User talk:Trockennasenaffe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Trockennasenaffe!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Validation failed tags[edit]

Hi, when you add "InvalidSVG" tags, please make sure to remove the "ValidSVG" tags (if any). This file for instance now has two tags. Also, it's just my opinion, but I don't think the tag should go on top of the page. Most of the time it doesn't matter whether the SVG is valid or not, and I'm sure most users don't care about the validity, so it shouldn't be the first thing they see. It would make more sense to put it in a more discreet place - either in the infobox or at the bottom of the page. WikiLaurent (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for the information. In the future I will make sure that there are not two different tags. I just didn't expect people to tag SVGs wrong.
I put the tags on top of the page, because I realised that most people did it that way. Furthermore I think this is the best way to do it because only this way people will surely realize that this SVGs source code is invalid and uplode a valid version. As far as my experience goes, this often works. Invalid SVGs may be displayed wrong on in some cases. You ought to consider that SVGs may be used in other ways than to be rendered to png by MediaWiki.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 21:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Digikam Oxygen.svg[edit]

Hello, when making svg file ensure you have embedded raster image you use, now this svg links to /media/250gb/valokuvat/Syksy 02-09-05 Kuusamo, inkavaaralla luonnonpuistossa suomen komeimman kosken kuvaamista/img_5766_4.jpg that exist only on your computer. See Help:SVG#Frequently_asked_questions --Justass (talk) 11:22, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the information but i did't made the svg. I have downloaded it from the Oxygen Project.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
I will check SVGs next time, sorry.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 11:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

no more speedy deletion kindly[edit]

dear Trockennasenaffe i know that the fair use copyrighted pictures vary from country to country but in my country it is legal to use a picture if you identify it to be copyrighted and mentioning the owner company which is exactly what i did , so could you kindly remove the speedy deletion from the picture ,thanks alot >

the link [1]— Preceding unsigned comment added by Josephero (talk • contribs) 18:40, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Dear Josephero, It doesn't matter if there is a fair use policy in you country because Commons doesn't accept fair use policies. Maybe you first read the notes that I and others wrote on your User talk page--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 19:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

File:ER20 01.JPG[edit]

Wie bei allen Dateien mit OTRS-Baustein müssen bei diesem Bild einige Infos manuell nachgetragen werden. Übernimmst du das bitte? --Leyo 12:18, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Das war mir nicht klar. Ich dachte der Verschiebebot übernimmt das. Ich habe es jetzt mal versucht und hoffe das ist richtig so.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 15:34, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Es handelt sich um einen Bug. Richtig ist es, aber noch nicht fertig. Wenn du die beiden Dateibeschreibungsseiten vergleichst, erkennst du, dass noch mehr Informationen verloren gegangen sind. --Leyo 15:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Sind wir hier bei „Wer erkennt den Unterschied“ ;-) ? Ich denke du meinst die Sache mit der Lizenzumstellung. Ein entsprechendes Template habe ich leider auf Commons nicht gefunden.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 16:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Nein, ich meine Beschreibung, Urheber, Datum, …
Betreffend Lizenz: Da kannst du je nachdem {{GFDL|migration=relicense}} oder {{GFDL|migration=redundant}} einsetzen. Es gibt aber auch Bots, die dies erledigen. --Leyo 17:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Ist das jetzt so ok?--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 18:31, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Ja, danke. --Leyo 18:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Westbank barrier.png[edit]

Hallo Haplorrhinus ! Ich habe gesehen, dass Du die Datei Westbank barrier.png nachberbeitet hast. Die Datei sieht sehr schön aus, aber mir fehlt die Kartenlegende (was bedeutet das verschiedene Grün?). Kannst Du die Karte evtl. auch ins Deutsche übersetzen? By-the-way: Optipng - ist das ein gutes Programm? Gruß --Furfur (talk) 11:21, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Inhaltliche Fragen zur Karte kann ich dir leider nicht beantworten, da ich sie nicht erstellt habe. Ich habe nur die Dateigröße verringert indem ich die Datei mit OptiPNG optimiert habe. Das Bild selber wird dabei nicht verändert. Für diesen Zweck ist das Programm sehr hilfreich.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 11:50, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Chemical images that should use vector graphics[edit]

Hallo Trockennasenaffe. Bitte beachte meinen Teilrevert in File:Capsaicin Formulae.png. --Leyo 11:14, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Attac_I-Steuer_060228Paris7.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Attac_I-Steuer_060228Paris7.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Attac_I-Steuer_060228Paris7.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yellowcard (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Sequenz diagramm-1.png[edit]

Hallo Trockennasenaffe, solche Edit sind nicht notwendig:

  1. Dateigröße ist relativ unwichtig, (vor allem 2kB Unterschied.)
  2. wird dadurch bei diesem Bild das Thumb unschärfer, siehe COM:USOP#PNG_tips.

MfG -- πϵρήλιο 19:43, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Perhelion, leider muss ich deiner Ansicht widersprechen:
zu Punkt 1: Durch die steigende Verbreitung von Smartphones und der damit oft verbundenen geringen Bandbreite (GPRS, Edge) verursachen größere Artikel spürbar längere Ladezeiten (habe ich selber ausprobiert). Die Artikelgröße wird dabei hauptsächlich durch die Größe der Bilder bestimmt. Gelingt es dabei die Größe der Bilder in einem Artikel deutlich zu reduzieren (in diesem Fall über 50%), wirkt sich das merkbar auf die Ladezeit aus.
zu Punkt 2: Ich denke da hast du etwas missverstanden. Ich sehe nicht wo der Artikel beschreibt, dass durch png-Optimierer das Thumb unschärfer wird. Das ist auch nicht plausibel. Das müsstest du gegebenenfalls noch näher erläutern.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 07:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Ok, Punkt 1: kleinere Dateigröße ist natürlich generell besser, jedoch ist deine Optimierung für den Thumb zumindest teilweise irrelevant (da ja der Server das Bild neugeneriert, mal abgesehen das 2k ein Witz sind).
zu Punkt 2: Solange der Bug, der gleich in der ersten Zeile unter Note beschrieben ist, nicht. -- πϵρήλιο 09:19, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Zu Punkt 1: Die Optimierung der Kompression ist für den Thumb tatsächlich irrelevant. Die Reduktion der Farbtiefe bringt aber in vielen Fällen einiges, da der Thumbgenerator leider nicht intelligent genug ist um zu erkennen, wie viele Farben das PNG tatsächlich hat. Das kann jeder leicht selber verifizieren.
Zu Punkt 2: Der Satz ist leider missverständlich. Dort steht: “so indexed PNGs are unsharper”. Meine optimierten PNGs sind nicht indexed sonder 8 Bit Graustufen.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 09:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
In der Tat, der Bug schließt tatsächlich auch gray scale images mit ein (wenn du möchtest kannst du das dort ergänzen). Mal sehen was die Software-Neuerungen uns bringen (auch thumb-mäßig, wobei deine color reduction dein thumb um 1k reduziert hat). -- πϵρήλιο 11:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Qr-40.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Qr-40.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

thumperward (talk) 09:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Qr-10.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Qr-10.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

thumperward (talk) 09:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Atheist_campaign_tube3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Atheist_campaign_tube3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 17:37, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Free-software-song.svg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content : images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Free-software-song.svg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | svenska | +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: Please see the file's page for more info.

Saibo (Δ) 00:49, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

And it seems to be licensed with -nd http://www.gnu.org/music/free-software-song.html --Itu (talk) 01:09, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
+:Hmm... Da die ganze Seite unter -nd steht heisst das aber wohl dass hier nichts verwendet werden kann, sondern nur die Seite dort gespiegelt. --Itu (talk) 01:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Atheist_campaign_tube3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Atheist_campaign_tube3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

User:Trockennasenaffe/vector.js[edit]

Du hast deine User:Trockennasenaffe/vector.js in Category:User scripts einsortiert, weil du mein Script User:Saibo/catgraphtabs.js kopiert hast, statt es einzubinden. Das geht so:

importScript('User:Saibo/catgraphtabs.js'); // use tracking: [[User:Saibo/catgraphtabs.js]]

So bekommst du auch Updates/Verbesserungen. Wenn du kopierst, geht das nicht. Entweder also die Kategorie entfernen oder Script importieren. ;-) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 03:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis! Die Kategorie war doch auskommentiert oder nicht? Ich habe von dem Zeug leider nicht so viel Ahnung. Mir hat das mal jemand gebastelt, ich weiß nur leider nicht mehr wer das war. Ich habe das Skript jetzt importiert, nur leider macht es nicht mehr ganz das, was es vorher gemacht hat.--Trockennasenaffe (talk) 07:04, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Die Kategorie war für JavaScript auskommentiert, ja, aber nicht für MediaWiki. Das würde mit <!-- --> oder nowiki gehen.
Es macht nicht dasselbe? Was ist denn anders? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:21, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Oja, das gleiche Thema bei mir. ^^ Grüße -- πϵρήλιο 09:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Bei dir, naja - gleiches Resultat, anderer Grund. ;-) Schau mal: so wie bei mir in User:Saibo/monobook.js bei "AjaxDeleteExtraButtons" kannst du Vorlagen mit { im JavaScript inaktivieren. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 23:12, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Ariane Sherine TAM London 2009 2.jpg[edit]

Hey, thank you for uploading to Commons. I cropped File:Ariane Sherine TAM London 2009 2.jpg because the portrait that was in the background is protected by copyright. Otherwise this image would have been a Derivative work. --Vera (talk) 08:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Eisl.ML1982.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eisl.ML1982.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rd232 (talk) 16:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Großplastik Prügel-Nonne.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Großplastik Prügel-Nonne.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Großplastik Prügel-Nonne.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Smooth_O (talk) 13:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.