User talk:Wikibob

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Please tell me the difference between Image:Lang en.png and Image:Uk flag 300.png. Thuresson 03:30, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Image:Europe_blank_map.png[edit]

Kindly correct it, shoudl you feel Varidon should be mentioned. This map is made using, and vastly simplyfying, one of those provided by Apple with its Claris Impact programme's library, as free use (see e.g. http://esce.net). wiki-vr 17:35, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Re: I have a question concerning Image:Europe North-European countries map.png. Are you claiming you created the original http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Europe_blank_map.png? That link just refers back to the commons image, there is no upload information on it. Has it been renamed or moved somewhere? Or are you using the PD tag to mean you edited an existing image? If so what is the original source of the image you used? Don't get me wrong but the style of that map looks like that those en:User:Varidon used to upload in 2003 as GFDL. Thanks, -Wikibob 01:47, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

It's free to use,-) but I am not a lawyer, not say a US one:-( wiki-vr 08:59, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Re: Hi again, thanks for replying to my query on the above map, but your answer is unclear to me and I cannot determine whether the source is PD, GFDL or maybe copyrighted. You refer to http://esce.net but this has a background map which has less detail. You mention the source map is from "Claris Impact programme's library, as free use", do you mean Claris (now Appleworks I guess) have released the map you used into the public domain? I've added an incomplete license info tag to the image in the meantime. -Wikibob 14:01, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

Image:Piazza st. peters rome 1909.jpg[edit]

You tagged this image I uploaded with {{Incomplete license}}. – Many web site owners (including museums) will claim that they own public domain stuff, and we cannot accept their word for it. We definitely need more detailed information about copyright regulations in various countries. There are many interesting old photographs with expired copyrights, and we need a way to determine which ones we can use. – Do you have any suggestions how we proceed with Image:Piazza st. peters rome 1909.jpg? I am inclined to move the discussion to the picture's talk page and to remove the incomplete license tag. Thoughts? Rl 09:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

I've copied this to Image talk:Piazza st. peters rome 1909.jpg and replied there.-Wikibob 18:21, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image:Woodburn fractal.jpg[edit]

Wikibob,

Thank you for taking what you saw as appropriate action. Your hard work makes sure that Wikipedia retains its integrity. Unfortunately I neglected to add the appropriate permission information with the photo. Could you please advise how I can communicate this and what is the appropriate license. Please see this document: http://dheera.net/jason/test/convo.jpg

Kind regards, Jason7825 21:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

I have replied on your Talk page. -Wikibob 01:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Kosovo Karten[edit]

Hallo bob,
rein rechtlich gesehen ist das Kosovo teil Serbiens deshalb haben wir Serbien in der karte immer in grau dergestalt, genauso wie es hier beispielsweise der Fall ist (NRW in Deutschland). Germany Laender Nordrhein-Westfalen.png
Güße aus Dortmund--Rokerismoravee (talk) 13:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Commons Scope - Pdf and Djvu files[edit]

I have added some text dealing with these based on the discussion on the talk page. Users are by no means unanimous about which files should be allowed, and I have tried to follow the majority opinion. Thus, the suggestion is that if a Pdf or Djvu file is educationally useful even to a single other Wiki it should be kept. Would you like to comment before this page goes live? Please do so at the bottom of the talk page. Regards, --MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

RE:no source tags correct?[edit]

Wikibob, as for Image:Parseval PL 18 1913-05-03.jpg you're right and I have restored the image, sorry for any inconvenience. As for the images of Eduardotrinchera (talk · contribs), you can see his talk page full of copyvio warnings. He has 87 deleted edits all of them because uploading copyright violations. Every single image he upload, he sources at "own work" and license it under GFDL. Take a look at: Image:Escudo de huánuco.jpg, Image:Ciudad de Huánuco.jpg (low-resolution and no exif data), Image:AvenueJavierPrado.jpg (exif data of a Sony Cibershot), Image:Arequipacity.JPG (low-res, no exif data), Image:Lima expressway.jpg (low-res, no exif data), and so on. His deleted contribs has exif data with multiple cameras, Sony Cibershot, Nikon, Panasonic, etc. I don't think this images worth a DR, and I placed the no source tags just to wait 7 days for user clarification before deletion. Cheers, KveD (talk) 20:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


Image:Map_India.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Map_India.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jelahi (talk) 09:51, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


Image:Map_India_Bhopal.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Map_India_Bhopal.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jelahi (talk) 09:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Bradlerovy boudy[edit]

Frankly I have no information concerning author of this postcard. Apparently the name given is publishers. Thanks for a hint concerning PD-Old. I changed the template to Anonymous-EU. Probably should change all PD-Old to Anonymous-EU as well. Most of my postcards uploaded to commons belong to that category. Jojo (talk) 08:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token d10b3b22e9f6642e1a00974e0f9b8af0[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Image:SOHO instruments pnggray 300.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:SOHO instruments pnggray 300.png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-The RedBurn (talk) 10:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

I have requested undeletion at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current_requests#Image:SOHO instruments pnggray 300.png. -Wikibob (talk) 18:47, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Pictogram voting comment.svg update I posted this reply from the SOHO webmaster at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current_requests#Image:SOHO instruments pnggray 300.png, and effectively retracted my undeletion request. -Wikibob (talk) 09:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

OTRS check[edit]

The author of this work sent an OTRS permission authorization email some time ago:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Image:Matis-Becchete.jpg

The OTRS permission doesn't seem to have been applied. Would you be able to check the OTRS inbox?

If it needs to be sent again, I can get the author to send it. Please let me know.

Kind regards, Jason7825 (talk) 04:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Category scheme France[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Category scheme France has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zolo (talk) 12:13, 20 May 2012 (UTC)