User talk:Zil

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

TUSC token 56a6b85ed8dbadd88024106275f443f0[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Béjaïa[edit]

Je ne m'occupe pas vraiment de la rédaction d'articles sur Béjaïa sur wiki, plus de l'Algérie, la Kabylie en général, mais j'ai cherché quels articles pourraient être "illustrés". J'ai trouvé par exemple le stade de Béjaïa (fr:Stade de l'Unité Maghrébine,..), l'aéroport (en:Soummam Airport,..), également différents bâtiments important comme le siège de la Wilaya (équivalant des préfectures), la mairie, université, musée, mosquée, le fort qui domine la ville etc. et pourquoi pas des sièges de société s'il y en a (j'ai vu sur le site de la société Cevital qu'il y a leur principale usine). Je sais également qu'il y a pas mal de pétrole qui passe par le port (raffinerie, etc..), donc des images qui pourraient illustrer des articles sur l'économie de l'Algérie (sur en, fr,..), et même sur le tourisme (en:Tourism in Algeria) avec les plages (sûrement bondées à cette époque). Voilà plusieurs pistes, pour que tu puisses choisir. Bref il y a en fait pas mal de photos utiles à prendre. Ça fait trois ans que je n'y suis pas retourné, alors je te souhaites surtout de passer de bonne vacance en Algérie Face-wink.svg. - Masen (talk) 03:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok, à dans mi-août alors. Masen (talk) 10:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gare Avignon TGV - Perspective by JM Rosier.JPG[edit]

Bonjour,

j'ai vu que tu avais demandé la suppression de ma "Image:Gare Avignon TGV - Perspective by JM Rosier.JPG" ce pour quoi j'ai eu une explication complémentaire par un autre contributeur (car je ne savais pas pour l'architecture)... mais je ne comprends pas pourquoi celle-là est pas les autres de la Category:Gare d'Avignon TGV qui, pour certaines, montrent tout autant l'architecture dont des parties de la "coupole" de verre. note bien que c'est une demande pour moi-même comprendre et éviter de refaire la même erreur, pas pour que tu te lances dans une croisade anti gare d'Avignon.

Cordialement

--Jmrosier (talk) 12:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Comme je l'avais dit, ce n'est pas pour lancer une croisade, juste une envie de comprendre... mais vu ta réponse, je pense donc que ce n'est pas spécifique à ma photo et quel que soit l'angle que j'utiliserai, la photo sera en faute... je n'insiste donc pas avec ce sujet ! Merci et encore désolé car je ne savais pas pour l'architecture --Jmrosier (talk) 17:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Machu Picchu interieur.jpg et al.[edit]

Bonjour,

Tu as marqué quelques images comme copyvios, je les avais importées de Wikipédia. Elles ont été importées à l'origine par fr:Utilisateur:Clifden, la même personne qui a mis les photos sur ce site. Il l'avait confirmé sur sa page de discussion, mais il est inactif à présent. On avait mis la licence CC-BY-SA FR. Peut-être qu'on peut enlever le tag "copyvio" ?

Merci, le Korrigan bla 22:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Ah, ok, je vais vérifier. Autre chose : techniquement le bandeau le plus approprié n'est pas "copyvio" mais "pas de permission" : "copyvio" est un peu fort et invite les admins à supprimer les images très rapidement, tandis que "pas de permission" (ou mieux, une procédure de suppression plus habituelle) laisse le temps de contacter l'utilisateur. le Korrigan bla 06:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Gorges du Cians.jpg[edit]

Fiouf, on se croirait en Lozère ! Stef48 (talk) 18:55, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Théoule-Sculpture.jpg[edit]

Bonjour. J'ai mis l'information manquante. (Galathee, sculpture de Jean Saintout). Cordialement. --gilbertus (talk) 17:05, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Est-ce que[edit]

vous voulez etre un administrateur? ;) (sorry for my bad french, but I'd really like to nominate you!) abf «Cabale?! Quelle Caballe?» 18:01, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Your Flickr reviewer request[edit]

Hello. As a result of your request at Commons talk:Flickr images/reviewers, I have added you to the reviewers list. Please see the instructions at Commons:Flickr images/reviewers and add {{user trusted}} to your userpage. Best regards, Abigor talk 18:18, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

Héhéhé[edit]

Bon, voila, avant de supprimer fr:Fichier:Cuivré à identifier02.jpg (vidange de fr:Catégorie:Désormais sur Commons avec un nom différent), je pense qu'un renommage de File:Cuivre identifier02.jpg peut être envisagé (bug avec Commons helper au niveau du "à" du titre sur fr). Bref, j'ai vu que tu es l'auteur du transfert et que tu es dans la liste des trusted users, donc... :o) --Coyau (talk) 20:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

File:3. devet.jpg[edit]

You deleted this image, and the author is my brother, and he gave me personally this picture. I hope that the other two won't be deleted, too. --Maduixa (talk) 01:01, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Photos supprimées sur ton intervention[edit]

Une série de photos ont été supprimées sur ton intervention il y a un moment. Le contributeur, visiblement peu à l'aise avec Commons, est revenu et affirme que les photos étaient effectivement de lui. Je te suggère de lui donner la marche à suivre: uploader une image plus large, envoyer par mail... soit dit en passant, cet épisode au cours duquel j'ai vainement tenté de faire entendre raison à un tas de gens qui faisaient les sourds est pour moi la confirmation que Commons est un projet qui ne fonctionne purement et simplement pas. 81.240.24.72 14:49, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Hola, deseo que me ayudes[edit]

Hola, deseo que me ayudes con algunas imagenes que subi sobre el Manga Hellsing, el cual son para el proyecto de Wikipedia, Anime y Manga en español; Asi, que si sabes, como validarlas y que sean legales en Commoms, te lo agradeceria mucho, espero, que me hagas este favor, Sino entiendes lo que digo, traducelo y asi nos mantenemos en contacto. Saludos. Sebastian David Gallego Lloreda

This DR[edit]

I'm afraid in this DR the license was certainly cc by 2.0 at upload. With kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 02:04, 29 August 2009 (UTC)


File:McDonnell_Douglas_MD-12.png[edit]

DRTabercil (talk) 23:45, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

File:WesternBalkans800.png[edit]

It is all my work, not from flickr Hxseek (talk) 23:17, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Flickr_-_nicogenin_-_66ème_Festival_de_Venise_(Mostra)_-_Pixar.jpg[edit]

Hi, I myseft uploaded many images from the same Flickr set, but have left those images with visible fictional characters because they are not covered by COM:FOP in Italy and are copyrighted creations of Pixar. Thanks for your work uploading images --Justass (talk) 16:45, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Une demande de suppression que tu as faite[edit]

Bonjour.

Tu as demandé il y a environ un an la suppression de Thaksin-affiche.jpg, car tu pensais qu'il ne pouvait être réutilisé que sous le régime du fair use, lequel est interdit sur Commons.

Or il se trouve qu'il s'agit d'une affiche qui a été prise dans un lieu public en Thaïlande (cf. historique du fichier sur Wikipédia avant manipulation), et en conséquence, peut bénéficier de la liberté de panorama et être distribuée sous licence libre (tu peux le vérifier ici). Serais-tu d'accord pour une restauration ? Hr. Satz 11:12, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Attention en effaçant des catégories[edit]

Bonjour. Une catégorie en rouge, tout un comme un lien rouge sur WP, c'est souvent une catégorie à créer, pas une catégorie à retirer. Je fais allusion à ces deux edits que j'ai annulés. Par ailleurs, il est dommage d'avoir retiré les dernières images de la catégorie "Images from 2009 Venice Film Festival to check" sans leur avoir affecté de catégorie pertinente puisque c'était le but premier de cette catégorie temporaire. Ces deux personalités par exemple n'ont toujours pas de nom. Merci d'être plus précautionneux à l'avenir. Cordialement. — Xavier, 01:39, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Disons que j'avais créé cette catégorie temporairement pour charger les images depuis flickr. Je suis d'accord qu'il eut été mieux d'identifier ces personnes. Maintenant, elles ont au moins une catégorie pertinente même si cette catégorie n'est pas très précise. D'autre part, je n'ai pas la même vision que toi sur les catégories en rouge. - Zil (d) 08:21, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Identifier les personnes de cette catégorie est précisément la raison de la présence de cette catégorie temporaire (voir cet appel) car toutes les images de cette catégorie faisaient déjà partie de Category:2009 Venice Film Festival. Laisser les images dans cette seule et unique catégorie n'a pas grand intérêt car celui qui cherche la photo d'une personnalité précise n'ira jamais parcourir les 800 photos qu'elle contient. J'espère que ça vous apparaît clairement désormais et que vous ferez plus attention à l'avenir.
Quant aux catégories rouges, vous dites ne pas partager ma vision. J'aimerais connaître la vôtre qui me paraît erronée. Une catégorie existe de facto à partir du moment où une image est placée à l'intérieur. Une catégorie rouge n'est pas une catégorie inexistante (abus de langage), mais une catégorie qui nécessite d'être intégrée à l'arbre principal. Avez-vous compris ou avez-vous besoin, pour cesser d'enlever des catégories légitimes, que je demande à la communauté d'éclaircir la chose ? — Xavier, 10:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome[edit]

Not a problem, I'm happy to help! Have a good day! TFCforever (talk) 19:56, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Senegal[edit]

Dakar[edit]

Copy paste from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Russavia/Required_photos#Dakar with Russavia agreement

« Patrouilles automatiques »[edit]

Hello,

Je voulais juste te signaler que je t’ai donné les droits d’Autopatrolled. Concrètement, cela ne changera rien dans ta manière de contribuer à Commons, mais les patrouilleurs de Special:RecentChanges et Special:NewPages sauront qu’il n’y a pas besoin de vérifier tes contributions en quête de vandalisme ou de boulette (tes modifications ne seront plus marquées du disgracieux point d’exclamation rouge).

Amicalement, Jean-Fred (talk) 14:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Pourtant des boulettes, j'en fait. - Zil (d) 15:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Renames[edit]

Hi, I see you've tagged several WEF-files to be renamed, Thanks for that. Please look here though, as you forgot the ".jpg" at the end of the name. I've fixed it, but please notice :-). Thanks again, –Krinkletalk 21:32, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

{{Supported by Wikimedia France}}[edit]

je réponds tardivement. Si, toutes les images actuelles de cette catégories peuvent être considérées comme supportées par Wikimedia-France. Mais je comprends bien le pb. Es-ce qu'un bot pourrait être chargé de rajouter le modèle en question aux pages images. je ne me sens pas de le faire à la main. merci Jeffdelonge (talk) 18:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)


{u|boing-boing}}[edit]

Moved from User talk:84.75.160.122

Hello,
I've seen that you categorize the pictures I upload. thank you for your help.
boing-boing is a bot I use to upload pictures from flickr. I could upload a whole set in one command.
The categorization is done more or less automaticaly using a scripts and based on the tags of the flickr images.
That's why I recategorize the pictures afterward and why I use temporary cats like Category:People_of_Sikkim_to_sort to avoid missing a category.
Thank you again for your help and I'm sorry if you think you do useless work with those uploads.
Kind regards
- Zil (d) 20:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi Zil / boing-boing, thanks for informing. Just a hint: "teach" your bot to use just a single temporary category as Category:People_of_Sikkim_to_sort to avoid such "useless work" ;-) Regards, Roland — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.75.160.122 (talk • contribs) 20:26, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Abbé Pierre[edit]

Hi. Why did you revert File:ABBE PIERRE-24x30-1999.jpg to the watermarked version? - ZombieLeChuck (talk) 09:52, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Tortues sénégalaises[edit]

Bravo donc pour ces magnifiques tortues. Comme je suis tous les articles du portail Sénégal, j'ai mis une veille sur Flickr, avec le mot-clé "Sénégal" dans les images libres de droits, ce qui me permet de voir les nouveautés chaque matin, et c'est ainsi que j'ai trouvé les tiennes. Bonne continuation et peut-être à bientôt, Ji-Elle (talk) 07:52, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Redresser une image[edit]

L'image à redresser

Bonjour,

Pourrais-tu redresser File:Biblia Fjellstedt II (1890) 968.jpg, il semblerait que la couverture soit un peu de travers ?

Merci. --Dereckson (talk) 16:31, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Flickr - lardfr1's -Tyra Banks - 2.jpg[edit]

I think your name was absued for a faked flickrreview. --Martin H. (talk) 16:15, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

You're right. I'm not link to those uploads. User may have mimic my bot boing-boing. - Zil (d) 16:21, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
That explains it, thanks. The example maybe was File:Flickr - aktivioslo - Sofia Nizharadze - Georgia (1).jpg. However, I wasnt aware of this flickr upload methode, but I have to say that it is very intransparent. User:FlickreviewR/Images never editted by their reviewer is messed up with reviews from you and uploader Boing-Boing, Multichills BotMultichill or Diaas Dudubot. Such mistaken copy&pastes - to AGF - or fakes - regretably I have seen to much of them - are not very often but it happens. A review without any confirming edit by the reviewer isnt a review, I suggest to use the blank {{flickrreview}} and have flickrreviewr done the review work. --Martin H. (talk) 16:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
May be the page could be improved to exclude when the bot upload the image with his owner review ? - Zil (d) 16:39, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I think, and so my suggestion, that the bots have to be improved. Its not clear if e.g. File:Flickr - nmorao - CP Tdgs, Estação de Vila Nova de Gaia, 1994.10.06.jpg was ever reviewed. If sometimes in the future a copyright holder tries to revoke the license and your bot logs (if any) are not at hand we have nothing to proofe {{flickr-change-of-license}} in a 100% save way. We have enough flickrreview related delreqs. Its however just a suggetion, the process is not in an optimum, the non-functioning page User:FlickreviewR/Images never editted by their reviewer is only minor nuisance, I dont realy work with this page, I only know that it exists. --Martin H. (talk) 17:02, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
I have a simple sollution to keep User:FlickreviewR/Images never editted by their reviewer-4 etc working: Can Boing-boing stop flickrreviewing the images in your name and instead just place {{flickrreview}} on the images to have FlickrreviewR review the images? You are uploading the full size versions, so I dont expect FlickrreviewR will have a problem with reviewing and it will not fill any backlogs for reviewing. --Martin H. (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
I'll do that on the next upload. The goal was to limit the work for the flickrreviewbot. - Zil (d) 18:10, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Yoshihiro Tatsumi 2010.JPG[edit]

Merci de mettre {{rotate|90}} à ce fichier. (I hope my French will make sense.) Yasu (talk) 15:05, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

{{File:Inauguration de la mosquée Al-Fath de Planoise.jpg}}[edit]

{{File:Inauguration de la mosquée Al-Fath de Planoise.jpg}} - Zil (d) 20:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Zil, le fichier est situé dans un site Internet qui autorise la réutilisation de fichiers (WordPress). Cordialement, Toufik-de-planoise 13:34, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Paris images[edit]

Pas de quoi ! Et puis on a gagné au passage quelques images de la Tour Eiffel... :-) Mu (talk) 14:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Ah, je comprends mieux - je n'avais pas vu passer les catacombes, en effet. Best wishes, Mu (talk) 14:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Latvian politicians[edit]

Hi. I've discovered a gold mine for Latvian politicians at here. The flickr user is Saeima (which is the national parliament of Lativa) and has the official national parliament coat of arms. Given the extent of the photos 2300 odd including valuable ones of sessions like this etc I'd say it is definately a photographer insider of the Saeima. I wondered if you could use a bot to upload all of the photos of the politicians to the commons unless there is some problem. Photos like this are very hard to get hold of; its obvious to me that the person who uploaded them to flickr is the photographer so has the right to release the images under this license. Please can you bot upload them, it won't work when I do it. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:11, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll ask some people on wikipedia if they can help with the categorizing. All I can think of is Category:Deputies of the Saeima. The profile ones at least can go in there. If you can upload the rest of them this would be very useful. Keep up the great work you do!Blofeld Dr. (talk) 10:33, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, that's great thanks!Blofeld Dr. (talk) 20:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi. I was looking for a photo of the Tenasserim River of Burma and cam across recent uploads by this user. There looks to be a lot of images of important persons, politicians, economists, governors, chairman of various bodies or whatever. What do you think? E.g Trevor Phillips. See the wikipedia articles en:Trevor Phillips (currently has no image), Isabel Sawhill en:Isabel Sawhill (currentlu has no image) etc. Can you upload them? Blofeld Dr. (talk) 12:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

You're doing an amazing job with uploading photos. Thankyou Zil.Blofeld Dr. (talk) 16:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

HI. Sorry to be a nuisance but I do a lot of searching for images tfor articles I write so I keep stumbling across images! I've found two more photostreams which may have valuable images. The first is images from Ministery of Culture of Uruguay?? and European People's Party. They should both contain images of a lot of notable persons we probably don't have images for many of them. Perhaps ask help from some of the other bot uploaders if its too much of a burden. All the best. Blofeld Dr. (talk) 16:58, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Flickr batch uploading/Plushev[edit]

My answer. -- TarzanASG +1  12:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

US Geograph[edit]

Hi Zil. This post was copied from my message to Jimbo Wales (with no reply):


US photographs[edit]

Copied from Jimbo Wales take page:

Something occurred to me. Unlike the UK where images of most villages can be uploaded from http://www.geograph.org.uk/ there is a considerable problem for many places in the US and Canada obtaining a plentiful supply of decent freely useable photographs for small towns, and even larger ones, one example I can think of is Calabasas, California.... I was wondering Jimmy if your foundation would endorse the idea of running a US version of geograph to photograph every grid square or whatever you use for the United States. Sure it would be an ambitious project, but not as ambitious as wikipedia... This would not only solve our problem of having a poor supply of photographs for many places in the United States but it would build up a highly valuable bank of images over time under a Creative Commons/GFDL license which I am certain many people would find very valuable. I wonder how many times somebody has looked for a freely useable image of a small US town or unincorporated place and found no images on it. Given that geograph is clearly a massive success and has suppled the majority of British villages with images, I wonder if it would be too much to ask if the foundation could host a US version of such a project to attract people into a project which would photograph the United States in such detail? I know that the United States is considerably larger than the UK but I don't see why such a project couldn't be a success for most places with a high internet population. If I can get some sort of backing I'll make a formal proposal on this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:21, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I second this - if this can be made viable, it would be a great idea. (It's

actually something I've considered before; trouble is I'm not net-savvy enough to know where to begin in creating it.) I've done enough photographing of backwoods Virginia to know that free images for much of the country are next-to-impossible to come by at the moment, even for some of the larger/more notable places (see Big Stone Gap, Virginia for but one good example). I know it's a huge country, but the population is pretty large - I don't see why this couldn't work. --[[User:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Ser Amantio di Nicolao]][[User_talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Che dicono a Signa?]][[Special:Contributions/Ser Amantio di Nicolao|Lo dicono a Signa.]] 22:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)


Zils. I and a number of people support the idea of starting a photograph project to photograph every "grid square" of the United States like we have with geograph UK. Given the major success of the geograph UK project I wondered if the foundation would endorse the idea of having one for the US. One of the biggest reasons is the distinct lack of photos we have for many US towns and unincorporated communites and indeed the lack of photos of some of these please on the web. I think it would prove a valuable resource given the traffic that wikipedia and related projects gets I am sure contributors to photographing the United States in such detail would gradually increase and the project would take off. If so we would then have a plentiful supply of photographs for just about anywhere and indded a valuable US geo photo bank. Obviously a project for many developing countries in Africa and Asia may not be possible but I am certian that given the amount of traffic wikimedia gets such a project could be extended to countries like Germany, Netherlands, France Italy etc. Please let me know what yout think. The project could be a sister project to the commons but it would need to be set out in a grid square type format like the geograph website is. Naturally uploaded photos would simultaneously be place din the commons. If possible can you respond when you return and contact Sue Gardner or whoever you think might see some light on such a project. I really want to get some support on this, so if you think it is a good idea please help me spread the word and get some support and contact the foundation.

Blofeld Dr. (talk) 10:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Greek photos[edit]

Hi I came across these political photos. The names are in Greek but they look valuable.Blofeld Dr. (talk) 09:59, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife[edit]

Ah, that's too bad. Thanks for the uploads anyway! Steven Walling 05:32, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Géolocalisations Kyoto[edit]

Comme ces géolocalisations sont toutes fausses (tellement approximatives [je ne conteste pas que le coin de montagne indiqué soit à quelques kilomètres du centre-ville de Kyoto] que ça en devient faux), je pense que le mieux serait de les supprimer carrément. Pour ce qui est de la tour de Kyoto, je pense que les coordonnées doivent être sur l'article de Wikipédia correspondant à la tour de Kyoto. Pour le festival Aoi Matsuri, je crois qu'il a lieu chaque année au palais impérial. Donc on pourrait mettre les coordonnées du palais impérial. Teofilo (talk) 21:32, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

C'est comme si on mettait le Mont Valérien, ou la forêt de Marly comme géolocalisation d'un événement qui se passe au Jardin des Tuileries. Teofilo (talk) 21:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

2011 Egyptian Protests[edit]

It has been over a month and noone seemed to respond to the request. any reason for that? -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, I noticed the subcategory Category:Egyptian Revolution of 2011 to check which you created, and would like to help out. I assume "checking" entails describing and categorizing the images. Or does copyright status need to be checked as well? --Ranveig (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Guinea[edit]

Hi. Can you upload most of the images under here, particularly the photographs by User:Attawayjl. It has some much needed images of Guinea and people of Guinea Bissau. The aerial views of Conakry are valuable.. Attawayjl has over 900 free images of Guinea I think which are greatly needed, mostly Senegal and Guinea. Blofeld Dr. (talk) 16:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Also I remembered I made a flickr agreement with CharlesFred on flickr 325 sets!! which can be uploaded. Although they seem to like photographing men, they have an awful amount of valuable photos from all around the world. The OTRS ticket can be viewed at File:Agordatmen.jpg. GFDL I believe. Can you upload? I think if you evade the "men of the world" category you could by pass the images of men... Thousands of valuable images like this. Blofeld Dr. (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC) Blofeld Dr. (talk) 16:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Flickr - nicogenin - 66ème Festival de Venise (Mostra) (92).jpg[edit]

Dear Zil,

Can you please consider passing this image above and backdating the pass to December 24, 2009? Right now there is an npd tag on it but according to the image file history, you marked this image on December 24, 2009. Something went wrong and the flickrpass did not show up, however.

You also passed other images from this account like these two images below:

  • The flickr owner ( N. Genin) has hidden these images today but he has other images from the same 2009 event as I note in this link to the flickr account owner's collection of pictures which all still licensed as 'cc by sa generic.'

Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:46, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

  • Thank you for your confirmation on the license. Best wishes from Metro Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Photos from European People's Party to check[edit]

Hello Zil, you created this category. What does "to check" mean? How can I check the photos included in this category? Thank you, FishInWater (talk) 20:44, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. -- FishInWater (talk) 21:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Flickr - europeanpeoplesparty - EPP Summit 19 March 2009 (17) (1).jpg[edit]

I don't know why but the flickr review bot keeps reviewing this image every 6 hours every single day I notice. It puts it in the 'Flickr never edited by the reviewer' column like this and this. You don't have to respond to this message on my talkpage. I'm just letting you know about this case, that's all. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 07:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Flickr - Jeff Attaway - Ouag Storm.jpg[edit]

I don't think this can be uploaded as a jpeg image file by Boing Boing. I think it should be deleted. Maybe it should be uploaded as an .ogv video file? No one can mark it at present. Just a suggestion. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

  • OK. Thank You for resolving the problem. Best wishes, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:36, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Flickr batch uploading[edit]

Hi there, the other day, I added a couple of items to Commons:Flickr batch uploading. It lists you as one of the participants. Given that past requests have often been responded to on the same day, but there's been no reply to my requests, I was wondering whether I've missed something / done something wrong. I've also posted this message to user Multichill. I haven't watchlisted your page (so if you reply here, please notify me with a talkback), but I do monitor the upload request pages. Thanks a lot. Schwede66 01:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

If there's anything I can do to help with this, please let me know. Schwede66 21:36, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

The lion of Egyptian revolution (Qasr al-Nil Bridge).jpg[edit]

I was wondering if you could give you opinion on the picture nomination to be a featured picture. -- The Egyptian Liberal (talk) 08:39, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

To be checked[edit]

Please see Category talk:To be checked. - dcljr (talk) 18:00, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Kitty attack sur ta talk page[edit]

Youngkitten.JPG

AHAHA

Irønie (talk) 21:24, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Acrobates_pygmaeus_(Marsupial_volant_pygmee).JPEG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Acrobates_pygmaeus_(Marsupial_volant_pygmee).JPEG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Seb az86556 (talk) 07:05, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Steel fabrication.GIF[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Steel fabrication.GIF has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bomazi (talk) 13:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio[edit]

Pour info, l'image File:Samsung mobile phone E1130 08 package.jpg a été supprimer pour violation de copyright. La packaging de la boîte est protégée et appartient à la société Samsung. - Zil (d) 12:31, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Oui, j'ai remarqué. C'est dommage, ça illustrait bien l'article Escalade... Je suis en discussion avec celui qui a supprimé l'image pour comprendre pourquoi celle-ci a été signalée est pas d'autre. Et ce soir je vais regarder si il y a vraiment mention de copyright sur la boîte... Smile --Absinthologue (talk) 13:11, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Laos[edit]

Hi, any chance you could bot upload these very beautiful free images of Laos from flickr? We don't have an abundance of Laotian photos.Blofeld Dr. (talk) 09:22, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Currently, my bot is dead and I'm not that far from Laos but too far away from my PC to fix it. You could ask the COM:FBATCH project or JeanFred to upload them. -Zil in Singapore.

AAGE[edit]

Vos crop 1 Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F075424-0004, Bonn, Genscher mit Politikern aus Frankreich - crop Hélène Missoffe.jpg et 2 Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F075424-0004, Bonn, Genscher mit Politikern aus Frankreich - crop 2 - Hélène Missoffe.jpg de la photo originale Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F075424-0004, Bonn, Genscher mit Politikern aus Frankreich.jpg

sont erronés : La femme qui se trouve sur la photo originale que vous avez cropée n'est pas Anne-Aymone Giscard d'Estaing mais Hélène Misoffe (cf les Pdd des pages de wiki où elle se trouve. --Albergrin007 (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Secretariat of the European People's Party[edit]

Hello. I work with the EPP and I would like to point out that many of the pictures under the Category:Secretary General & Secretariat of the European People's Party are with "All right reserved". Could you take them off? Thank you.

Hello when did you change it ? - Zil (d) 13:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Wouldn't remember the exact date, but recently.

Unfortunately, the CC license are not revocable. What would be the reason why we should delete those pictures... - Zil (d) 20:29, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:39, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Re:[edit]

I don't understand your point. Former name File:Vista Aneto.jpg was kept as a redirect.

My intention was make searching easy to the lectors when they search for the Pirineos.

Thanks. Yanguas (talk) 14:45, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Flickr batch import - current status?[edit]

Hi, can you write a short update on the follow requests please? I am unsure about the current state. Are they done or are they running? Last comments are years ago.

--Slick (talk) 16:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Bogdanci-IWW.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bogdanci-IWW.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

AFBorchert (talk) 16:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Zil,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Que peut-on faire contre les mal-comprenants ?[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que tu as rétabli la signature du studio Harcourt sur cette image, qui vient à nouveau d'être vandalisée par User:Andy king50.

BAFFIE Laurent-24x30-2001.jpg

Ce personnage est un spécialiste de la chose et je me suis déjà fermement opposé à lui par le passé. Que peut-on faire pour qu'il comprenne enfin que la signature d'une œuvre d'art fait partie de l’œuvre ? Je suis bien sûr intervenu sur sa page de discussion (vois l'historique, il a viré tout ce que j'avais écrit) mais dans le genre buté il semble difficile de faire mieux !

Amitiés,

Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 18:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

My maintenance edits are no "vandalism". Putting digital watermarks, signatures, and any other text, logo etc. indicating authorship, ownership, copyright etc. into any image is strongly discouraged by the policies of commons. The last time i tried to explain it to Jean-Jaques, but he seems not to accept our policies but only hin own wish of a special treatement. Maybe you can explain it to him better in french, to re frain putting digital logos in his images.- Andy king50 (talk) 18:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
First of all, Jean-Jacques MILAN could you please assume good faith ?
Well then Andy king50, it's a good idea to remove watermarks but here it is more like a signature on a painting. So some people would like to keep the signature to illustrate for example fr:Studio Harcourt... May be we could keep 2 versions of those files. - Zil (d) 00:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Solution has been found with the help of Rama
The template {{Studio Harcourt signature}} has been created. You could use it on Studio Harcourt Image. Check those 2 pictures :


Bonjour,

Faire deux fichiers avec et sans signature est une solution que je n'ai pas proposée, et que je réfute catégoriquement, car elle ne tient pas la route du point de vue de l'éthique et du respect des artistes. Les photos réalisées par le Studio Harcourt sont unanimement considérées comme des œuvres d'art et comme telles, elles comportent une signature qui les authentifie. Aurait-on l'idée saugrenue de publier sur WP des œuvres tombées dans le domaine public, comme la Joconde de Léonard de Vinci, les Tournesols de Van Gogh ou bien d'autres, en deux versions, avec et sans signature ? Ou d'acheter chez Harcourt une photo qui ne porterait pas la signature du studio ? Certainement pas !

J'ai essayé d'expliquer tout cela calmement mais l'obstination d'Andy m'a fait sortir de mes gonds. D'autres que moi lui ont fait la même remarque par le passé, mais il poursuit inlassablement son idée aberrante. Si tu vas voir dans le wikilivre de photo l'article sur Harcourt, tu verras que seules les premières lettres de l'alphabet sont bien fournies. La personne que téléchargeait les fichiers s'est arrêtée au moment où les premières suppressions de signatures ont eu lieu. Il est impossible de ne pas faire le rapprochement !

Amitiés, Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 11:08, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Thermes de trajan gismondi 4.jpg[edit]

Bonjour. Je ne comprends pas ce qui ne va pas avec cette image. C'est une photo que j'ai prise lors d'une visite du musée de la civilisation romaine à Rome, c'est un détail de la grande maquette de Gismondi. Ai-je oublié de préciser une info ou bien est-ce le fait que la maquette de Gismondi n'est peut-être pas dans le domaine public ? Les photos n'étaient pas interdites et je n'ai vu nulle part mention du fait qu'il soit interdit de les réutiliser (je parle de photos prise par soi-même). Mais si c'est le statut de la maquette qui est douteux, pourquoi remettre en cause cette photo uniquement quand il existe une catégorie pour les images de cette maquette sur Commons ? Si ces autres images sont autorisées (certaines proviennent de Flickr et ont été validées, d'autres d'un site qui n'est plus en ligne, Theatrum Pompei Project, mais qui apparemment précisait que l’œuvre était tombée dans le domaine public), les miennes devraient l'être aussi non ? Cordialement, Cassius Ahenobarbus (talk) 10:23, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Catégorie à vérifier[edit]

Yo,

Category:Escalade, studio, 2014 - Supported by Wikimedia CH. Merci Ludo (talk) 12:06, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Zil,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Dégaine d'escalade[edit]

La nouvelle photo téléversée

Bonsoir,

Ludo te signale l'existence de File:Matériel d'escalade - studio WMCH - broche et dégaine 2.jpg. --Dereckson (talk) 17:37, 25 May 2014 (UTC)