User talk:Kilom691

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Factotum initial[edit]

OK, Thanks for your help, JMCC1 (talk) 15:17, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved, --JMCC1 (talk) 16:53, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:José_Vilalta_Saavedra[edit]

Category discussion warning

José Vilalta Saavedra has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

P. Hughes (talk) 16:48, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Barcley custom corsets04.svg[edit]

Hi, the weird license of the source has been fixed, maybe you can license your derivative work under {{Cc-zero}}? Thank you! Hekerui (talk) 11:27, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uploads by Fæ needing speedy deletion[edit]

Hi, Could you explain why you added files to this category, apparently without any reason? Thanks, Yann (talk) 22:59, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
these pages (hundred of thousands in the categories Fleurons by year) are supposed to be fleurons, typographical images and decorations. But among the uploaded files are many pure text images, or very low quality images, or blurred text, or whatever has been wrongly recognized as a typographical fleuron by some automated process in the website where this was taken from. I am cleaning those away, to keep only real images of something, of some quality maybe.
F (talk) 07:33, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhombohedron.svg[edit]

File:Rhombohedron.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 2600:1014:B062:2E42:983B:34C0:5DAD:AB45.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License of SVG Cycling Jerseys[edit]

Dear Kilom691, You uploaded a cycling jersey SVG icon to Wikimedia Commons. Great work, thanks for that! It is the file:Jersey_white_dots_on_red.svg .

However, the shape is exactly the same as the file:Jersey polkadot.svg that I created, and uploaded under CC-BY-SA. This means that if you create derivative works, you must

  1. credit the original creator(s), and
  2. share it under the same license

You did not credit me as the original author of the work you made a derivative of.


Could you make changes to the images you uploaded? You can do this very simply by adding the following line to the icons you originally created (and removing the current license template line)

{{Self |1= cc-by-sa-4.0|author=Kilom691 |attribution= Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey polkadot.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]}}

and if there is a summary table, change the line that reads |source={{own}} with a line that reads something like

|source={{own}} Shape based upon [[:file:Jersey polkadot.svg]] by [[User:IIVQ]]

If you based this icon on another icon than File:Jersey polkadot.svg, you can substitute that and credit the creator thereof as well as the authors of the work they based their work on.

See also: User:IIVQ/Cycling Jerseys and Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Cycling Jersey Icons

With regards, IIVQ (talk) 16:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ashy Prinia 4.jpg[edit]

Hi Kilom - File:Ashy Prinia 4.jpg is clearly identified in its filename! Please don't put it (or other similar files) in Category:Unidentified birds, that is for birds where the identification is not known. Put it directly in its relevant species category. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And the same goes for File:100. Shikra.in.jpg and 234 other files newly added today to Category:Unidentified birds. Why? Clearly identified images should not be placed in this category unless you have good grounds for doubting the named identity. Please put them in their relevant categories, and not in an Unidentified category. - MPF (talk) 13:59, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bandeira Itaituba.svg[edit]

File:Bandeira Itaituba.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jonilson Costa de Oliveira (talk) 00:38, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Catégorie à vérifier[edit]

Bonjour Kilom691,

Je remarque (dix ans après) que tu as ajouté la Category:Henri Lallemand sur la page File:Die Gartenlaube (1894) 666.jpg où l'on voit un portrait de Charlotte von Hagn, d'après un tableau de "L'Allemand". Es-tu sûr de pouvoir identifier ce peintre comme Henri Lallemand ? À ma connaissance ce dernier n'a pas peint de portraits et n'a pas ou guère séjourné en Allemagne.

Cordialement Cymbella (talk) 20:55, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kilom691&oldid=853074762"