User talk:Yamavu
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
|
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | Ελληνικά | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | Hrvatski | हिन्दी | Հայերեն | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | Latina | Lietuvių | 日本語 | 한국어 | Magyar | Македонски | मराठी | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Scots | Shqip | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / Srpski | Suomi | Svenska | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | Vèneto | 中文 | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
|
Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. |
|
|
| (P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?) | ||
[edit] Image:Invisible Pink Unicorn.svg
| Image deletion warning | Image:Invisible Pink Unicorn.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
--Wiggum 07:38, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tanuki
I requested deletion of your uploaded file from the german wikipedia. Evtl-Marderhund.jpg and Evtl-Marderhund2.jpg.
The new images are here:
--Micha L. Rieser 20:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Okay thanks for uploading to commons after classifying and even placing deletion tags. What more can I ask for? --Yamavu 21:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Asian catgirls.jpg
This image was deleted for reasons explained in Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Yuko Ogura.jpg. —LX (talk, contribs) 01:18, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Commons:Featured picture candidates
See Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Female artistic nude.jpg--Econt 14:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Big Buck Bunny
Moin Yamavu. Ich habe gerade gesehen dass du vor ein paar Tagen Screenshots aus „Big Buck Bunny“ hochgeladen hast. Du gibst dabei die CC-by version 2.5 an. Am Ende des Filmes steht jedoch 3.0. Ist das ein Versehen gewesen, oder gibt es älteres Material unter dieser Lizenzversion? Gruß --M.L 19:56, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Die dürften das Projekt nun unter CC-By 3.0 vertreiben. Es war vorher 2.5. Das könnte heißen das die Letzten beiden Bilder di ich hochgeladen habe unter 3.0 stehen, der Rest streng genommen dual lizensiert ist. Aber wir können auch alles unter 3.0 laufen lassen. --Yamavu 21:59, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Glowing_vulpine.jpg
| Image deletion warning | Image:Glowing_vulpine.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
Jarekt (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image deletion warning
| Image deletion warning | A file has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
abf /talk to me/ 12:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Re: Jerboa image
Thank you for your kind comment and your welcome. ■ MMXXtalk 13:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image:DaVinci - LudovicoSforza-1495 GoldenRatio.jpg
Hallo Yamavu, ich habe eine Frage zu deinem Bild "DaVinci - LudovicoSforza-1495 GoldenRatio". Ich verstehe die Aussage nicht die du mit dieser Darstellung machen willst. Aus dem Originalbild (Image:Pala sforzesca.jpg) wurde ein Stück ausgeschnitten um Ludovico Sforza frei zu stellen. Du zeichnest über diesen Ausschnitt den Goldenen Schnitt, und willst jetzt eine Aussage über klassische Bildkomposition treffen? Ich sehe da die Logik nicht. Sollte, wenn es um Bildkomposition geht, nicht auch das gesamte Bild verwendet werden? MFG --Jahobr (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Über Zuschnitte weiß ich nichts. Ich hab nur zufällig ausprobiert, wie die Querlinien in dem Verhältniss des Goldenen Schnitts aus das Bild passen und fand das einfach nur beeindruckend wie einige im Zeichnen übliche Hilfslinien fast mit den roten Linien übereinstimmen bzw die roten Linien als Grenzen für verschiedene Bildbereiche gesehen werden können. (Die linke Vertikallinie stimmt mit der Mittellinie des Körpers überein, die untere Horizontallinie ist direkt auf Schulterhöhe) Es gibt sicher jemanden der dir das genauer erklären oder widerlegen kann. Wie gesagt es war eher ein Zusammenhang, der mir bei dem Bild zufällig aufgefallen ist.--Yamavu (talk) 20:57, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
- Es gibt in deiner Abbildung keinerlei Zusammenhang zwischen dem „Goldenen Schnitt“ und irgendwelchen "üblichen Hilfslinien"! Es handelt sich nämlich um kein Bild sondern nur um einen Ausschnitt (siehe hier)! Man kann aus jedem Bild der Welt einen Teil so ausschneiden, dass Linien auf dem „Goldenen Schnitt“ liegen. Damit zeigt man doch gar nichts! Das Bild ist falsch und irreführend, und sollte dringend entfernt werden. MFG --Jahobr (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, ich habe das Bild ersetzt. Ich hoffe, das ist in deinem Sinne. Ich wußte nicht daß es sich hierbei um einen Ausschnitt handelte. Beim neuen Bild ist das nicht der Fall. Falls du ein besseres Bild findest um die Anwendung des Goldenen Schnitts in der Kunst zu illustrieren, ersetze mein Bild einfach im Artikel. Ich werde das alte Bild mal entfernen, da ich wohl hier wirklich auf dem Holzweg war. sry --Yamavu (talk) 10:03, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- Es gibt in deiner Abbildung keinerlei Zusammenhang zwischen dem „Goldenen Schnitt“ und irgendwelchen "üblichen Hilfslinien"! Es handelt sich nämlich um kein Bild sondern nur um einen Ausschnitt (siehe hier)! Man kann aus jedem Bild der Welt einen Teil so ausschneiden, dass Linien auf dem „Goldenen Schnitt“ liegen. Damit zeigt man doch gar nichts! Das Bild ist falsch und irreführend, und sollte dringend entfernt werden. MFG --Jahobr (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
[edit] File:Mithra Cosplay rework.png
| Pay attention to copyright | File:Mithra Cosplay rework.png has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page. Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
--AnimeFan (talk) 05:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Gagarin
Gagarin ist wie befürchtet von uns gegangen. -- Lychee (talk) 08:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Copyright status: File:Metra_City_of_Woodstock_in_Deerfield.jpg
|
Català | English | Français | Македонски | Polski | Português | Suomi | +/− |
| This media may be deleted. |
| Thanks for uploading File:Metra_City_of_Woodstock_in_Deerfield.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. You can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you. |