User talk:Orange-kun

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:WWay)
Jump to: navigation, search

RE:Wikipedia logos[edit]

hey ! Thank you for the notification but could you go look at User talk:Bastique ? I is more well-placed for answering. Otourly (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm really sorry but you should ask again to User:Bastique, Regards, Otourly (talk) 18:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi. I appreciate you've uploaded a less smooth version of the logo, but there are a few problems. Namely, you've used a different font for the wordmark, the letters are not all small caps, and the you've made the wordmark a little wider than it should be. Also, I forgot to change the Э in encyclopedia to lowercase э (like in File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-kk.svg). Can you please either tell me how to make the globe less smooth (did you just copy paste it from another image?) or will you please upload a new one, with the correct font, width and spelling? Thanks, whichever you choose. —iNkubusse? 12:07, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

I'll upload new one by myself, not problems. Yes, I just copied and pasted logo from English version. About text "Уикипедия": I made it closer to other cyrillic versions which I improved: Russian and Ukrainian. See for reference: File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-ru.png Aboud width: I think it's ok, it reads better now. And now it uses right caps, they all caps, just a little bit smaller than first and last. See symbol "E" in English logo. It's not "e". I didn't used a different font, it's still Linux Libertine O. I use Photoshop. So I'll just change Э in encyclopedia to lowercase э. Ok? I can maintenain SVG version too.--Orange-kun (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
My bad about the small caps, I didn't even notice that mine weren't. But the wordmark is still way too wide. See the guideline, it clearly states the correct width. It wasn't my decision. Just make them both a little shorter, like in the original upload. It reads just fine. —iNkubusse? 19:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
See this chapter it says if wordmark dosen't fits even with -30 spacing you can enlarge it (with tagline) and there's example of Russian logo. So we see here exception for the such logos. Kazakh logo almost the same: the same text in wordmark (only В and У are diffirent) and tagline has almost the same width (it has fewer symbols but uses larger spacing while fontsize remains original 13 pt). I suggest to leave it in current version. Our current Russian version (already live on Russian wiki) was good accepted in our community. It was smoothed too, and recieved much of bad comments because of it. There was suggestions to either increase spacing in wordmark even more, but this would be really long. Kerning (space between every letter) was picked-up accurately and took long time. I guess it's perfect now, and if problem was only in guidline instructions, just don't bother.--Orange-kun (talk) 21:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
I just cannot see why you guys (from Russia) think the wordmark should be longer. My native alphabet is Cyrillic too (Macedonian) and I don't see any problems with the wordmark length, but if the majority shares this opinion, I guess it's ok. My only concern is that maybe this is not generally agreed upon, but I'll assume good faith (from your side). :) Cheers. —iNkubusse? 22:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Чăваш Википедийĕ[edit]

Wikipedia-logo-v2-cv.png

Апельсин-кун, ты не мог бы чуток подсобить с логотипом Чувашской Википедии? У нас проблема та же, что и у всех — основная надпись получается чересчур размытой. Поправишь? Flagellvm·Dei 17:48, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Да, конечно, я всё сделаю =)--Orange-kun (talk) 10:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Готово. Извиняюсь за большое количество перезаписей файлов, но по-другому никак не увидеть сравнение - как отображается именно в браузере. Я обновил PNG и SVG версии.--Orange-kun (talk) 18:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо огромное! PNG-версия просто супер, лучше чем у остальных. Как ты это делаешь? Не мог бы ты ещё в SVG-версии сделать первую и последнюю буквы чуть потоньше? Flagellvm·Dei 12:29, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
В Photoshop'е отрисовываю текст, там есть несколько вариантов сглаживания текста. Если выбрать "резкое", тогда текст получается резко сглажен (как на моих отрисовках в PNG). Ну я там же в фотошопе и кернинг подбираю (типа отступ между каждыми двумя соседними буквами: выделяешь по две буквы и ставишь отступ. Потом сохраняю PNG-версию (сам шарик-глобус я просто копирую с других версий). Потом сохраняю нормальную PSD-версию с текстом, который можно редактировать, открываю этот файл в Adobe Illustrator, он поддерживает формат фотошопа, текст открывается также и можно редактировать. Потом я уже векторный шар копирую из другого файла и вставляю туда, получается что векторная и растровая версия совпадают. Ну потом уже векторная версия всё-равно будет размытой, потому что таков алгоритм обработки ... Я попытаюсь ещё более резкой сделать SVG-версию, но ничего не обещаю, там уже пипец ) в векторе сложнее.--Orange-kun (talk) 17:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Small question[edit]

I know this looks irrelevant, but I am curious to know which letter did you use to write this symbol ɡ? The Macedonian handwritten letter Д cannot be found in the common unicode fonts. Best--MacedonianBoy (talk) 15:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I used ɡ (please note that it isn't standard G letter, it's a variant, but in Arial font they looks the same. You can copy it and use with font Linux Libertine for example) This character can be found in Windows character map in additional latin section (not a cyrillic)--Orange-kun (talk) 00:35, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Спасобо, I may use sometimes this letter and that's why I am asking you. best,--MacedonianBoy (talk) 12:28, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
Can you tell me, is it the same as Serbian logo? Could I update Serbian logo with this version?--Orange-kun (talk) 08:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

[edit]

Hi Orange-kun,

I made this logo version as a proposition. I described the differences that I made on that version. But you've replaced it with new one different in font style (this one is kind oblique), spaceing and in letter J. That's not the version I've described here. --Lošmi (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

I left a note there, that this is a different version now. I think you should upload it under a different name to avoid confusion, but never mind. Cheers. --Lošmi (talk) 15:55, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
I have replaced your version to avoid bluring, sorry. Also please note that you shall use a font under free license, so you can't just place text in any font. Linux Libertine O for the European languages.--Orange-kun (talk) 20:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

IE9 screenshots[edit]

Hello, you must know that while Windows Internet Explorer platform preview screenshots are valid since they don't show any user interface (tab bar, colored buttons, icons, among others); full screenshots of IE9 (Beta or RC) with those bars/elements are copyrighted by Microsoft corp, so they are not allowed here. See Commons:Screenshots#Web_browsers --Linfocito B ~ Greetings from Colombia. 21:24, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

so, I see. They may delete them then.--Orange-kun (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Russian Imperial arms[edit]

In your SVG of the File:Lesser Coat of Arms of Russian Empire.svg, there is a yellow or gold bordure placed around the shield. Heraldicly speaking, this then is not the correct coat of arms as a bordure on a shield is an actual heraldic charge and changes the meaning of arms. Could if be removed or changed to red like the shield?

Very nice SVG image, by the by.
Η936631 (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for you notice! I'll pay attention to proposed changes as soon as I'll have sparetime. I used different depictures of Imperial Amrs, and was not guided by the heraldic description, I guess it's my mistake.--Orange-kun (talk) 04:02, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

PNG optimization[edit]

I did not wanted to split the discussion, so I wrote there: User talk:32X#PNG optimization. --TMg 13:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

File:English_language.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:English_language.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

125.24.137.171 11:10, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Logo for 200k articles of Czech Wikipedia[edit]

Hi, I'd like to ask you to create logo for celebration 200k articles of Czech Wikipedia. I like your logo for 600k of Russia Wikipedia. Could you create this logo for us. There is standard Czech Wikipedia logo. Name of new file could be File:Wikipedia-logo-cs-200k.png. I would be most grateful. Thanks.--Sevela.p 13:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Deutschemarknotes.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Deutschemarknotes.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Deutschemarknotes.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Rd232 (talk) 00:08, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Daft Punk wordmark.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daft Punk wordmark.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 09:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Daft Punk in robot costumes.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Daft Punk in robot costumes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SimonLyall (talk) 10:08, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, heb [T C E] 14:13, 11 September 2013 (UTC)