User talk:Urbandweller

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Urbandweller!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Urbandweller!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Danneskiold-laurvig.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Danneskiold-laurvig.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--80.167.179.233 15:36, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Danneskjold.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Danneskjold.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--80.167.179.233 15:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Both of the two preceding files are copyright violations. Though their original heraldic designs (blazons) date from the late 17th century / early 18th century, these artistic interpretations were created by Fr[iedrich] Britze (1870-1956) for use in the 1937 edition of Danmarks Adels Aarbog. As such they remain copyrighted until 2027 (70 years post mortem auctoris). If you want to find a copyright-expired version of the same symbols, the easiest match would be "Dansk Vaabenbog" from the early 20th century, as its artist, Hermann Baagøe Storck, died in 1922. His drawings were reprinted in 1973 as "Danske Adelsvåbener. En heraldisk nøgle" and published by Politikens Forlag. 80.167.179.233 15:57, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Please use the correct date format[edit]

Hi Urbandweller,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Niels Christian Frederiksen by Jens Petersen & Søns Eftf.jpg. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD format (ie. 2014-01 for or 2014-12-26 for ). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}} for "between and ". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in English: here. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 19:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Okay, I will use that format in the future. Thanks. --Urbandweller (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paulae 17:46, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Max_Ballin_by_Julius_Folkmann_1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paulae 17:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Peter_Martin_Madsen_(Halsted)_by_Julius_Folkmann.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Peter_Martin_Madsen_(Halsted)_by_Julius_Folkmann.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paulae 17:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Frederik_Hey.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Frederik_Hey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paulae 17:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Anton_Bing.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anton_Bing.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paulae 17:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Nina Bang by Elfelt, large 01 cropped.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nina Bang.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Ludvig Mylius-Erichsen by Marius Christensen 02 cropped.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ludvig Mylius-Erichsen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Johan Georg Forchhammer large.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Johan Georg Forchhammer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Dansk Mønt - Kronebog[edit]

Hei! Vet du om vi kan laste opp bilder fra Dansk Mønt - Kronebog til Commons? Ser de blant annet har bilder av forskjellige kroningsmynter. Mange flotte bilder du bidrar med her, forresten! Vennlig hilsen --Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 13:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

some questions answered please[edit]

What does being female or male have to do with politics?

How long is 60 to 70 real years in internet years? -- Queeg (talk) 14:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

To me, it is simply vandalism. If you want to scrap the category, discuss the issue first. --Urbandweller (talk) 14:36, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Interesting use of the "adverbizing" of the word "simple". Perhaps you should take a few moments to review the word "simple" and perhaps a few more moments to find a different phrase that describes what I call the "obvious solution" which was the removal of the unnecessary and useless categories.
Incidentally, I would like to point out that both your signature and mine are using a number that is greater than 2000 for the year. -- Queeg (talk) 03:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Quellennachweise für Fotos[edit]

Sehr geehrte/r Urbandweller, in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia schreiben wir gerade über die Personen der Fotografen-Dynastie der Hansen's und ihrer Partner von Anfang an. Nun haben Sie dankenswerterweise viele Uploads von Fotos der Urheber getätigt. Wäre es Ihnen möglich, zu den Fotos überprüfbare Quellen-Nachweise zu erbringen, aus denen auch für Uneingeweihte die Richtigkeit der angegebenen Urheberschaften ersichtlich wird? Für Ihre Mühen herzlichen Dank und besten Gruß, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:35, 31 August 2011 (UTC) P.S.: Ich bitte Sie deshalb herzlich um das Obengenannte, um gerade auch bei Wikimedia Commons im Sinne der Nachweis-Erbringung vorbildliche Anleitungen für zukünftige Uploader zu geben. Anderenfalls erleben wir vielleicht eines Tages, daß Informationen zu einem bestenfalls irrtümlich benannten Urheber sich als "Wahrheit" rund um die Welt verbreiten. Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis und Ihre Unterstützung, nochmals besten Gruß, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 15:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Sie können die Porträitsammlung des königlichen Bibliotheks hier finden (leider nur in dänischer Sprache). Und hier haben Sie ein Beispiel, wo die Quelle angegeben ist. Für die Zukunft werde Ich neuen Uploads mit Links versorgen, so daß kein Zweifel über den Urheber möglich ist. Mit freundlichen Grüßen----Urbandweller (talk) 09:36, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Johan Hassel backsite of a carte de visite, but the front of the photograph must be another carte?
Vielen, vielen Dank. Ich habe eine Zeitleiste bei Commons für Dänemark formuliert, um unter anderem historische Fotos und Dokumente dort einzusortieren. Eine Frage zu Ihrem nebenstehendem Upload: Ist Ihnen möglicherweise ein Fehler unterlaufen? Wie kann es sein, daß die Vorderseite beschnitten ist, die Rückseite aber unbeschnitten (cutted edges?)? Nochmals herzlichen Dank für Ihre Mühen, --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 19:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Max Dvorak.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Max Dvořák.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Emil Haslund.jpg[edit]

Hvordan, vidste du billedet var fra 1945? --Gajolen (talk) 08:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Han har armbind på og bærer synligt pistol - så det må være fra befrielsen i maj 1945 eller senere på året. --Urbandweller (talk) 09:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Anders Johannes Jørgensen May 1945.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anders Johannes Jørgensen May 1945.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

heb [T C E] 10:57, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

File:PalleHuld.jpg[edit]

Du lade till {{PD-1996}}, vilket bland annat kräver att bilden publicerades någonstans före den 1 mars 1989. Skulle du kunna specificera var någonstans bilden publicerades före den 1 mars 1989 så att dessa uppgifter kan verifieras av andra personer? --Stefan4 (talk) 13:05, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hans rejse blev dækket af dagbladet Politiken og senere beskrevet i bogen Jorden rundt i 44 Dage af Palle (1929). Billedet er publiceret i disse medier. --Urbandweller (talk) 13:35, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

PD-Denmark50 is not enough[edit]

Hi there. You have left a note at my talk page pointing out that PD-Denmark50 is not enough and that a US license is also needed. Thank you for bringing my attention to it. However, it has left me a bit confused since I found the license on an existing file which had long been on Wikipedia Commons and I therefore thought it was enough. Now I am unsure of the implications of this. Could you point me in the right direction of the correct license that (might) solve the problem? Sorry about the trouble.Ramblersen (talk) 21:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

A small follow-up. File:Leo Mathisen.jpg is the file where I became aware of the license and it is not listed in the category that you linked to. Should it be so or is there a difference that I am missing?Ramblersen (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2013 (UTC) Oh I suppose that PD-1996 is the answer to my last question. I will go through the files now. Sorry again for the trouble.Ramblersen (talk) 22:07, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Hver_8._Dag[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Hver_8._Dag has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

69.181.197.118 10:58, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Category:Louis Tocqué[edit]

I have added a few works to Category:Louis Tocqué. Please do not revert or remove this category. Thanks you in advance. Coldcreation (talk) 17:30, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

There is no need to over-categorize Tocqué's portrait paintings - Category:Portrait paintings by Louis Tocqué‎ should be enough. --Urbandweller (talk) 18:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Placing the works in a category such as portrait paintings is too specific and inaccurate. Many works in that category are not paintings at all, and many are not portraits, they a full figured persons painted within a particular setting or surrounding, beyond mere portraiture. In fact, several of the works are not even by the artist Louis Tocqué. They are engravings made by others, or they are paintings "after" Louis Tocqué. What we should do is merge all the works that both correctly and incorrectly form part of Category:Portrait paintings by Louis Tocqué into the more general Category:Louis Tocqué, where they will all fit nicely.Coldcreation (talk) 22:01, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I could not disagree more, and I find a strange, to say the least, that you insist on wasting my time by disputing the relevance of specific categories. Specificity is the raison d'être of categories. --Urbandweller (talk) 22:16, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
This discussion is now moved to Category talk:Portrait paintings by Louis Tocqué. Coldcreation (talk) 22:24, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

File:C.C. Hall by J.V. Gertner 1864.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:C.C. Hall by J.V. Gertner 1864.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.160.174.254 09:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Hi Urbandweller. I see you reverted my move of File:Frederiksborg Slot i måneskin 1817 by J.C. Dahl.jpg from Category:Frederiksborg slot - Depictions to Category:Frederiksborg slot in art where I strongly believe it belongs. Compare for instance with Category:Buildings in London in art. The whole idea with naming of categories on wikiepda and wikiepda commons is to use consistent naming practices to create a coherentsystem of categories amd subcategories whjich is easily navigable in terms of geography, time and topic. In general, subcategories of Category:Frederiksborg slot is a complete mess. The subcategories should reflect general wikipeda commons categories such as building time ("Built in Denmark in XXXX"), the name of the architect, the type of the structure (Category:Architectural elements, topic Category:Frederiksborg slot in art) etc.

As you can se, Category:Frederiksborg slot - Depictions in only located in category Category:Frederiksborg slot. It doesn't fit into other categories, unlike Category:Frederiksborg slot in art which also fits into Category:Hillerød Kommune in art and Category:Buildings in Denmark in art. Apart from that, it is incorrect to capitalize Depictions after "-". "slot" in "Frederiksborg slot" should on the other hand have been capitalized. It is also completely silly to have Category:Frederiksborg slot - Views from lake and garden both because this category doesn't fit in with wikiepda commons' standard categories and because it is the standard view of the castle which means that it belongs in the main category. If you think a whole subcategory is needed for the castle as seen from across the lake, it is most likely because there are far too many similar images and that a clean-up is what is really needed which only kept the best images from different angles. Again I suggest that you compare to the subcategories used for other similar buildings. If you disagree with these points, I suggest we start a formal discussion so that we could get imputs from other editor.Ramblersen (talk) 05:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)