Difference between revisions of "User talk:Niklem"

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
(I didn't upload this image)
(Unidentified policy?: answer)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 83: Line 83:
 
::::That user is reverting my edits, removing templates, I've done request as you said but he reverts my edit again.--[[User:Δαβίδ|Δαβίδ]] ([[User talk:Δαβίδ|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 18:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 
::::That user is reverting my edits, removing templates, I've done request as you said but he reverts my edit again.--[[User:Δαβίδ|Δαβίδ]] ([[User talk:Δαβίδ|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 18:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 
::::: Why carrying on the [[COM:Edit Wars|edit war]]? Try [[COM:AN|asking admins]] for help. --[[User:Niklem|Niklem]] ([[User talk:Niklem#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 18:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 
::::: Why carrying on the [[COM:Edit Wars|edit war]]? Try [[COM:AN|asking admins]] for help. --[[User:Niklem|Niklem]] ([[User talk:Niklem#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 18:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
  +
  +
== Unidentified policy? ==
  +
  +
  +
*What's the story on all these "Unidentifiable people" AfDs? The phrase "Unidentifiable people" doesn't appear in [[COM:EDUSE]] and if it did, it would be a major new and unjustified prohibition on content on Commons. [[User:Smallbones|Smallbones]] ([[User talk:Smallbones|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
  +
*: Well, nobody said that this phrase should be in [[COM:EDUSE]] or wheresoever. And of course there is no such policy. All these images are, in my humble opinion, out of project scope, as they may be treated as "private image collections, e.g. private party photos, <...> collection of holiday snaps and so on" or "files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold". And by meaning that the people depicted are unidentifiable, I'm only appealing to common sense: since people depicted most likely will not ever be identified, and the images contain nothing special and valuable for educational purposes, there is not much need of them. --[[User:Niklem|Niklem]] ([[User talk:Niklem#top|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 17:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:54, 30 November 2013

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Niklem!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Autopatrol given

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. odder (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Great, thanks! --Niklem (talk) 17:45, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Добрый вечер

Просьба при переносе в пнг или свг файлов из руВП, надо, вероятно, переносить всё описание полностью. И источник, иначе файл будет удалён (источник - не загрузивший). И все лицензии, это же не ваша подпись)) --Vizu (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Здравствуйте! Вы про этот файл? Да, шаблон {{PD-trivial}} я потерял, извините. --Niklem (talk) 18:15, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Logo CTC TV NEW 15-09-2012.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Logo CTC TV NEW 15-09-2012.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

INeverCry 20:23, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Кадетская слава 1.jpg File:Кадетская слава 2.jpg File:Кадетская слава 3.jpg

Доброе время суток!


Вы считаете, что смысл статьи о кадетском корпусе увеличился, когда 5\6 информации из статьи выкинуто? Патрулирующие и администраторы до Вас оставили страничку без изменений. Что касается медиафайлов File:Кадетская слава 1.jpg File:Кадетская слава 2.jpg File:Кадетская слава 3.jpg, то это действительно моя работа. Как на сайте кадетского корпуса, так и здесь, в Википедии. Видите ли, я являюсь выпускником этого учебного заведения и участвовал в создании некоторых интернет-ресурсов, ему принадлежащих. Поэтому Ваши замечания об авторском праве неуместны. Надеюсь вы поймёте меня правильно.--Arsenikum 447 (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

Hi Niklem,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English | മലയാളം | +/− --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Thanks a lot! --Niklem (talk) 10:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Pyotr Ofitserov.JPG

Привет,

нет ли проблем с лицензированием этого файла и можно ли аналогично сделать портреты персонажей дела Кировлеса из трансляций РАПСИ ? --JamesBand (talk) 07:31, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Добрый день. Файл загружен как скриншот видео, опубликованного под лицензией Creative Commons CC BY. Судя по лицензии РАПСИ, они не допускают использование своих материалов в коммерческих целях на необразовательных ресурсах, поэтому загружать контент из их трансляций нельзя. --Niklem (talk) 09:19, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Reviewer

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Niklem, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 11:32, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, that's great, thank you! --Niklem (talk) 12:14, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Endophloeus markovichianus

Hello Niklem, you changed 6 photos of me form ..markovichianus.... to ...marcovichianus... in consequence of changing the page and the Category from k --> c . In fact in F.E and BioLib and ... the spelling is with c, that is why myself asked for the k --> c. In the meantime I discussed the problem at two competent places (french Monde des Insectes and German Wikipedia) The result in both cases: korrekt is k. Therefore I think it best, we had the photos on a page with Endophloeus markovichianus and a second page Endophloeus marcovichianus redirected to Endophloeus markovichianus. Than everybody could find the photos with the correct name a n d the widespread wrong spelling. Same argumentation for Category:Endophloeus markovichianus. (In my recherches I was told, that in Russian c and k is the same thing anyway) Lot of work, perhaps you would do it? Otherwise tell me, then I can ask someone else. Thanks, --Siga (talk) 14:18, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello Siga. May I wonder if it is arranged with Schofför, who has requested initial renaming? --Niklem (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
No, its me who asked initial renaming, but if you want I will ask Schofför to do re-renaming --Siga (talk) 07:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Alright, it's done. --Niklem (talk) 11:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
The 6 photos, that's perfect. I owe you a beer. But the Category should also be Category:Endophloeus markovichianus and a page Endophloeus marcovichianus should exist and be directed to a page Endophloeus markovichianus with the Category: Endophloeus markovichianus. With that every form of spelling is satisfied. I cannot do that myself or I dare not, being not experienced. Of course I will alter the rest, concerning my photos and their use.--Siga (talk) 14:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Now I am satisfied 200%. No more sleepless night. Thanks a lot. --Siga (talk) 14:52, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Alright, glad to be helpful :-) --Niklem (talk) 14:53, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Question

Hi, may I know why I can't nominate wrong categories for deletion ([1], [2])?--Δαβίδ (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello. May I, in my turn, know why do you request deletion of non-empty categories? --Niklem (talk) 18:06, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
At first overcategorization, second is a oringinal research in title of category. And please take soma actions against that user, because he reverts my edits without certain explainations.--Δαβίδ (talk) 18:09, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
I believe you should state your request on COM:CFD. And I neither have sufficient rights for taking any actions on anyone on Commons, nor see any need for doing it with the user who reverts faulty actions. --Niklem (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
That user is reverting my edits, removing templates, I've done request as you said but he reverts my edit again.--Δαβίδ (talk) 18:32, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
Why carrying on the edit war? Try asking admins for help. --Niklem (talk) 18:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Unidentified policy?

  • What's the story on all these "Unidentifiable people" AfDs? The phrase "Unidentifiable people" doesn't appear in COM:EDUSE and if it did, it would be a major new and unjustified prohibition on content on Commons. Smallbones (talk) 17:37, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
    Well, nobody said that this phrase should be in COM:EDUSE or wheresoever. And of course there is no such policy. All these images are, in my humble opinion, out of project scope, as they may be treated as "private image collections, e.g. private party photos, <...> collection of holiday snaps and so on" or "files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold". And by meaning that the people depicted are unidentifiable, I'm only appealing to common sense: since people depicted most likely will not ever be identified, and the images contain nothing special and valuable for educational purposes, there is not much need of them. --Niklem (talk) 17:54, 30 November 2013 (UTC)