User talk:Tournasol7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
My main page
 
Discuss
 Quality images 
Quality images
 Featured pictures 
Featured pictures
 Valued pictures 
Valued pictures
 

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Grossen Berg 4 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:38, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obergasse 24 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obergasse 23 in Zwingenberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:36, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obergasse 17 in Zwingenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panoramic view of Zwingenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:00, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loewenplatz 6 in Zwingenberg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Would be better with more exposure. --Bgag 15:05, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done--Tournasol7 06:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 14:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Bergzabern Castle (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems slightly leaning outward, otherwise good. Or is the building on the right side crooked? --Plozessor 05:20, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done--Tournasol7 06:11, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktkirche in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktstrasse 29 in Bad Bergzabern (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment Is rotation necessary ? --Sebring12Hrs 13:27, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is an easy fix, you can ask a bot to do it. --C messier 00:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The request has been sent. --Tournasol7 05:40, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK. But I'm not sure about the WB, as it looks a bit too blueish. --C messier 21:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done--Tournasol7 06:10, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:48, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Zwingenberg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktbrunnen in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lutheran church in Zwingenberg (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old cemetery in Zwingenberg (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:01, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 12 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obertor 6 in Zwingenberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:20, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obertor 10 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obertor 1 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obertor 2 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obertor 5 in Zwingenberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St George church in Wismar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.-Marien-Kirchhof 3 in Wismar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goethe school in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 3 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Subjectively it seems a bit stretched in height, but might be a wrong impression. Otherwise is good. --Plozessor 05:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luebsche Strasse 25 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luebsche Strasse 15 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luebsche Strasse 23 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fuerstenhof in Wismar (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 11:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Bad Bergzabern (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinter dem Chor 5 in Wismar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:36, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Wismar (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bohrstrasse 3 in Wismar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraemerstrasse 5 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:23, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kraemerstrasse 15 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castel Sant'Angelo from Belvedere dei Salviati (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:37, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinter dem Rathaus 3 in Wismar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bademutterstrasse 26 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ABC-Strasse 17 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweinsbruecke 9 in Wismar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Not ideal perspective but might be difficult in a small street. Otherwise very good. --Plozessor 05:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinter dem Chor 5 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserkunst in Wismar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I'd make it a bit brighter but that is a matter of taste. --Plozessor 05:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 28 in Wismar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 29 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Giles Laurent 14:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 25 in Wismar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:59, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant'Agnese in Agone from Gianicolo Hill (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:12, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni Calibita church in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 16:20, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria statue at the Schwerin Castle (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Equestrian monument of Friedrich Franz II in Schwerin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerin Castle (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerin Castle (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwerin Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:38, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition[edit]

Bonjour Tournasol7,

Au nom de l'équipe d'organisation de Wiki Science Competition 2023 en France, je tenais à vous remercier de votre participation. En 6 semaines, 838 photos ont été partagées, de 51 personnes, dont beaucoup de nouveaux contributeurs (57 % des comptes créés spécialement pour le concours). En nombre de photo, cela place la France à la 2e place, juste derrière la Macédoine. C'est assez encourageant pour un concours qui n'est habituellement pas organisé en France.

Toutes les photos de l'édition française sont regroupées dans cette catégorie. Et les lauréats sont indiqués sur cette page.

L'équipe d'organisation française en a terminé pour cette édition 2023, le jury international va prendre le relais. Nous vous tiendrons informé s'il y a une édition française en 2024.

Pyb en résidence (talk) 15:10, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 1 in Schwerin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 12 in Schwerin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Schwerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Schwerin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heracles statue at the Schwerin Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:The Martyrdom of Saint Dorothea by Josse van der Baren St Peter collegiate church in Leuven (1).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Martyrdom of Saint Dorothea by Josse van der Baren St Peter collegiate church in Leuven (1).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 13 in Schwerin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Markt 11-12 in Schwerin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrichstrasse 1 in Schwerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muscari azureum in Marburg BG (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron selense subsp. selense in Marburg BG (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! State Chancellery of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in Schwerin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse tamer statue at the Castle Bridge in Schwerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marstall in Schwerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street light in Schwerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:36, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Anne church in Schwerin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schusterstrasse 11 in Schwerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ministry of Finance of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in Schwerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schusterstrasse 15 in Schwerin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:21, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 10 in Schwerin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamp post in Schwerin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --OmegaFallon 14:39, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Slovenska Bistrica (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Ptuj (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Ptuj Castle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ptuj Castle (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Ptuj (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ptuj Castle (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maximilianstrasse 19 in Mindelheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornstrasse 6 in Mindelheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinhannsstrasse 2 in Mindelheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrstrasse 10 in Mindelheim (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:35, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant'Andrea della Valle in Rome from Gianicolo Hill (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant'Agnese in Agone from Piazza San Pietro in Montorio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Bled Island (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immaculate Conception church in Kamnik (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James church in Kamnik (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tonovcov Grad (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Zalec (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Defense tower in Zalec (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Zalec (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Seven Sorrows church in Slovenska Bistrica (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lake Bled (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Kobarid (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:43, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Ivrea (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Giovanni in Valle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Verona (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter church in S Bonifacio (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist cathedral in Oderzo (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Latisana (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vitalis church in Muzzana del T (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Gorizia (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:30, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Gorizia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Gorizia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 09:31, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene cathedral in Desenzano (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Lecco (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Lecco (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Ivrea (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Ivrea (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Brescia (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Faustinus & Jovita church Brescia (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of Sorrows church in S Giorgio di Nogaro (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Como (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:26, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Fidelis basilica in Como (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tempio Voltiano in Como (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Como (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:06, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Desenzano del Garda (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene cathedral in Desenzano (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Lecco (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:43, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Radomianin 22:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church from Gianicolo Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, impressive ceilling! --Shougissime 13:36, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Capitoline temple in Brescia (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Brescia (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cathedral of Brescia (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:32, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Faustinus & Jovita church Brescia (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (16).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruins of the St Peter church in Viana (16).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine des Messagers in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 rue de Thionville in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Poste in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Bateliers in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Tisserands in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Syr in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9 rue de la Poste in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20 rue de l'Eglise in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Neuve in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Grevenmacher (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 24 Grand-Rue in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue du Blannen Theis in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 pl. du marche in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 27 rue de Treves in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:42, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Grevenmacher (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20 rue de l'Eglise in Grevenmacher (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Tisserands in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moselle river in Machtum (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:17, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Joseph church in Machtum (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bled Island & Bled Castle (1).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bled Island & Bled Castle (1).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Grevenmacher (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Remich (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Imp. St Francois in Remich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Neuve in Remich (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:18, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator church in Schengen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Remich (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 11:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13 rue de Thionville in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20 rue de l'Eglise in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 00:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Grevenmacher (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Joseph church in Machtum (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 17:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 27 rue de Treves in Grevenmacher (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Joseph church in Machtum (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:37, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Johannes Enen in Ehnen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Mathias Wellenstein in Ehnen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:28, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Remich (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:18, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sant'Agnese in Agone from Gianicolo Hill (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:38, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Neuve in Remich (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator church in Schengen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Joseph church in Machtum (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:37, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Roch church in Ehnen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Nikolaus Hein in Ehnen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 03:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Stephen church in Remich (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Neuve in Remich (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator church in Schengen (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 19 rue de Thionville in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de la Poste in Grevenmacher (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clara Direz Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simone Wild Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Passiflora edulis on the stamp of British Virgin Islands.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 05:17, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neja Dvornik in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kristin Lysdahl in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andrea Ellenberger in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 18:55, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ilaria Ghisalberti in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:55, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary of the People church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andreja Slokar in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kim Vanreusel in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simone Wild in Soldeu 2024 GS 2nd run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, good focus to woman --Michielverbeek 07:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neja Dvornik in Soldeu 2024 GS 2nd run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 19:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Trivio church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 00:31, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ptuj Castle (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tonovcov Grad (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 07:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Mary church in Kobarid (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Bled Island (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Wow! --Plozessor 07:01, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Immaculate Conception church in Kamnik (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:36, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estelle Alphand in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:25, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Britt Richardson Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adriana Jelinkova in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:29, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 14:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 14:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (23).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:18, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zrinka Ljutic in Soldeu 2024 GS 2nd run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thea Louise Stjernesund in Soldeu 2024 GS 2nd run (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:32, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soldeu 60th anniversary museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World Cup Soldeu 2024 (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 20:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katharina Liensberger in Soldeu 2024 GS 2nd run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Britt Richardson in Soldeu 2024 GS 2nd run (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, still better cropping a bit at the bottom --Poco a poco 17:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World Cup Soldeu 2024 (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World Cup Soldeu 2024 (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unofficial winner's ceremony GS Soldeu 24 (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castelo de Guimaraes (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Francis of Assisi convent in Guimaraes (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nossa Senhora da Oliveira church in Guimaraes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 05:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of the Dukes of Braganca in Guimaraes (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Guimaraes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espigueiros do Lindoso (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igreja de Ponte da Barca (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bridge in Ponte da Barca 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castelo de Guimaraes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palace of the Dukes of Braganca in Guimaraes (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:13, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Igartza Errota in Beasain (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:51, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Augustine convent in Hernani (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Hernani (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Carlos V in Hondarribia (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:55, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City walls of Hondaribbia (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grandstand in Soldeu 2024 GS (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I don't think the faces should have been blurred, but good quality. --Mike Peel 01:03, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael Archangel church in Vitoria-Gasteiz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:41, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Espainia Plaza in Vitoria-Gasteiz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John church in Miranda de Ebro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary church in Miranda de Ebro (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:37, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Casa de los Urbina in Miranda de Ebro (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:42, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Andrea Ellenberger in Soldeu 2024 GS 1st run (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! XII apostles basilica in Rome (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:03, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sara Hector in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katharina Truppe in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World Cup Soldeu 2024 (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unofficial winner's ceremony GS Soldeu 24 (25).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AJ Hurt in Soldeu 2024 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Carlo al Corso in Rome (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria dei Miracoli in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (26).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:27, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GR 10 Auzat 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Amans du Fort church in Aubin 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Muret-le-Chateau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massif de Lherz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:44, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Pont-de-Salars 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! XII apostles basilica in Rome (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Castelnau-Picampeau (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Castelnau-Picampeau (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Le Fousseret (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:10, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter in chains church in Le Fousseret (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Marignac-Lasclares (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grandstand in Soldeu 2024 SL.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Fontrailles (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martyrdom of St John the Baptist church in Fontrailles (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Trie-sur-Baise (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A little bit dark. --XRay 05:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Square tower in Trie-sur-Baise (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carmelite church in Trie-sur-Baise (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria in Vallicella church in Rome (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Malabat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Michael church in Serian (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption of Our Lady church in Blousson (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Monpardiac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cemetery church in Troncens (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John church in Tieste-Uragnoux (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Ladeveze-Riviere (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Labaye (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Lawrence church in Ladeveze-Riviere (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Juillac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 23:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John of the Malva church in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 13:53, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franziska Gritsch in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marie Lamure in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (16).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Elena Stoffel in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:09, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marion Chevrier in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lucrezia Lorenzi in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinita dei Monti in Rome (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 17:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camille Rast in Soldeu 2024 SL 2nd run (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lena Duerr in Soldeu 2024 SL 2nd run (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:40, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ali Nullmeyer in Soldeu 2024 SL 2nd run (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 05:35, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paula Moltzan in Soldeu 2024 SL 2nd run (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinita dei Monti in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John of the Malva church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinita dei Monti in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:01, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unofficial winner's ceremony SL Soldeu 24 (20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 00:43, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carla Mijares Ruf in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kim Vanreusel in Soldeu 2024 SL 1st run (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leona Popovic in Soldeu 2024 SL 2nd run (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinita dei Monti in Rome (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinita dei Monti in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marion Chevrier in Soldeu 2024 SL 2nd run (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unofficial winner's ceremony SL Soldeu 24 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zrinka Ljutic in Soldeu 2024 (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paula Moltzan in Soldeu 2024 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anna Swenn-Larsson in Soldeu 2024 (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:View of Suria (3).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:View of Suria (3).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unofficial winner's ceremony SL Soldeu 24 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zrinka Ljutic in Soldeu 2024 (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anna Swenn-Larsson in Soldeu 2024 (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saverdun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Saverdun (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:41, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Soppe-le-Bas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in Soppe-le-Bas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Blaise & Martin church in Chaudes-Aigues (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria dei Miracoli & Santa Maria in Montesanto (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Трифонов Андрей 19:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady church in Saverdun (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in Soppe-le-Bas (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lachapelle-sous-Rougemont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:12, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Telephone box library in Lachapelle-sous-Rougemont (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:20, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in Lachapelle-sous-Rougemont (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP[edit]

Your next FP. 18:55, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Or this one… 20:00, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Coueilles (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Catherine church in Labastide-Paumes (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Riolas (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Matthew church in Riolas (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Castelgaillard (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Pouyastruc (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16 rue de la Victoire in Tarbes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Assumption church in Osmets (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:10, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chelle-Debat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Chelle-Debat (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Santa Maria della Scala in Rome from Piazza San Pietro in Montorio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Looks quite dusty and foggy. But overall OK for me. --Tuxyso 12:35, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World Cup Soldeu 2024 (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 08:01, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Vincent church in Soppe-le-Bas (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old bridge in Espalion (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de justice in Espalion (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:21, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Salles-Courbaties (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. A little bit dark. Rainy day. --XRay 07:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zrinka Ljutic in Soldeu 2024 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 18:30, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Garidech (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Lys (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Julian church in Saint-Lys (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent church in Bez (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Naussac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Vincent church in Bez (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 14:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Naussac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Garidech (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Julian church in Saint-Lys (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Faith church in Ste-Foy-de-Peyrolieres (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Giles church in Rieumes (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Rieumes (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Market hall in Rieumes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tourist information centre in Rieumes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Berat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unofficial winner's ceremony SL Soldeu 24 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Andrew church in Longages (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Christopher church in Montsaunes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 05:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Figarol (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Figarol (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Pujos (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Nicholas church in Pujos (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at pl de la Republique in Aspet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Rue Augustus Saint-Gaudens in Aspet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue to the Cardinal Sourrieu in Aspet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Aspet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Germerius church in Juzet-d'Izaut (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Fronsac (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of St-Beat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garonne river in St-Beat (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Orientius church in Antignac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 04:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at pl de la Republique in Aspet (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Aspet (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Aspet (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Germerius church in Juzet-d'Izaut (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Assumption church in Antichan-de-Frontignes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:08, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Thi 20:51, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 01:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residence Charles Tron in Bagneres-de-Luchon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 81 all d'Etigny in Bagneres-de-Luchon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Edouard in Bagneres-de-Luchon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Luisa in Bagneres-de-Luchon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James church in Oo (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residence Charles Tron in Bagneres-de-Luchon (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Moustajon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:40, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Moustajon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:41, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lafont Castle in Bagneres-de-Luchon (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Orientius church in Antignac (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Julian church in Moustajon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lafont Castle in Bagneres-de-Luchon (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Residence Charles Tron in Bagneres-de-Luchon (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James church in Oo (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James church in Oo (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 05:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:55, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Germerius church in Juzet-d'Izaut (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James church in Oo (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Sierra 2.0 CLX (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Celsus and Julian church in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 06:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Backa Palanka (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart church in Futog (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trg slobode 7 in Novi Sad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grckoskolska 2 in Novi Sad (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grckoskolska 10 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vallee d'Astau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 05:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruisseau de Medassoles in Grange d'Astau (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 05:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Backa Palanka (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trg slobode 7 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kralja Aleksandra 4 in Novi Sad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikolajevska 1 in Novi Sad (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikole Pasica 4 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kralja Aleksandra 4 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kralja Aleksandra 5 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 14:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Rosalia church in Temerin (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Basil of Ostrog church in Sirig (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Narodnog fronta 1 in Zrenjanin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trg Slobode 10 in Zrenjanin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Zitiste (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikole Pasica 4 in Novi Sad (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:56, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunavska 33 in Novi Sad (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Snow church in Zabalj (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Zitiste (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 12:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Basil of Ostrog church in Sirig (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reformed church in Zrenjanin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kralja Aleksandra I Karadordevica 1 in Zrenjanin (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Zitiste (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunavska 29 in Novi Sad (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunavska 31 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of San Giovanni Battista dei Fiorentini (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 14:21, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Backa Palanka (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunavska 31 in Novi Sad (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svetozara Miletica 22 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Zitiste (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (12).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (12).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (13).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (13).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Snow church in Zabalj (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Rosalia church in Temerin (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Basil of Ostrog church in Sirig (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flag of Serbia in Srbobran (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:13, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Zitiste (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Snow church in Zabalj (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svetozara Miletica 36 in Novi Sad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikole Pasica 4 in Novi Sad (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunavska 1 in Novi Sad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunavska 29 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Backa Palanka (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svetozara Miletica 22 in Novi Sad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Snow church in Zabalj (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint George church in Zitiste (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grckoskolska 2 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grckoskolska 10 in Novi Sad (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikolajevska 1 in Novi Sad (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:48, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svetozara Miletica 10 in Novi Sad (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:38, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dunavska 33 in Novi Sad (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 20:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Snow church in Zabalj (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Drow male 20:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]