da categoria Category:Railway lines of Portugal para Category:Railway lines in Portugal. Está bem assim? Um abraço, --Jcornelius (talk) 22:16, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps...

...you can fill up this category with some files from flickr. Thanks in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 20:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi.

I´am sorry to tell you, but despite my best efforts and searchs, it seems that flickr doesnt have any images of Airport crash tenders on Portuguese airports. I´ve search with english, spanish and portuguese words (like airport, aeroporto, autotanque etc) but by not knowing the technical tranlation of "Airport crash tenders" to portuguese, it limits my efforts. Despite this i´ve still not given up, and so if i see any image related to this subject i´ll upload it. With best regards. Tm (talk) 12:49, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you anyway for looking for such files. Perhaps you fall over one in some weeks. Greets, High Contrast (talk) 19:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Miss Universe Dayana Mendoza en Nicaragua 11.jpg

Hello. I see you've reverted back to the watermarked version of the photo. Per Wiki policy, photos should not contain watermarks on the photo itself. There is also a tag on the image's page that says this. I reverted the photo back to the cropped version to address this problem. Mbinebri (talk) 02:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Flickr reviewing

Hi there, I've gone ahead and closed your request for Flickr review status as successful and I've added you to the reviewers list. You now have the ability to review Flick Images, I suggest that you read the instructions before you start reviewing, there's also a user script, that can help you with reviewing by adding flickr review tabs to the top of all Image pages.

You can add the following code to your monobook to use the script.

importScript("User:Patstuart/Flickrreview.js");

If you need any help with anything, feel free to ask me. Mitch32(Want help? See here!) 22:06, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

I´m Agree

please delete the image of HotelPlaza MarioPani. jpg, i upload a new pic who author is me. sorry the inconvenient.

Your revert

Hi. Regarding your revert here: I want to inform you that user:Mladifilozof in fact uploaded that file with false licence and false claim about author. You can clearly see from his edit that source for the file that he uploaded was this file: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Serbia02.png - and in that source file you can see first upload from year 2006 where user:Electionworld uploaded that file with this description: "(ew|en|PANONIAN Self- made map by PANONIAN PD-user|PANONIAN Category:Maps of Serbia )", which clearly indicate that I am author of that file. PANONIAN (talk) 18:38, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

I reverted your upload because the file was sourced to one file version of File:Serbia02.png (i corrected the source in File:Voivodship_and_Serbia.png): This version was incorrectly uploaded over your version, thats a fact, but now that version is in File:Voivodship_and_Serbia.png and your (rectified) is on File:Serbia02.png. So i see no problem with having two versions of the same map. Tm (talk) 18:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

But, the file version that was uploaded as new file was not "incorrectly uploaded over older version" - it was uploaded due to objections that some users had to original file version, but I tried to made a compromise solution with the last file version. If there is still problem with last version then other users should use discussion page of the file to adress these problems. I see no reason why 2 same files should be uploaded. Therefore, I translated abother file into Serbian language so that it can be useful in some projects. PANONIAN (talk) 19:15, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Ok, since you reverted that file, please explain to me why there should be two same files in Wiki Commons? Both files do have virtually same info. PANONIAN (talk) 19:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

First. I´not doubting you but could you please show me links about those file versions discussions, so i can understand better the context of this, as this discussions, especially with maps about the Balkans can be pretty complicated. As you can see i corrected the atribution on File:Voivodship_and_Serbia.png. About the existence of two maps of the same region, i think that is the standard here to be possible to have several files of the same map, or maps of the same region and period (not talking about old maps, with more than 70 years). If you disagre you can always open a file deletion request to see in what ends. Tm (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Bandeiras

Ola boa noite. Em 2005 foi feito um grande erro. As bandeiras na Wikipédia não são corretas. As da Wikipédia são para as ceremonias. As que eu telecargei são as oficiais. Luso-Tuga (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Não digo o contrário, pois as bandeiras vistas em cerimónias oficiais e nas fachados dos Paços do Comselho portugueses são as que carregou. Cintudo as bandeiras que ficaram licenciadas em 2005 foram estas bandeiras, não o que agora carregou. Se quiser substituir as bandeiras (aconselho-o a esperar o debate na esplanada da Wikipédia portuguesa pois observei que ainda ninguém se procunciou a não ser com dúvidas), faça-as pelo seu punho e carregue-as aqui com o nome diferente. Cumprimentos Tm (talk) 20:05, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Map dispute

Well, if you are totally neutral and if you do not know much about history of that part of Europe, would you be so kind not to revert my edits and to let me and user:Mladifilozof to reach any possible compromise solution? I do have content dispute with him, but I do not understand why you revert my edits which even he does not revert? Regarding my edits that you revert: 1. I was the one that released that image into public domain and user Imbris modified the original map, but did not changed the licence, so the original licence permission for the map is still mine, 2. I do not understand why you write that map is a derivative work of user:Mladifilozof, when it is clear that he only uploaded map version made by user:Imbris, and therefore, author of derivative version is Imbris, not Mladifilozof, 3. term "other versions of the file" usually refer to versions of the same file in different languages or with some other minor differences. Contrary to that, this is a file totally changed from original file, and therefore, original file is simply not an other version of this file. I do not understand why you constantly adding that to the file page - such addition is redundant and misleading. PANONIAN (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

And just one note: author of this map version, user:Imbris was indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia due to sockpupetry and constant POV pushing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Imbris - thus, his contributions here (including this map) should be further revaloriated and examined. PANONIAN (talk) 09:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso a Cavalo.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso a cavalo. Manhufe.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso a montar a cavalo 1.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso com Boina.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso com cães.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso com um boi.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:00, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso em Manhufe.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso no Château Keriolet 01.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso no Château Keriolet 2.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso no Château Keriolet.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:02, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza Cardoso no seu atelier.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza-Cardoso 1.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza-Cardoso 2.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza-Cardoso 3.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:04, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza-Cardoso com Chapéu.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza-Cardoso com maquina fotografica.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza-Cardoso em Paris 01.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza-Cardoso em Paris 02.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo de Souza-Cardozo com um cigarro.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Amadeo em criança.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Anadeo de Souza Cardozo com um cigarro.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Castelo, Guimarãesby Mário Novais.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:48, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Igreja de Nossa Senhora de Oliveira, Guimarães by Mário Novais.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 12:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Lucie de Souza Cardoso em Manhufe 01.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:18, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Lucie de Souza Cardoso em Manhufe 02.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Lucie de Souza Cardoso em Manhufe 03.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:20, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Lucie de Souza Cardoso em Manhufe 04.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Lucie de Souza Cardoso em Paris 01.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)


File:Lucie de Souza Cardoso em Paris 02.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:22, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Imagem

Olá. Queria fazer uma pequena referência acerca desta imagem e da respectiva página de discussão. Sigo de perto esta imagem - fui eu que a digitalizei. Reverti a edição da p´gina de discussão porque está a ser manipulada e porque não é a primeira vez que este IP faz isto. Este IP é responsável por transformar algumas páginas de discussão em autênticas lixeiras. Eu e um editor alemão, ChrisHH, tomamos conta de algumas páginas onde este IP manipula informação e assina sempre como estando a escrever de New Jersey, quando na realidade está muito perto de Torres Novas. Conheço pessoalmente a pessoa detrás desse IP e sei quais são os seus fins, por isso retirei da página de discussão um texto que iria dar origem a lixo desnecessário. Outro dado que queria referir: no final da minha página pessoal, poderá ver um documento oficial da Junta de Freguesia com o brasão da Vila. Se tiver alguma pergunta, dê um salto à minha página de discussão. Cumprimentos e, já agora, Boas Festas. Trebaruna (talk) 09:14, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

For Flickr Uploaders

Hello Tm!

Wouldn't this category appropriate for you? Greets, High Contrast (talk) 01:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I didnt remember to add this infobox. Greetings Tm (talk) 21:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Anna Cyzon 01.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anna Cyzon 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 14:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Anna Cyzon 02.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anna Cyzon 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 14:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Olivia Wilde in 2010 Independent Spirit Awards.jpg

Man you work quick... you got the image up on Flickr faster than I could after Pulicciano agreed to change the license... <G> Tabercil (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Julia_Heliconian_(Dryas_lulia)_photographed_at_the_Butterfly_Alive_Exhibit_at_the_Santa_Barbarba_Museum_of_Natural_History.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Julia_Heliconian_(Dryas_lulia)_photographed_at_the_Butterfly_Alive_Exhibit_at_the_Santa_Barbarba_Museum_of_Natural_History.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tm (talk) 05:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

RE:

Está disponivel no site da NASA e tudo que está lá disponivel é dominio publico. Isso é absurdo. MachoCarioca (talk) 04:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Firearms images

You've requested the batch upload of firearms images. It has been fulfilled please try categorizing category:Images of Firearms to check.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Miss Universe Dayana Mendoza en Nicaragua 11.jpg

Hi Tm, just letting you know that I've now edited out the watermarks on the full-size image without cropping. I hope this will be to your satisfaction - if not please talk to me at my talk page before reverting. Thanks! Dcoetzee (talk) 17:02, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Manors

Ola, TM! Porque colocas sempre os solares como "edifícios agrícolas"? São prédios residenciais, pertencem a uma tree de categorias diferente, como podes confirmar, embora lá no topo também estejam dentro da agricultura, uma vez que estão na tree das farms. Abraços,--Darwinius (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Uma pequena correcção. Os solares ou casas solarengas (em inglês manor houses) não eram meramente edifícios residenciais, mas igualmente os centros administrativos de unidades agrícolas pertencentes à nobreza terratenente. Veja http://www.inventario.iacultura.pt/pico/madalena/casas.html, para uma definição de casa solarenga, em especial a nota 2. Cumprimentos Tm (talk) 19:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

TM, veja por favor Category:Manors, a categorização que colocou está incorrecta. Veja também Category:Agricultural buildings, e logo verá que não encontra nada remotamente semelhante a solares ali. De resto, os solares nem sempre eram "centros administrativos de unidades agrícolas pertencentes à nobreza terratenente", pelo que nem por esse motivo faria sentido colocar a categoria ali. No entanto, como já lhe mostrei, "edifícios agrícolas" servem funções totalmente diversas dos solares, pelo que não percebo porque insiste em colocar essa categoria ali.--Darwinius (talk) 07:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Reparei também que você colocou no sumário de edição um link para "Manorialism", coisa que nunca existiu em Portugal, pois nunca tivemos feudalismo por cá. Como já lhe disse, tanto há solares rurais como urbanos (veja aqui o exemplo de um) e, apesar de muitas vezes os solares rurais estarem incorporados numa propriedade agrícola, isso não implica que a administração da propriedade fosse feita aí. Por vezes eram arrendados ou aforados a outra gente, e a administração era feita sempre com o proprietário das terras, morasse ele onde morasse, muitas vezes por intermédio de um feitor. A colocação destes edifícios como "agrícolas" é uma aberração que nem nos verdadeiros manors existe aqui no Commons, e menos sentido faz ainda no caso dos solares. Quanto às "farms", como já lhe expliquei, apesar de não ser exactamente uma categorização correcta no caso português, já se encontram como categoria superior dos "aristocratic estates", pelo que a sua colocação ali é redundante. Peço-lhe que não insista nessas categorizações, que são manifestamente incorrectas e vão contra o que é seguido aqui no Commons.--Darwinius (talk) 08:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Note também que o próprio texto que você mostrou sobre os solares da Madalena, no Pico, demonstra que o termo era usado tanto para o caso das propriedades senhoriais como para, naquele mesmo caso, "as casas de feição mais erudita do concelho da Madalena", abarcando "não só as grandes casas rurais localmente chamadas "solares", mas também outras cujo porte e expressão denunciam um passado de relativo poderio socio-económico e alguma influência das correntes arquitectónicas eruditas.". O próprio texto diz que nenhum daqueles solares foi algum dia sede de senhorio, tendo sempre sido claramente "residências sazonais e secundárias ". Na Madeira ocorreu precisamente o mesmo, e ainda no século XV grandes residências senhoriais, como a dos Vasconcelos em Vale-d'Amores, Calheta (onde hoje se encontra o Centro das Artes), tendo sido efectivamente sede de uma grande sesmaria, mudaram de mãos ainda em vida dos que as ergueram.--Darwinius (talk) 08:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Categoria da Estação de Covelinhas e da Rede Ferroviária Nacional

Bem, quanto à categoria de Covelinhas, sinceramente não reparei que "Train" deveria ter sido escrito com letra pequena. Mea culpa, pode mudar à vontade. =P

Quanto à Rede Ferroviária Nacional... bem, neste caso não concordo muito com mudar o nome da categoria, porque é o nome próprio de uma empresa que faz a manutenção das infra-estruturas ferroviárias em Portugal (na realidade, o nome completo da empresa é REFER – Rede Ferroviária Nacional, EPE.). Coloquei o nome da categoria sem acentos porque tive receio que a Wikimédia Commons não reagisse bem a caracteres com acentos no nome das categorias. Por outro lado, "Ferroviária Nacional" não é um bom nome para uma categoria... porque nunca existiu tal entidade em Portugal - embora tenha existido uma empresa chamada Rodoviária Nacional, mas essa nunca teve nada a ver com caminhos de ferro, ehehe. Abraço! Ajpvalente (talk) 01:24, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Le_Voyage_Dans_La_Lune.ogv

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Le_Voyage_Dans_La_Lune.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tryphon 11:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Please

Do not revert my changes at "Child with Smallpox Bangladesh.jpg". Luispihormiguero (talk) 19:51, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

File:LM-2008 tram.JPG

Hello Tm!

Thanks for identifying this mistake. After I have uploaded this image, I was thinking that this would be some Wiki-based Javascript problem. Anyway, it was another, easier problem... Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

File:MIG hitted with 20mm cannon bursts into flames.jpg

Hi, you uploaded the above file. I uploaded a smaller version earlier and a 3-photo sequence from the USAF Museum File:MiG-17 shoot down sequence 3 June 1967.jpg, File:MiG-17 shot down by F-105D 3 June 1967.jpg. The shoot-down sequence is inverted. This led me to the conclusion, that probably the National Archives-file is inverted. Therefore, I inverted the smaller colour NRA-file. Maybe you want to invert your file, too. Greetings Cobatfor (talk) 12:51, 19 September 2010 (UTC)


Category:Orders and Decorations

Category discussion notification Category:Orders and Decorations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

-- One or more related categories that you created have been listed for a name change as part of the above discussion. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 12:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

File:XM2010_(Right_back_view).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:XM2010_(Right_back_view).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.103.148 07:42, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

Os comboios do Morão

Olá Tm!
Obrigado por subir as fotos de Nuno Morão do flickr. Só uma coisa: Como estás a pedir uma "subida massiva" queria-te dizer que já subí muitas fotos dele ([1], [2], [3] e muitas mais. Já vi as tuas correcções, obrigado!). Agora tenho um poco medo que haverá muitos duplicados, que achas? Além disso: este é um comboio do tipo 2300/2400, não este ;) Saludos, --Jcornelius (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Caro JCornelius. Já tinha reparado que tinhas (assim como eu) carregado muitas fotos do nmorao que se encontram no flickr. Quanto ao perigo da existência de duplicados, creio que esse teu receio é infundado visto que as fotos anteriormente carregadas aqui no Commons foram carregadas todas(?) carregadas inalteradas ou por mim ou por ti. Como podes ver na página onde eu fiz o pedido para as restantes imagens serem carregadas, no que foi feito pelo Zil (a ele é que se deve agradecer o facto de elas terem sido carregadas, não a mim), este referiu que muitas imagens não foram carregadas, precisamente por estas já terem sido anteriormente carregadas, pelo que não deverão existir duplicados. Quanto à confusão entre uma locomotiva e uma automotora, tal deveu-se a que nessa altura já me encontrava com bastante sono e só conseguir ver vermelho à frente, característica partilhada pelas duas. :) Cumprimentos. Tm (talk) 17:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)


  • Obrigado pelo teu esforço no carregamento e catalogação das fotografias ferroviárias, irão (e já estão) a dar muito jeito nos artigos ferroviários da Wikipédia. Tal como tu, estou a ver se as categorizo correctamente, e são, felizmente, tantas que ainda há muito que fazer. Para já creio que não vale a pena categorizar mais a fundo o material rebocado do que Category:Railway wagons of Portugal e Category:Railway coaches of Portugal, como está a ser feito. Mais tarde, logo se poderá categorizar esse material mais detalhadamente, o que levará o seu tempo (como calculo que tenhas uma ideia, existem centenas de classes de carruagens, vagões e furgões em Portugal) - se é que valer a pena, porque planeio apenas criar uns quantos artigos na Wikipédia sobre os vagões (e já calculo que irão andar em cima de mim à conta da "notabilidade" dos artigos, um conceito que eu detesto e que já me custou uns artigos). Mais uma vez, obrigado pelos teus esforços! Clin Ajpvalente (talk) 04:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

IGESPAR

Hi Tm, I noticed this edit. Does the pt Wikipedia have some sort of monument project? We do, we just did Commons:Wiki Loves Monuments to get more pictures. Multichill (talk) 21:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Template:IGESPAR

Muito obrigado, bom trabalho. Do you think we could create a projecto monumentos históricos português sobre Commons ? Regards, Otourly (talk) 16:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

O projecto é nacido: Commons:Projecto Monumentos Portugueses Otourly (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Série 1150

  • Peço-lhe que pare com as guerras de edição por causa da Série 1150. Existe uma diferenciação entre locomotiva de linha e locotractora - a CP admite isso nos seus esquemas de material circulante (que não posso postar aqui na Wikimédia, por razões óbvias), e em qualquer site existe a distinção entre ambos os tipos. Uma locotractora, em Portugal, muito raramente faz serviços de plena via, porque não está preparada para isso - serve apenas para fazer as manobras de material não motorizado nos parques, ramais e estações! Além disso, se existe secção própria para ela - a categoria "Portuguese shunter type 1150" está dentro da categoria "Shunters of Portugal", que já faz parte da categoria "Locomotives of Portugal". Não faz sentido ter duas vezes a mesma fotografia dentro da mesma árvore de categorias, pois não? Espero que consigamos resolver este problema a bem, porque conflitos não ajudam em nada a nossa já complicada tarefa Clin Ajpvalente (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

Caro Ajpvalente. Permita que discorde, não no que afirma sobre a distinção sobre serviço completo e serviço em parques e estações, mas se reparar outras categorias de locomotoras estão classificadas não sobre a categoria "sunters of ..." mas sobre "locomotives of ..." ou mesmo especificando o tipo de veículo que é, como por exemplo estas categorias de locomotoras:

Como pode ver estas locomotoras estão classificadas por "Diesel locomotives of ...". Por isso proponho para acabar com esta disputa que se mova a categoria "shunters of Portugal" para "Diesel locomotives of Portugal" visto não conhecer locomotoras modernas eléctricas. Cumprimentos. Tm (talk) 13:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

  • Parece-me ser uma boa solução. SMirC-thumbsup.svg Ajpvalente (talk) 14:26, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Anna Cyzon 01.jpg

Hi there, could you please be so kind to delete the file: Anna Cyzon 01.jpg (if possible Anna Cyzon 02.jpg and Anna Cyzon.jpg as well), I've uploaded them onto my flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/29759986@N03/ under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license, that is why someone uploaded them onto wikimedia commons, in the meantime Anna Cyzon contacted me and asked to delete this photos from the Internet, I've deleted them from my flickr album and requested deletion from the wikimedia commons, unfortunately - they are still here, and she contacted me once again saying very strictly that she didn't allow for the publication of these pictures. I would appreciate if you could help me in deletion of these pics. regards daniel kruczynski (author of these pictures) Dany kruk (talk) 18:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC) dany_kruk 22nd of November, 2010, 19:37 CET

File tagging File:Anna_Cyzon_01.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Anna_Cyzon_01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Anna_Cyzon_01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Dany kruk (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Anna_Cyzon_01.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anna_Cyzon_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dany kruk (talk) 22:42, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Anna_Cyzon_02.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anna_Cyzon_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dany kruk (talk) 22:44, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Anna_Cyzon_02.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Anna_Cyzon_02.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Anna_Cyzon_02.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Dany kruk (talk) 22:44, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Anna_Cyzon_02.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anna_Cyzon_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Guy 23:10, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Mongol_Empire_History.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mongol_Empire_History.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Masur (talk) 15:28, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Roman HanEmpiresAD1.png

Excuse me? Please, this map fix about part of korea. This is CPOV and you are trying to deny the existence of Gojoseon and Goguryeo. Please, stop to edit warrior. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 08:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Please, we need to talk. Stop to back, and tell me about cause of back. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Edit warring

I have protected File:KhitanAD1000.png for a week due to the unproductive edit warring. This is a warning that if I see anyone recommence the edit warring once the protection is lifted or expires they will be blocked, this includes yourself. Discuss the issues of the image on the image talk page or the user talk pages of those involved in the edit warring. Bidgee (talk) 06:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Stop distorting the history!

File is no your property, property of everyone. So everybody can upload. But you told as me, "Don't touch it!". This is so unfortunate. And, do you know korea history? If you know, you wouldn't distorting the history for file. I'd advise study korea history to you. Thank you. --Idh0854 (talk) 02:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Be involved in talk. --Idh0854 (talk) 03:13, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: Edit warring after warnings. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

. Bidgee (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "This is utter ridiculous. Blocked for the first time in more than 4 years of being in commons and almost 24000 in commons alone, i´ve never been warned (as far i remember) much more being blocked, i´am stating this only to show that i´ve enough experience to know the rules of Commons. The others blocked users are the ones that are trying to subvert the rules, by uploading their versions of the maps, knowing full well that this is a hot topic, and they´ve been reverted for more than one user for at least a year and warned (see this and this. I made the reversions trying to protect the original files from this POV pushing and unsourced changes and being accused of having a CPOV (i suposse it mens a Chinese point of view, an accusassion that amuses me because i´afull fledged portuguese). And this is what i get????????? I also would like to ask the blocking administrator if he as read the warning in Category:Maps of Korea put there, precisely because of files; also read the propose guideline or policie Commons:Avoid_overwriting_existing_files and you ll see that i´ve made this reversions in good faith (not tainted by POV pushing, so thats why i request that i´ve bee uhblocked. Thank you. Tm (talk) 04:46, 23 December 2010 (UTC)"
Unblock reason: "Block expired. --ZooFari 02:49, 1 January 2011 (UTC)"

This template should be archived normally.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | हिन्दी | magyar | македонски | Plattdüütsch | português | русский | +/−

You were warned about edit warring, it doesn't matter who is pushing opinions as edit warring is just that.
As I have stated to Idh0854, I will be willing to unblock you if you agree to no longer edit war on any file on Commons, use talk pages (File or User talk pages) and use other means (such as taking it to COM:AN or COM:AN/U [if it is about another editor]) and do not revert (files or the file pages). If you recommence edit warring you will be re-blocked but for a longer period of time. Bidgee (talk) 04:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I think that you know perfectly well that as soon that the images blocking ends the korean users will again restart the edit warring that they started (except in this file and this file were i reverted the 2009 edition to the original) in the first place (see for my argumentation what i´ve found:this and this discussions in the administrators noticeboard and whare it says "User:DieBuche to convince him uploading his versions to these files to seperate own files (see 8, 9(Better to see here), 10 and 11), but he refuse doing so and while discussing went on he keept up uploading his versions. (By the way: we showed him how to upload to a own file, too, see 12 and 13)." why i terminantly refuse to discusse with this users as i know that sooner or later this edit warring wil restart. Tm (talk) 05:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
PS: I wrote several times that they were perfectley entitled to upload they versions of the files under a new filename as my reversions where only trying to protect this heavily used images from things like "the article was forced to show through a modification not controlled in the articles a point of view that was contrary of the reason why the image was in the article (and in contradiction of what the article says). It's a new way of pov-pushing using commons as base for having to do just a few changes to modify hundreds of articles in various language...". Tm (talk) 06:02, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
I'm not willing to unblock (even with the edit warred images protected) when the threat of further edit warring exists. Fact is if the revert war recommences the images will likely be placed on longer protection with longer blocks for those who were involved in the edit war. No matter if you're trying to revert to a "good" version it isn't a reason to edit war and in this case I seen an edit war which shouldn't have happened had it been taken to COM:AN/P. Bidgee (talk) 12:54, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Tm, just relax for a while, this block is not directed to your contributions but to safeguard commons from being a silent witness of a never ending edit war...if there is a serious problem with an image that will start an edit war, just notify the admins so that it will be trated accordingly...--...Captain......Tälk tö me 13:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)