User talk:Ziko

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Ziko!
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Contents

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Antwerpen-lange-wapper-slot.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Antwerpen-lange-wapper-slot.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 17:07, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:1975-revesp-julio-aug-mbow.jpg

Of course. This magazine cover is not old enough to be in the public domain. You said the author is Simo Milojevic and that we have permission from Osmo Buller, but I cannot see any OTRS ticket. So if we can check that we have proper permission from the copyright owner, we cannot accept the cover. Regards. --Dodo 20:47, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I am not quite familiar with the different labels, you see. What does OTRS ticket mean in this context? I have asked Osmo Buller by mail wether I have his consent; Simo Milojevic was then an employe of UEA. What do I have to do? By the way, I learned about the deletion only by chance and would otherwise not even noticed it.--Ziko-C 16:37, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Guernica-picasso.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Guernica-picasso.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

User:G.dallorto 19:37, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] [Landesparlamente]

Hallo, Deine Grafik sieht ja ganz gut aus, aber warum gibt es den Punkt für die zweitstärkste Fraktion nur für die ostdeutschen Länder und nicht für alle? Gruß, Korny78

Weil es im Westen immer klar ist, dass entweder CDU oder SPD die zweitstärkste Fraktion stellt. Man könnte darüber streiten, ob die zweitstärkste überhaupt angegeben sein muss, aber es erschien mir interessant. Das ostdeutsche Parteiensystem ist immer noch etwas anders als das westliche.--Ziko-C 16:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Wpm02 13.JPG

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wpm02 13.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 15:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. Kanonkas(talk) 00:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quality Image Promotion

2005-02 Hoek van Holand strand.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Image Image:2005-02 Hoek van Holand strand.JPG, which was nominated by you for Quality Image status, was reviewed and has now been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

[edit] Image:2008-07-21 uk vp 02.JPG

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:11, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:2008-07-21 uk ueacentjara 06.JPG

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:2008-07-21 uk nl eduksistemo 03.JPG

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:15, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:2008-07-21 uk neof historio 02.JPG

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 00:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:2008-07-24 uk pilipovicx 02.JPG

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Mifter) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 20:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:2008-08-17 kolen gestookt fornuis.JPG

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Encyclopédie

Hello,

Can you tell me which images disappeared? There was a glitch on Commons servers yesterday, so maybe that was the cause. Otherwise some thumbnails do not show because there are over 12.5 million pixels, but that's a Mediawiki limitation. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Well, in that category (and others), if you scroll down, there are some examples. Does this mean that only the thumbnails don't work? I clicked on the signs but nothing happened. So I thought that those pics simly miss now.--Ziko-C (talk) 18:20, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:1965-jonas-lapenna.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:1965-jonas-lapenna.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Trixt (talk) 18:43, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


[edit] File:1964-nro1-janfeb-ogr-heuss-ollenh.jpg

Image deletion warning File:1964-nro1-janfeb-ogr-heuss-ollenh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Rosenzweig δ 22:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] kategorisieren

Hallo, danke für die Arbeit, die würde auch was bringen, wenn du nicht die 'Uncategorized...' Zeile drinlassen würdest. Bitte also entfernen! --Ayacop (talk) 10:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Tja, die lasse ich oft drin, wenn ich mir unsicher bin, ob nicht noch andere Kategorien denkbar sind. Beispiel Bundesgartenschau 1961: Da habe ich das Uncategorized normalerweise entfernt, jedoch gelassen, wenn eventuell auch Schlossplatz (Karlsruhe) eine sinnvolle Kategorie sein könnte. So guckt dann zumindest noch ein weiteres Augenpaar nach dem Bild. Übrigens, gibt es eine Diskussionsseite für allgemeine Fragen zur Kategorisierung der BA-Bilder?--Ziko (talk) 12:39, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Keine Ahnung. Momentan alles unter Commons Talk:Bundesarchiv/Todo, da ist nicht viel los, da kann man schon noch schreiben. --Ayacop (talk) 18:27, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Ich bin aber der Ansicht, dass du zu großzügig mit dem Drinlassen der Zeile bist. Andererseits wenn du meinst, irgendjemand kategorisiert noch die Gartenstühle in File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F011112-0009A, Bonn, Beethovenhalle, Frauenliga aus Irak.jpg, dann glaube ich, solltest du es selbst machen. --Ayacop (talk) 19:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Gut dass du's sagst, ich sehe gerade, es gibt eine Kategorie Beethovenhalle.--Ziko (talk) 19:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Politicians of Germany

Hi Ziko, magst du die Leute möglichst nicht da, sondern in eine tiefere Kategorie schieben? Ich versuch die verzweifelt leerzuräumen, weil es nichts bringt, preußische Könige und Grünen-Abgeordnete und ZK-Mitglieder in einer Hauptkategorie nebeneinander zu sammeln... aber es kommt immer wieder von oben nach... Wenigstens in eine Abgeordnetenkategorie (z.B. Member of the German Bundestag) oder eine regionale (z.B. Politicians of Bremen). Ginge das? Danke + Gruß, --Elya (talk) 13:42, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Ja, das ginge natürlich. Ich bin mir aber meist nicht sicher, wie die Unterkategorien lauten könnten. Abgegordnete ist mir noch zu wenig, ich überlege Parteikategorien, die müssten aber dann besser eine Kategorie innerhalb der Partei sein... Ich stelle absichtlich in die Hauptkategorie, um mehr Übersicht für das spätere Einräumen zu haben. Wenn eine Person erst einmal in eine Unterkategorie verschoben ist, findet man sie schwerer für weitere Einordnungen. Es ist beim Erstentdecken auch einfacher, nicht sofort an eine Unterkategorie zu denken, die es oft (z.B. für StS) noch gar nicht gibt. Ich beteilige mich auch gerne am späteren Einräumen.--Ziko (talk) 14:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peto de Federico Faccio Peláez forigi liajn publikajn fotojn

Saluton, Ziko! Federico Faccio Peláez petis min sur mia persona pagxo forigi artikolon pri el E-vikipedio kaj la publikan foton de li. Mi nun vidas, ke la foto en la artikolo estis alsxutita de vi kaj petas vin forigi gxin el la komunejo. Kun koraj salutoj, Alaŭdo (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Saluton, dankon pro la atentigo. Mi nun forigis almenaux la foton el "lia" artikolo, kaj estonte petu forigon (aux cxu prefere vi faras?). Pri la ekzisto de la artikolo mem... tikla debato nun ankaux en Foundation-l, pri biografioj de vivantaj personoj, cxu ne?--Ziko (talk) 12:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Nice pictures of Wikimedia 2009

Hi Ziko, thanks for the nice pictures of Wikimedia 2009, I am now using the one of me on my Wikipedia page. May I also use it on my facebook page, even though the stupid idiots at Facebook don't have a place to put the license? --WiseWoman (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC) P.S. you left a yellow Stickit with bullet points on it, it is important? If so, I can email it to you.

[edit] Category:Europawahl 2009 in Köln

Hi Ziko,
category names on Commons have to be in english as per policy. Also, if you don't upload more images about this topic, it's not a good idea to create a category for 1 image. Cheers. --Túrelio (talk) 12:40, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you are right. / Other images coming. Ziko (talk) 12:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Da du wohl deutsch sprichst, wie ich gesehen habe: wähle immer nur die spezifischsten Kategorien. Also z.B. bei File:2009-05 EW Köln BNG ÖDP.JPG nicht "Category:European Parliament Election 2009" und "Category:European Parliament Election 2009 in Cologne", sondern nur letztere, weil erstere ohnehin Oberkat. zu letzterer ist. Nun genügend verwirrt? --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Nein, du hast völlig recht, und ich reparier das gleich.:-) Ziko (talk) 12:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Ach, du bist mir zuvorgekommen. Vielen Dank! Ziko (talk) 12:55, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Diese Category:Election posters in Germany mit partei-spez. subcats gibt es auch noch. --Túrelio (talk) 12:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


[edit] Deine Wahlkampffotos

File deletion warning Einige deiner Bilder have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these files, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--Isderion (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] reusage

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:2007-06_ktag_westerwelle.jpg --Martina Nolte (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Oha! Danke für den Hinweis! Ziko (talk) 17:16, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Hab dir den Blog, in dem sie das Bild schließlich verwendet, auch auf der File.disk. verlinkt. --Martina Nolte (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Ich habe mal die Betreiber selbst kontaktiert, da ich mich für einen Kommentar nicht extra anmelden will. Mal sehen... Scheint eher Naivität als bewusste Frechheit zu sein. Ziko (talk) 19:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Ich weiß nicht, wer sonst noch in Kontakt gegangen ist. Bisher auf de-WP: de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen/Archiv/2009/05#Nutzung_von_Wikipedia-Bildern_im_Blog_von_Beate_Wedekind und de:Wikipedia:WN/M#beatewedekind50plus.blog.de. Grüße --Martina Nolte (talk) 18:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Die Betreiber haben mir jetzt geschrieben, sie würden mit der Userin Kontakt aufnehmen, und ich habe bei ihr einen netten Kommentar hinterlassen (ging auch ohne Anmeldung). Ziko (talk) 19:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:2009-11-29_rdam_piet_01.JPG

File deletion warning File:2009-11-29_rdam_piet_01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 17:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:2009-11 Terlouw Leisink.JPG

Български | Česky | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Svenska | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.


This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 17:21, 6 December 2009 (UTC)