User talk:WhiteNight7/1
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
(좌파/권위) | 
289 | 
| 
| 
wpja실망
Contents |
[edit] 쿠도군님?
일단 After라고 잘못 쓰신 부분은 제가 다시 올릴테니까, 계속 새 사진 올리고 계세요. -- iTurtle 06:00, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Namdaemun Fire-4.PNG
Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/−
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 06:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Namdaemun-Fire-17.jpg
Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/−
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 07:30, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:1412kid-conan.png
Afrikaans | العربية | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(繁體) | +/−
안녕하세요, WhiteNight7/1!
위키미디어 커먼스에 그림을 올려주어서 감사합니다. 커먼스에 올리는 그림은 위키미디어 프로젝트의 모든 사용자들에게 유용해야만 한다는 점을 유의해 주세요. 다른 사람들이 그림을 잘 발견할 수 있어야만 유용하게 사용될 수 있습니다.
다른 사용자들이 잘 발견할 수 있기 위해서는, 그림이 적합한 분류나 토픽란이나 갤러리나 또는 그 모두에 중복되어 링크되어 있어야만 합니다.
어떤 분류가 적합한 분류인지는 CommonSense가 도움을 줄 수 있을 것입니다. 또한, 당신이 올렸던 모든 그림에 대해서는 갤러리를 사용하시면 쉽게 찾을 수 있습니다.
위키미디어 커먼스에는 제대로 분류되지 않고 방치된 수많은 그림들이 있습니다. 혹시 그런 그림들을 발견하시면, 제대로 된 분류를 좀 잡아주세요! 감사합니다. Ficell 04:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Wii.svg
Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/−
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 14:00, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Dokdo 20080628-panorama.jpg
| Image deletion warning | Image:Dokdo 20080628-panorama.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
--shizhao (talk) 02:20, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:EBS Logo.svg
Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/−
There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.
This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 08:07, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Nuvola apps kalzium.svg
The author of SVG version must relicense that picture, not anyone else. You put the right license template, but you have no right to do so :) Regards, A.J. (talk) 08:37, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 진보신당 로고에 관해
위키미디어에 올리신 로고를 보니 퍼블릭 도메인 규정을 적용하셨던데, 과연 그 규정이 이 이미지의 저작권을 온전히 설명할 수 있을지 의문입니다.
