User talk:Toubabmaster

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Please stop being rude[edit]

Please stop with personnal insults in my talk page. If you are really interested in contributing to QIC, you are welcome and may well start by reading carefully the quality images guidelines, concerning size and other things. If, on the contrary, you are only having fun in disrupting the work of others, then your case will be easily dealt with. -- Alvesgaspar 13:05, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:100 0586.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:100 0586.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 18:00, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

OTRS required[edit]

Hi, I noticed you obtained permission to use File:Pont La Roche Bernard.jpg on Wikipedia from the author - but any such permission for a previously published work must be confirmed through the Commons:OTRS process. If you don't the image will have to be deleted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dcoetzee (talk) 10:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Pont La Roche Bernard.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Pont La Roche Bernard.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pont La Roche Bernard.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Captain-tucker (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Grand Bravo pour votre zèle. Avec des gars comme vous sur ce site, on préjuge négativement des contributions des autres, sans en avoir la moindre preuve...Exellent!! Continuez comme ça...--Toubabmaster (talk) 11:53, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Toubabmaster. You have new messages at Captain-tucker's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−


Copyright status: File:Côte_de_belle-ile.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Côte_de_belle-ile.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

 fetchcomms 16:36, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Removing info[edit]

Uh, I'm rolling back all your recent edits because you've basically removed all the copyright info. If you have them deleted, please request that instead.  fetchcomms 16:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

English: I did the same on your most recent edits as well. Please do not remove these informations, especially license. I am afraid I really do not understand your reasoning here. Could please state why you are doing this ?
Français: J'ai fait de même sur vos dernières modifications. Veuillez ne pas retirer ces informations, en particulier celles sur les licences. J'ai bien peur de ne pas comprndre votre démarche. Pourriez-vous s'il vous-plaît expliquer les raisons de vos actions ?
Jean-Fred (talk) 22:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Jean-Fred (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
English: Last warning. Next time, short block just to make sure you realise we are talking to you.
Français: Dernier avertissement. La prochaine fois, ce sera blocage court pour être certain que vous comprenez qu'on vous parle.

Jean-Fred (talk) 08:25, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Bateau Belle-ile.JPG[edit]

Hi Toubabmaster!

Why did you remove twice the Category:Vehicles facing left? This is a boat and a boat is a kind of vehicle and it's facing left. So, where's your problem?

regards, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 06:07, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Bateau Belle-ile.JPG, File:Les aiguilles de Port Coton.JPG, File:Pointe des poulains 4.JPG[edit]

Salut Toubabmaster!

Premièrement: s.v.p pardonnez moi mon français si mal.

Aux images: D'abord vous avez téleversés quelques images à wikimedia commons et vous avez ajoutés quelques informations accompagnants à ces images. D'après vous avez essayés plusieurs fois d'éteindre ces informations. Normalement des utilisateurs comme moi continueront à remettre à zéro cettes extinctions d'information. Mais vous avez écrits à votre User page hier: Mes imports ne sont pas et n'ont jamais été ma propriété. Les licences ne peuvent donc pas etre conservées en l'état.

Donc: Si vous n'êtes pas le proprietaire de ces images ou des droits de publier les images, je crois ça vaut mieux d'annuler les images mêmes complètement.

Cordialement, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 08:20, 27 July 2010 (UTC)


Bonjour

En effet, je souhaite la suppression des images que j'ai importées dans la mesure ou elles ne sont pas les miennes. C'est dans ce but que j'ai retiré des informations. J'en avais d'ailleurs parlé à User:Jean-Frédéric, sans succès. Je ne connait pas la procédure pour supprimer ces images. Peut-etre pourriez-vous m'aider? Merci --Toubabmaster (talk) 22:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)


Ok. Je crois que c'est possible d'annuler toutes vos photos, parce que la téléversion (upload) des images était un erreur, parce que vous - au moment de téleverser ces photos - ne saviez pas que vous n'avez pas les droits nécessaires aux images.

Donc, vous écriverez ici s.v.p. une liste des noms des photos; et moi, je vais questionner quelques compatriotes wikipédiens, comment le faire d'annuler (delete) ces photos.

A bientôt, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 16:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

En fait ça concerne toute mes imports.[1]. Ce n'est pas moi qui ai prit les photos. --Toubabmaster (talk) 00:48, 29 July 2010 (UTC)


Salut Toubabmaster!

J'ai commencer de préparer toutes vos images au speedy delete. Je vais completer la liste successivement.

faits
begin old maps
end old maps

A bientôt, fcm. --Frank C. Müller (talk) 11:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

J'ai rajoutté le modele de suppression sur les autres photos. Merci pour votre aide. --Toubabmaster (talk) 13:32, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
I don't know what is happening here, but please don't tag pictures of maps for copyvio when they are clearly over 100 years old. Wknight94 talk 13:51, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Merci de dialoguer avant d'insister. Ces images n'ont pas été scanées par moi, donc les licences ne peuvent etres conservées. Rien a voir avec leur date de création. --Toubabmaster (talk) 13:53, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Next time I have to revert, you will be blocked. Wknight94 talk 13:54, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Apprend a lire le français avant de faire n'importe quoi...vous etes également (avec moi) l'auteur d'une guerre d'édition. Qui va vous bloquer? --Toubabmaster (talk) 13:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Pour les cartes anciennes, peu importe qui les a scannées; voir {{PD-scan}} ou {{PD-art}}. –Tryphon 14:37, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Ben justement, c'est pas des licences qu'on peut voir sur ces images. La licence PD old doit tenir compte des droits liés a la numérisation. Vous pouvez bien sur inventer toutes sortes d'excuses pour ne pas admettre les torts du curieux administrateur qui bloque son contradicteur sans discussion (on ne qualifiera pas le message que l'on peut voir plus haut une tentative de discussion, hein). --Toubabmaster (talk) 23:28, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Non, il n'y a jamais de droits liés à la simple numérisation. {{PD-old}} indique simplement que l'image originale est dans le domaine publique à cause de son âge, et il est sous-entendu que la numérisation n'a pas apporté de nouveau copyright (comme indiqué sur {{PD-scan}}, ce tag est généralement utilisé pour les cas où il pourrait y avoir un doute, où certaines retouches on été effectuées par exemple, mais ne sont pas suffisament créative pour qu'il y ait copyright). Dans le cas qui nous occupe, je pense que {{PD-old}} est adéquat, mais vous pouvez utiliser {{PD-scan}} si vous préférez.
En tout cas, il n'y a pas de raison de demander la suppression rapide de ces images. Si vous pensez qu'il y a un réel problème (i.e. si mes explications ne vous ont pas convaincu), vous pouvez demander leur suppression de telle sorte que d'autres personnes puissent exprimer leur avis. –Tryphon 23:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Merci de vos explications. Je conteste votre interprétation, mais je vous remercie de vos explications. Je suis tout de meme surpris de voir que les admins se permettent de reverter mes contributions sans me fournir d'explications. Est-ce que c'est a moi de faire l'effort de demander à Abigor les raisons qu'il l'on conduit a reverter mes contributions? En attendant, je vais naturellement reverter des contributions qui ne m'ont pas été expliqués. On peut m'accuser de mauvaise foi, encore faut-il faire l'effort de venir entammer un dialogue avec moi. PS: Je trouve scandaleuse l'attitude de la personne qui a bloqué mon compte, et je suis pas tellement surpris de voir que plus de trois jours après le blocage, je n'ai toujours pas été débloqué, malgré ce que l'on peut lire sur cette page. --Toubabmaster (talk) 13:11, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Tous les temps sont indiqués pour le fuseau horaire de Greenwich (GMT), donc votre blocage expirera dans moins d'une heure (en été, il y a deux heures de décalage avec la France). Pour ce qui est de remettre les tags de suppression rapide, je ne peux que répéter que ça n'apportera rien de bon. Je vous recommande d'entamer une demande de suppression (une seule où vous pouvez lister tous les fichiers concernés, voir COM:MDR); c'est la procédure standard dans ce genre de cas, où tout le monde n'est pas d'accord avec la suppression. –Tryphon 13:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Me dire que tout le monde n'est pas d'accord je veux bien, mais quel est le problème? personne ne vient m'expliquer les raisons qui ont ammené un administrateur a reverter mes demandes de suppressions. Que l'on ne soit pas d'accord avec les droits liés a la licence des vieilles cartes, je peux le comprendre, en revanche j'ai beaucoup plus de mal avec les photos. A moins bien sur que l'on cherche a me pousser a la faute...Je ne desepère pas d'avoir un jour, une explication Au passage, je n'ai toujours pas été débloquer a cette heure. --Toubabmaster (talk) 14:06, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────────────────┘
I have undone the autoblock from this account. Try editing now. Wknight94 talk 14:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Je ne peux pas m'exprimer à la place d'Abigor, mais je crois que c'est cette discussion qui l'a fait douter de vos motivations. –Tryphon 14:18, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Mes motivations font douter Abigor? C'est noté, mais en attendant j'estime avoir fait une demande en bonne et due forme. Je ne m'estime plus responsable de la présence de ces photos sur ce site. S'il existe des raisons valables a ces reverts (autres qu'une impression de doute) je suis a votre disposition. En attendant une explication solide et argumenté ne comptez pas sur moi pour effectuer de nouvelles demandes (dont je suis certain qu'on trouvera encore une excuse pour refuser ma demande). La responsabilité juridique de ces copyvios est a présent le soucis d'Abigor. Bonne continuation --Toubabmaster (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days[edit]

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: Tagging files for deletion inappropriately. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 13:58, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Grand bravo a l'administrateur qui fait une guerre d'éditions et qui vient bloquer par la suite. L'ajout d'un modèle copivio sur les images est justifié car je n'ai pas moi meme réalisé les numérisation de ces images. Je demande la meme sanction (3 jours) a l'encontre de l'administrateur qui participe a une guerre d'édition et qui bloque sans chercher a comprendre quoi que ce soit. Je continurai donc a faire les ajouts qui me plaisent sur les images que j'ai importées. N'en déplaise a Mr Wknight. --Toubabmaster (talk) 14:02, 31 July 2010 (UTC)


Sorry Mr Wknight, but i'm not the man who have Digitizing this map. You have to delete it. --Toubabmaster (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

It doesn't matter. No one can claim copyright to an exact copy of a map that is 300 hundred years old. Wknight94 talk 14:15, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Be carrefull with the copyright status. You can't speak about PD-old because to keep this licence, the right must come from the personn who have Digitizing the maps. I think that peopole like you, who block, whitout undrestand after war edddit is not a good thing for this place. --Toubabmaster (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
See my comment above. Simply scanning an image is not creative enough to create a new copyright. Only the copyright of the original author is relevant, and in the case of old maps, it has expired. So {{PD-scan}} would be the correct license. –Tryphon 14:41, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
You know what happening in tree days. I will continue to put the copyvio template whithout explanation from Wknight94. --Toubabmaster (talk) 23:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
Please don't do that, it will only earn you another (longer) block. If you really think those images are copyright violations, the correct thing to do is opening a deletion request. But if your only issue is the rights associated with digitalization, I can already predict the outcome; as I tried to explain to you, the digitalization process involves no creativity, and is therefore not eligible for copyright. –Tryphon 00:01, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 2 weeks[edit]

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 2 weeks for the following reason: . If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

How about some justification for the block, or should I just take it to noticeboard/problems. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 00:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC) Huib talk Abigor @ meta 07:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

Une justification est trop vous demander? Vous avez choisit de ne pas répondre à mes messages sur votre page de discussion, et vous continuez a réfuser le dialogue en me bloquant sans autre forme de procès. Merci pour votre sens du dialogue. J'invite les lecteurs de cette page a consulter mes contributions pour chercher a comprendre les raisons de ce blocage, moi je n'ai rien compris. 15 jours ne devraient pas etre trop long...je dit donc a très bientot cher Abigor. --Toubabmaster (talk) 10:54, 8 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Amada44  talk to me 07:42, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 2 weeks[edit]

Blocked user.svg
You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 2 weeks for the following reason: . If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. See block log.

Azərbaycanca | Български | বাংলা | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Gaeilge | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Simple English | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

? It is possible to know why? You choose to not talk with me on Commons:Deletion requests/Toubabmaster. It is possible to know when this picture will be deleted? --Toubabmaster (talk) 18:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

why? because you keep adding copyvio tags.
Your images might never be deleted. If you go to the deletion request page you will see, that other people too think that you are the author of those photographs. I do not believe that none of the images you have uploaded are not yours.
Until very recently, you have never come up with reasonable reason why those images need to be deleted. Now why should your father want them deleted? Is there a good reason? Amada44  talk to me 19:52, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
My father don't want to give his pictures. I do it because it was for aticle for french wiki, but father saw it and says me to delete them. Now, if you don't want to delete it, it's your choice, not mine. Maybe, if you talked me about your choice on the page Commons:Deletion requests/Toubabmaster, i never continue to keep adding copyvio tags. You prefer to say nothing and waiting for a new block. --Toubabmaster (talk) 22:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
look, I am not doing this to annoy you, all right? Its just that your story seems to be made up. If you release images into public domain, you can not undo that! Do you understand that? Also, why should your father not want those images released? (I still don't believe that its not you who did the photographs!) Give me a good reason!! And when you write it, try to not accuse me because that doesn't help. Amada44  talk to me 07:19, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
You choose to don't belive me. I accuse you, because it's the truth. If you don't like that, please do your job whith respect for others. On commons, many pictures are deletd for copivio problems. Sometimes you choose to belive. And now you prefer to keep and block. I'm sure that block is here only for keeping the pictures, and you don't want to explain your choice whithout block. Thaks for everything, the copivio is your problem now, not mine. --Toubabmaster (talk) 10:52, 2 September 2010 (UTC)