User talk:Urhixidur

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] License request

Before I delete your Image:500px-The_Earth_the_Moon_and_1_Ceres_(1_px_=_10_km).jpg, I thought I'd ask: did anything ever come of the license request? If not, please tell me so the image can be deleted. If the request was granted, please amend the image's license accordingly, and mention your success on Commons:Deletion requests so I can archive the discussion. Regards — Dan | Talk 19:21, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I've yet to receive any kind of answer. What I'll do is I'll replace the danged Ceres part of the image with a formless grey blob and re-upload the image. There isn't much in the way of detail in the offending image anyway.
Urhixidur 01:20, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:180px-France_Riots_spread.png#:Image:180px-France_Riots_spread.png

Dear Urhixidur, first of all, many thanks for taking care of my request. I have added a suggestion for a better editing of the image at the address in subject. Again my thanks for your very kind help. Best, --Piero Montesacro 22:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Neptune's irregulars

Hi! Thank you for updating the svg file (Neptune irregulars); I’m a bit stuck in real life recently so I hardly noticed yesterday’s eclipse not alone the naming of the Neptune’s irregulars … Tried to improve the labels by switching from stroke to fill. "Fill" produced better results with the wiki renderer in the past but apparently not so any more. Feel free to switch back. Cheers. Eurocommuter 20:12, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:SupersededSVG

Please don't use this template on SVG images. AnonMoos 12:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Makes sense. Which image are you talking about? Urhixidur 02:52, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Image:Copper-symbol.svg and Image:Symbol venus.svg -- AnonMoos 01:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I see. I should have used Template:Superseded instead. Thanks. Urhixidur 13:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop misusing superseded tags

Dude, there are only limited circumstances in which one image can supersede another: when two images are visually basically equivalent, but one is in a preferred image format; when one image is visually "cleaner" and/or at a higher pixel resolution (this applies mainly to photograph-type images, rather than to abstract symbol images); and when one image is simply outright factually incorrect or obviously "broken" in some way. That's pretty much it -- and none of these reasons applies to the two images referenced above, and you personally happening not to like a particular image (from your individual aesthetic point of view) is not a valid reason to slap a "superseded" tag on... AnonMoos 14:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree. When given a choice between two SVGs where one uses a thin line and the other a thick one, the latter wins hands down over the former if the image is rendered at small sizes (such as thumbnails). You may have a point that one doesn't actually "supersede" the other, since I guess the thin-line version could have its uses somewhere. If the images are properly categorised, then there isn't even a need for cross-linking them. Seen in this light, I guess there isn't a need for a "Superseded" template then.
See, I argued myself to your stance. Maybe you should take a few notes and try reasonable argument before cranking the volume up to the next notch, as you did here (I never brought aesthetic considerations into the picture: you assumed that I did).  :-) Urhixidur 04:15, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Irregulars; update needed

Did not logged in for a few months; apologies. Started to look “what’s new” yesterday. Updating the data sources for TNOs. Irregulars will follow. Eurocommuter 15:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Ground_Track_-_Unit_-_Combat_-_Anti-Armour_-_Unknown.svg

Image deletion warning Image:Ground_Track_-_Unit_-_Combat_-_Anti-Armour_-_Unknown.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

189.47.7.103 13:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:EightTNOs-fr.png

Bonjour, j'ai reverté l'ajout des accents sur Haumea et Makemake, n'ayant pas trouvé de preuve que ces graphies sont usitées dans les sources francophones de qualités de façon prépondérante.----Lilyu (talk) 23:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Pourquoi attendre ? Historiquement, on a toujours francisé les noms des corps célestes. Il suffit de regarder les noms des premières planètes mineures (Cérès, Junon, Astrée, etc.). Comme Maké-maké et Hauméa sont déjà les graphies établies des divinités éponymes, les graphies anglaises sont erronées. Urhixidur (talk) 12:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Ce n'est pas de l'anglais, mais du maori. Je vous invite à militer auprès des astronomes français pour qu'ils utilisent des accents.
Quant aux dieux, les usages des formes avec accents sont minoritaires dans la littérature francophone, je ne dirais pas que les graphies que vous proposez soient "établies". --Lilyu (talk) 14:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


[edit] File:Jeux de la Francophonie.png

File deletion warning File:Jeux de la Francophonie.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 21:27, 18 November 2009 (UTC)