User talk:Tokorokoko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tokorokoko!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

File:Koku-koen Dog-run Tokorozawa 09.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:55, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

  • added {{PD-self}} Thanks.--Tokorokoko (talk) 07:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Please use sub-categories[edit]

dansk | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | русский | svenska | +/−


Over-categorization.svg
Start hand.svg
When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

--Apalsola tc 09:29, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for telling me. (^-^) --Tokorokoko (talk) 15:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Rename request[edit]

The rename request for File:209.jpg may be right, however, in isolation I don't find it meaningful, even when I look at the file description, it doesn't add to my understanding. Would you please be able to review the request, add to the description field, and look to see if there is more that we could do to the name in conjunction with the description. Thanks for looking at this again.  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. Right, as you mentioned, it is not enough meaningful yet. Let me see ...
OK, now I found that this is from the same old postcard, and the place, today, looks like this. --Tokorokoko (talk) 09:35, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Tenmangu --> Tenman-gū[edit]

You made a move request for Category:Tenmangu to Category:Tenman-gū. There are many subcategories with various spelling of Tenmangu. Can you make move requests for those who have to be renamed also and give me a message as soon as you have done that. --Havang(nl) (talk) 21:11, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing Havang(nl); sorry for late reply. I know what you mentioned, and thank you very much for renaming the big category first any way. That would be a big help for me or someone to work on the many smaller ones too. Thanks!--Tokorokoko (talk) 16:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

National Treasures of Japan[edit]

Hi! I am Bamse on en-wikipedia and working on Lists of National Treasures there. I have a question on this list: Why is 六祖恵能伝 listed under 仏教経典? As far as I understand 六祖恵能伝 is a biography and not a sutra. Unfortunately my Japanese is very limited (but I can read it to some extent), so I hope you can help me and translate the above question to Japanese and place it on the talk page. bamse (talk) 19:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done - I placed your question translated to Japanese there. (My initial feeling is that it is a good question, and you are probably correct.)
First of all, I would like to say, as one Japanese, that, thank you very much for working on the List"s" of National Treasures of Japan in English. You have been working on, and made them very informative and high quality lists, with using sortable tables and accompanying the images of most of them.
Although I am not personaly familiar with the contents of 六祖恵能伝 nor the precise definition of 仏教経典, generally, books or writings with titled 『 —— 』 , are usually meant to be 伝記 (biography), or 伝説 (legend, tradition, folktale) at least.
At the same time I could guess that it might be simply because they just decided to put it together with 仏教-related items in closest category for convenience, while in fact it is not really a "経典"(^-^?) - Let's see if we can find out. Thank you again for taking your time and making sure that they are correctly categorized. --Tokorokoko (talk) 16:06, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for translation. Even if 伝 is in the meaning of 伝説, it looks a bit out of place as all other entries in 仏教経典 are sutras. I used the sub-categories of this article for three national treasure lists: writings, swords and other crafts. At least in the sword list everything seemed fine (still working on the other two). If possible, I'd also be interested to learn where these sub-categories were taken from. As far as I know, bunkacho, only distinguishes main categories: 書跡・典籍, 工芸品,... bamse (talk) 00:32, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes, you are right. I believe those are good questions. → Let us move to ja:ノート:国宝一覧 for further talk, with someone responded.--Tokorokoko (talk) 08:26, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token efc928667f7d23462fccea0937adffae[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

:)[edit]

You're welcome. Face-wink.svg mickit 07:06, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

('▽') *  --Tokorokoko (talk) 03:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

自治体の旗(紋章)のライセンスについて[edit]

初めましてMtiと申します。日々の活動お疲れ様です。さて、貴殿が投稿されている旗や徽章のライセンスですが、著作権性を欠くと主張する{{PD-self}}がつけられていないと削除されます。{{PD-self}}を付けていただきますようお願いします。あなたのおかげで自治体の旗の投稿画像が増えていくことに感謝しています。私も旗を作成していますが、日本の自治体は現存しているので1500か所・消滅している自治体は2000ヶ所以上ありますのでそのうちの一つ以上投稿していただければ私の作業負担も減りますのでご協力よろしくお願いします。--Mti (talk) 03:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

※後に読む人を混乱させないために一応書きますと、"著作権性を欠くと主張する{{PD-self}} …" → {{PD-self}} は "著作権性を欠くと主張" しないです。
お知らせをどうもありがとうございます。
市町村章と旗の著作権については、私も少し勘違いしていてまだ理解が充分ではないと思います
し、また現行のルールや解釈も整理/改善の必要があるのではないかと感じました。   --Tokorokoko (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)


(追記):Mtiさん初めまして。ご投稿を拝見しました。ご活動に感謝致します。 以下いくつか気付いた点を 感想文程度ですが少し書いてみます。

  • {{PD-ineligible}}を、ライセンスとして多用されていますが、公表後五十年を経過した団体名義の著作物の場合 {{PD-Japan-organization}} が適切かと思われます。
    自治体の紋章や旗は 当たり前ですが wikiUserの作品,創作ではありません。あくまで模写、再現しているだけです。必ず元のデザインをした方がいらっしゃいます。その 誰かがデザインした作品に対して、"「創作性を欠く」ために、著作権発生の「資格がない」" とみなす文言を貼り付ける行為は、本人の意思に拘らず法的以前に、重い行為です。場合によっては攻撃的な、意味をも持ってしまいます。 お時間のある時にでも公表年月日を再度ご確認・ご検討くださいませ。
  • .jpg形式でたくさんご投稿されていますが、もったいない。 と思いました。jpeg画像はリサイズ保存するだけでも劣化しこの用途には不向きです。 作りましたのでどうぞ、使ってください、と言われても、jpegでは使用も修正もできない場合が多いです。 せっかくですから今後は できればvectorで プレーンな.svg形式で、投稿された方が後に再利用されやすい より有意義なご投稿になるのではないでしょうか、 作成は無料ソフトのInkscapeとテキストエディタだけでできます。し、後からみんなで手分けして修正することも容易になります。 それでも今後もどうしてもわざわざjpeg形式で投稿し続けなければならない特別な理由があったらおきかせください。 
参照: ja:Wikipedia:SVGへの乗り換え  --Tokorokoko (talk) 14:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

(返事)こちらこそ、初めましてMtiです。Tokorokokoさん、svg画像の編集お疲れ様です。現在、私は現存自治体・廃止自治体の紋章・旗を作成しており、宮城県・東京都・大阪府ははぼ全部完了しており、千葉県・奈良県・香川県の大方はできております。JPGでの画像は勿体ないとおっしゃているとおり、確かにそうだと感じておりました。svgのことですが、私はあまりsvgの方法には詳しくなく、専ら他力本願でありJPG方式で続けておりました。Tokorokokoさんたちがsvgにしていることに対しては大変感謝しております。後、Zscout370さん・Tanuki85さん・Life of Rileyさんにも投稿の手伝いをしていただいて大変感謝しています。--Mti (talk) 20:18, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten-stare.jpg

Arigatougozaimasu!

Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:43, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Kochirakoso!  ありがとうございます(^▽^) --Tokorokoko (talk) 16:28, 22 February 2014 (UTC)


Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Tokorokoko,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)