User talk:Wdwd/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive

Contents

Image Tagging Image:Konstantstromquelle jfet.png

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Konstantstromquelle jfet.png. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 15:42, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Konstantstromquelle jfet 2.png

Please add your files to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. For example to Category:Electrical diagrams.

Please note that SVG is better format for such images.

EugeneZelenko 15:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Game screenshot

Hello, thanks for this screenshot, but can you add source for copyrighted game ? For exemple Jumpman is under copyright, so do you have source about a public release of this game ? If you have it, it will be better to had it on the image description. Another think, you unload name like "Screenshot Jumpman.png", its beter to rename this in "Jumpman screenshot.png" because like this category are already sorted. Thanks. ~ bayo or talk 23:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, my screenshott from jumpman vanished. :-( i assume it has been removed by an admin. You are right yes, the C64-*game* is copyrighted. But a screenshot? Take a look at the english wikipedia: jumpman. Why is it ok to put a C64 game screenshot on en.wikipedia.at and not on commons.wikipedia.org? -- Wdwd 14:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC), a little bit confused.

Image:Screenshot Spiel Enigma.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Screenshot Spiel Enigma.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rtc 00:53, 8 March 2007 (UTC)


Image:Schlagschluessel_BumpKeys.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Schlagschluessel_BumpKeys.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard 17:19, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Wdwd!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Maschinentransformator Transmission 14.jpg may be deleted

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenščina | +/−

The Maschinentransformator Transmission 14.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly.

HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 16:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Peter Weller Todestag

Hi. Ich frag mich, was interessiert die Leute der exakte Todestag, den kann man auf der Wikiseite der Person nachschauen und er hat keinen Einfluss darauf, ob die Datei PD ist - zumal man nicht überall derartig Geburt und Tod anzeigt (*, †). Der Link auf die deutsche Wikipedia gehört auch in den deutschen Text find ich, versteht ja nicht jeder. lg Hekerui (talk) 20:26, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, aha, wollte das genaue Sterbedatum nur verdeutlichen. (da mit 10 Tagen knapp an der 70-Jahres Grenze). Wenns nicht passt, mach es bei Bedarf wieder rückgängig.--Wdwd (talk) 20:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Hast Recht, dass sich ein Link auf seinen Artikel gut macht, hab einen eingefügt. lg Hekerui (talk) 21:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Vienna rectifier Eingangsspan.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vienna rectifier Eingangsspan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vienna rectifier Eingangsspan.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi Magog the Ogr, i don't have any permission for this image. All i have done was a transfer (and a rename) from the en-wp to commons - as you know. Sorry for the circumstances,--Wdwd (talk) 09:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

File:An-218-brochure-1.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:An-218-brochure-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Denniss (talk) 19:40, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:SS California (1907).JPG

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:SS California (1907).JPG, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:SS California (1907).JPG]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:17, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry,i don't have any further information about this image. All i have done was a transfer from the en-wp to commons.--Wdwd (talk) 14:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Aufräumen bei Commonstransfers

Hallo Wdwd. Danke beim Mithelfen beim Commonstransfer. Mir ist eben dieser Beitrag von dir aufgefallen. Dazu ein paar kleine Bemerkungen:

  1. Bitte entferne keine Lizenzen: Du hast die CC-by-sa-3.0-Lizenz entfernt: auch wenn die CC-by-sa-3.0-de-Lizenz weiterhin da ist, sie sind nicht 100% identisch und sollten daher beide stehen bleiben.
  2. Für die GFDL-Lizenz: bitte entferne die Bild-GFDL-Neu-Lizenz und ergänze dafür den GFDL-Baustein um den Parameter für den Migrationsprozess. Konkret heißt das, dass Dateien die unter GFDL-Neu hochgeladen wurden, dann hier auf Commons {{GFDL|migration=not-eligible}} draus wird. Die "importierte" Vorlage mag zwar einfacher erscheinen, erschwert aber die spätere Wartung in Bezug auf den Umstellungsprozess der GFDL-Lizenzen.
  3. Kategorien: Commons darf man ruhig alles kategorisieren, was man sieht, also ruhig die Kategorien für Heizkraftwerk, weißes Gebäude etc. drin lassen.

Das nur, weils mir auffällt, sieh es nicht als Kritik an. Viel Spaß noch und ansonsten: weiter so! --Quedel (talk) 15:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Quedel, kein Problem. 1. Ja das mit den Lizenzen ist so eine Sache. Hab halt immer die weggestrichen, die mir (gefühlsmässig) als redundant/überflüssig erscheinen sind. zu 2. Ok, notiert. 3. Hmm, ist unscharf, zumal die Kategorievorschläge vom Bot durch die Artikelverwendungen der Bilder oftmals, nun ja, suboptimal ist.--Wdwd (talk) 17:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Bildbearbeitung und Bildüberschreibung

Hallo Wdwd, ich wäre Dir dankbar, wenn Du solche Bildbearbeitungen und Bildüberschreibungen wie diese (File:Graetzel-Zelle 01.jpg) entweder zukünftig unterlässt oder sie zumindest vorher mit dem Bildautoren absprichst, d.h. ihn informierst. Bei dem besagten Bild hast Du unter anderem die in der Bildbeschreibung ausdrücklich erwähnte OLED-Leuchte einfach mit abgeschnitten. Gruß --Kuebi (talk) 10:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Siehe bitte de:Diskussion:Organische_Leuchtdiode#Merck_Schleichwerbung. Bildbeschreibung entsprechend anzupassen ist kein Problem, hab ich nun erledigt. Samt Umbennung, da der Dateiname offensichtlich nicht zum abgebildeten Objekt passt(e).--Wdwd (talk) 07:00, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Weil eine IP da Schleichwerbung sieht? Bist Du dann bei den Bildern, beispielsweise in diesem Artikel [1] (schon im zweiten Bild [1] das HSBC ist ja so etwas von penetrant), dann bitte so nett und entfernst dort auch die "Schleichwerbung"? Und ich bitte Dich nicht als IP darum! --Kuebi (talk) 12:03, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
Was passt an der jetzigen Version von File:Polymer organische Solarzelle 01.jpg bzw. File:OLED 01.jpg nicht und was stört Dich konkret?--Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:DeWitt Clinton (locomotive).jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DeWitt Clinton (locomotive).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Bismarck1905.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bismarck1905.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:13, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup nach Commonshelper-Upload

Hallo Wdwd, hab grade gesehen, dass Du häufig Bilder mit dem Commonshelper verschiebst. Vor einigen Tagen erhielt ich den enorm wertvollen Hinweis auf dieses Script. Es ist in meinen Augen vor allem deshalb wichtig, weil es den ursprünglichen Autor wieder richtigstellt. So funktioniert auch da Gadget für Nachnutzer (Use this file on the web) wieder richtig. Probier's mal aus! --Schwäbin (talk) 21:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Schwäbin, danke für den Tipp.--Wdwd (talk) 09:04, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Full wave Cockcroft Walton Voltage multiplier.png

Hi Walter. I wonder, how can you convert AC to DC, having three inputs and one output. Smile Ground should be the second output for DC power, so pls fix this error. Sealle (talk) 17:14, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Sealle, the drawing is from en:user:Whitepaw, as noted. My work was the transfer from en-wp to commons. In my opinion, the drawing is correct: The two AC inputs are "phase inverted" (that are split phase, like in the en:Split-phase electric power system - so when one AC input has +V, the other AC input has -V in reference to GND, and vice versa.) The GND (earth) is the reference potential for DC output and the two AC inputs. GND is not an input nor an output - i removed this word.--Wdwd (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
This was persuasive. Thanks! Sealle (talk) 19:41, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kerrwinkel.svg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kerrwinkel.svg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Wdwd,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 01:30, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Ossanna-kreis.svg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:55, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

typo, fixed.--Wdwd (talk) 19:42, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Percolator Cutaway Diagram.png

Two things about this:

First, while we do not delete png files that have been superseded by svg file, we do delete the png when it is uploaded at the same time or later. There is no good reason to keep both because the svg will be rendered as a png whenever needed.

Second, and more important, it is against the rules to simply remove the {{delete}} tag from a file before the discussion is closed. Once a DR is started it must run to conclusion unless it is withdrawn by the nominator or closed as a {{speedy}} by an Admin.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:13, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Ok, my fault, sorry.--Wdwd (talk) 07:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

File:DM-Verseilung.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:DM-Verseilung.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jjeka (talk) 18:27, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

OTRS permission for File:Friedrich Wilhelm Hauck (1944).jpg

Hello Wdwd,

a valid permission to put an image under a free license can be given only by somebody who owns the rights to the image. How is that possible if even the author is unknown? The same is true for several other images uploaded by this user to which you just added OTRS tags. Something is wrong here. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 18:02, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi Rosenzweig, es liegt im OTRS eine (plausible) Freigabe des Rechteinhabers vor - dieser muss nicht gleich der Autor sein, wenngleich wie in diesem Fall kann es auch der "Inhaber des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts" sein. Weiters:
  1. Die Daten wie Klartextnamen aus dem OTRS kann/darf ich nicht im Wiki veröffentlichen. Aus diesem Grund übertrage ich keine dieser Daten und belasse sie in der vorhandenen Form. Ggf wäre ein Hinweis im Author-field auf das OTRS denkbar, ist andererseits aber redundant zur schon bestehenden Vorlage und beinhaltet keine zusätzliche/andere Information.
  2. Die Textvorlage für die Freigabe, welche in diesem Fall verwendet wurde und dem Vorlagentext auf de:WP:TV entspricht, frägt nicht ab wie der Rechteinhaber (Autor oder Inhaber der vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechte) öffentlich genannt werden will. Das könnte ein Problem sein da diese cc-Lizenz eine Namensnennung (Pseudonym) verlangt - es ist andererseits aber nicht festgeleget, dass dieser Name (auch wenn es ein Pseudonym ist) öffentlich sein muss.
Nichts desto trotz, kann ich auch Fehler machen - zumal noch nicht so lange im OTRS tätig. Vielleicht wäre es sinnvoll den Freigabetext für cc-lizenzen mit einer Frage um die Art der öffentlich sichtbaren Bezeichnung zu erweitern, dann wäre das ohne Rückfragen zu übertragen.--Wdwd (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Wieso ist diese Freigabe des (vermeintlichen oder tatsächlichen) Rechteinhabers plausibel, wenn der Urheber nicht bekannt ist? Verstehe ich nach wie vor nicht. Enthält diese Freigabe Angaben dazu, warum derjenige der Rechteinhaber ist? Typischerweise ist er entweder identisch mit dem Urheber, oder er hat die Rechte ererbt. In beiden Fällen müsste der Urheber bekannt sein. Alles andere bedürfte einer ausführlicheren Erklärung. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 19:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Es kann die Freigabe entweder der Urheber oder Rechteinhaber des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts erteilen, wer auch immer von beiden. Der Name und möglicherweise auch andere Daten von einem der beiden Möglichkeiten sind bekannt, aber im OTRS und eben wie oben erwähnt, nicht öffentlich. Was nicht abgefragt wird, wie die öffentliche Nennung erfolgen darf/kann - es liegt keine Info vor, wie der Urheber oder Rechteinhaber des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts öffentlich bezeichnet werden will. Das wird dzt. nur in manchen Rückfragen abgefragt, aber eben nicht in den Standard-Textvorlagen für die Freigabe bei der cc-Lizenz. In diesem Fall fehlt sie auch.
Der Freigabeprozess ist immer eine mehr oder weniger unscharfe Plausibilitäseinschätzung, praktisch nie eine vollständig "wasserdichte Beweiskette", d.h. das "vermeintlichen oder tatsächlichen" lässt sich fast nie zu 100% sicher entscheiden.--Wdwd (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Das überzeugt mich alles nicht. Ich habe jetzt Löschantrag gestellt und dort nochmals begründet warum. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 18:06, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
ok. (kann Deine Position nachvollziehen)--Wdwd (talk) 18:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Noch drei Bilder mit kuriosen Freigaben

Die Freigaben für File:Fritz Haas.JPG, File:Hellmut Schreiber-Volkening.JPG und File:Herbert Kleine.JPG sind ebenfalls seltsam. Als Quelle ist jeweils "Archiv Corps Masovia" angegeben, als Urheber "Archiv Corps Masovia". Das de:Corps Masovia Königsberg zu Potsdam ist eine Studentenverbindung und keinesfalls der Urheber, denn dieser ist eine natürliche Person. Ich nehme an, es handelt sich um irgendeine Art von rechtsfähiger Körperschaft, also wäre denkbar, dass das Corps die Urheberrechte oder vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechte durch Erbschaft, Vertrag etc. erworben hat. Auch hier müsste aber jeweils der eigentliche Urheber bekannt sein, sonst wären die Rechte nicht dort. File:Hellmut Schreiber-Volkening.JPG ist zudem augenscheinlich aus einer Zeitung oder dergleichen gescannt, File:Herbert Kleine.JPG aus einem Buch. Ist sicher, dass diese Bilder nicht einfach von irgendjemandem irgendwann, aus welcher Quelle auch immer, in besagtes Archiv gesteckt wurden und jenes Archiv nun einfach behauptet, nicht nur die Bilder, sondern auch die Rechte an ihnen zu besitzen? So sieht es nämlich am ehesten aus. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 18:17, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

In allen drei Fällen tritt als "Inhaber des vollumfänglichen Nutzungsrechts" die Corps Masovia (Studentenverbindung Corps Masovia Königsberg zu Potsdam) auf und ist (möglicherweise unpassend) im Author-Field eingetragen - mit einer Freigabe von jemanden der vorgibt vertretungsbefugt zu sein. Ob die Akteure im dortigen Archiv irgendwas falsch behaupten oder ins Archiv was reinstecken was dort nicht hin soll, kann ich nicht beurteilen.--Wdwd (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
In dem Fall sollte nachgehakt werden, wer denn nun jeweils die Urheber sind. Wenn das Corps wie behauptet vollumfängliche Nutzungsrechte haben will, sollte das dort bekannt sein, von den Urhebern bzw. deren Erben müssen diese Rechte schließlich letzten Endes kommen, auch wenn sie vielleicht weitergereicht wurden. --Rosenzweig τ 23:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Habe in der Sache nachgefragt.--Wdwd (talk) 07:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
... und nach Antwort die OTRS-Freigabe zurückgezogen. Sorry, da war ich wohl zu vorschnell.--Wdwd (talk) 12:50, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
OK und danke. --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

What to do with picture now?

File:FourPlanetSunset hao annotated.JPG

The preceding file is used in en:Ecliptic which is a Good Article nominee. But apparently you consider the permission letter that has been received inadequate. What would be the next step? Delete the image? Jc3s5h (talk) 18:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the reminder - I'm not sure if this image is eligible for {{PD-USGov-NASA}} - the customer use a public (none NASA) email address and i ask the to confirm his authorization. I get until now no response. Next step will be: 1. I will put a "no-permission-since" tag into the description and 2. try to get confirmation.--Wdwd (talk) 19:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bechstein1853

Hallo Wdwd,

Bechstein1853 hat mir eine Wikimail geschickt (hat mich wohl versehentlich für einen Admin gehalten). Inhalt grob zusammengefasst: Er ist jetzt erstmal im Urlaub und kann sich wahrscheinlich erst danach drum kümmern, bittet aber darum, mit einer Löschung erstmal abzuwarten. Soll ich euch die ans OTRS weiterleiten? Grüße, --El Grafo (talk) 19:55, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi, am einfachsten direkt mit der angegebenen Ticket-Nummer im Subject die Email schicken.--Wdwd (talk) 20:01, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Kein Problem, geht das dann an permissions-de? --El Grafo (talk) 20:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Ja, bitte.--Wdwd (talk) 20:12, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
OK, ist raus. --El Grafo (talk) 20:14, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Robert J Graves.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Robert J Graves.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Robert J Graves.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Liliana-60 (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

File:12062929CP1 0140.JPG

Please, check the license that you have set in this file. {{CC-by-sa-3.0-de}} does not exist. --Art-top (talk) 18:49, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

fixed. Thanks,--Wdwd (talk) 18:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

File:045R01001078 Zeitungsblatt zur Eröffnung der neuen Floridsdorfer Brücke am 3. Oktober 1978.jpg

Hallo! Du hast natürlich Recht, dieses Bild ist nicht frei lizenziert, da es aus einer Zeitung stammt. Ich habe es leider unter den vielen Bildern, die ich hochgeladen habe, nicht bemerkt, tut mir Leid. Wenn du willst, kannst du es zur Schnelllöschung vorschlagen. Darkweasel94 (talk) 19:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi, ok, mache ich. Ich schaue mal im Rahmen der OTRS-Freigabe alle Bilder (grob) durch - Ob ich was finde was nicht passt. Bis jetzt ist es das einzige Bild. Bin aber auch erst bei rund der Hälfte. Das ist bei so Massenfreigaben immer so eine Sache - und gewisse Arbeit, da das kein Bot automatisch kann. Die Freigaben kann, wenn die Lizenz passt, per Bot eingetragen werden, am einfachsten über eigene Vorlage die Du dann auch selber verwenden kannst. Näheres per email von permission.--Wdwd (talk) 19:21, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
PS: Tlw. sehr interessante und tolle Aufnahmen.--Wdwd (talk) 19:27, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
OK, danke für deine Information - dann hab ich wenigstens nicht alles total falsch gemacht. Smile lg Darkweasel94 (talk) 19:29, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Sailors on JS Bungo load dummy mines into the hold during RIMPAC 2012, -10 Jul. 2012 b.jpg

I had shown the reason that this image is fully compatible with commons in its note page. So I have converted this {{Unfree}} into an ordinary deletion process. Please review carefully, as Lymantria did.--トトト (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi トトト, i try my best and i'm not perfect. In this case i was not able to verify a commons compatible license.--Wdwd (talk) 19:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Ursula Stock, 157.jpg usw. bis File:Ursula Stock, 181.jpg

In dem Permissions-Email heißt es, dass die Bilder

Ursula Stock, 157.jpg ... Ursula Stock, 181.jpg

betroffen sind, d. h. alle Bilder mit den fortlaufenden Nummern 157, 158, 159 usw. bis 181. Du hast aber nur 157 und 181 freigegeben. Das gleiche gilt für die Bilder

Ursula Stock, 12.jpg bis Ursula Stock, 99.jpg

und für die Bilder

Ursula Stock, 100.jpg bis Ursula Stock, 156.jpg

Könntest Du bitte alle diese Bilder mit OTRS versehen?

Danke --Gerd Leibrock (talk) 06:51, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi,
1. Bei "157 ... 181" (2012092910002717) hab ich die dazwischenliegenden Nummern nachgetragen - da sind die drei "..." als Folge zu interpretieren, aber nicht unbedingt leicht/klar verständlich.
2. die Freigabe 2012082810008699 bezieht sich explizit nur auf Bildnummer 12 und 13. Eine Folge ist nicht erkennbar.
3. die Freigabe 2012092510008184 bezieht sich nur auf Nr. 154 bis Nr. 156. Die Nummer 155 nachgetragen.
4. Die Freiagbe 2012092110009207 ist - da hab ich zwecks abklärung extra in der Retourantwort die vier Dateien 14, 69, 153, 70 angegeben, die auch freigeben sind, auf die sich nach damaligen Interpretation die Freigabe bezieht.
Würde folgendes vorschlagen: 1. bis 3. ist erledigt. Zu 4. und zu ticket 2012092110009207 bitte ich um eine kurze Info per OTRS/email zwecks Klarstellung und damit es im OTSR dokumentiert ist. - es müsste dies die Liste mit Nr. 14 bis Nr. 153 ohne Lücken sein, bitte im Rückbestätigung.--Wdwd (talk) 18:27, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Danke, dass Du die Mühe auf Dich genommen hast. Frau Stock wird in den nächsten Tagen eine Email schicken, in der die Genehmigung für Nr. 14 bis 153 bestätigt wird. -- Gerd Leibrock (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Bitte. Ich hab diese Konversation auch im OTRS als Notiz abgelegt. Bitte um kurze Bestätigung/Genehmigung zu ticket 2012092110009207 von Frau Stock, damit ist das eindeutig (unmissverständlich) und die Freigabe damit abgeschlossen.--Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Wdwdbot

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:37, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you.--Wdwd (talk) 15:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Restored files

I've restored the 3 deleted files from User:Bchulmers:

I also closed the DR. INeverCry 18:27, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi INeverCry, thanks for your quick reaction. In the OTRS-ticket the owner (artist) did not mention these three files. In my opinion the permission for this three files above is not valid. Maybe we get in the future an additional permission from the artist, until then we have no clearance. I would suggest to delete this three files again.--Wdwd (talk) 18:41, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
I've re-deleted them. INeverCry 18:48, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Convert all interlaced JPGs

Hello, can you by any chance give a look at this bot work request? Thanks, Nemo 10:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Blumen2007.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blumen2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Weiße Maenner-Esbjerg.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Weiße Maenner-Esbjerg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 19:52, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Helmut Rogl.jpg

Hallo! Welche Informationen fehlen dennoch für dieses Bild, damit das OTRS in Ordnung ist? --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:21, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Information fehlt keine. Rückfrage ob Rechteinhaber einverstanden ist, ist im Laufen--Wdwd (talk) 19:36, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Nachtrag: Bestätigung ist eingelangt, erledigt.--Wdwd (talk) 19:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:FVerrPla02.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:FVerrPla02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Polarlys (talk) 12:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

“Post Commons-Transfer cleanup”

Hallo Wdwd. Ich halte sowas für kontraproduktiv. Dieser Baustein sollte nicht von einem Bot entfernt werden. Eine manuelle Kontrolle ist IMO unerlässlich. --Leyo 19:58, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Leyo, hmm, war/ist noch Teil der Transferroutine vom OTRS-Transfer-Batch um die Bilder auf commons in eigene Kategorie einzutragen (was in diesem und einigen weiteren Fällen nicht mehr der Fall ist). Ich lass diesen Bearbeitungsteil künftig weg.--Wdwd (talk) 20:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Ev. wäre es eine sinnvolle Alternative tools:~magog/do_cleanup.php drüber laufen zu lassen. --Leyo 20:28, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Diese Schnittstelle lässt sich nicht gut/einfach automatisieren und ist auf manuelle Bearbeitung mittels Web-Browser ausgelegt.--Wdwd (talk) 18:18, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Ist die Schnittstelle unter tools:~magog/cleanup_multi.htm besser geeignet? --Leyo 23:34, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Titanic Plakatierung Ostseehalle Kiel.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Titanic Plakatierung Ostseehalle Kiel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Hans-Gaertner-Paedagoge.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hans-Gaertner-Paedagoge.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hans-Gaertner-Paedagoge.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

GeorgHHtalk   12:26, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Superphenix-2.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Superphenix-2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Rainer von Vielen Live.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rainer von Vielen Live.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

High Contrast (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Ursularucker.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ursularucker.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 16:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Das Museum Albert Schweitzer P7280015.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Das Museum Albert Schweitzer P7280015.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Heubergen (talk) 19:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Registan 5 b.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Registan 5 b.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SeanZCampbell (talk) 06:31, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 17:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Schneider Paul Durchblick.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Schneider Paul Durchblick.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Krd 09:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Krd 13:50, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Transfer image from de.wikipedia

Can you please check File:Amber Road.jpg and reupload if necessary? It appears to have been transferred at lower resolution from de:Datei:Bernsteinstrasse.jpg. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, the deleted version of "de:Datei:Bernsteinstrasse.jpg" on de.wiki is the same:
30. Mai 2006, 09:26 . . Rovere (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) 1.012 × 1.474 (415.608 Byte) (Verein Österreichische Bernsteinstraße)
on de.wiki is an older file version available with a lower resolution:
30. Mai 2006, 09:25 . . Rovere (Diskussion | Beiträge | Sperren) 149 × 220 (38.677 Byte) (Verein Österreichische Bernsteinstraße)
so, reupload is not necessary.--Wdwd (talk) 19:08, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Any idea how this image is higher resolution? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
i've no idea. The text in OTRS is not limited to a particular resolution; Same user/uploader on wikivoyage. In my opinion it should be ok to transfer the image from wikivoyage-old.org to file:Amber Road.jpg.--Wdwd (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Metz Centr-P 4.1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Metz Centr-P 4.1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

moogsi (blah) 06:12, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Radebeul Villa August Bamm.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Radebeul Villa August Bamm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

95.157.18.206 17:33, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Benutzer-Benj--WikiBild-Benutzerseite.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Benutzer-Benj--WikiBild-Benutzerseite.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Benj (talk) 14:43, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Madagascarfrosch.jpg

Hallo Wdwd. Dein Bot hat komischerweise ein Duplikat einer schon vorhandenen Datei hochgeladen. Ich hatte gedacht, dies gehe nicht… --Leyo 09:14, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Leyo, oops, das ist ein Bug in meinen Botscript. Erkennt in der de:Vorlage:Nach Commons verschieben (bestätigt) nur dann den alternativen Dateinamen, wenn dieser mit dem Indexschreibweise 1= eingeleitet wird. Ob die commons-Software Dateien mit SHA1-Checksum von anderen bestehenden Dateien nach dem Hochladen prüft und bei Übereinstimmung verwirfft, weiss ich ad hoc nicht.--Wdwd (talk) 15:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Ich hatte mal eine DVD mit ca. 500 Bildern zum Hochladen erhalten. Da waren auch ein paar einige Duplikate dabei, die der Commonist aber nicht hochlud. Ob dies Commonist-spezifisch ist, weiss ich nicht. --Leyo 15:50, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Meda-Stemma.jpg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Meda-Stemma.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

File:GodzillaCIMG0450.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GodzillaCIMG0450.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vantey (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Grewenig Meinrad 2.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grewenig Meinrad 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Narayan (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Grandmontagne Mechtild.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grandmontagne Mechtild.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Narayan (talk) 14:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kaltenbrunnerorgantaiwan.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kaltenbrunnerorgantaiwan.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Kaltenbrunnerorgantaiwan.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 15:12, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Strache.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Strache.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 21:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Kleinman.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Kleinman.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 09:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Manni.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Manni.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smooth_O (talk) 09:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Kleinman.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kleinman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 12:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Bild noch zu retten?

Hallo, du kümmerst dich doch viel um NowCommons-Sachen. Kannst du eventuell zu File:Listertalsperre01.jpg noch die gelöschte erste Fotoversion von de:Datei:Listertalsperre01.JPG hierhin retten? Gerne auch gleich unter anderem Bildnamen. Das dürften ähnlich verschiedene und erhaltenswerte Motive sein wie bei de:Datei:Listertalsperre02.JPG und de:Datei:Listertalsperre03.JPG. Holger1959 (talk) 00:18, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, ja mache ich wenn der botrun von meinen aktuellen Transferstapel durch ist (dauert noch etwas). Ansich hätte de:Datei:Listertalsperre01.JPG auf de-wp noch nicht gelöscht werden dürfen, da nicht alle Dateiversionen übertragen wurden.--Wdwd (talk) 07:33, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
dankeschön! Holger1959 (talk) 15:54, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

habe noch 3 Bilder von Helfmann gefunden, wo die ersten Versionen nicht mehr da sind:

Ob das wirklich andere Motive sind, weiß ich aber nicht. Holger1959 (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Habs nachübertragen.--Wdwd (talk) 19:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Triceratops-01.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Triceratops-01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 23:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Franco Leon Südbahnhof Ffm 1 28.4.13.jpg

Hallo Walter, du hast bei o. g. Bild gerade das OTRS-Ticket eingebunden. Wurde explizit die aktuelle Dateiversion freigegeben? Dann sollten die beiden vorherigen Dateiversionen gelöscht werden. --тнояsтеn 17:21, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi Thgoiter, es wurde keine Dateiversion explizit freigegeben (nur der Dateiname) und kein Wunsch auf Löschung von vorherigen Versionen gestellt bzw. eingeschränkt. Die anderen Dateiversion wurden vom selben Konto hochgeladen, und laut Metadaten/EXIF auch mit identer Kamera zu ähnlichen Zeitpunkt aufgenommen -> Aus meiner Sicht kein Grund zu einer Versionslöschung.--Wdwd (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Auf User talk:Animagus spricht sich der Uploader explizit für die neue Version aus. Aber ist auch nicht so wichtig... --тнояsтеn 17:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 09:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Mito Falanto Taranto.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mito Falanto Taranto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.10.107.62 12:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jansa2.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jansa2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jansa2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 18:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Gabeug1.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gabeug1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:46, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

File:H 00010099 Fashion Food.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:H 00010099 Fashion Food.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

File:H 00010842 Smart Food Buch.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:H 00010842 Smart Food Buch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:07, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

File:H 00012471 Kulinarische Ueberflieger.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:H 00012471 Kulinarische Ueberflieger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:07, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Brunsvigia marginata ibiblio org PDMary Sue Ittner.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Brunsvigia marginata ibiblio org PDMary Sue Ittner.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:SPECP1.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SPECP1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SPECP1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Palosirkka (talk) 06:23, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Membranwohnbau RTW-maxRIEDER foto paulott.jpg

hi, you added OTRS to this image, but forgot to apply a license. Can you pls have a look. Thx. --JuTa 22:27, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Oops, thank you for the hint. Fixed.--Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Quantity.pdf

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Quantity.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:TRUMPF Laserschneiden 50mm.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:TRUMPF Laserschneiden 50mm.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yellowcard (talk) 13:02, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Von der de:WP übertragene Dateien

Hallo Walter, kann man den Bot nicht so umschalten, dass er das Feld „Anmerkungen“ mit an die “Description” hängt? Zum Beispiel kann man File:Alte Graefte.jpg anhand der verbliebenen Informationen geographisch nicht mehr zuordnen. -- Olaf Studt (talk) 06:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Olaf, dieser Punkt liegt programmtechnisch im Commonshelper bzw. User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske). Mein Bot steuert diese Tools an, quasi macht das was sonst der Anwender im Webbrowser machen würde. Hmm, einfache Lösung fällt mir ad hoc keine ein, ausser rund herum zu programmieren und Teile von commonshelper zu übernehmen. Vielleicht wenn Du bei Magnus mal nachfragst? Die de:Datei:Alte_Graefte.jpg hat auf de-wp eine leeres Anmerkungsfeld.--Wdwd (talk) 08:46, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
Kann Dein Bot eigentlich Bild: innerhalb von gallery-tags in File: umwandeln? Oder ist das eine Funktion die über Commonshelper nicht zur Verfügung steht? Siehe [2] --Denniss (talk) 04:06, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
Commonshelper kann das nicht. Aber das kann ich in mein Script einbauen, da ich (wie in den Bsp) so ein mini-cleanup mache wo ich das anpassen kann. Kommt zwar nur selten vor, ist aber trivial. Baue ich ein.--Wdwd (talk) 07:21, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Thomas Gatzemeier Le Ciel 2007 Öl auf Leinwand 180 x 160 cm.jpg

Hallo Wdwd,

soweit ich mitbekommen habe wollte der Benutzer eigentlich auch für seine anderen hochgeladenen Dateien eine Genehmigung schicken, hat sich im Text aber anscheinend nur auf diese eine bezogen. Du wirst wahrscheinlich sowieso nochmal nachhaken, diesen Hinweis schreibe ich dir nur zur Sicherheit. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 14:53, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rosenzweig, dieses Ticket bezieht sich nur auf dieses eine Bild. Ich hab noch alle andere offenen Tickets vom gleichen Absender rausgesucht und auch eingetragen. (sind in Summe 4).--Wdwd (talk) 15:40, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Dann ist ja alles ok, danke. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Insekt zur Bestimmung.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Insekt zur Bestimmung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Xocolatl (talk) 22:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Raupe zur Bestimmung.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Raupe zur Bestimmung.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Xocolatl (talk) 22:48, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Hochladen auf Commons ohne jeglichen Versuch einer minimalen Kategorisierung

Ehrlich gesagt empfinde ich diese Massentransfers von :de nach Commons, die nur unkategorisierte Dateien produzieren, obwohl im Dateinamen oder auf den Beschreibungsseiten genügend Hinweise für eine erste Einordnung vorhanden wären, als unkollegial gegenüber denen, die dann auf :de die Dateien löschen sollen, zumal einige Kollegen sowieso nur löschen, ohne sich um die Dateien auf commons weiter zu kümmern. Auch migration=not-eligible oder migration=relicense sollte eine Maschine doch erkennen können. Gruß --Enzian44 (talk) 23:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

„Ohne jeglichen Versuch“ stimmt nicht ganz. --Leyo 06:39, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

File:-b-Apple's Adavanced M7 chip --b- 2013-09-11 23-25.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:-b-Apple's Adavanced M7 chip --b- 2013-09-11 23-25.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

RP88 09:11, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Asilah, Wandbild 2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Asilah, Wandbild 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Balgach.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Balgach.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Balgach.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Supposed copyright violations

Dear Wdwd, You dropped some copyright violation notes om my user talk page, but IMHO you must have been mistaking. The images are from the BOLD systems site and each image has a separate license. You can see the license by mousing over the correct image. Please, take a second look. Thank you. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 16:27, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Lymantria, i didn't find one out of these four images on BOLDSystem (File:Parhelophilus consimilis.jpg). In this case i was not able to confirm any license. The other three images (File:Lucilia cluvia.jpg, Lucilia eximia.jpg, Lucilia coeruleiviridis.jpg) have a CC-NC-* license on BOLDSystem. - in my opinion and as far as i remember, i selected the right images with this tricky mouse-over-function.--Wdwd (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Really, you didn't. I will ask for undeletion. The first one you were right about and I deleted the image myself (although I think that it would have been appropriate to mark it "missing source" and give it a week). I will see if I can upload a correct one instead. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 08:05, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Ok.--Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

OTRS-Ticket 2013020110009425

Hallo Wdwd, Du hast vor einer Weile das obige Ticket bearbeitet, das sich auf die folgenden Bilder bezog:

Mir ist nun aufgefallen, dass alle Bilder bis auf der erste und das letzte wegen fehlender Freigabe gelöscht wurden. Kannst Du hier korrigierend eingreifen? --Kjunix (talk) 20:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Kjunix, danke für den genauen Hinweis. Die Freigabe bezieht sich in der Tat auf alle 6 Dateien, habe fehlerhafterweise die OTRS-Markierung nur bei #1 und #6 eingetragen. Habe einen undeletion request gestellt.--Wdwd (talk) 08:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Besten Dank – die Bilder sind nun wieder da. --Kjunix (talk) 06:13, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Duplicate category added by bot

Hi, regarding this edit: Category:Derker Metrolink station was already present so the bot didn't need to add it again. --Redrose64 (talk; at English Wikipedia) 19:34, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the hint. I will improve the algorithm.--Wdwd (talk) 19:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Vitruvian Barnstar Hires.png The Technical Barnstar
Danke für den Kategorie-Bot! McZusatz (talk) 09:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Danke Dir.--Wdwd (talk) 13:50, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

OTRS-Prüfung

Hallo Wdwd,

ich bin auf ein Bild mit einem OTRS-Ticket gestoßen, dass mich etwas stutzig gemacht hat, File:Mattweiner.jpg ist wohl ein Pressebild von AMC. Es nutzt das OTRS-Ticket 922303. Das selbe Ticket wird von weiteren Bildern genutzt (File:El-pflick.jpg, File:Sopranos-ontheset.jpg sowie weiteren Bildern, die bei Flickr unter CC stehen File:Mrliflive 140x190.jpg & File:Aesop Rock live.jpg), die in meinen Augen überhaupt keinen Zusammenhang haben. Kannst du mir mal schreiben was das Ticket aussagt? Danke. --CennoxX (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, nach kurzen Check: Das Ticket bezieht sich auf eine Aufnahme: File:El-pflick.jpg. Diese Aufnahme, Quelle und Datum (Jahr 2007) passen zusammen. Die anderen Aufnahmen wurden tlw. erst Jahre später auf commons transferiert (auch von en-wp, das OTRS-ticket wurde zuvor auf der en-wp eingefügt). Da es ein älteres Ticket ist und es auch die en.wp betrifft, möchte ich Dich bitten diesen Fall auf Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard vorzubringen. Bei dieser Ticketverwendung ist was dubios.--Wdwd (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Danke, hab da jetzt geschrieben, die Seite Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard habe ich kurz nachdem ich hier geschrieben hatte auch gefunden.--CennoxX (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

File:ExpressionBlend3.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:ExpressionBlend3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 10:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

File:ExpressionDesignScreenshot.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:ExpressionDesignScreenshot.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 10:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

File:ExpressionEncoderScreenshot.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:ExpressionEncoderScreenshot.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 10:56, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Unbekanntes Drachenfutter.jpeg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Unbekanntes Drachenfutter.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wer?Du?! (talk) 22:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

File:UnbestimmtesMottenviech.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:UnbestimmtesMottenviech.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wer?Du?! (talk) 23:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Medaille-sommerspiele-1936-berlin.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Medaille-sommerspiele-1936-berlin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 23:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

File:SilverFast DC Pro.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:SilverFast DC Pro.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:SilverFast HDR Box.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:SilverFast HDR Box.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:SilverFast PrinTao.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:SilverFast PrinTao.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Tebis V3.4.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Tebis V3.4.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 06:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Sf ai studio.png

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sf ai studio.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Codename Lisa (talk) 06:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Greifvogel2013.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Greifvogel2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:58, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Schaich-Zayid-Moschee innen.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Schaich-Zayid-Moschee innen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2.207.63.107 13:26, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Spülabwasseraufbereitung Schema.jpg

Hi Wdwd. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 09:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Homopolar Motor Large neutral.jpg

Hi Wdwd. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 09:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Erzberg10euro-RS.jpg

Hallo Walter, kennst du dich bei den Münzen und deren Urheberrecht aus. Ich kann da gar keinen Kommentar dazu geben. danke K@rl (talk) 09:55, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Euro-Münzen dürften kritisch sein, siehe Commons:Currency#Euro. Im Prinzip ist die landesspezifische Seite ein künstlerisches 3D-Objekt, d.h. Freigabe des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers wäre nötig - zusätzlich zum Fotografen seiner Lizenz. Die einheitliche EU-seite ist von Seiten der EU etwas "schwammig" (=unklar) freigegeben, vorallem was die Nachnutzung angeht. Da dürfte der Konsens der sein, den ich mich da auch anschliessen will: Im Zweifelsfall eher nein. Auf de.wp scheinen die Euro-Münzen eher toleriert zu werden, wenngleich mir nicht klar ist warum. Denn eine urheberrechtliche Ausnahme ist jedenfalls für mich nicht ersichtlich. Dieser Bereich dürfte ähnlich wie die bekannte Briefmarken-Problematik sein. Und ein eher weit gestrecktes fair-use (wie auf en.wp) gibt es auf de.wp nicht. Auf de.wp ist das fair-use auf spezielle Bereiche limitiert, wie bei PD-alt-100 und der SH einiger Logos. Letztere auch schon umstritten.
Mein Standpunkt: Ich verschiebe keine Abbildung von Euro-Münzen auf commons (ausser fehlerhafterweise) und vermeide es auch solche Bilder hochzuladen. Nur Abbildungen von Münzen die PD-old sind, wie diese sind meiner Meinung ok und auch ok für commons.--Wdwd (talk) 18:23, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
das heißt österreichische Münzen nein, deutsche ja? --K@rl (talk) 20:14, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Betreffend Euro-Münzen meiner Meinung ohne Freigabe vom Rechteinhaber/Künstler weder Abbildungen von de-münzen noch at-münzen. Ist aber nur meine persönliche Einschätzung die nicht passen muss.--Wdwd (talk) 20:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. (my edits in the ar.wiki are very limited at all)--Wdwd (talk) 12:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 05:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 02:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 21:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Münzen

Ich würde mir nicht soviel Arbeit machen und die Münzen schlicht mit schwarz füllen oder halt die Bilder löschen lassen. Da ist einer auf einer Mission - soll er doch seinen Willen haben. Die Trolle gewinnen auf Dauer sowieso. Man muß sich doch fragen, weshalb diese Knallchargen die Arbeit nicht selber erledigen. SInd doch alles Bildexperten hier. Oder etwa nicht? -- Smial (talk) 22:40, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, manche von den Bildern sind durchaus ganz gut - ware schade. Das Ausmaskieren ist nicht so das Problem. Ansich ist die Argumentation schon nachvollziehbar: Euro-Münzen abzubilden ist strenggenommen urheberrechtlich kritisch - ausserdem ist es als Skalierungshilfe/Größenvergleich auch nicht so besonders gut. (besser wäre da ein Massband/Millimeterpapier/etc... Zur Not auch Alltagsgegenstände ohne Schöpfungshöhe, wie z.B. ein Streichholz.--Wdwd (talk) 08:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Ich ärgere mich über die Arbeitsbeschaffungsmaßnahme für andere Mitarbeiter. Löschantragsknöpfe drücken ist natürlich einfacher. -- Smial (talk) 09:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

New URL for OgreBot's old version filemover

Hello. I've identified you as a user who has previously used OgreBot's old version filemover. Please note the new URL: toollabs:magog/oldver.php. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Faculty of Economics.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Faculty of Economics.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 19:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File:ShangriaLa.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ShangriaLa.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 19:46, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Briefmarken 1991NicaraguaCIMG2148.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Briefmarken 1991NicaraguaCIMG2148.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yellowcard (talk) 09:39, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Datei:Strohm Hufbeschlag Liane Maas.jpg

Dear Wdwd, could you cancel this picture please? The owner of the photo is not similat to the creator. Now the owner of the photo don't want to see it published here. Thank you for your effort and co-operation.--Horseexperts (talk) 15:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Horseexperts, nehme an es geht um diese Sache. Wie schon von von Hic et nunc auf de.wp dargestellt, schliesst die erteilte Lizenz auch die Nachbearbeitung mit ein. Die Originalversion bleibt dabei aber in der Versiongeschichte erhalten, siehe File:Strohm Hufbeschlag Liane Maas.jpg bzw. hier der direkte Link.--Wdwd (talk) 19:56, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Stamp Albert Einstein 2005br.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stamp Albert Einstein 2005br.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Robert Weemeyer (talk) 17:15, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

CommonsHelper

Du hast am 9.2.14 das Bild Heyerode 1.jpg mittels dem CommonsHelper auf Wikim.Comm. hochgeladen. Ich habe seit Ende Januar mehrfach versucht dieses Bild (aber auch andere) mittels des CommonsHelper+Tusc (als directupload) auf Commons hochzuladen. Es funktioniert aber nicht mehr. Und seit gestern komme ich nicht mehr auf die entsprechende Seite. Im letzten Jahr hatte ich noch mehrfach versch. Bilder auf diese Weise hochgeladen. Bin ich jetzt zu dusselig oder gibt es da einen Fehler oder eine Progammänderung? Weil ich über das Heyerode-Bild auf Dich gestoßen bin, frage ich mal hier, da ich nicht weiß wo ich sonst nachfragen kann.--79.214er (talk) 09:10, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Commonshelper bzw. die server wo er läuft haben mitunter Ausfälle - nach einiger Zeit funkt es dann wieder. Die Adresse vom commonshelper hat sich in den letzten Monaten geändert, aktuell ist http://tools.wmflabs.org/commonshelper/.--Wdwd (talk) 10:31, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
CommonsHelper hat heute wieder funktionert, trotzdem Danke.--79.214er (talk) 14:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Kanadakraniche.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kanadakraniche.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Brackenheim (talk) 21:27, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Batterie Lady (N).JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Batterie Lady (N).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Antemister (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

File:NSK Garda Sarajevo.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:NSK Garda Sarajevo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 23:04, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Filenamen

Genau das versuchte ich zu vermeiden das versuchte ich zu vermeiden: Sonderzeichen in Dateinamen. Das Datei ist jetzt ziemlich egal, aber für weitere dann bitte culvert oder dive_culvert in Betracht ziehen. --Itu (talk) 23:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Sonderzeichen im Dateinamen sind dank durchgehenden UTF technisch kein Problem (mehr). Siehe, zufällig gewählt, z.b. Dateinamen wie File:Герб бабаюртовского района.jpg Das Umbenennen von Dateinamen, die nicht englisch sind, auf englische Bezeichnungen ist auf commons explizit nicht erwünscht. Siehe bitte Commons:File_renaming, Punkt 2. "ue" statt "ü" ist im Deutschen hingegen ein Tippfehler, daher umbenannt.--Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Das Sonderzeichen kein Problem darstellen ist ein Gerücht und eine Idealisierung. N.B: es geht hier um beliebige externe Verwendung und nicht jegliche Software verdaut Sonderzeichen in jedem Fall, egal ob UTF8 oder nicht. Und natürlich ist ue kein Tippfehler sondern die von mir bewusst gewählte sonderzeichenvermeidende Transkription von ü, das kann nicht missverstanden worden sein.
Davon abgesehen halte ich das Beharren auf "nationalsprachlichen" Bezeichnungen für fragwürdig: Man reduziert zwar die Dominanz des Englischen, schränkt aber die Rezeptibilität für den Rest der Welt jeweils automatisch stark ein. Nicht wirklich sinnvoll für ein internationales Projekt wie commons. Die Sonderzeichenproblematik kommt da eben noch hinzu. gruss. --Itu (talk) 21:32, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Hast Du konkrete Beispiele, abseits MediaWiki, wo bei heutiger Software Umlaute in Dateinamen technische Probleme bereiten? Ausgenommen die Anzahl von Sonderzeichen die technisch ausgenommen sind (z.B. "*") In der MediaWiki-Software gibt es diese Probleme durchgehend nicht mehr (komplett UTF-tauglich, sogar das rechts-nach-links bei manchen Schriften wie im hebräischen funkt überraschend gut).
Commons ist dezidiert ein mehrsprachiges Projekt. Auch Dateinamen dürfen in jeder beliebigen Sprache gewählt werden. Es besteht bewusst auch keinerlei Pflicht extra eine englische Übersetzung mit angeben zu müssen - was jene Personen benachteiligen würde, die über keinerlei Kenntnisse in Englisch verfügen. Das mag in babylonisches Gewirr ausarten, offensichtlich ist das aber das kleinere Übel. Du kannst Dateinamen von Deinen Dateien natürlich in Englisch wählen, aber bitte verlange dies nicht von anderen.--Wdwd (talk) 15:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Radio wave absorbing foam 4.jpg

Hello. Thanks for your edit to the categories of this image. :-) However, I'm afraid that the photo isn't of an anechoic chamber - this was one wall of a lab at a radio observatory rather than being a complete chamber. As such, I've reverted your change. Perhaps it would be worth creating a category such as Category:Radio testing equipment for images like this? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:45, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Mike, thanks for your clarification. Would be Category:Electromagnetic compatibility okay?--Wdwd (talk) 21:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Interesting - maybe that's the right category for it. I've just not thought of it that way before. The aim of this sort of setup is more to test the properties of a radio receiver, to make sure it's stable, has good noise performance and is generally working properly before it gets mounted on a radio telescope. So that's not quite looking for electromagnetic interference, although that would be a part of it I guess. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
In my knowledge this type of absorbing foam is used mainly in electromagnetic interference test setups for different electronic equipment. I know it from anechoic chambers, like this one. As you say it could used in open structures too. Maybe there are some more applications. Thanks for the info, i added the category.--Wdwd (talk) 19:37, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Kenya Airways Boeing 777-2U8 (ER) 5Y-KQT Amsterdam.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kenya Airways Boeing 777-2U8 (ER) 5Y-KQT Amsterdam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 04:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

File:D.Firtash, was born on May 2, 1965 in Ukraine.jpg

Hallo Walter, auf dieses Foto hat ein Ukrainer vom OTRS Team eine URV Verletzung gestellt. Allerdings ist ein Fotograf und als Eigenes Werk definiert. Wo liegt da der Fehler. --gruß K@rl (talk) 09:04, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Karl, fehlende Quelle wurde eingetragen. Im OTRS findet sich dazu nichts, es gibt auch keine eingetragene OTRS-Ticketnummer. Das beste wäre, wenn Du direkt bei Ahonc nachfragst. Vermutlich ist die Quelle fraglich, auch das einzige Bild von dem Uploader, geringe Auflösung, keine EXIF -> Verdacht, dass das irgendwo im Web entnommen wurde.--Wdwd (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Nachtrag: Kurze Bildersuche ergabe eine copyvio. Bild hier mit höherer Auflösung. Habe gleich ein speedy-delete gestellt.--Wdwd (talk) 13:47, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Okay, danke für die Info. Ich werde das auch die Wiener Zeitung weitergeben. Wegen falscher Lizenzierung habe ich nämlcih schon angeschrieben ;-) --K@rl (talk) 15:36, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Kanada Reisen NvK.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kanada Reisen NvK.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ciaurlec (talk) 18:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Mikrofonfoto

Hallo Wdwd, bitte um Aufklärung, warum Sie im Foto des dynamischen Mikrofons (Sennheiser e845S, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dynamic-microphone-senn.jpg) das Firmenlogo wegretuschiert haben, während bei allen anderen Produktfotos auf http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikrofon Firmenlogo und Name sichtbar sind und genannt werden. Falls keine triftigen Gründe vorliegen, bitte die Markenneutralität von Wikipedia respektieren und entweder Originalfoto wiederherstellen, oder aber alle anderen Produktfotos auch retuschieren. Falls für andere Wikipedia-Artikel ein herstellerneutrales Foto benötigt wird, bitte die retuschierte Version als neues Foto anlegen und dieses in die entspr. Artikel einbinden. Dankeschön. --R. Jacques 10:19, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi R. Jacques, primär entfernt weil gewisse dominate Darstellung/Präsentation des Logos, Vermeidung von sowas wie "Product Placement". Die Herstellerbezeichnung scheint, für interessierte Personen die es genauer wissen wollen, nach wie vor in der Dateibeschreibung auf, nach dem Anklicken der Datei.
Diese konkrete Entfernung hat nichts mit irgendwelchen anderen Fotos zu tun und ist auch nicht an irgendeine Bedingung zur zeitnahen Bearbeiter anderer Bilddateien gebunden. Hinweis: Die Lizenz unter der der Urheber dieser Aufnahme gestellt hat, erlaubt explizit die Nachbearbeitung, unter den in der Lizenz genannten Bedingungen, die erfüllt sind. Ein Anrecht auf ein bestimmte "Originaldarstellung" gibt es in diesem Bezug bzw. im Rahmen dieser Lizenz nicht.
Da es die selbe Aufnahme ist wurde keine neue Datei/neuer Dateiname angelegt, dafür gibt es die Versionsgeschichte ("History"). Die Originalaufnahme bleibt in dieser Versionsgeschichte erhalten, was auch in Übereinstimmung mit der Bildlizenz ist. Neuer Dateiname wäre auf alle Fälle dann angebracht, wenn es eine unabhängige und neu erstellte Aufnahme wäre.--Wdwd (talk) 12:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Umsiedlungstreck Bessarabien.jpg

Hallo! I have got a message from you concerning this file. I would like to explain the situation. The file illustrates Bessarabian Germans, who lived in Southern Ukraine before IIWWW. Therefore the date of the image before 1940. I believe the lycence might eb changed to PD-old. What do you think. This file was originaly uploaded to German wikipedia, where you also marked it. The duplicated file might be deleted as I understand. But it must be saved in wikimedia. This is old image. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 20:20, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, on the german wikipedia there is no author information for this file too. Date is also unknown - let's assume something between 1930 .. 1940? Do you think this photo was taken before 1930? And there is no OTRS validation that the original author agreed to license the file under the GFDL license. The uploader (de:user:Axel Hindemith) will get a notification message. Maybe he can provide more info about this issue.--Wdwd (talk) 20:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The picture made not later than 1940 (I have corrected it in the file discription). That time Bessarabia was a part of Romania, therefore it might be lycenced as PD-Romania. It looks like correct. Do you agree? --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Was this picture first published more than 70 years ago in Romania? I don't know. We need reputable source of this picture. If it was not published for more than 70 yrs in romania it is not eligible for PD-Romania.--Wdwd (talk) 20:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes, Bessarabia was a part of Romania, see here: Bessarabia#Part_of_the_Soviet_Union. Bessarabia Germans were deported after WWII, so the picture was made before the war. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 08:03, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
It is a fact, that Bessarabia was a part of Romania. That is not in doubt. The question is: It is not sure, that this photo was first published or released for more than 70 years in romania to be eligible for PD-Romania. We have no evidence about the source.--Wdwd (talk) 10:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Please also pay attantion to these two files: File:Bess deutsche Umsiedler Abfahrt Klöstitz 1940.jpg and File:Viehherde Bessarabien.jpg. I have changed the lycence, but now I am not sure I am right. If you chack the Category:Bessarabia Germans, you'll find several similar images from Bundesarchiv. I donot know, is it possible to check the archive from presence of the mentioned ("unlycenced") photographs? Thank You! --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:31, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Rita kuczynski bild klein.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rita kuczynski bild klein.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mehlauge (talk) 14:48, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Sprechbrief der Feldpost.jpg

hallo walter, wie geht es dem ticket zu dieser bilddatei? ich frage deswegen, weil ich sie hochgeladen und das kommunikationsmuseum gedrängt habe, die CC-einwilligung an permissions@... zu schicken. das müsste schon vor zwei wochen passiert sein.

es soll noch mindestens ein weiteres foto folgen, welches ich von dem museum habe. ich brauche aber sicherheit, dass der prozess sauber läuft, bevor ich mir und den archivaren die arbeit aufhalse. weil ich im OTRS-system nicht angemeldet bin (und auch nicht sein will), muss ich Dich auf diesem weg kontaktieren. Du warst zuletzt an der datei tätig. danke, Maximilian (talk) 20:54, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Bei File:Sprechbrief der Feldpost.jpg erfolgte die Freigabe und ist entsprechend eingetragen. Wenn Du mir den Dateinamen der zweiten Datei mitteilst, kann ich nachschauen.--Wdwd (talk) 07:13, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

mir war nicht klar, dass die oben genannte feldpost schon fertig abgehakt war, denn OTRS klingt für mich (in sachen bildrechten nicht vielwissenden) nach einem laufenden verfahren. habe gerade ein neues bild aus demselben bestand hochgeladen; die freigabe müsste heute oder morgen bei Euch eintrudeln: File:Sprechbrief Telekommunikationsmuseum.jpg. danke, Maximilian (talk) 11:41, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

so, walter, die freigabe ging jetzt vom kommunikationsmuseum an permissions@ ab. grüße, Maximilian (talk) 08:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Amt-1.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Amt-1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kopiersperre (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:36, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Hugo wolf SG.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hugo wolf SG.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 12:31, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Adil chihi.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Adil chihi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Commerzbank-Zentrale 2004-11-28b.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Commerzbank-Zentrale 2004-11-28b.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pedelecs (talk) 17:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Daniel3.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daniel3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jmabel ! talk 03:13, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Hystkurktr.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hystkurktr.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 20:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Russkugel.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Russkugel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 08:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

File:GRAPHEN STRUKTUR.PNG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GRAPHEN STRUKTUR.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 16:19, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Reedrelais DIL (smial).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Reedrelais DIL (smial).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smial (talk) 22:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Halbleiterrelais (smial).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Halbleiterrelais (smial).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Smial (talk) 22:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Halbleiterrelais (smial).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Halbleiterrelais (smial).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 13:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

BOT

I don't think that it makes sense that only the BOT's list contains the moved objects like File:Geode-Tongrube-Bergstrasse(1972).jpg, be it that there exists a reference to the original author.--Grunswiki (talk) 13:01, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Verstehe leider nicht genau, was Du meinst. Die Autor-Info wurde 1:1 und ident zu den Vorgaben von de.wp übertragen. Extra nun nochmal kontrolliert, das ist ident. Einzig die Koordinaten-Info (Vorlage/Template im Text) wurde als eigene Vorlage übertragen, da ich beim Transfer keine de.wp Vorlagen 1:1 übertrage. Vorlagen von de.wp haben meist hier keine direkte Entsprechung sondern müssen übersetzt werden. Deswegen entferne ich alles was mit {{...}} in den Textfeldern vom Information eingeschlossen ist. Das fehlende Wort "Tongrube", was diesen Vorgang bei diesem Transfer zum Opfer gefallen ist, wurde dankenswerterweise manuell korrigiert. Das wäre die einzige kleine Unpässlichkeit, die ich bei diesem Transfer erkennen kann.--Wdwd (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Es wäre doch hilfreich, wenn das Objekt auch in meiner Spezialseite für alle hochgeladenen Dateien erschiene.--Grunswiki (talk) 19:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Das ist mir nicht möglich, da ich nicht unter Deinem Benutzerkonto und unter Deinem Namen Daten hochladen kann. In diesem Fall müsstes Du die Datei selbst hochladen bzw. selbst entsprechende Tools wie den Commonshelper steuern, die dann unter Deinem Konto und Deinen Namen via OAuth den Transfer durchführen.--Wdwd (talk) 19:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Uli 50 Feb 1991 Diedersdorf 1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Uli 50 Feb 1991 Diedersdorf 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tine (talk) 17:39, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Karl Weinbrenner

Hallo Wdwd, was haben diese Warnungen in der Category:Karl Weinbrenner zu bedeuten. Mir ist das nicht wirklich klar, was da gemeint ist. --danke und gruß K@rl (talk) 20:43, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Lade bitte keine Fotos die Werke von Karl Weinbrenner zeigen hier hoch und wo keine weiteren Ausnahmen wie Panoramafreiheit greift: Die Schutzfirst von den 70 Jahren nach Todesjahr gelten in diesem Fall nicht (siehe commons:URAA) Auf de.wp sind diese Fotos geduldet, da der Künstler vor mehr als 70 Jhares verstorben ist.--Wdwd (talk) 10:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
Das ist ja meine Frage: Wieso greift da nicht die Panoramafreiheit, wie bei File:Elisabethkirche Mistelbach 0226.jpg und das Foto ist nur geduldet. Das ist doch vom einzelnen Land und nicht vom Künstler abhängig. --gruß K@rl (talk) 13:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Verstehe Deine Frage nicht ganz. Bei dem von Dir erwähnten Foto fällt das dargestellte Werk (Kirche) unter die Panoramafreiheit -> URAA hat keine Bedeutung, in diesem Fall. Ein Werk, z.B. Skulptur von diesem Künstler, aufgenommen in einen Innenraum, ist aber auf commons nicht okay. Obwohl der Künstler seit mehr als 70 Jahren verstorben ist. Weil hier auf commons (zusätzlich) US-Recht und darin diese erwähnte URAA-"Richtlinie" gilt. Wie geschrieben, auf de.wp wäre solche eine Aufnahme punkto gezeigten Werk geduldet - da auch de.wp von der WMF betrieben wird und ansich US-Recht unterliegt, daher meine Formulierung mit "geduldet". Schlafende Hunde soll man nicht wecken--Wdwd (talk) 18:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Ja aber Karl Weinbrenner war ein Architekt und Baumeister, da gibt es keine Kunstwerke die in irgendetwas drin stehen sondern alle österreichischen, auch tschechischen wo eben die Panormaafreiheit gilt auf Dauer stehen egal wie lange er tot ist. Da gilt doch auf Commons trotzdem das österreichische Recht. Da dürfte ein Foto wie File:Karl Renner-Büste von Alfred Hrdlicka Wien2008.jpg auch nicht da sein, wo Hrdlicka erst 2009 gestorben ist. --K@rl (talk) 09:27, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Wenn die Panormaafreiheit gilt, dürfen Aufnahmen von Kunstobjekten ohne Freigabe dieses Künstlers auch auf commons hochgeladen werden. Auf commons gilt jedenfalls zusätzlich US-Recht, somit die Einschränkungen zufolge URAA. Ob Panoramafreiheit auch für Kunstobjekte (nicht Gebäude) im öffentlichen Raum nach US-Recht anzuwenden ist, wenn diese Objekte nicht den US sondern wie in diesem Fall irgendwo in AT stehen, ist mal fraglicher Graubereich. Für File:Karl Renner-Büste von Alfred Hrdlicka Wien2008.jpg gilt in Österreich die Panoramafreiheit.--Wdwd (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
In Ö ist mir schon klar, aber wenn es nach US nicht erlaubt wäre, hätte Wiki Loves Public Art gar nicht stattfinden dürfen ;-) --K@rl (talk) 12:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


--  Gazebo (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

File:HaraldPsaridis13.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:HaraldPsaridis13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tine (talk) 10:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

File:RainerKuhlen0105.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:RainerKuhlen0105.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jbergner (talk) 11:48, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Kuki.jpeg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kuki.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Tine (talk) 07:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Deutz Motor.jpg

Template:Image permission/layout Krd 08:24, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Honscheid Wegkreuz.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Wilkomsfeld-Panorama.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Ruppichteroth Honscheid.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Leoboudv ([[User talk:Leoboudv|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:51, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Wall e und Eve.jpg

Template:Autotranslate ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 00:07, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Drift.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Gretarsson ([[User talk:Gretarsson|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:34, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Lol1.gif

Template:AutotranslateUser: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 16:55, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:26, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Ogrebot new uploads

Hello. I just happened to be looking around and noticed you were having issues with OgreBot. OgreBot cannot upload to a non-existent page, but if you create the file page first, even without any upload history, OgreBot can transfer the files afterward. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Magog the Ogre, thank you for the info. This was a minor fault on my side.--Wdwd ([[User talk:Wdwd#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:24, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Felixweil.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Rosario Berganza 02:35, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:MitSpaghetti.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Rosario Berganza 02:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Brackenheim ([[User talk:Brackenheim|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Imec-logo.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Nolispanmo 15:02, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Milena Rampoldi.jpeg

Template:Autotranslate Martin Sg. ([[User talk:Martin Sg.|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 22:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 22:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Geagea ([[User talk:Geagea|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Susanne Gaschke.jpeg

Template:Autotranslate Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Lettermerk-goud.svg

Template:Autotranslate Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 14:11, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Boyland-Sims-Oxidation-Mechanismus.png

Template:Autotranslate Kopiersperre ([[User talk:Kopiersperre|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:50, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

File:San Anastasia.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Oursana ([[User talk:Oursana|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:00, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Martinwodrich.jpg

Template:Autotranslate    FDMS  4    21:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Perdita Klimeck.jpg

Template:Autotranslate WolfgangRieger ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Kai Tracid 2002.jpg

Template:Autotranslate --Mdann52talk to me! 15:53, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Elise Kutscherra DeNys 01a.jpg

Template:Autotranslate 95.90.51.227 18:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Benutzer-BRainY.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 06:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Holger schneider.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 06:30, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Jpr65.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 06:41, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Martinmewes.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 06:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Shopping.JPG

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 07:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Slides2.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 07:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Synapsecms mlogo.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 07:33, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ulrike Wiki.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 07:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Wohlwollen und Dankbarkeit.png

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 07:50, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:XIIIR.jpg

Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 07:51, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Heidelberg Südstadt, Neckartalbahn und Rheintalbahn BILD04267.JPG

Template:Autotranslate Koffeeinist ([[User talk:Koffeeinist|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:57, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Logo Floridsdorfer AC.png

Template:Autotranslate //  Gikü  said  done  Thursday, 27 November 2014 20:48 (UTC) 20:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 23:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Nierenstein.jpg

Template:Autotranslate 84.61.160.191 09:18, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Christian Reimeir - Innsbruck - 2014.png

Template:Autotranslate WolfgangRieger ([[User talk:WolfgangRieger|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:15, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Bardowick-Bus.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Emha ([[User talk:Emha|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Logo Wiener Lokalbahnen.svg

Template:Autotranslate Josve05a ([[User talk:Josve05a|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Beeline.svg

Template:Autotranslate kashmiri 18:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)