User talk:Useddenim

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
alt= link=
Archives
Archive 1 Archive 2
Archive 4


Reverts[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Categorization.

Neath and Tennant again[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming#Similar looks

vSTRs[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming#vSTR

Standard Icons[edit]

Moved to Talk:BSicon/Icon geometry and SVG code neatness#Standard Icons

vKRWs[edit]

moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming/SPL#vKRWs

Please stop![edit]

moved to Talk:BSicon/Renaming#Diagonal + curve

any[edit]

moved to Talk:BSicon/Icon geometry and SVG code neatness

hSTRlf green et al.[edit]

I've noticed you've been uploading some "standard" curves and have been using the old naming scheme (lf, rg, etc) as opposed to the "modern" scheme (l, +r, etc). Was this intentional? Lost on  Belmont 3200N1000W  (talk) 21:11, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

I must’ve missed the memo that we’ve switched over. Feel free to move them. Useddenim (talk) 21:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Well, with "h" prefix, none has been renamed as yet... Only "d", "v", "D", "C", maybe some others. In standard "bahn" set it's impossible to proceed with "h" for now: there's   (hSTRl) & co. But for "other colours", maybe. YLSS (talk) 21:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, that’s it. I knew there was a reason to follow the old naming. 8·) Useddenim (talk) 00:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I think this brings up a bigger issue. The "D" and "C" sets only got the new naming scheme for "future" consistency. (And who doesn't want consistency across BSicons?) But if virtually everything else is staying old, then they aren't consistent and maybe they too should use the old scheme… Lost on  Belmont 3200N1000W  (talk) 16:46, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Nah, they’ll get there eventually. It’s just that I don’t think anyone wants to tackle the fix to   (STRlf),   (ABZrf), etc. (Unless someone want to write a ’bot request?) Useddenim (talk) 17:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
One happy day... YLSS (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:BSicon exCONTl+4.svg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:BSicon exCONTl+4.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

And also:

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 13:24, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

All fixed. Lost on  Belmont 3200N1000W  (talk) 13:52, 20 January 2015 (UTC)