User talk:ToSter

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
English: Welcome to the Commons, ToSter!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 22:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 791c8d5bcb6ebb386c4547457c7b98f2[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Commonist licenses[edit]

Dear ToSter,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to less than 8000 files (started with about 1,8M files) . Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt?

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}
{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}
{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much, Multichill (talk) 12:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

I think I got the images changed now :-) --MGA73 (talk) 21:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, ToSter!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:19, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

File:07 Stara Lesna, stacja meteorologiczna.jpg[edit]

Hello,

I'm trying to classfy File:07 Stara Lesna, stacja meteorologiczna.jpg. Since the description was in Polish, I assumed that it should be in category:Weather stations in Poland but I'm not sure. Could you help me? Pierre cb (talk) 01:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. I will correct the category in that case. Pierre cb (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dolina Starolesna, Ostry Szczyt.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolina Starolesna, Ostry Szczyt.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Beskid Slaski, Skalite i Kotlina Zywiecka.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beskid Slaski, Skalite i Kotlina Zywiecka.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kalisz, bazylika kolegiacka 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalisz, bazylika kolegiacka 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gory Swietokrzyskie, Kakonin.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gory Swietokrzyskie, Kakonin.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Koszysta z Hali Gasienicowej.jpg[edit]

Mała Koszysta nie jest z tej strony w ogóle widoczna. Pozdrawiam--83.12.91.242 14:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Dlatego też po konsultacjach z Rafikiem k zmieniłem podpis, który wskazuje cały odcinek grani, a nie żaden konkretny punkt. ToSter (talk) 14:44, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
Mł. Koszysta to odcinek grani czy pojedyncza kulminacja?--83.12.91.242 23:23, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
W sumie racja, wyrzucę ten podpis w ogóle lepiej. ToSter (talk) 00:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
Nie, nie, to nie było pytanie retoryczne :-). Ja nie mam specjalnie dostępu do literatury tarzańskiej, swoją wiedzę opieram na tym, co samemu udało mi się wygrzebać z czeluści internetu. A Mł. Koszyta, jako odcinek grani, świta mi przy okazji map WiG-u.--83.12.91.242 18:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 :) wg wszystkiego co mam, to jednak kulminacja. Nic się chyba bez tego podpisu nie stanie :) ToSter (talk) 22:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
http://www.e-gory.pl/index.php/Mapy-online/Tatry-czesc-polska-WIG/Tatry-czesc-polska-WIG/drukuj.html Takie coś mam w ulubionych, z tym że raczej już "troszkę" zdezaktualizowana :) Najlepszego w Nowym Roku tak przy okazji.--83.12.91.242 12:03, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Mapa fajna, choć faktycznie zdezaktualizowana - ale widać np., że rzeczywiście w Wołoszynie były Przedni i Zadni Garb :) Coby nie mylić, zostawię jednak Małą Koszystą bez podpisu. Również najlepszego! ToSter (talk) 16:21, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dolina Zadnich Koperszadow, Muranskie Czubki.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolina Zadnich Koperszadow, Muranskie Czubki.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Przelecz pod Kopa Kondracka, Giewont.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Przelecz pod Kopa Kondracka, Giewont.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 22.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 22.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 26.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 26.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 70.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 70.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pruszkow, Durchgangslager Pruszkow.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pruszkow, Durchgangslager Pruszkow.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gory Fogaraskie (Fagaras Mountains) 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grzes, Dlugi Uplaz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grzes, Dlugi Uplaz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.



Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska zaprasza Cię na warsztaty fotograficzne, które odbędą się w Łodzi, 1-3 maja 2010. Twój wkład do Wikimedia Commons wskazuje, że możesz wiele skorzystać z udziału w warsztatach i podzielić się swoim doświadczeniem fotograficznym z innymi. Warsztaty są skierowane do:

  • osób już wgrywających mniejsze czy większe ilości zdjęć do Wikimedia

Commons - niezależnie od ich jakości

  • fototoamatorów - nie związanych dotąd z projektami Wikimedia
  • zawodowych fotografów - w charakterze doradców i wykładowców

Nie ma znaczenia jaki typ fotografii preferujesz - w Wikimedia Commons jest miejsce zarówno dla portrecistów, dokumentalistów, jak i fotografów pejzażu miejskiego i przyrody. Wikiwarsztaty będą miały charakter kameralny (max. 40-50 osób) i trwały przez weekend 1-3 maja 2010 <sobota-poniedziałek>, Zajęcia będą się odbywały w Łódzkim Domu Kultury oraz w plenerze. Organizatorzy zapewniają w ramach opłaty konferencyjnej (50 zł od osoby) - nocleg( PTSM na ul. Zamenhoffa), wyżywienie (obiady) i bezpłatny dostęp do Internetu w trakcie obrad.

E-mail: wikifoto@wikimedia.pl WWW: http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwarsztaty_fotograficzne Tel: 0-22 219 56 94 Stowarzyszenie Wikimedia Polska, ul. Tuwima 95, p. 15, Łódź.

Zobacz też: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/pl/6/66/Zaproszenie_wiki_foto_2010.pdf

Pozdrowienia,

Organizatorzy Warsztatów Wikifoto 2010

Codziennie jak sprawdzam moja "watchlist" widze kupe twoich zmian kategorii w zdjeciach starej Warszawy, ktore ja tez kiedys pozadkowalem. Ciesze sie ze ktos kontynuje ta prace. --Jarekt (talk) 12:43, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Pozdrowienia[edit]

Codziennie jak sprawdzam moja "watchlist" widze kupe twoich zmian kategorii w zdjeciach starej Warszawy, ktore ja tez kiedys pozadkowalem. Ciesze sie ze ktos kontynuje ta prace. Chetnie pomoge jesli potrzebujesz pomocy od adninistratora albo bota (user:JarektBot) --Jarekt (talk) 12:50, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Category:Wayside shrines in Pruszków county[edit]

Witaj, jako że zostało ustalone, że nie mamy w Polsce 'counties' wszystkie tego typu kategorie są do przeniesienia do Category:Wayside shrines in Powiat prószkowski, itd. Po prostu trzeba te wszystkie kategorie zebrać i wrzucić do CommonsDelinkera (kiedyś się za to wezmę). Także prosiłbym o wzięcie to pod uwagę na przyszłość :). Yarl 12:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

No właśnie... To jest trochę zagwozdka, z punktu widzenia j. polskiego to niezbyt pasuje. Z drugiej strony dla osób pl-0 jest to bardziej konsekwentne.
Commons i enWiki różnią się między sobą, to jedna z tych różnic. Dużą autonomię nazw posiadają np. Niemcy (patrz kazwy kategorii dworców, kościół - wszytko po niemiecku). To pokazuje, że Commons raczej nie da się zunifikować. Yarl 12:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Taak, spis wezwań kościołów trzeba zrobić koniecznie :). W ogóle to chyba zaspamuję CDelinkera nowymi nazwami kategorii dla kościołów: Category:Saint Catherine of Alexandria church (Krokowa). Jest odrobinę krótsze i bardziej spójne (patrz nadkategorie). Yarl 13:08, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Category:Immaculate Conception churches in Poland :)

:re, Ohrid[edit]

cześć, I noticed your work, and i look that you have finished а great work. I just want to inform you that the categories for villages and churches аre completely correct. Villages in Ohrid covers not just the Villages of the municipality of Ohrid, but villages in Debarca Municipality to. Category Villages in Ohrid has a broader meaning and means all the villages that gravitate to Ohrid. Such is the division of Macedonia. (i will try in polnish: Ochrydski wsi and wsi w gminie Ochryda ) The Category Churches in Ohrid covers the churches of Ohrid Municipality and other municipalities that gravitate to Ohrid. And these are the churches of the Municipality Debarca. The same thing with the capital Skopje. Skopje's villages are all villages of 15 municipalities of Skopje. I hope that you understand me. --R ašoAero-stub img.svg 16:14, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm happy that you was in Macedonia. I hope that you the next time will stay longer and see the other beauties. Otherwise I am from Tetovo. Abouth the categories, only to inform you that I have gathered here all those related with Macedonia and should not be any errors. If you have questions, feel free to address me. However, the Macedonians and the Poles are still people from the same origin. ;))))
Pozdrav - Pozdrowienie--R ašoAero-stub img.svg 17:46, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

re:Pomnik - kotwica[edit]

Niestety, nie pamietam gdzie to bylo :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Chocim,_pomnik_Konaszewicza-Sahajdacznego.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chocim,_pomnik_Konaszewicza-Sahajdacznego.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

195.110.6.202 09:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Alba_Iulia,_obelisk.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alba_Iulia,_obelisk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Korce, Qemali Square 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korce, Qemali Square 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 17:35, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Chocim, pomnik Armii Czerwonej.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chocim, pomnik Armii Czerwonej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cezarika1 (talk) 04:32, 9 May 2013 (UTC)