User talk:Xauxa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Archives[edit]

User talk:Xauxa/Archive-2007

2008 ...[edit]

Imágenes[edit]

Hola.

Me podrías decir a que pueblo pertenecen esta imagen y las demás de la serie.

Muchas gracias. Un saludo.--FCPB (talk) 15:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Las imagenes son de "Campo del Agua", (nort-oeste de Aira da Pedra). Villafranca del Bierzo. El Bierzo, Spain. (Info now also given in the description to the fotos.) Saludos Xauxa (talk) 22:30, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Gracias, conozco Campo del Agua, pero quería asegurarme. Un saludo.--FCPB (talk) 23:05, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Sö 301 Ågesta bro alternative view.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Done. Xauxa (talk) 20:38, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Visingso Tempelgarden Statue.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visingso Tempelgarden Statue.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Re: Ministerios[edit]

Hola,

Yo hice la foto desde el puente de la autopista M-30, es decir, desde aquí. Supongo que al estar tan lejos del Ministerio no hay ningún problema. Pero parece ser que existen las llamadas zonas de seguridad alrededor de algunos edificios oficiales, tanto civiles como militares. Por ejemplo, hace dos años yo estaba fotografiando el Cuartel General del Ejército del Aire (Madrid), y un policía me dijo que no podía hacerlo, ya que estaba dentro de la zona de seguridad. He encontrado esta información en Internet sobre la prohibición de hacer fotografías, por si te interesa.

Pero nosotros hemos tenido suerte. Si estuviéramos en Londres podría haber sido peor :).

Saludos.

--Zaqarbal (talk) 11:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Hola Luis,
Gracias por tu respuesta. He leido el articulo, varios incidentes contados también han pasado a mí. Creo que pasé el limite de seguridad por el ministerio, pero son un poco susceptibles, pienso. (Excellente foto de la Torre Picasso de Madrid en el articulo!) Saludos –Xauxa (talk) 19:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Linkoping Domkyrka GrotesqueFigures02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Linkoping Domkyrka GrotesqueFigures02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nuevos Ministerios-Arcada01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nuevos Ministerios-Arcada01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Madrid Paseo de Castellana.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Madrid Paseo de Castellana.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-Huerto medieval.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:37, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view3.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view6.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:55, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view5.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


File:Madrid Juan Pablo II-view4.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Love your pics[edit]

Just wanted to say: I love your pics. --George (talk) 11:44, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Thankyou very much for saying so. This year so far, I have been lucky to receive 4 QI-tags, which is a great encouragment. Things like that together with cheers from users like you make me happy, thanks. --Xauxa (talk) 22:50, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bjursaas kyrka organ balcony.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bjursaas kyrka organ balcony.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hammerdal kyrka view2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammerdal kyrka view2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Askeby church pieta04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Askeby church pieta04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Froso kyrka Jungfru Maria.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Froso kyrka Jungfru Maria.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Xauxa!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, missed - as sometimes happens - my ordinary routine! --Xauxa (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bilbao Euskotran 404.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bilbao Euskotran 404.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thank you! --Xauxa (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Saintes Eglise Saint Eutrope-Church window01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saintes Eglise Saint Eutrope-Church window01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thank you!! --Xauxa (talk) 21:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Authorization for use of image[edit]

Hi, Xauxa!

The picture of St. Teresa of Avila is wonderful! We are publishing a book about one of the parts of the Complete Works of St. Teresa, called "Foundations." We would like your permission to use this image on the cover. Please could you send us in a better resolution? Thank you so much!! paula@loyola.com.br

I am sorry to say that there is no higher resolution of that image (I suppose you mean the statue). It was taken in times when I had to spare my memory cards. When I pass Ávila I can take it oncemore, but I have no such journey planned for in the nearest future, so of course it will be too late for you. --Xauxa (talk) 23:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
(answer also sent to e-mail address above)

File:Hita-solar watch.jpg[edit]

English word is "sundial"... AnonMoos (talk) 02:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, of course. Thanks for correcting the description text. --Xauxa (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 10.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 09.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 08.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 07.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 06.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:22, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 05.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 04.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 03.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


File:Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 02.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:24, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Files "Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 02.jpg" to "Rosinos-Sanctuary Virgen del Campo 10.jpg" have now been licensed. Sigh! --Xauxa (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sepulveda Iglesia y Monasterio de San Frutos-2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sepulveda Iglesia y Monasterio de San Frutos-2012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wiki loves monuments[edit]

Hej! Jag ser att du har laddat upp en del bilder som skulle kunna vara med i Wiki Loves Monuments tävlingen. Lägg gärna till mallen {{wikilovesmonuments|se}} på de bilderna där du kan byta ut se mot landskoden för de bilderna som inte är svenska. Mvh Ainali (talk) 10:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Jo, det verkade lite jobbigt bara, måste man kolla emot någon lista eller så, eller räcker det med att fota ett monument och lägga dit mallen? :) Xauxa (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Inte så lätt att lägga till i efterhand, men det gick. (Y:et i Timrå) Xauxa (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2012 (UTC) redrawn, not listed Xauxa (talk) 10:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seskaro Aludden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seskaro Aludden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Solna_Brick_wall_4-skifts_munkforband.jpg[edit]

Hello Xauxa, I wonder if you could tell me which building you were taking a picture of here? I would like to know so I can put the pic onto on the English WP Brickwork page, and be exact about its identity. It's a nice pic; well done!
Jonathanriley (talk) 21:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Update:
Well there you go -- your photo is on there now:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brickwork#Monk_bond

... but it would be much nicer if I could mention the building to which it belongs. If you are worried that the building is a private house, then you could just say so -- that would be no problem for me at all! Then I could edit the article to say 'A private building, St Martins Road, etc. etc.'

Anyhow, thanks for uploading the pic to the WM Commons, its a great pic. :)
Jonathanriley (talk) 16:07, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello Jonathan
I have put coordinates in the description of the picture. In google-maps you can spot this row/file of small private houses, built in English style. The picture was taken five years ago, but maybee it was the second house on left handside. At least I now could see some grapes growing, looking through the fence (in street-view). Very nice looking houses. An interesting article you have done, I have to read it more closely. Xauxa (talk) 10:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Why don´t you consider to use this File:Arvika 10skift munkforband.jpg, instead of the present one from Arvika. It will show the way the corners are made, and it is the same building, Former Post Office. The picture you have chosen gives the texture, but I perhaps should not have made it so tilted. Theres a cropped version too, but not sharp. Xauxa (talk) 10:55, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the message Xauxa. I do like the alternate pic you've linked, and i take your point about the highlighting of the quoins there. However, the pic that's in the WP page at the moment is nice for conveying those great diagonals swishing down the building, which are obviously differently derived diagonals from those of the New Malden Library building in the pic just above. The corner shot just doesn't get these diagonals at all.
These are all super pics though. Thanks again Xauxa, great work!
Jonathanriley (talk) 23:52, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Quite interesting, alls those bonds. The 10-layers monk bond is not so easy to find, at least not in such great area as is shown in the Former Post Office, Arvika. However, if I get close to one, I will take a better picture. Xauxa (talk) 11:07, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Timra Y-et.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timra Y-et.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Xauxa,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 13:50, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Iglesia de San Juan en El Bierzo[edit]

He notado que has vinculado las fotos de la iglesia de San Juan de Fiz con el municipio de Corullón, sin embargo está en el de Villafranca del Bierzo, justo en el límite con Corullón, pero en Villafranca. Sería recomendable cambiar el nombre a las fotos para evitar confusiones. Si así lo quieres puedo encargarme de ello. --DPC (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Vale, sí me puedes ayudar con eso, te agradesco! Gracias por notificarme. Xauxa (talk) 22:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)



català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Xauxa,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,
the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Wiki Loves Public Art logo
Message delivered by odderBot on 14:28, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Brownie2 overview3.jpg[edit]

Could you possibly supply the dimensions for this on the desciption page or on the image itself (ruler, hand etc...): Brownie2 overview3.jpg? Soerfm (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

The camera was loaded with roll film, 9 x 12 cm. This will give you a hint of the measures. Unfortunately the camera is stored away in some archive box, not sufficiently localizated yet, I will fulfill the measurements in due course. (a intelligent guess would be around 12x15x19 cm. --Xauxa (talk) 21:59, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Gracias! ;-) Besserwissern (talk) 08:24, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you, I like that! --Xauxa (talk) 21:44, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Permission to Use Image[edit]

Hello Xauxa.

Thank you for sharing your great photos on Wikimedia Commons! I am contributing to a academic book to be published by the University of Arizona Press, and I would like to use your photo of the shicra at Caral-Supe in my chapter (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PeruCaral22.jpg).

Can I have permissions to use the photo, and the language you would like me to use for the correct attribution? If it is more convenient, you can reply directly to my email address: youngwolfeh@yahoo.com

Many thanks!

Halona Young-Wolfe MA Binghamton University

I have responded directly to the given e-mail addres.--Xauxa (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2014 (UTC)