User talk:Xauxa/Archive-2007

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Hola Xauxa, perdón por la tardanza en contestar, pero a veces tardo en entrar aquí. Siento haber quitado las imágenes de esa categoría, pensé que estaban duplicadas simplemente. Con respecto a la categoría "church" no la encuentro, si me pasas un enlace a la página podemos mirar si es redundante o no. Un saludo --Anna 23:48, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hola, tienes razón, esa página "Church" es algo redundante e innecesaria si ya está la Categoría Churches, pero mejor dejemos que opine más gente sobre el tema, ¿no?. En cuanto a categorizar las páginas en lugar de las imágenes, estoy de acuerdo, yo hago eso también, porque sino las imágenes aparecen dos veces y es un lío. Un saludo --Anna 00:05, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Recategorization of Church pages[edit]

Xauxa, I have replied to your comments at User_talk:Kevyn.

Kevyn 01:50, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Untagged images[edit]

Hey there, image:Sjogestakyrkan nave1.jpg and Image:GustafVasa_ColumnTop.jpg are both missing licence tags, It would be good if you could add what licence you want them to be under, else they may have to be deleted. Thanks, Joolz 02:16, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

Har ändrat lite på[edit]

Hej, jag ville bara meddela dig att jag ändrat lite på Image:Solna kyrka view1.jpg genom att beskära den och göra den ljusare, på ett sätt jag tycker ser bättre ut på thumbnails. Om detta inte behagar dig, kan du använda "rev"-funktionen på bildens uppladdningshistoria för att återgå till tidigare version.

--Fred Chess 11:21, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Hej Fred, det blir nog bra. Jag litar på att du har bättre kalibrerad färgskärm än jag har. Xauxa 19:28, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Your Image Fronteatro.jpg =[edit]

Hi Xauxa, could you please upload your picture of the theatre in Mérida to commons? It was lost in the spanish wikipedia, because it didn`t have the GFDL-tag, and in the German wikipedia it is about to be deleted because of licencing doubts. But it is very good and would be a loss. Thanks, Longbow4u 19:43, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying me. I have made a quick search amongst my pictures, but this one I can not find. It must be someone else who is the photographer. I will put my other pictures from Mérida on Commons as soon as possible. Xauxa 07:10, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for the response. And the new nice pictures of the aqueduct. I read your message, well, surely someone else MUST have a picture of this nice place! Longbow4u 08:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
I have put some pictures on the page. Unfortunately I chose wronge name on the files. I can not correct it, I suppose. Xauxa 22:37, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
Great, I just saw your picture of the theatre. Perfect. Longbow4u 08:25, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
BTW, uploaded again under correct name. Xauxa 10:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

Template:Featured pictures candidates/Image:Merida Roman Theatre1.jpg[edit]

Hi Xauxa, I tried to remove the noise on your picture. How did you get that much noise on it on a ISO 200 image? It was not dust. Anyway, maybe you redraw your proposal for a cropped image because the oppose-votes maybe chage their mind and I prefer the non cropped version. Thanks --Ikiwaner 19:51, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Hi Ikiwaner, thanks for trying to improve my picture. First version is out of the game now. I also thought that the revised version would be gone at the same time. First version gives a better sight of the arena, but with ugly buildings...
My camera Olympus C5050 unfortunately gives much noice at 200 ASA (the high setting was a mistake, because it was a sunny day!) I have now learned that lowering sharpness, contrast and saturation with 5% will give me a much better image, it also must be taken at 64 ASA. Such images you will see in my church-pictures I have uploaded. Xauxa 23:32, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
On most cameras, shooting at ISO200 on daylight is no problem. If the settings of your camera are too high, try once shooting RAW and processing the image in Adobe Camera RAW (part of Photoshop).
Let's see what happens with the image, if the cropped version gets more support I can reduce noise also there. But it's usually a bad idea to post more than one version of the image. --Ikiwaner 06:25, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
I think we shall "stop here" and not do anything more with that picture. Better find some other image to "promote". My settings are very adjustable, normally there is no problem, just a mistake this time:-) Xauxa 10:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

Tack[edit]

Tack för din hjälp att omkategorisera Category:buildings and structures of Sweden. // Fred Chess 05:02, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Tack själv. (Jag tyckte f.ö. att jag hade gjort en bra "plats" för kommande historiska byggnader, men nu håller jag nog med om att det i det fallet är bättre att göra en gallerisida.) Det behövs lite fler ögon som ser över kategoriseringen då och då. Vissa bilder lämpar sig för kategorisering i själva bildfilen, andra bör hellre klassas via gallerisidor. Det ger sig efter ett tag. Xauxa 10:49, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Kategorisering[edit]

Hej. Jag flyttade person-artiklar till formen Efternamn, Förnamn. Du är välkommen att ge kritik på min diskussionssida. // Fred Chess 20:59, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

Så att du inte tar efter detta exemplet: user:Dbenbenn flyttade tillbaka alla artiklar... förresten, jag passar på att påtala att village pump nu finns på svenska Commons:Bybrunnen. // Fred Chess 21:58, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
He-he. Nej, själv tänker jag inte ägna mig åt reklassificering av svenskar den närmaste tiden. Tittade på en av underkategorierna, den var sorterad lite hipp som happ, sorteringen bör ju vara efter efternamnet naturligtvis, oavsett i vilken ordning för- och efternamn står. Xauxa 23:47, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Kategorisering igen[edit]

Hej igen.

Jag tycker att det är trevligt att folk kategoriserar på eget initiativ. Det känns som om 80% av mina edits just ju är omkategoriseringar....

Du kanske är intresserad av att ta en titt på commons:Project Country Categories. Det är liksom en råskiss som jag själv byggt upp, om du undrar hur jag tänker i mitt kategoriserande.

Tror du att category:buildings in Malmö är en bra kategori? Det känns som att alla kyrkorna är ju också byggnader, och jag tror dessutom inte det är så vitalt att skilja ut byggnader från andra möjliga artikelsidor (för det finns nog inte så många). Egentligen är detta också emot mitt försök att undvika underkategorier, för konsekvens, för då kan man säga till folk "använd category:kommunnamn bara" , och sedan kan man själv skapa artikelsidor efter behag, som man ju kan flytta också, och länka till.... till exempel en artikel Buildings in Malmö...

Men jag tänkte bara tala om hur jag tänker, säger inte att du har fel. Kommentera gärna.

Jag gjorde redan user:Godewind sur på mig för att jag inte ville låta honom använda category:Fårö (Gotland), utan tyckte det skulle ligga i category:Gotland, så jag vet inte om han kommer ladda upp några bilder på Fårö. :-) Det är ju sant att det kommer bli väldigt många artiklar i kategorin "Gotland", men samtidigt så blir det så inkonsekvent om alla skapar egna kategorier, för då kanske en använder "Category:Gotland" för en kyrka på Fårö, och en annan använder "Category:Fårö", eller "Category:Lilla Karlsö", osv. Jaja.... jag är som sagt mycket öppen för diskussion...

Fred Chess 01:17, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Min tanke var den att eftersom det fanns en underkategori för Stockholm, så kunde en motsvarande för Malmö passa in. Jag ville också få bort några "lösa" bilder som låg under Category:Buildings and structures in Sweden. Bildfilerna var kategoriserade, och som praxis bör man ju hellre lägga till än ta bort ... Det finns ju olika "system", att klassificera via bildfilerna alternativt via artikelfilerna (eller i kombination som nu). Bilderna ligger därför nu både i artikeln och "löst", jag visste inte hur det bör vara så jag lät det vara så.
Enligt mitt tyckande bör geografiklassningen vara så detaljerad att bilderna inte blir för många i varje kategori, kanske finns en praktisk gräns någonstans under 500 st. I fallet Gotland skulle det alltså - enligt min önskan - finnas underkategorier för Fårö, Lilla Karlsö, Gotska sandön etc. Dessa geografiska kategorier "korsar" man sedan med det man nu vill skapa en kategori för, byggnader, personer, vägar etc. Beträffande kyrkor har hittills kategoriserats efter stiften och även med kategori för kommunnumnet (för Stockholms del i underkategorier för stadsdelsområden). Kyrkorna bör på grund av stiftsindelningen (och projekt kyrkobyggnader) åtskiljas från övriga byggnader); jag tycker det fungerar ganska bra.
Jag tycker att din kategorisering i stort är bra. Jag tycker mängden foton sedan får avgöra antalet underkategorier.
Rådet att klassificera efter kommun är bra, då kommer bilderna "ganska rätt" redan från början och kan sedan eventuellt fördelas på underkategorier av någon som vill ordna till det.
Xauxa 21:55, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

Escudos[edit]

Hola Xauxa, subiste hace tiempo dos escudos a la wiki sueca, este Image:Escarequipa.jpg y este Image:Escica.jpg, pero no pusiste origen. ¿Son traídos de una página web o dibujados por ti? Si lo recuerdas déjame un mensaje para poder ponerles la procedencia a esas imágenes. Gracias y un saludo. Anna 00:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Hola Anna, no se si debo tener mala conciencia por eso. He visto que es algo especial con los escudos, por eso no he seguido poniendo los escudos de Perú en Commons. Los imagenes son fotocopiados de un libro, el Gran Enciclopedia del Peru (Lexus editores 1998). He visto los escudos en otros fuentes tambien, pero ese es lo que he usado. Si tu opinas que es apropriado hacer así, puedo seguir poniendo los otros tambien, si no es mejor que les vas sacando. Xauxa 21:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Hola Xauxa, Los escudos son públicos pero cada reproducción que se hace de ellos tiene los derechos de autor del dibujante, ese libro seguro que tiene copyright y los escudos representados en él tendrán los derechos de la editorial o el autor del libro, por tanto, si pusieras como origen esa edición de la "Gran Enciclopedia del Perú de 1998" no sería válido para Commons, a no ser que la editorial accediera a liberar las imágenes de su libro bajo la licencia GFDL o Creative Commons. Sería diferente si fotografiaras los escudos o los dibujaras tú mismo, ya que serían "tu obra". Un saludo. Anna 23:16, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Correcto. Entonces me imagino que es algo especial con los escudos. Porque en otros casos estoy dudando que un solo re-dibujo de un imagen evita el copyright. (Por lo menos, un dibujo de un foto viola los derechos del fotógrafo.) Conclusión, si veo los escudos en un lugar publico, puedo tomar un foto, y sería mi "obra", pero dudo que voy a tener ese oportunidad. Lamentablemente, tengo que pedirte que los vas sacando! Gracias por tu respuesta. Xauxa 07:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Linkoping Domkyrka MariaWindowDetail1.jpg[edit]

Linkoping Domkyrka MariaWindowDetail1.jpg

Hi Xauxa, I love this picture so much that I nominated it for FPC... I should warn you, my nominations don't have a good history of succeeding. :) But I love it nonetheless. You can vote if you like. cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 12:05, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating, let´s see the results. Mostly the comments are somewhat harsh, but anyway, if passed, all good. Xauxa 06:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Re:World Heritage Sites in Peru[edit]

Hello Xauxa, I tried to subcategorize them more specifically as they are archeological sites, but if you don't consider correct this category just tell me where they should go, maybe should we create Category:Tourism in Peru? Saludos. Anna 23:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Upploaded by Gortu as en:Image:Visicalc.gif[edit]

(I have changed it from gif- to png-file) Xauxa 10:42, 28 September 2005 (UTC) Thanks! --Gortu 23:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Template:Featured pictures candidates/Image:Eugène Delacroix - La liberté guidant le peuple.jpg[edit]

Hello,

please go and read my answer to your question.

El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 18:05, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your answer. But did you read the lower part of the Template talk:PD-Art, especially the comment of Husky? It seems not. El ComandanteSkull and crossbones.svgHasta ∞ 14:38, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Edit count - test[edit]

Count edit here

I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms ?

Re: Pictures from Retiro park[edit]

De nada. Suelo consultar datos sobre monumentos y edificios de Madrid para ponerlos en la descripción de las imágenes. Si necesitas información sobre artistas, arquitectos, obras, etc... puedes consultar estas páginas web:

Saludos. --Zaqarbal 10:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:Avila Convento de Sta Theresa Memory plate.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Panther 15:43, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

License hase now been added and tag taken away. Xauxa 13:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Re: Identification help needed[edit]

I know that building. But, because of its kitsch style, I've always thought it was only a kiosk, a bar, or something like that. I don't know how it is called, but I'm almost sure that it's not a monument. In fact, it doesn't appear in the park's information cartels. Anyway, upload the pictures if you want, and if someday we find out its name, we'll write it at the description page. Regards, --Zaqarbal 22:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Okey, the building looks like it is not in use, some rubbish inside. The look and the chimney makes me associate with a crematory, in egyptian stile. Or something like that, perhaps one of those capricho buildings. Xauxa 00:38, 21 December 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Tyreso_kyrka_brick_wall.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tyreso_kyrka_brick_wall.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Adambro 22:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Information on who took the picture (I myself) was clearly visibly, but I had forgotten the tag, now it is there. Xauxa 21:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Your Peru contribs[edit]

Hi, just wanted to thank you for uploading nice pictures from Peru, specially the ones of the shanty towns in Lima, although I live there these images are hard to take. --Andersmusician $ 02:45, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

de:Dom zu Visby[edit]

Hi, I used some of your pictures in the German article on Visby domkyrka. Perhaps you are able to read it. Do you have more details of the interior? Perhaps the Epitaph for the Lübeck admiral Tinnappel? If necessary, please contact me on my en or de Wikipedia page under the samme user name. Regards, --Kresspahl 07:57, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome. I will with pleasure read the german article. I do not think I have more than that I have uploaded. But let me check. Xauxa 11:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:English_bond01.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:English_bond01.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:41, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

PeruCaral01.jpg[edit]

Hello, I tried some color correcting on Image:PeruCaral01.jpg and linked to it from your picture (the new version is here Image:PeruCaral01b.jpg). If you like it, I would like to put the modified version on the Caral and Norte Chico sites and also if you want I can try working on the others as well. KyleThayer 19:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

I have answered on your discussion page. Xauxa 11:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:RegionAyacuchoEscudo.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:RegionAyacuchoEscudo.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Lokal_Profil 23:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi (answering in English, though Swedish is our mutual language).
I started loading up cote-of-arms for the regions of Peru, images scanned from some books. I was adverted that this was not permitted, so I stopped. I think it is best to remove all those cote-of-arms i uploaded 5-7(?), becuase I have seen they pop up in other versions like the bird of Fenix. So, please go ahead, and take them away. I had some discussion about this some time (years?) ago. I thought fair use or the special tag for cote-of-arms was good enough, but I see now, it is not.
Quite another thing is, that I do not see the point that it is not possible to illustrate with cote-of-arms just what they were created to illustrate. It makes it impossible to use them for their purpose, to be a symbol for something. But, it is not your fault, neither mine. Laws of copyright are quite complicated. Xauxa 19:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Visicalc.png[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Visicalc.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 11:48, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Chinchon_Santa_semana_Pasion.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 00:37, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:ValleDeLosCaidos Left wing vault.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ValleDeLosCaidos Left wing vault.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:13, 10 November 2007 (UTC)


Image:Christinae_kyrka_altarpiece01.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Christinae_kyrka_altarpiece01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.142.75.228 21:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Christinae kyrka altarpiece01.jpg[edit]

Sorry the painter died 1989 - so no way for PD --84.142.75.228 21:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)