User talk:Whaledad

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Whaledad!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Whaledad!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Houston_CowParade_2001-001.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Houston_CowParade_2001-001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

 Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:26, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

[1] -- Mdd (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Vraag[edit]

Hoi Whaledad, je zult wellicht al gezien hebben dat ik het niet met de wijziging hier eens ben. Maar nu heb ik een vraag. Zelfs als zou het alleen keramiek zijn, hoe kom je erbij dat dat weergegeven moet worden zoals jij dat hebt gedaan? Neem bijvoorbeeld een foto van de Delfse poort van Geraldus, zie hier. daar zet hij toch ook niet meer:

  • Source = Sculpture by Cor Kraat
  • Author = Sculpture by Cor Kraat (Picture by: Gerardus)

Het komt op mij over, dat ik het bij de Shark Art Gallery foto op de reguliere wijze heb weergegeven. Maar de opvattingen zijn hier ook aan verandering onderhevig. Hebben Gerardus en ik het niet juist gedaan? -- Mdd (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Mdd, prettig om op normale toon te kunnen communiceren. Ja, ik denk dat zowel jij als Gerardus het verkeerd hebben. De significantie (het kunstobject) in beide gevallen is niet de foto, maar het object dat is gefotografeerd. Dus "the source" is het oorspronkelijke kunstwerk. De "author" is de kunstenaar die het oorspronkelijke object heeft gemaakt (of ontworpen, als het gaat om architectuur, bijv.). De secundaire author is de fotograaf, die in het geval van 3D objecten een nieuw kunstwerk "bovenop" het oorspronkelijke maakt. Vandaar mijn nevenplaatsing van "picture by". Dit is mijn begrip, maar ik ben niet het allesbepalende orakel voor Wiki in deze. We kunnen best op zoek gaan naar een specialist die ons uit de brand kan helpen. Whaledad (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Kun je die ad-hominem argumenten achterwege laten? Hierom zal ik de discussie tot een minimum beperken. Hier heb ik advies gevraagd omtrent bovenstaande. -- Mdd (talk) 20:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
De foto is het werk van de fotograaf, die genoemd moet worden. Op Commons wordt dan de bron aangegeven met {{own}}. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Deze bewerking lijkt me ook omstreden gezien deze discussie. Zou je daar niet gewoon nog even mee wachten? -- Mdd (talk) 20:35, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Hoi Whaledad, ik heb een mail gestuurd naar Barbara Nanning. Verder heb ik hier nog een vraag. Mvg. -- Mdd (talk) 21:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

RfD pictures by Reginaldduckworth[edit]

(Moved from higher location on Talk Page) All of the suggestions for deleting photographs posted by Reginaldduckworth are without merit. All photographs are licensed for usage in any and all media in perpetuity or they are owned by Reginaldduckworth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reginaldduckworth (talk • contribs)

  • For the pictures RfD-ed this seems unlikely. Whaledad (talk) 21:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Blessed Mary of the Divine Heart files are in Public Domain[edit]

Schwestern vom Guten Hirten - Munster, Westfalen (Congregation of Sisters of the Good Shepherd) published a book with all of these photographs called Maria Droste zu Vischering to promote her canonization cause and the pictures are referenced as in PD because because Blessed Sister Mary of the Divine Heart lived between September 8, 1863, and June 8, 1899, and in United States the copyright ceases after 100 years since the death of its author (70 years in other countries). Also numerous prints are using these images of the Blessed Maria Droste zu Vischering for public devotion of the followers of the Catholic Church, so these files should not be deleted. 84.90.94.99 18:52, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

In USA, the copyright expires 95 years after the work was first published, not 100 years after the death of the author. When was the book published? --Stefan4 (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Also: unless these are self-portraits, the date that the subject died is irrelevant, but the date the photographer died is crucial. Whaledad (talk) 19:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

As you can see here and here, all pictures of Blessed Mary of the Divine Heart are placed in Public Domain by the Congregation of Sisters of the Good Shepherd. Several articles on internet use these portraits (see an example here and another here). Please, do not delete the images - all of them are important to illustrate her life on WP. 84.90.94.99 22:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)