User talk:Tuvic

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Info

Nederlands Dit account is van nl:Gebruiker:Tuvic en wordt enkel sporadisch gebruikt. Voor overleg: nl:Overleg gebruiker:Tuvic.

English This account is used by nl:Gebruiker:Tuvic. Talk: nl:Overleg gebruiker:Tuvic.

Policy proposal:No deletion of improved versions of images[edit]

Hi Tuvic. You may be interested in this: Commons:Village pump/Policy proposal:No deletion of improved versions of images. pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:36, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

  • I responded, but it's al lot of replies and a lot of text to read. For my part, images may be deleted, but only after thorough investigation, and not "because there's a redundancy tag on it". --Tuvic 21:25, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

deletions[edit]

I'm really sorry - user told me, that he has fixed linked articles!

Couse my fault, I'll fix it.--WarX 21:27, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm no linking images...

BABOROW == Baborów, so the new file name should be image:POL_Baborów_COA.svg

--WarX 21:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Apparently, another user fixed this already. Thanks anyway :-) --Tuvic 07:20, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Caricatural vandalism?[edit]

Hoi Tuvic, ik kreeg van een andere mod hier de vraag de gebruiker Fecal te blokken. Ik kan de cartoon waar het over gaat echter niet vinden dus neem ik aan dat het al verwijderd is. Wat was ongeveer de inhoud? Erg grof of viel het mee? -Svdmolen 20:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

De tekeningetjes zelf waren ok, maar de tekst begrijp ik jammer genoeg niet :-). De karikatuur op Image:Felipe Calderon.jpg is ondertussen verwijderd, die op Image:Felipe Calderon sin fondo i.jpg staat er nog, maar is zowat gelijkaardig met de andere, waar weliswaar 2 personen op stonden. Het is allemaal niet zo heel erg, maar het leek me toch de bedoeling ongemerkt die mens belachelijk te maken via ons project. --Tuvic 10:17, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

revert to old copyrighted version[edit]

Hi

Could you tell me why you reverted Image:Kelmis Blason.gif to the old gif?? instead of my gif version of my SVG file?? That old one come from the website and so is copyrighted. Mine is not...

Thank in advance for an answer.

Min's 10:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I reverted it because you just uploaded it over the old one with as only explanation "Use as possible the SVG version 75px". (I forgot to revert the license as well, I apologize for that mistake.) So, because I saw totally no reason why the old image should be replaced with a different (they're not totally the same) image, I reverted your changes. This was also because there wasn't any mention of copyvio or something like that. If you had put that in the edit-summary, is would have made things more clear.
Also, if the old image was a copyvio, please have the old versions deleted. Otherwise there would be no reason to having uploaded the new image. --Tuvic 13:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Indeed yes, I try to have better images as well, and I think that the one I uploaded is clearer than the old one. I dind't mention at first the copyvio because it wasn't the first reason for which I uploaded the new one.
And of course they are similar... Except for the shape on the blason that is to the choice of the herald, and I prefer the modern one that is easier to use. Or there's a difference I haven't seen, then I must redo it... :)
In fact the first reason was to improve the quality of the pictures used on wikipedia. It's also why I suggest people should use the svg version on the local pages of La Calamine.
I can't erase the old one. I'm no SysOp. Dank Je en goeie namiddag. Min's 14:47, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Well, it's good that you try to improve the quality of images in Wikimedia Commons. But, you must also be aware that all Wikipedia's use this images. so if you replace an image just because you think it's better, than you're actually deciding for every editor in Wikipedia. Someone might have chosen the old image because of it's beauty (for them, maybe). So you should really not replace images just because you prefer another version.
In this case, you say it's because of a copyvio, and so this makes it acceptable. But, the copyvio has to be removed, so you have to make a request for deletion for the old images. Anyone can do this: you don't have to be an admin to make a request. --Tuvic 15:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Indeed, I don't decide for every contributor into wikipedia but I only change images that (in this case) is in a small number of articles. If it doesn't work like this, I can also edit all pages and change it by myself on every wikipedia. I makes exactly the same, just takes more time :) (Gonna ask for deletion) Min's 08:32, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok. But beware, most users of the wiki's (including me, I must admit) react really annoyed when someone from Commons just replaces an image for no obvious reason. The only hint we usually have is the edit summary, so I advice you to always state very clearly why and what and so on. So, keep up the good work, and sorry for the extra work. --Tuvic 15:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Superseded/2007/04/05[edit]

there's some (not always working) code available ? When or where does it don't works ? Any way, I agree it's not a valid reason for deletion. VIGNERON * discut. 07:51, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

The code does not always render a correct border around the image: for example: in this template, the flag and the name of the country (Tsjechië) should on the same heigth, but instead, the country-name looks some sub-script-type. Also, in normal text, the text is also some pixels lower than the image. --Tuvic 08:46, 9 April 2007 (UTC)